DISQUS

PhillyD.tv: Police Beat-up Pastor on Camera

  • TOMINATOR · 7 months ago
    Complete abuse of power.
  • itidbit · 7 months ago
    and now it is time to expose this with the power of the internet!
  • Cam · 7 months ago
    Well the gross and horrible thing is that this does happen and it is horrendous. Now Im Canadian and I have a slight grasp and understanding of American Law isnt the gentleman in the right when he says that they need to show him the fact that the dog has detected something???? So that he knows that there is probalble cause??? correct me if im not right like I said Im not American. I really do hope that serious action is taken against those officers this is ridiculous
  • EntrE · 7 months ago
    well that's what happens when some stupid redneck asshole policemen are in charge. the typical american country bumpkin who thinks he's better than you anyway now gets a taser in his hands. in this case there were several taser holding redneck bastards who totally abused their power and should pay for it!
  • Dylan99 · 7 months ago
    Actualy the cops did the right thing. You can be arrested w/o a reason , it is in the law, that you can be held for up to 24 hours w/o any reason. They told the guy the dog flagged on him, and they had to search it, the guy refused to get out the cop warned him he would drag him out, then a few seconds later he said he was going to break the window, and then they sat at the window giving the guy more chances still to just let them search the car. the guys a dumb ass and the cops followed the law. hell even if the dog didn't flag on the car they could have searched it just for the hell of it, and had it been completely legal under a whole list of laws.
  • striker66 · 3 months ago
    you cant be arrested without reason what the fuck are you talking about. and he didnt get out of his car because we cant always give in to cops. they have to follow the law just like everyone else.
  • justanotherguy99 · 3 months ago
    Dylan I hope just once, you'll try really hard to find the courage NOT to be a kiss ass to the police and meet that 1 special cop who is so eager to beat you back into the submissive accepting puppy you are now.
  • steven · 7 months ago
    I agree. I mean why taser him. He is a pastor its not like he is going to friggin shoot you up. They could have just dragged him out.
  • Ryan · 7 months ago
    I agree with you, but why just not get out of the car if he had nothing to hide? He could have just prooved the police wrong, and then go on his way wherever it was he was going.

    The police tazering him was completely uncalled for. Even if he was being uncooperative, they could have used some other method, like you said.
  • Kyaizen · 7 months ago
    You have the right to stay in your car until they have a justified reason to make you get out.
  • FX325 · 7 months ago
    If you listen they said the dogs alerted them to narcotics. More so if you wonder about the taser, check out the cops that get killed trying to be nice. There is no sense in a 5 on 1 situation to beat him, but personally i thought he was asking for it.
  • Trevon Swift · 7 months ago
    I can see where you are coming from but what I believe was he was trying to make a point. He had his right not let them search his car because of the 4th amendment.
  • Alina · 7 months ago
    yea but who knows what the cops would of done to him if he did get out the car
  • babaG · 7 months ago
    Sure, he could have gotten out but he isn't required to until faced with a reason. Also, cops have been known in the past to plant evidence such as drugs and weapons on 'criminals'. Fuck the corrupt world.
  • Victor · 7 months ago
    He does not have to get out of the car legally, they have the right to stay in his car until law enforcers have a justifiable reason to wanting to search, and the dog did not find anything. this was absolute bullshit
  • Appo · 7 months ago
    You don't get out of your car because when they search the car they basically rip off everything to see if there's "drugs". Two broken windows is probably less expensive than a ripped up inside.
  • blah · 7 months ago
    well yea i guess he could have done that but even men of god have pride especially sence they had no right/warrant/whatever to even talk to him or hold him
  • ORVX · 7 months ago
    Ryan you’re a simpleton, do u fucking get it. him not HAVING to comply is the whole point, if you allow that, we are all fucked cops don’t errrr shouldn’t get do whatever they want because the feeeeeeel a certain way. I they can do whatever because they don’t like your attitude, your hair style, you name it, it’s a slippery slope, that we have already stated down. In 1000's of other situations like this, this is where the cops plant the "evidence" if you don't give a shit about your freedom please leave. For the record, freedom is a relative term, we just closer then sum, we are not there and people that think like you insure we keep moving in the wrong direction.
  • Craig · 7 months ago
    first i want to say that this should not have been done it was completely wrong and all of the cops involved should lose there job. However for you to say he's a pastor what would he do is very silly like a pastor could never hurt anyone. Here are a list of pastors for you to research. Jim Jones, David Koresh, Rev Moon, Marshall Applewhite.
  • The only smart one · 7 months ago
    He never said he was a pastor! How would the police know? He was a citizen who was refusing to get out of a car when asked. That IS resisting arrest.
  • ofsoundjustice · 5 months ago
    The Constitution of the United States of America was based upon giving the citizen the benefit of the doubt. "Innocent until proven guilty." You are allowed to 1. Plead the 5th. You don't have to say a word. You are allowed to 2. Remain in your vehicle until shown proof of suspicion, or "probable cause."

    Furthermore, EVEN IF the officers had given the man a legitimate reason along with proof, EVEN IF the man was a complete douchebag to the officers (hypothetically), and EVEN IF the citizen was in the wrong, this is simply a horrific display of the cruelty and abuse of power shown by these specific officers. A man with his hands over his eyes, who has not once shown a sign of aggression, is not a threat. Yet these men were so eager to shove him into glass, drag him out of a vehicle, taze him SEVERAL TIMES, and step on his head, pushing his face into asphalt............................But no, you say he was resisting arrest. So this is what happens? This is just? This was deserved?

    Oh and by the way, what exactly are you hinting at? If the police had known that the citizen was a pastor, would they have reacted differently? You seem to be taking on a very "oh it's fine, they just didn't know any better" attitude.

    Nice name, jackass.
  • tmun · 3 months ago
    But what was he being arrested for?? He has to be arrested on some grounds before he can resist that arrest! They had no reason to be arresting him in the first place. You don't have to get out of the car when told to by a cop unless he has probable cause for "ordering"(as the officer on the video said) you to get out.
  • ORVX · 7 months ago
    a your an idot, dumb one. mopre likley a cop or family of a a cop, as we all know, more often then not what I just said is a redondent stament.
  • ORVX · 7 months ago
    being a a pastor has nothing to do with this, if we have to play the game, we do, so do the pigs.
  • sean dearling · 7 months ago
    there border patrol they have the authority to search you


    im not saying you deserved to get tazed but you and idiot
  • stever · 7 months ago
    Idiot!
  • LOLing · 7 months ago
    swine strikes again
  • Kevin · 7 months ago
    wtf? Police over react sometimes, I don't get it.
  • BAMFofTheWeek · 7 months ago
    If there was nothing in the trunk to be worried about, he could've just let them search the trunk and had it over with.

    Just because he's a pastor, he just gets more sympathy.

    The cops abused their power, sure, but he was obviously hiding something if he didn't just let them search his trunk, big deal.
  • Dillithium · 7 months ago
    Not really, people have rights. He can refuse a random search. I would too.

    It doesn't mean you're hiding something, it means you understand your own rights and don't want the police tearing up your belongings.
  • cpdy · 7 months ago
    it was wrong how they just beat him up.the cops should go to jail and never get there jobs back.thats just mess up.i would of did the same thing .
  • Jake · 7 months ago
    scenario:

    in this scenario, you LOVE you some porn. Like... LOVE it. And you just got back from buying a big box of it! yey for you! It's sitting in your trunk right now and your on your way home.

    Then a cop pulls you over and demands to inspect your vehicle. You've done nothing wrong, but you still really don't want this random cop to see you new porn collection.


    in short, there are PLENTY of reasons to not want your car searched even if you've done nothing wrong. But most importantly, the cops have NO RIGHT to search a car without a warrant. If they TRULY had probably cause, they could have detained the man while waiting to get a warrant filed.

    But once we start allowing police officers to search property without a warrant, we are giving away all of our freedom. If cops could search your house whenever they wanted to, then your house might as well be property of the state.
  • Amber A · 7 months ago
    Well said. I totally agree. When something like this happens because a man invoked his rights we know there is something truly wrong in America.
  • Tom Micale · 7 months ago
    To just "let them do it" is to just let them strip you of your constitutional rights. If we are so willing to shed our rights for convenience or because of FEAR of authority, perhaps we didn't deserve them to begin with.
  • Trevon Swift · 7 months ago
    Its not that he was hiding something because they obviously found nothing to charge him with. It was the fact that they did all of this with no probable cause. He had the right to deny them a chance to search the car.
  • Hunter · 7 months ago
    Wrong. Sure the guy was stubborn but i would have been too. They had no reason to search his car. It was clear the cops were just looking for action, thats why they wouldnt bring the dog back out. Tbh i would have drove off. like the other guy said, they have to have a justified reason to search your car.
  • Aloha amigo · 7 months ago
    If you watch the second video, the police ended up searching his car when he was in jail and did not find anything.

    I do agree that this would not have been such a big deal if he was not a pastor.
  • Chris · 7 months ago
    Its all about standing up for our rights. He should not have to answer t these cops. It pisses me off when people say, "well he had nothing to hide he should have listened" Does this mean we have to do everything a cop says if were innocent. Cops need to leave us alone, they abuse their power way too much. I would have done the same thing. Its about our rights and the slippery slope we are on. What happened to being free?
  • annoanonymous · 7 months ago
    saying that he was stupid and had nothing to hide is a stupid idea. you have a right to not let the police search you.

    not to mention they probably would have torn up his car to shreds looking XD
  • Ben · 7 months ago
    they did search his car and found nothing. he just saw no reason to get out of the car.


    law enforcement has this high and mighty label that is a complete false sense of power.

    they just wanted to make it as hard as possible
  • WickedlyWanton · 7 months ago
    I'd like to see if what he says happened really did happen. We just see a little bit of what he's talking about. And seriously, from what I heard, he was being an ass.
  • Yaps · 7 months ago
    The cops were being asses toward him as well. If cops could use tasers on people just because they think they're being assholes then the entire population of the world should prepare for a lot of tasings.

    Could the pastor have handled it differently? Yes. Could the cops have been more professional? Definitely. The video makes police, who already have many years of bad reputation surrounding them, look that much worse.
  • WickedlyWanton · 7 months ago
    As someone who works in law enforcement, what I saw was someone who was being belligerent, who might have had a weapon, and could have potentially hurt himself or others. If the dog had alerted on the car, they had probable cause to take him out of the car. I would rather be tazed than hit with pepper spray, in all honesty. They gave him every opportunity to get out, he didn't, and while he was screaming, was probably resisting. You can resist without hitting or biting or whatever. By not moving, holding on to the steering wheel, etc, while they try to get you out of the car will get you hurt. And why would they have done all that on camera had he not been suspicious? Despite what many people think, cops are not stupid. They knew they were being recorded--and by their own surveillance!
  • Amber A · 7 months ago
    This just shows the "blue shield" The pastor could have been "nicer" but I would be pissed too. He had a right to know why they were trying to arrest him along with refusing to answer their questions. If the dog had alerted then they would have found something. They plain out LIED. They did not have probable cause to get him out of the vehicle or search the vehicle.
  • Joe · 7 months ago
    This isnt about how "nice" anyone is to another. This is about rights.

    The only cause these officers had were their own suspicions. They see someone resist their questions, so they think "this guy is hiding something". They clearly used the dog as a way to bypass the law.

    This guy did absolutely nothing wrong. Everything he did was well within his legal rights, and I guess these days the law doesn't even care anymore.
  • Trevon Swift · 7 months ago
    Do you seriously think that if you're being tasered by more than one gun, you can resist arrest? Try getting tasered and see if you can move a muscle in your body. They tasered him as soon as the window was broken.
  • Rezzy · 7 months ago
    Probable cause my good sir.
    You can go on like "OH WELL HE COULD HAVE HAD A WEAPON ON HIM BLAH BLAH BLAH" but there's a HUGE difference between could have, and did. This man did NOT have a weapon on him, they had no reason to suspect he did, and had no grounds to remove him from the vehicle. You can go ahead and say "WELL HE COULD HAVE..." but the fact is that he DIDN'T. Which means what? They fucked up. They did their job wrong. I've taken Criminal Justice, I work for an ex-police officer. If a police officer just randomly chooses me to pick on like that, I'm not going to comply. And why? Because I don't have to. If they have no grounds to prove I've done something wrong, I don't have to let the search my stuff, and I won't.
    Police are to be held to a higher standard then everyone else.
  • sorryifithurts · 7 months ago
    You, my good sir, should be the dbotd. The police aren't imbued with some magical power that lets him or her know there is a hidden weapon. What, are the police supposed to take the word of the people they pull over? Of course, no one has ever lied before. Jesus-Joseph-Mary, you're an idiot.
  • hunter k. · 7 months ago
    right on
  • PistolPaul · 7 months ago
    Ok, youre a bit right in some way, but how do you explain that they were standing on his face and laughing at him at the end
  • hunter k. · 7 months ago
    what i mean by right on is he should plead non guilty and the cops used their power in way that made it seem like he had done something wrong, i swear sometimes cops piss me off
  • CWebbPanther · 7 months ago
    "As someone who works in law enforcement, what I saw was someone who was being belligerent, who might have had a weapon, and could have potentially hurt himself or others."

    That's clever how you've changed the definition of the work "belligerent" to include following the Constitution.

    "If the dog had alerted on the car, they had probable cause to take him out of the car."

    That's true. Or it would be. If the dog had alerted the officers. Apparently "probable cause" doesn't mean what I thought it did, either.

    "I would rather be tazed than hit with pepper spray, in all honesty. They gave him every opportunity to get out, he didn’t, and while he was screaming, was probably resisting."

    Any movements while being tazed are completely involuntary, therefore making it impossible to resist anything (which I believe is the whole point of a tazer in the first place). Apparently "paralysis" implies enough muscle control to intently resist arrest.

    "You can resist without hitting or biting or whatever. By not moving, holding on to the steering wheel, etc, while they try to get you out of the car will get you hurt."

    So you're saying that by not moving at all, one can resist arrest? No you're right, it's quite dangerous to break one window, unlock the door, open it, and pick a person up out of the car. It's totally appropriate to taze a man for doing nothing more than abiding by his constitutional rights.

    "And why would they have done all that on camera had he not been suspicious??"

    Because until he had a video camera himself, it's was nothing more than their word against his.

    "Despite what many people think, cops are not stupid."

    Really?

    "They knew they were being recorded–and by their own surveillance!"

    Which we'll probably never see.
  • Chris · 7 months ago
    This just goes to show what they are teacging our cops. You are afraid of everyone. "He could have had a weapon blah blah." Hes not doing anything wrongt he doesnt need to answer your questions. You are no God we do not answer to you. Cops use that bullshit to justify their actions. Stop abusing your power. Read the god damn constitution. Your here to protect us, they stopped him unlawfully and tried to make him answer questions. Why should he answer you? This is not freedom if every cop can stop you and demand you to get out of your car.
  • striker66 · 3 months ago
    wait you would rather risk dieing from a tazer (which many people have) then have something sprayed in your eyes. i dont think you realize how excruciating it is to have thousands of volts of electricity running through you (you try not to scream or shake). stick your finger in an electrical outlet thats only 120 volts!! and i must say some cops are that stupid. (not all) but just like any other person some are really dumb and get carried away with their power and responsibilities. if the dog really detected something why wouldnt they have brought it back out instead of wasting so much time and having to go thought the hassle of explaining why they had to use force on the man.
  • striker66 · 3 months ago
    you have obviously never been tazered before
  • Tommy · 7 months ago
    Really? Look at him, why would he been suspicious did you watch the video?
  • bob jones · 7 months ago
    well thats why there is a video to show you what happened you dumb shit
  • a · 7 months ago
    fuck yourself. cops ARE stupid, otherwise they wouldn't be cops, they'd be productive members of society, not power crazy steroid poppin cocksuckers. FUCK THA POLICE, FUCK THA POLICE, FUCK EM!!!!

    eat shit and die in bacon grease pig.
  • a · 7 months ago
    Cocksuckers won't even get a slap on the wrist let alone what they deserve, how many cops know what a taser feels like. If I were in that little guy's position I'd go columbine on all they're asses, pastor or not I'd v for vendetta all up in that mutha fuckin checkpoint. see what a taser does against my eagle bitch, fuck I'd go out gunz blazin.
  • a · 7 months ago
    RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA fuckin pigs make me so angry man. I can't believe AMERICA of all places has stooped to such a fuckin low that the government has given cops the go ahead to enforce such shitty injustice to innocent people. SEND THEM MOTHAFUCKIN COPS TO AFGHANISTHAN TO DIE for a lost cause, instead of bullying travelling pastors or anyone else who has a fuckin basic knowledge of thier rights as an AMERICAN citizen.
  • Jodi · 7 months ago
    omg that is terrible i cant believe my eyes at that vid im in total shock why would those cops do that to this poor INNOCENT man
    this reminds me of the vid with the girl who was beaten down by that cop that phil put up one time this is horrible
  • Nicolas · 7 months ago
    Ok. I agree it's abuse of power, but if you have nothing in your car, LET THEM CHECK IT!!
    WTF?
  • Amber A · 7 months ago
    People have RIGHTS. If you give up your rights everyday without thinking - maybe you don't deserve to have them.
  • Trevon Swift · 7 months ago
    It was the whole principle that if they had no probable cause, they had no right to search his car, let alone taser him that much or at all.
  • James3 · 7 months ago
    He should sue the police!
  • hunter k. · 7 months ago
    i agree he should sue them
  • fohasha · 7 months ago
    shit totally abuse of power but he was being stubborn at the beginning so i mean the police men took it too far not worth wat he got but he was still being an asshole juz imagine if he had let them look in the car it would have taken 30 min and he wouldnt have cuts on his face
  • ashman · 7 months ago
    well he didnt have to and i would have done somthing similar if not the same exact thing
  • Charlie · 7 months ago
    Fucking arrest the cop that tased him. in my opinion that was aggravated assault
  • Tommy · 7 months ago
    It was more than one cop.
  • Jen · 7 months ago
    The police definitely used excessive force, they could have gotten him out of the vehicle without using the taser.

    But at the same time, it sounds like he was being difficult. It's been awhile since I've taken a law course, but at least in Canada, you only have to give your name to a police officer if asked. So while he didn't HAVE to answer the questions, this probably wouldn't have happened if he'd just answered them. Of course the police are going to be suspicious if he refuses to answer. They'll be even more suspicious if he refuses to have his vehicle searched.

    It was completely ridiculous of the police to place him under arrest. They should have brought the dog out again, within full view of him and the highway safety officer.

    And his hands were covered, they didn't need to use one taser, let alone the number they used. Definitely an abuse of power, but I think this could have been avoided had he just answered the questions. But all in all, what the police did was pretty disgusting.
  • Webcrawler2007 · 7 months ago
    I don't think there was any reason to taser the guy. I mean really, he wasn't agitated or upset when the cops were breaking the window and if he had appeared to have a weapon then the cops wouldn't have just stood around and chatted with him. It's just a case of cops overreacting because someone didn't treat them like their word was law - which it's not. I agree that the cops may have been suspicious because the pastor wouldn't let them into the trunk, but this is abuse of power in it's purest form. You need more then suspicion to search a vehicle - esp if you're going to taser and beat someone into compliance. This type of behavior is why I'm glad I left the States. It happens way too often.
  • Zach casper · 7 months ago
    This has what the fuckary written all over it. Know you rights people! Don't let the government take away your freedom.
  • Drole · 7 months ago
    I definitely think that Excessive force was used but as far as the 4th amendment right.

    Under the “extended border search” doctrine, government officials may conduct a warrantless search beyond the border.

    It sucks for him but the border patrol had the right to search his car if they had probable cause(which I doubt they did).
  • blahblahblah · 7 months ago
    When you are being an asshole to the cops, and then refusing to comply with their commands, you will get fucked up. Just because he's a pastor doesn't make him innocent or less of a threat to the police. Dude got what he deserved. Let this be a lesson, just listen and comply and no one will get hurt.
  • Mr.X · 7 months ago
    No way you "just comply". That's if you're living in a police state. The police cannot search your vehicle without your consent or a warrant unless you have something illegal in plain view or there are exigent circumstances, neither of which apply to this man. They could have made him wait and gotten a warrant but they knew it wouldn't be granted. This guy should sue for illegal search,false arrest and assault and battery.
  • Pagrashtak · 7 months ago
    Yes, listen and comply, that way Big Brother can protect you.
  • ashman · 7 months ago
    i bet your a dick faced hog yourself!! you like abuse of power because thats wat this is plain and simple sure the guy was a bit suspicous but well within his legal rights.
  • andealz2008 · 7 months ago
    i dont think the police now a days even know the rights of people.
  • AMadToon · 7 months ago
    WTF the cops have nothing better to do because they cant catch mexicans coming into the united states, it was a STATE TO STATE transit dude he should sue their asses all cops that were there, the border patrol, the U.S. itself for letting these idiots be cops, and if he was smart hed leave that church go to some island like bermuda and live out his life but he prolly will just give it to the church, laughing at him really adding insult to injury, i have a good felling border patrol is DBOTD
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    The face is cops do have authority to tell you what to do. They are call law enforcement officers. When you mouth off to an officer and don't do what he has told you to do, you only make things worse for yourself. I don't care if the guys a pastor or the freakin Pope. Hes not above the law.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    oops. typo, face = fact
  • Matthew · 7 months ago
    Umm.. I don't know what country you are posting from, but in America, police do not have that much power. They have no more power over you than anyone else does, unless they have probable cause, which is very hard to justify in todays courts. This guy was resisting arrest, but the arrest was unjust.

    These cops are going to get their asses handed to them if he sues.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    I'm also from America. I have respect for law enforcement officers. I understand what their job is. Their job is to protect the people of this country and ensure that it is safe from those who would do the people of it harm.

    When a police officer tell you to do something, you do it. If the guy would have obeyed the police officer and gotten out of the car, he wouldn't have been arrested unless he had something unlawful he was hiding. He spent more time being beligerent than being cooperative.

    Bottom line is that we rely on law enforcement officials to protect our society from illegal activity. When some self-rightous pastor decides to challenge their authority, they are going to react just like a judge would if you called him an asshole while you were in his court. That judge is going to hand you a much stiffer punishment than he would have if you had kept your mouth shut.

    The way our great country works is we elect people into power to put other people into places of authority. We don't get to pick and choose when we wish to obey people with this authority. If you want to argue about what is right and wrong, that is what our court system is for.

    This douche bag of the day got everything he was attempting to get. Notice how he didn't have the hour long video clip up there of him being a defiant. Only the part he wanted us to see was presented.
  • Amber A · 7 months ago
    No No No NO NO. You are 100% wrong. Police officers should NOT be obeyed no matter what they say. You have the right not to answer their questions. You have the right to say no to an unlawful search. He may know he did nothing wrong, but a search on your vehicle/house/anything without a warrant or probable cause is an extreme invasion of privacy. Not to mention the extremely excessive force they used for someone who OBVIOUSLY was not carrying a weapon or pose a danger.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    From watching a 3 and a half minute clip you could tell that he wasn't causing a threat. I know this guy had the right to remain silent, he just decided to get mouthy with the cop.

    The job of the border patrol agents are to ensure nothing illegal is getting transported past the border. When I get stopped at the air port at a random security checkpoint do I have the option to say no thanks, I'm good? No, if i want to cross that checkpoint I will need to comply with the authority figure asking me to do something. If I resist, then that raises suspicion and I'm definately not going thru without a search.

    Would you get on a plane with someone refusing to go thru a security checkpoint and the authority figure says my mistake, I have no right to search you. Please let me carry the bag to the plane for you.

    I agree with you that cops need a reason / warrant to enter your vehicle or house when you are not at a freakin security checkpoint. Thats the whole purpose for the checkpoint. The border agents said the dog indicated a search was necessary, so they called the local police to enforce the law so that they could do their jobs. PROTECTING THE BORDER!!!
  • fyre · 7 months ago
    What people don't understand is that when you have the right to be silent, that's after you are being arrested. That also means you are read your rights. The 'police' in this video are clearly thugs.

    Just because they wear the same uniform as other law enforcement does not mean they are the same law protecting enforcement that is portrayed around America.

    Not reading someone's rights, Not bringing out the dog to sniff anything, Not finding anything, Not respecting an individual's rights, assaulting and battering a citizen exercising their rights as a citizen, and making fun of them is not professional and is no different than common criminal.

    Imagine them without badges. Imagine them in broad daylight on a non populated street doing this to a law abiding citizen. What is the difference between some low life's doing this and police officers doing this to this American citizen?

    He didn't even cross the border.
  • qwerty · 7 months ago
    The guy's a good story teller. lol. He should write a book. What an idiot. The dog doesn't have to bark, some dogs go crazy and scratch and yelp, some just stop and sit when they find something. Nice to hear ONE side of the story, but like i said, he good at telling stories.
  • boardofnumbers · 7 months ago
    Are you calling the pastor an idiot? You're a fucking asshole. You weren't the one that was tasered and severely beaten. After watching these videos, do you even need to see the cops' side of the story? Shut the fuck up.
  • ashman · 7 months ago
    well he didnt have anything in his car!!! wtf the dog didnt find anything if there was nothing to be found
  • Fenrir · 7 months ago
    another reason why no one likes the fukin poliece...
  • Drole · 7 months ago
    I definitely think that Excessive force was used but as far as the 4th amendment right the police were in the right.

    "Under the “extended border search” doctrine, government officials may conduct a warrantless search beyond the border."

    It sucks for him but the border patrol had the right to search his car if they had probable cause(which I doubt they did).
  • Wade · 7 months ago
    He fucking deserves what he gets... if hes got nothing to hide then fucking let them search it and be on with your day...

    people have to many rights as it is... and they abuse their rights just as much as a police officer may abuse theirs.

    people need less rights.... religion needs to die. this guy is a fucking attention whore.
  • Dean · 7 months ago
    errm.. what does religion have to do with this at all? lol it just seems you believe this guy is in the wrong because he's religious and feel the need to attack him.
  • JDiddy · 7 months ago
    People have too many rights??? If you hate the Bill of Rights that much THEN LEAVE THE COUNTRY!!!!!!!!
  • Wade · 7 months ago
    if your not breaking a law you should never REFUSE a search... warrants shouldn't be needed you should never have anything to hide unless your breaking the law then you should be punished.
  • AmbRN · 7 months ago
    I agree with some of you in that he must have been hiding something. The only reason why they used force is because he was "resisting arrest" and wouldn't shut up and obey the law. Yes the cops went over the top, but rule number 1 is shut up and obey, otherwise your making yourself more suspicious..i place most of the blame on the pastor
  • eekai · 7 months ago
    the pastor mentioned that after the beating up, the police searched his car and found nothing. any way you look at it, i do not see how the beating could have been justified. he was not resisting, he was seated behind the wheel, hands on his face and he got tazered many times. that is just plain cruel.

    say the pastor was hiding something. did the police not need a warrant for that? did they not need a search warrant? that was obviously abuse of power.

    and say the pastor was hiding something, i think the matter could have been handled differently and in a way that his face did not end up like that.

    those cops deserve to get fired and jailed.
  • fawfle · 7 months ago
    Just because you refuse a search doesnt mean you have something to hide. He was just protecting his own rights. Just think back to the Holocaust. The jews had rights, but they didnt stand up for them, and 6 million were slaughtered by Nazis. If you give up your rights so easily to lowlifes like those boarder patrol cops, you dont deserve them.
  • Allen · 7 months ago
    wtf, y do u need to tazer a man multiple times who's not resisting arrest. they had no right to search his car. those cops need to be laid off or somethin...WTF is wrong with them?
  • Wtfdizthis? · 7 months ago
    This just disgusts me that cops would do this.They better pay for his windows.
  • Wade · 7 months ago
    he was resisting... they said get the fuck out of the car... you should have gotten out. i don't care what rights you think your acting on... stupid fucking people have to many rights as it is
  • Wade · 7 months ago
    WAS NOT*** sorry anger typing causes a lot of mistakes
  • angry · 7 months ago
    Fucking cops should be Fucking Tazzered - but they know they get away with it - can you say Rodney King?

    Fucking pigs.
  • ErikaJean · 7 months ago
    This all would have been avoided if he would have gotten out of the car. He was being a dick. The police however had no reason for a taser. If he had nothing to hide, he should have gotten out when ordered.
  • Cecilia · 7 months ago
    He was being an ass about the whole situation. Talking them up, not letting them speak, bringing a friggin camcorder in the situation. But that's no excuse for the cops. They were both wrong. He should get a slap on the wrist, and all of those cops should be arrested and fired due to assault.
  • dfalken · 7 months ago
    Ridiculous... Law inforcement does not have the right to force you to answer any questions. Nor do they have the right to force you to let them search your belongings without a court order. Now, under the Patriot Act all bets are off, but is this considered calling under the patriot Act? I doubt it. Those officers should loose thier jobs and be forced to pay fines.....
  • amoep · 7 months ago
    Why be a pain in the ass. Just get out of the car. I know you have your rights but really, just get out. It would have taken the guy a whole lot shorter of time. I hate border cops and they suck but still, just get out. They shouldn't have gone at him so hard and clearly didn't be needed to be tasered. But now you have a broken window and face.
  • desertninja108 · 7 months ago
    I agree the police definitley used excessive force on the guy. I mean one shot of the tazer gun is usually enough to take a guy down, espceially for a guy his size. And though he acted kinda like a jerk he didn't resist (though its not like he could've), he even covered his eyes when told.

    It is unfortunate that this happened and events similar to this have been happening recently, part of this is due to the powers the government has been given since 9/11, the partriot act and such. Now police, and border partols have the power for search and seizure without a warrant as long as they believe or think (without proof) that there is probable cause.
  • Antmysta · 7 months ago
    He should of just got out of the car. Let them do there little search and he would of been on his way Instead, he wanted to be a smartass.

    I agree that the police used excessive force and could of easily just dragged him out.

    Also, at the part where the guy asks him to close his eyes. Why didn't he just step out the car or question why he was been asked to close his eyes.
  • Stacy Harp · 7 months ago
    Thanks for sharing your story, and I'm so sorry this happened to you. I have twittered it and passed on your video to some of my friends in the media.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    Great job stacey, get the news media involved. Spread the ignorence.
  • doodaday · 7 months ago
    Go get violated.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    And good job to you for ignoring of the constitution.
  • Alex · 7 months ago
    I find it kind of ironic misspelling "ignorance" when you are trying to accuse someone of it. >.>
  • do0rag · 7 months ago
    The ones who did this should be put in jail
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    No one deserves to go to jail here. The pastor learned his lesson I'm sure. I bet the next time a cop tells him to get out of the car he is going to listen. And the cops don't belong there because they didn't do anything wrong. They were just doing their jobs.
  • Amber A · 7 months ago
    No they weren't just doing their jobs - they were ABUSING their power. The do not have that much power in America - and FOR A REASON.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    I'll say the same thing I said to Art.

    It not really for society to decide what is excessive force. Until you spend a day in a cops shoes, you have no understanding of what is going thru their heads when some shithead is refusing to obey their authority.

    If the guy can’t follow a simple instruction like get out of the car, who knows what he would have done when taken out of the car?
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    The cops had no basis for arresting him. This is not a police state. People have rights. The police were violating those rights.
  • ashman · 7 months ago
    i bet your a republican!!
  • doodaday · 7 months ago
    Jason your a tool. Don't listen to whatever the cops tell you or authority tells you to do. Otherwise your just sheep. Learn your rights. Authority is never in the private interest & WILL be abused if not checked.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    Since when is it the police's job to tazer people who are adhering to the 4th amendment? I'd do the same thing, and I'd sue the everliving fuck out of them and WIN.
  • Userdome · 7 months ago
    no, you are wrong. He did not resist, did not have anything to hide, did not say he was a pastor and was not being a smartass. so it's safe to say, HE DID NOTHING WRONG. Jesus, we have rights you know and what good is having rights if no one cares about them, they are there for a reason. Theyon the other hand, did not answer his request for the dog, mocked him, laughed at him, beated him even though he WAS NOT resisting tazered him so he couldn't resist either way and threw him in jail for no reason, then they had to search the car and find NOTHING. EVEN though they should be suspicious, they did not have to do all that crap for no reason. they also DID NOT bring the god dam dog right? so in the end. the cops are ASSES and unfortunatly so are YOU
  • abbe · 7 months ago
    I lol'd at this.
    "I resisted arrest and bitched at them for 30 minutes, so they tazed me!"
    *Shock*

    Im really shocked and appalled that the police took action after a man refuses to cooperate with them for 30 minutes (or was it 1 hour?). Sure, you should stand for what you believe, but god damn, a force of authority without the ability to act on cases like this, can it really be called a force of authority?
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    Condensed version of what I said above. I couldn't agree with you more. I hate stupid people who try to treat police officers like their mall cops.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    It's because they pretty much are. You don't have to do shit that they tell you if you aren't breaking the law, and this man wasn't breaking the law.
  • fyre · 7 months ago
    Get a life buddy.
    Get a clue.
    Get some sun,
    Get some ass.

    Trolling people who refuse to be oppressed by some rogue faction of the law is really lame : / Even you know the laws and know this is wrong, are you attention whoring?

    Or are you one of the cops in this video?
  • Victor · 7 months ago
    Jason, until you know a law enforcer who has abused their power, of course you would have this point of view on the situation. But when you have a father who is a cop and abuses his family by beating them with no reason, and when tried in court, he is not guilty because he knows the judge, you will understand. This is simply the abuse of authority, this pastor was very educated in what he was doing and standing up for, which was the 4th amendment. He did nothing wrong.
  • Ryan · 7 months ago
    Seriously WTF! Watch the rest of the videos on his channel.
  • Jaimie · 7 months ago
    4th Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    There's his right, and the right of Americans, right there. You should not be considered suspicious if you know your rights and enforce them. If you watched the second video, he obviously had nothing to hide and was enforcing his rights.

    I will say that I believe he was pushing it due to the attitude he gave the cops, but I also believe that the cops overstepped their power by tazering him like they did and then beating him. He was being verbally resistant, but he was not being physically resistant as far as I can tell, therefore such force against him should not be necessary.
  • Séanin · 7 months ago
    Ahh, the joys of the stupid and corrupt legal system.

    Poor Guy. Real good speaker tho.

    Here in Ireland, theres NEVER any police around. Ever. Its retarded, especially when ya need them.
  • Art · 7 months ago
    I agree that the pastor should have just gotten out of the car. However...Tazing him.... that was excessive and unnecessary.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    It not really for society to decide what is excessive force. Until you spend a day in a cops shoes, you have no understanding of what is going thru their heads when some shithead is refusing to obey their authority.

    If the guy can't follow a simple instruction like get out of the car, who knows what he would have done when taken out of the car?
  • anon · 7 months ago
    This is one of the most ignorant things I have ever heard. It is up to society to decide what excessive force is. In case you didn't know the police work for us. Our taxes pay their wage and it is our elected representatives that determine what is law and elected and appointed judges that rule on that law. Heck, sheriffs are elected officals and are responsible for hiring individual police officers.

    Just because someone resisted arrest in the past and hurt an individual officer does not entitle that officer to use excessive force in subduing someone. You are to use the minimum force to safely subdue the person. A single tasing would have done it. Heck, warning him that he would be tased and forceably removed from the car in he didn't comply may have been enough.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    Yes, because anyone who knows their rights is obviously a terrorist...
  • Alex · 7 months ago
    Not for society to decide what is excessive force?! Are you kidding me? Are you a communist? In America, the majority of society decide what is and is not excessive force. Geez, keep this up and our world will really look like the one in the novel 1984...
  • Marc · 7 months ago
    if you refuse to cooperate with police, when they ask you to, especially when they say a dog may have found something. Refusing to obey to the police might show you have something to hide so they can take drastic mesures.

    That bitch just had to listen to the police officer, especially when they have been there asking him to get out of his car for over an hour as he said.
  • doodaday · 7 months ago
    You know why the pastor didn't listen to the cop? Cause he new 1000% he did nothing wrong & had nothing in his trunk. HE HAD NOTHING IN HIS TRUNK & they said he did. So he called em on it & was right. Now punish the abusive cops.
  • Alex · 7 months ago
    Right, never question authority. Just comply, those "rights" of yours don't mean anything. It's not like people fought and died for your right to sit in that car without being unlawfully searched or have the living crap tazed out of you.
  • warki · 7 months ago
    Seriously.. what the fuck.

    He knew his rights, that's perfect isn't it? There was no reason for the cops to be THAT fucked up to him! Even if they want him to get out of the car.. taser him that often? There no reason to taser him even ONCE! Just break the window, open the door and get him out, theres no need to beat him at any time.
    He didn't act like someone who wants to beat up a cop..

    Totally abuse of power. Seriously, this is NOT an offense, but there are too many of those fucking cops in the US...
  • LaurieA137 · 7 months ago
    "JUST" break the window, open the door and get him out? For all they know, he's got a gun under his seat. After trying to talk reasonably to this dope for over an hour, they've got reason to believe he's hiding something, and I'm sure they didn't want to be the next story in the paper about some crazy person pulling a gun and shooting the entire squad So they used NON-LETHAL methods to subdue him... taser. Too bad.
  • doodaday · 7 months ago
    So what if you have a gun in your car or house? Maybe the cops should do a daily check on you to just be sure. Right? Right? Ya I thought so. Thats was privacy & rights are for.
  • Francis Harris · 7 months ago
    Complete abuse of power!
  • Nickolas p · 7 months ago
    thats why i hate pigs so much this kind of shit happens fucking stupid pigs are useless
  • Michael · 7 months ago
    The cops should all lose there jobs for this because it is the law that they are required to inorm him of what charge hes being arrested for
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    Just because they didn't inform him of what he was being arrested for when the camera was rolling doesn't mean they didn't tell him.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    No, they told him. They told him he was "resisting arrest" but they had no reason to arrest him beforehand so that's BS.
  • Jeni · 7 months ago
    I was pulled over at a checkpoint one time, had no idea why. they came to the window asked for the normal stuff, then said "so your so-n-so, that means you know why we had you pull over" i said no i do not. At the time i was pregnant.. i had a drunk friend in the car i was driving home. We were both told to get out of the vehicle hands showing and all. Did what we were told. then we were patted down... Hard. I kept asking what i was being cuffed for, and nobody would inform me.

    i was not told why i was being arrested until almost 2 hours later after being in a cold disgustingly dirty cell, with no water and no restroom breaks...

    In the end the guy i borrowed the car from was drunk and forgot he lent it and called it in stolen.
  • doodaday · 7 months ago
    Oh snap Jeni! thats sucks. Unfortunetaly cops were going with good info there. Too bad the drunk friend was a temporary dumass.
  • police=bitches · 7 months ago
    I would have done the same thing as the pastor. fuck them police when they abuse power.
  • anon · 7 months ago
    I don't know how anyone can think this is justified. While it is common sense to be courteous to law enforcement it is not a crime punishable by beating to be rude. I can understand his short temper though considering the trampling his constitutional rights recieved. Would the police have just let him go if he complied? Of course they would have, but that's no the point. They had no right to search him in the first place. "I think you're a terrorist" is going to become a precursor to police searching anyone or anything as they please because they're bored? This is the USA people, we have the right to be assholes, the right to not be searched unless there is just cause, and the right to know what we are being arrested for. The police do not have special authority to make you do what they want unless you are breaking the law, suspected of breaking the law, or impeding justice. I have know people stopped by these random checkpoints that allowed the 'friendly police officer' to search their vehicle. Their property was strewn across the roadside haphazardly with little regard to keeping it safe or clean. Then when the police finished and didn't find anything my friend was told to pick it all up and go. I won't submit myself to an unreasonable search, though I would get out of the car before it escalated to the point that it had. I would still have made it clear that I wasn't giving them permission to search myself or the vehicle and that they were violating my constitutional rights, but I think I'd stop short of the beating.

    This guy is going to clean up in court and we the people are going to end up paying for a good portion of it. If he's smart he'll sue both departments and every individual officer that was present, for the actual beating or for the officers failure to protect his rights as well as to protect him from the use of excessive force.
  • doodaday · 7 months ago
    Very well said Anon!!!!!!
  • kaloolas · 7 months ago
    Was was he arrested for? A dog sniffing at him?
  • andrewL · 7 months ago
    He didn't follow the Chris Rock's rule of police... when a cop tells you to do something, shut the fuck up and do it
  • Heidi · 7 months ago
    That is so messed up, doesn't even matter that he's a pastor. I mean pastors beat and rape kids too. So that didn't render him harmless. But total abuse of power, for real, I think they tazered him for fun. Just to voice my opinion. Crazy story!
  • Cricky · 7 months ago
    Fuck every one of those cops, he did nothing wrong, it was a complete abuse of power. This makes me want to Taze those cops in their eyesockets. Pisses me off..
  • WatchinTVHD · 7 months ago
    i feckin hate pigs,they abuse their powers and on most occasions arrest the wrong people lol.
    give a mental patient a gun and a badge im sure as hell he'd do a better job than these planks.these pigs should lose their jobs for the violent display of power.6 guys vs 1 pastor and yet the pigs still needed to tazer him? give me a break
    cheerio
  • Blahp · 7 months ago
    Wow, he should totally sue.
  • Ola · 7 months ago
    Can you sue the police for this?
  • phschris1 · 7 months ago
    The crimes/torts that were committed in this video is ridiculous...I hope this guy wins millions and these cops are put on the street to starve.
  • Ryan · 7 months ago
    wtf! That is a complete abuse of power, not to mention breaking of the 3rd and 4th, possibly even 5th and 6th amendments. I hope those cops get what's coming to them: fired and soon after brought up on charges, the way it's supposed to happen.
  • Devin · 7 months ago
    That was a complete abuse of power. The pastor handled it rightly though because you have rights and you need to protect those rights.
  • someone · 7 months ago
    That baptist preacher is a douchebag.
    He has done this many times.

    There was one where he refused to even roll down his window and talk to the cops. They weren't accusing him of anything, he was just being an asshole to prove a point to youtube.

    You know his preachings are based around him hating the cops? Go watch all of his videos.
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Extremely excessive force, and they were the uncooperative ones.
    They should all lose their badges
  • ThatGuySW · 7 months ago
    Well the idiot should have just answered the questions in the first place and could have drove off. Then they'd never have tried to make him a lesson. Total abuse of power, but at the same time...he could have done like everyone else at the checkpoing and just drove off after a few questions.
  • Amber A · 7 months ago
    Oh you mean "He could have just given up all his constitutional rights and drove off just like all the other dumb Americans who don't understand what our forefathers fought for" Wars were fought and thousands of people died for dumbasses like you- and you repay them by twaiving them away without a thought.
  • suicidalparrot · 7 months ago
    judgemental much amber? so everyone who doesn't believe your point of view is a "dumb American"?
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    Our forefathers didn't fight for the right of a douchebag to record a video of a police officer enforcing the law so that he could try and get rich quick. At the end of the day, the people judging him in court will see that he had a problem with obeying authority. The cops were going to sieze anything that the guy had that was legal. The only people who try to twist the 4th ammendment are the ones who have something to hide or have a hidden agenda like trying to get a frivilous lawsuit.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    sorry, typo: correction: The cops weren't going to sieze anything that the guy had that was legal.
  • anon · 7 months ago
    It isn't a problem with obeying authority if their was no probable cause. The dog is not shown on the tape so it's hard to say whether or not they had the right to search his vehicle. Even if they had proable cause it's pretty clear that excessive force was used.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    You honestly think that this guy was trying to pull a get rich quick scheme? "OH YEAH! I'm going to use the 4th amendment to get beat to a pulp by police and I'll make a lot of money!" You are retarded. Go read the constitution.
  • LaurieA137 · 7 months ago
    Um, last time I checked, you HAVE to answer questions. If you refuse to supply your name or other information, you can be detained. He refused to answer questions... he didn't say what kind. He was being a prick just for the fun of it. If he answered the questions and still refused the search, then that IS his right. However, the whole purpose of the checkpoint is to CHECK people and cars.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    You don't have to answer shit if you haven't committed a crime. In this case the man committed no crime, but the cops found that as a crime in itself which is completely BS.
  • Keith · 7 months ago
    He should've just let him check his car if he had nothing to lose. Even so, that was total abuse of power on behalf of the police... He's going to have scars for the rest of his life now
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    He has a right to refuse warrant less searches. He stuck to that right and police didn't like it. The police are 100% at fault. We should never have to relinquish our rights for the sake of convenience. This is America, not China for God's sake.
  • mynameisray · 7 months ago
    I think this guy got what he deserved. Just because you are a god hippie this doesn't give you a free pass to do as you please. The officers simply asked him to step out of his car and he said no. This gives them probable cause to search the car. He chose to resist and police took what measures they felt were necessary. For any of you that disagree may you should put yourself in the shoes of the officer or maybe the officers family or anyone else for that matter. What if they man was carrying a weapon and opened fire on the officers and killed one? How would you feel than? What if this man did have drugs that he was carrying and sold them to your kids? How would you feel than? Asking the man to step out so they could check his car and not worry about any danger was more than reasonable. His failure to comply to such a simple request was his choice and he suffered the consequences of his actions.
  • randy · 7 months ago
    It's his 4th amendment to refuse to be searched if there is no probable cause. If refusing to be searched or step out without good reason gives cops probable cause, then why bother having a 4th amendment? All that does is contradict what the 4th amendment does for us ALL. It's not only "god loving hippies" who have fallen into this situation. Teens waiting at the bus stop, working moms on their way home, you yourself going to see your kids baseball game could run into a situation like this. How about tell me what you think after that happens?
  • aiden · 7 months ago
    in the states police have the right to place someone under arrest for 24 hours without any cause or reason...

    which is FUCKED
  • max v · 7 months ago
    Have police been abusing powers a lot more recently, a few weeks ago philly police beat up we the kings and FTSK for parking in the wrong spot
  • chicostudent · 7 months ago
    they idea of detaining him is putting him under arrest. they put you under arrest so that anything they find is considered to be found legally. the fact the dog alerted them to car is their probable cause. At the border these are standard searches as to stop teh flow of narcotics into and out of the us.

    think of it, if i had something to hide i would act the same way he did. say i never saw or heard the dog bark, and then refuse to be arrested. and claim it is my right to have private property.
  • anon · 7 months ago
    I'm sure this will come out in court. The dog's alleged signal should have been caught on tape. Heck the border agents wouldn't bring the dog back out to let him OR THE POLICE OFFICERS observe the signal. If I was the police officer on the scene I would have let the man go right then. The border agents did to the police exactly what the Pastor did, refused to do what the officer said, and they were actually breaking the law with the unreasonable search. But the citizen is the one that gets beaten as the officer takes the border patrols' word on it. Scary.

    So the answer to unreasonable searches is to bend over and take it? Let someone make up an excuse to do whatever they want to you and your rights?

    Points to all of those that realized that our rights were earned in blood and shouldn't be given up with a whimper.
  • randy · 7 months ago
    seriously Chico? A drug smuggler would probably not know his rights in the first place, just how much in cocaine he's got lined in his car, and how many years he'll get if he gets caught. I hate people saying "oh well if he didn't have anything to hide, he should have just listened". Ever wonder if maybe THAT is the reason cops take advantage? Because they know you "have" to listen? So when you don't, they teach you a lesson by showing you the power they have.
  • JimmyRocks · 7 months ago
    So he gets a beating for knowing his rights as a citizen of the US? Poor bastard. I'm sure this is how the State of Arizona and the Border Patrol want their employees to act. Yup.
  • Yourmomslover · 7 months ago
    Fuck those cops. They should be hung from their tiny balls and sodomized with a broom handle. Gee..I wonder why most Americans have a shitty outlook on cops? It doesn't matter if he is a pastor or not, these fucking cock fags will do this to anyone.
  • Jeff · 7 months ago
    This is just retarted the guy is being a dick to the police officers. If they want you to get out of the car just do it. and to all the people who say hes a pastor he's not going to do anything that's just retarted just because he is a pastor that doesn't give him the right to be obnoxious to police officers
  • Thepocalypse · 7 months ago
    I'm seriously starting to hate the police. Damn fascists.
  • Tommy · 7 months ago
    What the fuck. Why taze you.
  • Laura · 7 months ago
    Wow! This is a horrible injustice to his constitutional rights. Unfortunately, we all know that nothing will happen to the cops and this man will be persecuted by other cops across the United States for speaking out.
  • suicidalparrot · 7 months ago
    I want to see the entire video. What we have here is a snapshot of one fraction of of an event that was clearly constructed in such a way as to stir emotion and sympathy (complete with music). I'm not gonna give this guy as a pass as a law abiding citizen just because he's a pastor. He seemed like he was being belligerent to me. all he had to do was comply and most likely there would have been no tazing, no arrest, and no damage to his property. An alerted dog is PC for a search. now i don't give the police a pass here either. they could have handled it in a much better way. i don't think they needed to use the force that they did and from what i saw it seemed excessive. The trouble with what i saw was that it wasn't the complete picture.
  • PistolPaul · 7 months ago
    fucking sick that this happens in the ' legal world' i mean, this was police doing it...they sound like criminals to me almost..

    and ofcourse they were right in some way but they didnt have to beat him up, whats the point, if he even HAD a weapon, why eat him up etc, why not just drag him out of the car, and put handcups on ( how do u spell that)
    why throw around with him and stand on his face... they were even laughing at the end
  • Blobface · 7 months ago
    What nobody seems to understand is that your rights are gone.

    If you cant even exercise those rights, what rights do you have left?

    He exercised his right to not be searched without a warrant (or whatever it is, I'm not American), and the police tazered him for it.

    WHY DO YOU HAVE THOSE RIGHTS IF USING THEM GETS YOU ARRESTED?
    Can someone please explain this to me?
    He's a twat for doing what he legally and morally should be allowed to do?

    I agree, police in America are total agressive fuckwits, but how was this man in the wrong when he was only doing what he is ALLOWED TO DO.
  • MimsieSky · 7 months ago
    Excessive force.
    Granted the guy should have worked with them a bit more than he did, but he was right to question them. it was totally not cool that they A) broke his window B) Tazored him and C) beat him up. NOT called for AT ALL. he wasn't being violent.
    That should never have happened.
  • ROb · 7 months ago
    This is disgraceful. They were abusing their powers. When this is seen across the whole world it portrays an extremely poor image of America. Those police officers and border control officers should be out of their jobs immediately.
  • ciano'leary · 7 months ago
    ive been tazered its soooooooo painful
  • NAZI STATE · 7 months ago
    This is NOT a police state or a dictatorship. If you dont want rights get the fuck outa the States. To anyone you said he deserved it- YOUR AN IDIOT - Complete figgin sheeple. Know your rights & use em or lose em. To anyone says oh he must have been hiding something or why not let em search if he has nothing to hide? YOUR JUST DONT GET FREEDOM. You wanna live in '1984'? Fuck off to iraq then. You should be ashamed to be an American if you don't know & fight for your rights. Same goes to that law enforcement douche above who said he was resisting arrest. Blow me. That's what your trained to say. No wonder fucking pigs get no respect. I hope those cops lose their jobs & careers cause they aint any better than thugs with so called "law authority." Cause cops are not above the law either.
  • LaurieA137 · 7 months ago
    Forget the search, he states he wouldn't even answer their QUESTIONS from the very beginning. This guy is an idiot. He tried to "make a point" and wasted an hour of his time to do it. Meanwhile, who knows what REAL emergencies these cops were pulled away from to deal with this dope. And he KNEW they were going to break his window... did he stop and say "Ok, wait, I'll get out and talk to you"? No. He thought, "Hey! This will make great footage now that I've pushed these cops into going to extreme measures to deal with me." Maybe the cops were a LITTLE excessive, but the taser was totally called for, and I'm sure their adrenaline was high after dealing with him for so long, and wondering what he is really hiding.
  • Kasey · 7 months ago
    He didnt desearve to be tased, BUT he was refusing to cooperate with border patrol and police officers. Of course they were suspicious! He wouldnt let them search the car!!! Same thing would happen at an airport if people refused random searches. They definatly abused their power, but he should have cooperated
  • God · 7 months ago
    dude was probably smuggling some drugs
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    Actually they searched his car afterward and found (get this) NOTHING!
  • TheShmonz · 7 months ago
    Those policemen deserve to be shot at dawn, goddamnit! Poor sod, did nothing wrong. Complete abuse of power.
  • Noah · 7 months ago
    Why would they even tell him to cover his face if they were just going to smash glass from both sides? idiots...how cruel can you get
  • mas · 7 months ago
    Well officially tasering someone is considered the same force as putting your hand on them, this is the reason only high up people should be aloud to use them.
  • Amber · 7 months ago
    I think the only reason the pastor was being perceived as "difficult" is because he was agitated with the cops. They refused to answer his questions or to even bring out the dog again. He had every right to stay in his car and refuse a search. Some of you kept saying he should have just let them do it and get on his way, but why couldn't the police just bring the dog out? Answer his questions? Give him a REASON to allow a search to his private property.
    They went completely overboard and were out of line by tazering him. He was not be "resistant" by not allowing a search, he was excersizing his rights. HE DIDN'T EVEN SHOWS SIGNS OF THREAT. His hands were up and visible for Christ's sake!
    It just upsets me how the police abuse their power, and I have to commend this pastor for sticking up for himself and his rights. I hope the police get what they deserve and lose their jobs.
  • mig fighter · 7 months ago
    I WOULD BURN THIS POLICE OFFICERS AS AN EXAMPLE OR CUT THERE HANDS OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Mad~ · 7 months ago
    ...that's just really, really sick. I can't believe these kinds of people still exist.
  • TommyBoi · 7 months ago
    Yeah.....

    This is BORDER PATROL not random cops. If you cross the US border then you do what they say or you can return to the USA. He did not and could have had a weapon. He resisted a search AT THE BORDER and was then considered a threat. That threat was neutralized by a tazer. Life goes on.
  • mariog51 · 7 months ago
    I live like 65 miles from that border patrol checkpoint and all the border patrol agents that I know are asswholes, well 80% of them. I go by the checkpoint all the time and nothing ever happens. I think that they were just hungry for some action and thought that he did have something in the car and took it way too far. But they found their action.
  • Keith I. · 7 months ago
    I can understand one tazer to make sure he doesn't have a gun or something but to tazer him with 2 different tazers at once is rediculous and then to taze him again even after he is in handcuffs? Fucking pathetic excuses for human beings.
  • Mickmok · 7 months ago
    I think they were wrong yeah but he should have just let them have a look and if there was nothing there they would have just let him go.
  • Stevo · 7 months ago
    Ok first off when a police officer ask you questions and you refuse to answer them it is called obstruction of justice. Sometimes border patrol stations have to do required random checks. This could have been one of those and the fact that he resisted is suspicious to most police officers. Also when dogs alert to vehicles or persons the are trained not to bark, they sit down and sniff. They also warned him in the top video that when you obstruct justice they are permitted to use force " you can get out or we can remove you." And as for the marks on his head. after they pulled him from the car and the tazor subsided you can clearly see in the border patrol video that he resisted arrest physically. You can see him jerking and trying to pull away from the officer who was holding him on the ground. In my opinion he didn't deserve what he got, he should have just done what they told him to do and let them check his car. If he would have done that they would have found nothing and let him on his way. Unless he was actually hiding something.
  • Yehaw · 7 months ago
    I thought no answering questions was your right to be silent? Lying to a cop is definetly Obstruction of justice.
  • chicostudent · 7 months ago
    your right to silence has to be stated. he continued to talk and not respond to their questions. all he had to say was i reserve my right to remain silent. but as you can clearly see from the video he was quiet, even as he knew he was in a dangerous situation.
  • Lachrymist · 7 months ago
    1st let me tell everyone you have to obey all officer commands while in the traffic stops it is a law. 2nd if you feel your rights were violated you don't plead your case there you take it to the courts afterwards. These things happen all the time do I think they should of tazed him ..... no he was just being a douchebag just drag him out. When you are in court you can have the dog present so he can show you the signal he gives they are all different some sit down some lay down some bark three times some even back away.... they are all trained different. Why did you have the camera out unless you were looking for something?
  • Pants · 7 months ago
    That cop is a dickweed and a fat cunt. Fat ass jerk. Only in the south right? Well, the Dakotas and MN and WI are like the south of the north, so there's that stuff up here too. That cop is totally in the wrong. He should get tazed in his nuts, it's not like he's gonna have genius, nobel-prize winning kids anyway!
  • anthony · 7 months ago
    he was being alittle awkward by not leaving the car when requested and had enough opportunity to comply with the officers which as he was innocent he should have done, however their actions in how they got him out of the car and what they did to him after are completely unacceptable and disciplinary action should be taken.
  • grant · 7 months ago
    so this is the swine flu!
  • Jonathan · 7 months ago
    Poor guy :/

    But he does cry like abitch :P
  • Lachrymist · 7 months ago
    To the people that say they have to inform you what they are arresting you for thats true and false. They don't have to automatically tell you they can detain you up until 24hrs uncharged with suspision. They definitely don't have to tell you while you are locked in your car refusing to come out. My advice take complaints where they need to be with video proof don't try to be the HERO OF JUSTICE worldwide. pick your battles
  • Alex · 7 months ago
    No, they have to tell you what you are under arrest for when they are arresting you. You have the right to know what you are charged with. However, they can keep you locked up for 24 hours without reasonable proof they have a legitmimate claim. Meaning they can charge Johnny Doe with vehicular manslaughter, but they can only keep him locked up for 24 hours without some kind of proof.
  • Kyle · 7 months ago
    THE ANSWER TO ALL THESE PROBLEMS: LEGALIZE DRUGS.
  • Kawiiltn · 7 months ago
    your an idiot and I love videos like this, it shows the REAL side of law enforcement. Cops are pigs, not all of them, but they all get little power trips.
    And the pastor didnt have to show them ANYTHING, what he gets punished for knowing his rights? 4th amendment!!
  • Austin · 7 months ago
    fuck yeah. we cud save a bunch o money doin that, so the government doesnt have to waste money on the "war on drugs".
  • Alek013 · 7 months ago
    I'll second that motion.
  • nate · 7 months ago
    Yep, legalize that shit, their gona tax the fuck out of it, and thats the correct term.
  • Kim · 7 months ago
    I completely agree!
  • Mcers · 7 months ago
    i'm tired of hearing stories about these power tripping assholes
  • Whoa, Back Up. · 7 months ago
    I completely agree.
  • jenners · 7 months ago
    Well then I guess both of you are idiots.
  • Daniel Loop · 7 months ago
    This is such a tough situation: if the guy didn't have anything in his car, the majority will say that the cops were wrong and abused their power. If he did, then the opposite will happen: everyone can justify the cops actions. In my opinion, it was ridiculous to do what they did, because they could have just as easily broken the window, then opened the door and dragged him out instead of nocking him unconscious. They should have at least told him what they would do if he continued to resist, since he was not taking any action toward them.
  • Cree · 7 months ago
    No. She shouldn't have let them search the car. This is the united states of America and we should be afraid of our law enforcement, especially if we aren't breaking the law. This is what is wrong with the United states of America. When a man of god can't make his way home without being attacked by our country "protectors." This is wrong and I hope he sues the douchebags for every copper cent they have.

    Respect to Phil whom makes these things know

    ~`FriendlyFiasco`~
  • letmereply · 7 months ago
    Republican.
  • JOhnny2TimeS · 7 months ago
    FUCK THAT THEM DUDES USED GATCHO BAD EXCESIVE FORCE. FUCK THE LAW I SAY ANARCHY TO ALL THEM MOTHERFUCKERS!!!!!!
  • DonF72 · 7 months ago
    How are they idiots? did you watch the second footage of his account of the instance? Obviously excessive force and power tripping. Don't be a troll
  • Jenners.is.a.tool · 7 months ago
    up your vagina with and aids infected rusty hammer jenners
  • Fade · 7 months ago
    so that makes it ok?
  • Levi N · 7 months ago
    God this kind of thing is so ridiculous. But other than the fact that cops overuse their power, i think they also had something against him. Maybe not personally, but maybe they were anti-christians or something.
  • Klik · 7 months ago
    no, this dudes just a cunt, he shoulda let them just search it, why resist if you dont have anything to hide?
  • Joe · 7 months ago
    Because cops cant just do what they want whenever they want to. Theres a reason for that. We have freedoms and he wasn't under arrest for anything. He didn't HAVE to do anything.
  • Floyd · 7 months ago
    Hes not a cunt hes just not very smart
  • Chris · 7 months ago
    thats probably why he didnt let them search him or his car
  • phil · 7 months ago
    your an idiot, he said they eventually searched it and found nothing
  • Viet · 7 months ago
    Uhh, if you watched the second video all the way to the end, the police did search his car and they found nothing.

    But, he still should've let the cops search his car. If you have someone, in this case mutiplay somones, with a gun telling you to get out of the car, you do it.
  • Kasandra · 7 months ago
    People like you are the down fall of America. He didn't let them search his car BECAUSE THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY AND THEY HAD NO RIGHT TO.

    Go to China if you want to be treated like this. Dumb Communist.
  • pony · 7 months ago
    Because we have rights.
  • Ivan · 7 months ago
    He does have rights but he was goddamnit just completely shitty to those officers. If you do resist them when their looking for frugs of course your gunna get bloody broken into.As much as it is his fault The bastard police men freaking beat him up. The Tasering is understandable, But Beating the shit out of him. The Officers were completely out of line.

    One last thing the Police have the legal right to detain someone 24 hours with no cause. No more than that but that meant the Officer even if there were no drugs was acting legally til after the tasering. Id say he could Get the stitches paid for by the courts but his window was broken in the duty of the law.
  • Sal Wright · 7 months ago
    The dog caught a scent. That's probable cause. From there out, the officers _have_ to investigate, or they are not performing their duties.

    10 minutes, and he's on his way.

    A real holy man would render unto Caesar. But this whiner is not even an ordinary man, much less a holy one.

    Everyone at the airport goes through a metal detector. If you beep, you get searched. The dog is similar. If the police let him go, the same bubble-heads who are sympathizing with this little bubble-headed drama queen would complain the police weren't doing their job.

    We have different rights in different contexts. In this context, entering our country, we, the American public, have the right to have you, the American international traveler, searched for contraband, so we, the American public, don't have narcotics being sold in our cities, or illegal aliens in our territory.

    If our elected officials choose to put checkpoints on state borders, then yes, it is our civic duty to follow instructions for inspection there as well. If we don't like it, we write our congressmen, and if that doesn't work, we vote in new leadership, as we did recently.

    This clown is self-centered, on top of stupid.

    If you don't like being searched, don't go. Or better yet, don't come back. But don't insult the entire population of America by putting yourself outside the law.
  • Zane · 7 months ago
    It's called expressing your rights. If you don't express the law, the law will soon be forgotten. He did absolutely nothing wrong, he had every right to resist.

    The cops did not even express what they were charging him for. You MUST tell the person what you are charging them for before you are allowed to progress further. They did not even do that, therefore they had no right to do such a thing to him.

    Before you start cussing and acting like such a fool, you should gain some background knowledge.

    Think before you speak, you dolt.
  • JJ · 7 months ago
    because they are not a loud to under the constitution, say some random person walks up to your door of your car, says let me search the vechile, would you let them? Hell no! Without warrentys police are nothing but fat power hungery assholes who think they have rights to your personal life.
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    I'm from Arizona, I've been past those checkpoints before, and those cops think they have powers that normal cops don't.
    If you tell a normal cop that you don't consent to searches, you may get a ticket for something stupid (as I have. And no, I didn't have anything in my car, I just believe cops shouldn't be able to search people willy-nilly with no probable cause.), but he's not going to taser you 3 times and beat you till you're bloody.
    I hope they show the video in court and have the judge instead go against the cops.
    That won't happen though.
  • john · 7 months ago
    dont be a douche cunt ... if theres a fixable prob in the US its shitty power tripping police officers ... rights exist for a reason ..
  • otto · 7 months ago
    Klik your the douche bag- This is America & people died for our rights. Dont touch my shit you pigs!
  • Jen · 7 months ago
    Why refuse the search?? Because you have rights. Why should cops be able to do whatever they please. Why not stand up for the rights you are given to live in this country. If we don't stand up, it will only get worse...
  • Patrick Mauldin · 7 months ago
    Exactly what Pony said.

    As citizens of the US, we have rights given us by the US Constitution.

    This may seem like a relatively stupid reason to not submit to police, but the more we just capitulate the more we lose our rights.

    People have a lot more rights than they know. The police just know how to bully them into submitting.
  • Caleb Myers · 7 months ago
    To let them search his car is his prerogative and he didn't "need" to let them. He did the right thing in not allowing them to bully him like that. He'd of been a fool to let them violate his 4th Amendment right! I hope these officers all get fired and face counter lawsuits!
  • Jordan · 7 months ago
    He has the right as an American citizen to refuse a search if there is no probable cause. Also his right were not read to him and they used excessive force when they destroyed his private property
  • tony · 7 months ago
    all Americans have the basic right to resist a search if it is not based on any evidence, especially if a warrant is not present.
  • Ed187 · 7 months ago
    Because it's his constitutional right to refuse unlawful searches without probable cause.
  • jenners · 7 months ago
    EXCUSE ME? Maybe you need to watch that video again. The officer did in fact inform the man why he was being asked to step out of the vehicle. He was under arrest due to the fact that a drug sniffing K-9 alerted border patrol of something suspicious. That officer was doing his job-serving and protecting. What if he was carrying a bomb? Would you feel sorry for him then? That dumbass resisted arrest, which IS a crime. So either way at that point he should have been arrested. Don't be so naive. I agree that there are some, probably a lot, of cops who abuse their power, however, that is not what happened here.
  • Zane · 7 months ago
    Well then why didn't they do it again? There's no decisive proof that the dog did or didn't bark judging from that video.

    But if there was indeed something dangerous there would have been no need to hold the dog back and ignore the question about bringing the dog a second time.
  • Zane · 7 months ago
    Sorry for the double post but I would like to add something.

    You're certainly looking at it from the cops' perspective. But how about you look at it from the Pastor's perspective?

    Here, lets replace him with you.

    You're coming from work, and a bunch of cops decide to stop you. You ask for their reason and after a bit of talking they finally tell you that you're being accused of having drugs and/or a dead body due to a dog who did nothing but sniff. It didn't bark, it didn't make a sound, it just sniffed and left.

    Then after you ask the what the dog was supposed to do to indicate the confirmation of drugs and/or a dead body, they ignore you. Then they break your window and taser you, slam your head into a broken window and then drop you on the ground and stomp on your head.

    Once again I will say this, the cops did not have to right to use such brute force, and I certainly don't think you would love for this to happen to you. Especially being accused of something you had not done.

    I'll say this once more. Think before you speak, or in this case, type.
  • otto · 7 months ago
    No you pay attention you stoopid girl. The Dog didnt do anything the cops were lying about the dog!
  • Adi · 7 months ago
    Well if you watched the second video he sayed that he asked them to bring the dog and show him hes reaction near hes car.
  • Micah · 7 months ago
    ...They have to have a justifiable reason to arrest a person.
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    First of all, you can't be arrested for something they think happened.
    You can't be arrested for cops thinking you have drugs on your person.
    They have to have PROOF, they have to have the drugs in their possession. They said he had drugs in his trunk, yet he didn't have any.
    Yes he is going to be arrested for resisting arrest for that hour that he barricaded himself in the car, and possibly for obstructing justice.
    Also when they show the actual surveillance video of the dog walking by and not actually finding anything, I'm sure the judge will see this for what it is; Cops trampling over someones rights and using obsessive force because someone got a little overzealous about their rights.
  • Halftard · 7 months ago
    Jenners, if the dog doesn't bark audibly and they refuse to let him see the dog do it again to prove the point. Even if they did have the right to search him, even if he did refuse to get out the car, tasering him multiple times, then shoving his head into glass HARD (11 stitches) then locking him in a trailer and jeering at him without any sort of medical care when they DIDN'T FIND JACK SHIT in his car is an insane overuse of force.
  • phillyb · 7 months ago
    no the k-9 didnt do shit, they're prob racist or something
  • Dakota · 7 months ago
    Wow, F*ck off they abused their rights. You're a dumb f*cking c*nt.
  • Jess · 7 months ago
    Then why didn't they bring the dog again like he asked them and why didn't they respond to him when he asked them why he was being arrested.
    The only thing the cop did was keep on reminding him that he was a cop.
    A lot of cops are like that, they just want to try to prove that they're super superior to everyone else cause they have a gun.
  • MistFir3 · 7 months ago
    From just what those videos said, the dog showed no suspicion, therefore there was no probable cause. So he wasn't resisting arrest, just sticking to his rights.
  • Gun · 7 months ago
    incorrect.
  • Skyu · 7 months ago
    Ok I do agree that he should have gotten out of the car but in a way he does have the right to question an be given a reason. It is apart of the law for the accused to be told why he was being arrested. They should have told him the truth and not think they were wrong, by not taking out the dog when he asked, because he was sure as hell telling the truth.

    Then all the abuse they gave him is the bigger crime. Tazed like crazy, grinding your face in glass, and then having your head stepped on? What kind of arrest is that?
  • Noel · 7 months ago
    Exactly... so those cops were way pass wrong.
  • frostbitn · 7 months ago
    Yeah but every dog's detection signal differs. he may have just raised his paw behind the car which he would not have seen. If you ask me, if you have nothing to hide, let them search the damn car. Yeah they dont have the right unless you give them permission, but every cop has power deficiency issues and tries to take it out on everyone elese. Ive been stopped 3 times and all times bogus. I respected the cop and answered all their questions and they had to let me go because I had done nothing wrong. Just accept whatever they want especially if all they want is to look in your trunk.
  • Dudethathatesdumbdudes · 7 months ago
    Federal law permit the Border Patrol to establish checkpoints up to 100 miles inside the U.S. Border patrol are allowed to use k9s. Lets say they brought the k9 out again.
    What would the man do?

    Would he question the dog?
    Maybe get Eddie Murphy on the phone to translate what the dog is saying

    Did he himself train the dog? How would he know what to look for?

    He was informed on video tape that he was under arrest for failure to comply. Not only did he resist to that. He started resisting once he refused the search of the vehicle ( which by the way was a rental car so who knows what the dog sensed on the vehicle).

    He practically instigated the whole thing. Conveniently having the camera at hand. If they are going to break the window. You already know they are making their way in so why not unlock the door?

    The first video only shows a portion of the incident. He fills in the gaps on his second video. He spoke about the incident. How are we to believe him when in he clearly has no idea how his civil rights work.

    I loved the "Border Patrol Surveillance Video" portion of the first vid. The music makes it look like beating the shit out of a Moron/religious not job is a beautiful thing.
  • seth · 7 months ago
    How was he resisting arrest? He did not let them search the car, that was his right. Then they say "Oh well you are under arrest" without giving him a valid reason. All the cop had to do was call the dog back over...what is the big deal? Breaking the window and using a taser gun on him was not the answer.

    I like how you say "What if he had a bomb on him" like that is supposed to hold any weight for this particular incident. If every cop could use the "what if" excuse there would be even more unjustified arrests every day. This was stupid, every cop involved whether they were just spectating or actually involved should be suspended or fired. You don't treat other people like they are pieces of shit and have no rights whether you are a cop, the president, or anybody. I would have love to seen the pastor pull a deagle out and pistol whip him in the dome, stupid fucking cop who doesn't even know peoples rights. I'm glad those are the type of people that are enforcing the law for us, idiots.
  • Gun · 7 months ago
    100% agree. i've seen this guy egg on cops in videos before. he's looking for trouble for the sake of self glorification.
    had he stepped out of the car when asked, they would have found nothing, and he would have been on his way in 15 minutes.

    if you start refusing to comply with an officer, it becomes probable cause.
  • kirsten · 7 months ago
    They didnt give him a reason for being under arrest eccept resist but they didnt even have a right to to ask him to get out in the first place.. anyways its all bullshit. People go crazy when they get a little bit of power.. I wouldnt doubt that they like the violence.
  • david · 7 months ago
    However if the use of a drug dog and saying it found something (according to the cops) could be used to throw this out in court forever. By setting precedent that they its not probable cause. (as you cant have probable cause because a dog sniffed something when it obviously didn't)

    They had no right to arrest him, they didn't have probable cause because they didn't get signaled by the dog drugs were in the car (according to him). If they were drug sniffing, and they did get signaled by the dogs, dogs should no longer be allowed for obtaining probable cause. Because obviously they can not be trusted. (No drugs or anything else were found)


    He resisted arrest (for a crime which he did not commit. He refused a search which was within his rights, (and the search was not warranted) Boarder searches are legal, this was not a boarder search, this was well within the nations boarders. The cops did not inform him about shit for which he was breaking the law. The used execessive force, they did not even attempt to use natural means to subdue him after breaking the windows. They tased him multiple times. (he was calm, collected, and did not appear to pose any phyical threat to the cops, as such tasers werent warranted.

    the dogs didnt find shit. - this is the only part you need to focus on. (DOGS DIDNT FIND SHIT, HE WAS RIGHT, COPS WERE WRONG) This event is just one of many which fuels the hatred for police in this country. (They are fucking dirty, everyone of them has at one point fucking done something illegal, and not prosecuted themselves. They have let friends and family off the hook. FUCK THE POLICE.
  • Crashf0rce · 7 months ago
    They didnt have to taser him, or crush his head into the ground. That many officers could of just smashed the windows open then remove him without the need for tasering. (Of course I don't think they had the right to arrest him in the first place).

    And one more thing: Resisting arrest is illegal, but they had no grounds for arresting him in the first place, so I don't think it was his fault.

    All this because cops saw the dog sniff near the back of his car.... I would hate that dog if I was the pastor lol.
  • spencer · 7 months ago
    if the dog alerted them why didn't they find anything?
  • 614 · 7 months ago
    wow did you just compare a totally innocent man to a person carrying a bomb? even if he had a bomb thats excesive force i don't think anyone would care if he had just been tasered once because he was in fact resisting arrest and then removed but he was repeatedly taser and beaten which i believe is unexcusable
  • Caleb Myers · 7 months ago
    The burden of proof is not on the man. It's on the police. If the dog truly "detected" drugs in that vehicle, then it needs to be sold to a nice home for a family to look after it because it's worthless to the Force! He was not resisting arrest, he was asking them to state the cause of the arrest. He then asked the officers to bring the dog back out, they would not. When they found nothing in his vehicle, that should've been a clue that an apology should have been issued and him released. Now, they will face a lawsuit because there's no way these videos won't inspire a lawyer to take the case. Perhaps even the ACLU or ACLJ.
  • Justin · 7 months ago
    i dont know if you heard the pastors side of the story. he said the dog did nothing to alert the police. he was being falsely accused of something he didnt do. would you let the cops arrest you just cause "they have the power to"? this man had done nothing wrong and the dog did nothing to alert the cops. if this is so, the cops were definitely over reacting. in my opinion, each one of those cops who arrested him should have been arrested themselves for making a huge screw-up
  • Matty Burne · 7 months ago
    The guy wanted to know what the hell he was being charged with. Then all of a sudden the police taser him. That's complete abusement of your authority.
  • Tater · 7 months ago
    actually just because you refuse to let police search your vehicle that does not give them the right to arrest. They are required by law to obtain a warrant to search a vehicle if permission was not given by the vehicle owner. My feelings are that the man was completely within his rights to not allow them to search the vehicle.
  • Shed · 7 months ago
    Perhaps you need to watch them both again? He politely asked for the dog to come back to re-evaluate. The leader asked the grunts for it to be brought back out when they replied "no". They were caught in their own lie, so, to save humiliation, they just kicked his arse.

    Instead, they've just fucked themselves over. No doubt that something has happened to these officers. I doubt they've been fired, but I'm absolutely sure they've fucked their careers.
  • Jordan · 7 months ago
    Are you kidding, maybe YOU should watch the video again, he didn't resist arrest, he demanded reason, which is in the bill of rights, that they must have a reason, and they must have a warrant for search aswell. your the fucking idiot. he was practically tortured for fun. what you just said is a load of shit. he has his rights, they have no proof, they get scared, they beat him senseless, hes going to court, they get screwed, they did exceed their power, entirely, if you think the Bill of Rights is no big deal, i recommend a catscan
  • i cant stand cops · 7 months ago
    And to add, There was no reason for them to shove his face in broken glass and to tase him more than once
  • Lynn · 7 months ago
    it was excessive force once they used tasers and a one guy who was not resisting physically, he even followed their orders to cover his face. If he was just fuck off and completely disregarded those orders yes tasers could have been necessary. but there should not be any reason a large group of cops should feel threatened enough to tase on man who was only verbally resisting.
  • Levi · 7 months ago
    hey may have been placed under arrest, yes. But, they have to tell him what he under arrest for.
  • Kafer · 7 months ago
    There is a certain level of force a police officer, let alone a group of officers should use in any situation. Even if they did have probable cause, which the basically did, that is no reason to do that much damage to someone. A single shot from a tazer gun WILL render you motionless and uncontrollable and even if he had a weapon, while under the shock of a tazer gun the amount of force necessary to do that to a person's face is completely uncalled for and nothing needed to be done besides handcuffing.

    So your right, he was just doing his job, but he did it TERRIBLY. Given the situation there is no excuse for the level of force used against him, and we do have certain rights as far as questioning goes, and the actions of these cops lead my to be very suspicious of their intent.
    They were just doing their job at first, but they DID abuse their power by using a level of force that was unwarranted given the circumstances. The man was being overly difficult with them but there is a certain level of privacy we are entitle to as a right

    Please don't act like these cops did NOTHING wrong.

    PS: Oh by the way, for all you who are against the police here, many police dogs are trained to have very subtle signals that civilians don't necessarily notice. But that doesn't change the fact that they wouldn't bring it back out, which is very suspicious. However, since they found nothing, I wouldn't be surprised if the dog didn't in fact give the signal.
  • Morgan · 7 months ago
    I agree that he should have let them search because an officer doesn't need to explain how they know the dog had come to the conclusion of something that was possibly dangerous BUT NO WAY in hell should they have used SO much force to the point where the man need so many stitches for NOT resisting arrest.
  • mcleod · 7 months ago
    Maybe YOU should watch the videos again. The officers used unnecessary force on someone attempting to act on his fourth amendment. He showed no physical resistance and they tased him multiple times and forced his head into glass afterward s. Every one of those officers involved should be fired and spend a little jail time themselves.
  • Jenners.is.a.tool · 7 months ago
    Jenners... STFU your probably a fat porker of a cop masturbating to the jessica beil video and writing comments at the same time, buck up you man whore and grow a brain in a differnt place than your choade
  • Josh Fabean · 7 months ago
    wow a lot of you guys are missing the point. They can't just smash out your windows and taser you multiple times without you doing anything at all. Tasers are to disable a person who can cause harm to the officers or to themselves. A man asking what he is under arrest for is not someone who is probably going to cause harm to the police officer.

    and if police wanted to search my car for no reason I'd say no because it'd be a waste of my time. I know there is nothing illegal in my car and unless they have good reasons they aren't searching my car
  • bitches be crazy · 7 months ago
    no human being should have the power to do what ever the shit they want...there is such a thing as privacy... so if you agree with what the police did in this case, then do you agree with the C.I.A bugging people's phones just cuz they are a darker shade? if you do your one fucked up bitch
  • kyle · 7 months ago
    he asked for the dog to come back cause it didnt do anything u fucking dumbass
  • Xak · 7 months ago
    Even if he deserved to be arrested, which is yet to be determined, he definately didnt deserve to be tazered, bloodied, and mocked! That is a complete abuse of power and if a person is not physically resisting, they certainly don't deserve to be tazered, or bashed into broken glass. Had he lost an eye, or died, I'm sure you would still be saying that he deserved it.... which he did not.
  • Bill · 7 months ago
    totally agree, i know a bunch of nice cops but all you need is one bad one to give the whole system a bad name.
  • Jenners.is.a.tool · 7 months ago
    ... shutup
  • Nikki · 7 months ago
    I'm just tired of the power tripping assholes themselves.
  • Haley · 7 months ago
    woow fuck the police
    XD
    shit even if they DID need to taser him, one is enough to stop someone two maybe but he said he wasn't moving but to continue is just cruel shit maybe the cops are getting lazy, oh this guy won't get out of his car i wouldn't want to strain myself I just taser him. if i was him I would sue them so fast they wouldn't know what happened shit can't do anything else they're cops and if I hurt them it means more, you know because they're higher forms of humans than I am. ugh.
  • kippers · 7 months ago
    would you rather have no police at all? i dont condone what they did in the SLIGHTEST , but its better than the alternative
  • BRARG · 7 months ago
    Shit's fucked up.
  • Eli · 7 months ago
    "stuff is messed up" by offspring.

    your comment reminded me of that song.
    the video too.
  • Daria · 7 months ago
    Complete excessive force. Abuse of power. It seems as if you are trying to prove you are innocent you get the shit beaten out of you for it. He had no right to arrest him as far as I can tell.
  • homerrulezzzz · 7 months ago
    rodney king? is that you?
  • Braydon Wollmann · 7 months ago
    I hope you sue these fucken retard cops... poorest excuse for cops.... asshole low-lifes on a power trip!
  • Damiza · 7 months ago
    I hope you sue every one of them for everything they got and they all are discharged. You wonder why everyone hates these pricks in uniform they think the can do anything they want just because they have a badge and a gun. They need to get whats coming to then fast and hard!!!!
  • karim300 · 7 months ago
    bro i know thats soo messed up i felt bad when they tazed him...if i was him i would sue all those ppls money and make em live in the streets

    WTF BRO HE WAS A PASTOR U DONT DO THAT TO A PASTOR U FREAKING CUNTS
  • Whoa, Back Up. · 7 months ago
    Did he say "this is Wednesday the 15th, yesterday was the 14th..."?

    As far as I know, today is Wednesday the 14th...and yesterday was Tuesday the 13th....

    Man, he must have got one hell of a taser shot.
    Police power abuse strikes again. Keep us updated on what happens to those scumbag policemen, Phil. This is very interesting.
  • cg · 7 months ago
    today is the 13th dumba**
  • Kylee · 7 months ago
    Ahaha. It's Wednesday the 13th today, hon.

    But anyway, I despair for the future of America. This kind of crap is actually happening, but no one is doing anything about it.
  • paula · 7 months ago
    it was in april.
    and no today is the 13th and yesterday was the 12th
  • Tina · 7 months ago
    Ummmmm... I think that he was talking about April.
  • rune · 7 months ago
    Today's the 13th, yesterday was the 12th. Obviously this isn't from May.
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    I think you got tased too haha.
    Right now it's Wednesday the 13th
    Yesterday was the 12th.
  • required · 7 months ago
    today is wensdays the 13th
    and this happened in april so it was april 14th not this month
  • pmf026 · 7 months ago
    Thursday is 14th, Wednesday was 13th.
  • Lindzey · 7 months ago
    its wednesday the 13th
  • Beaker · 7 months ago
    This could have happened in April...
  • Matt K · 7 months ago
    He's talking about April. Look at the 15th of April, it's a wednesday.
    This obviously didn't JUST happen. And it's not even the 15th of May yet.
  • replay · 7 months ago
    This incident happened last month, its not really news..
  • Football4Life · 7 months ago
    look at the video from the trailer. it says 4-14-09

    it wasn't this month it was last month
  • Jesus · 7 months ago
    Y the fuck does it say near mexican in the tag? he wasn't going to mexico or from. Arizona isn't mexico assholes
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    Because Yuma is a border city, I'm not sure of the miles from the border exactly, but it's one of the closest cities we in AZ have to Mexico.
    He's driving through a border inspection place (for lack of a better term). And that's why it says near mexico, because it's near mexico.
  • Jordan · 7 months ago
    actually he described in the video that he was sent BACK to Uma, the border police were probably in Arizona, and thats what he refered to.
  • A.B. · 7 months ago
    ok to all you people who think the police had the right to search his car think of this,

    A police man pulls you over and asks you to strip down because their dog showed you had drugs or something in your clothes. Would you do it then? The way I see it its the same example of what happened to this man. He refused to be searched like you wouldn't want the police to strip search you when they didn't even had a good enough reason.
    People have rights for a reason!
  • Alesia · 7 months ago
    Cops don't ask people to strip down for a strip search. They pat them down and if the dog still smells someting, then they'll go from there.

    How about you think about this?

    People had stuff up their poop holes all the time, and if dogs smell it, guess what...there WILL be a cavity search.
  • Bobby · 7 months ago
    Lol. People don't have rights anymore. Not really.
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    It's really that mentality that makes stuff like this possible.
    Maybe if this happens to you you'd be a little more serious about it.
  • dustin · 7 months ago
    EXACTLY, the man NEVER granted them permission to search his car which is ILLEGAL without a warant which oh they DIDN'T have !!!
  • Smartbomb · 7 months ago
    The part I really fear most is here in the comments "He should have let them search if he had nothing to hide." I feel the freedom bleeding out of my country as my fellow Americans insist I should give up my freedom. I will always say no, even if I have nothing to hide. I will rather die, then let someone break my constitutional rights. Life just isn't worth living as a slave to the government.
  • 397theniceness9 · 7 months ago
    amen my brother! you tell these assholes about our rights!
  • person · 7 months ago
    i counted probably almost 10 officers all beating, tazering etc. on 1 helpless man screaming and probably crying on the floor.this type of thing can seriously bring you to tears... the brutality and disregard for this mans wellbeing is just horrifying.these are the people who are supposed to be pretecting us and helping us.those officers should at the LEAST be repremanded(i doubt i spelled that right) and i mean at least.
  • Bobby · 7 months ago
    Death penalty for supreme stupididty
  • Kory Davis · 7 months ago
    sure this all could have been avoided by getting out of the fucking car........but this is AMERICA we have rights, and these amendments were not made so that they could just be disobeyed by the "lawfully correct" police officers. how would you feel if that exact thing happened to you? this is a major wake up call....AMERICA'S justice system is fucked up and we are never really going to be truly safe. Sir (pastor) did you sue these dumbasses?...because you definitely deserve to and they dont deserve to be called officers of the law.
  • CommonSenselessVideo · 7 months ago
    gotta love the miranda rights that they are supposed to give you.
  • jojo · 7 months ago
    Miranda is given only to preserve statements you make while 1) in custody, and 2) being interrogated. So, if you're not in custody, doesn't matter if you weren't read your rights, and if you're not being interrogated doesn't matter if you weren't read your rights.

    If you are in custody, being interrogated, and you are not read them, then what you say can't be used against you (generally, but there are some exceptions to that). You have no right to have your rights read to you. It only keeps what comes out of your mouth usable in a court of law.
  • Carly · 7 months ago
    Because they were trying to arrest him, he should have been read his Miranda Rights while being taken into custody, i.e. when he was being taserd. Since that is obviously an inconvenient time though, he should have been immediately read his rights after being thrown on the ground. Because there does not appear to have been any questioning from that time until the time he was finally read his rights, it probably wont hold up in the court. However, once he was initially tasered, it was clearly demonstrated that he was not resisting and therefore they had no reason to continue to taser him. That is just my interpretation of what I have been taught of the law.

    My personal opinion is that the police should have done some kind of profiling and they should have come to see he was not very suspicious looking. Upon seeing that, they should have then answered his questions about his rights. If they had answered his question and shown him libel proof of probable cause, then he most likely would have cooperated. The police used excessive force and all involved in the tasering should have their badges taken away for abuse of power.
  • JB · 7 months ago
    Damn Mexicans!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • mexico party · 7 months ago
    jerk
  • Eagle2814 · 7 months ago
    WTF does Mexicans have 2 do with a guy getting tazered and arested by police?
  • Tone · 7 months ago
    I think he is referring to the hispanic names the officers had. Which is completely ignorant.
  • Viet · 7 months ago
    Wow. This guy is an idiot. Quit stereotyping.
  • yellowxwolf · 7 months ago
    He must have been touching little boys >.> lol
  • Caleb Myers · 7 months ago
    Retard. Being a Pastor myself, I take offense to that. And yes, I called you a retard. Please don't breed and create more stupid.

    I'm human, deal with it.
  • marco · 7 months ago
    i hope he takes them to court
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    After watching his video, I felt completely pissed off that these type of injustices are occurring in the United States. However, if you view his other videos, you'll see that this guy basically goes looking for trouble.

    I think he essentially approaches Border Patrol with a bad, uncooperative, aggressive behavior in an attempt to bate them on into a game of who knows the law better and who is going to fold. Sad on both sides.
  • stever · 7 months ago
    And a video camera.
  • Hayden · 7 months ago
    I was going to say, wow, power trip police officers. But then I realized that he came up to a border patrol booth with a video camera OUT. I'm not sure about you guys, but when I go through border patrol, I don't have my video camera out.
  • Joshafool · 7 months ago
    If that is true why is it bad?

    Police sometimes dress up as prostitutes or drug deals to catch criminals.

    If what you say is true it does not change the fact the officers broke the law, or what should be the law.

    Maybe we should have more people doing this sort of thing. Sort of the "who polices the police" sort of deals.
  • Wow · 7 months ago
    Pastor this is probably against your preachings of forgive and forget, but please sue the living crap out of these SOB's because you most DEFINITELY have a case and that's a true case of police brutality/excessive force or whatever you wanna call it.
  • LoafMasta88 · 7 months ago
    why does this happen is the U.S. he asks? Cause he's a fuckn' retard. If you had nothing, just let them search it for five minuets and let you go rather than waste hours and a beating all over nothing. You didn't see the dog, you don't know how they're trained and what signals they give, you don't have the right to order them to bring the dog back out, and even if you were in the right all you had to do was swallow your pride and get out for a few minuets. Thats it. Same thing happend to me like 2 years ago. The dog hit my car far no reason cause some times they make mistakes, I let them search my car and I went on my way. Took about 20 mn. If I had refused to get out and all like he did, same thing would have happened to me. Common sense.
  • Sandy · 7 months ago
    It's about knowing your rights. I would absolutely never let anyone search me, my car, or my home without a warrant. It is important for you to exercise your 4th ammendment rights. I'm sure that's why they got so mad at him. Because most people don't know their rights, and he does. It's not about doing what's easy, it's the principle of it all. I would never have anything to hide, but I'll be damned if they're going to search me just because they feel like it.
  • jenners · 7 months ago
    Your 4th amendment right is not applicable if there is reason to believe that they have a reason to search. If a cop came to your front door and smelled marijuana or saw a bunch of lines on a mirror they can, and will, search you without any need for a warrant.
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    Actually you're wrong.
    There was a supreme court case that basically said "You need a warrant to search a house" No exceptions.

    A car is different, if they smell it or see it they have a right to search, and if you refuse you are now resisting arrest, which is why once they said the dog found something, which it didn't, he should have got out of the car and taken the video to a lawyer and sued the hell out of them. I'm kind of sad he didn't because he might have thrown that chance out of the window.
  • Jenners.is.a.tool · 7 months ago
    ^^reply Jenners^^ --Jenners, up your vagina with a rusty hammer you tool.
  • Thomas N · 7 months ago
    And at that point, they are trespassing and I think you have the right to shoot even a cop that breaks into your house.
    They were lucky they had a pastor and not a liberty extremist on their hands.
  • Maxorz · 7 months ago
    If he actually did have drugs or a dead body on the back of his car, what do you think the police shouldn't done? That's what the border patrol is about, they are supposed to check everything that goes through. Policemen are allowed to check your cars whenever you are entering a country or a state. It'd be like going on an airplane without having your luggage checked. If not, how are they supposed to stop drug and weapon trafficking?

    And what they did after breaking the window, is pretty much "asshole behavior", but I don't think it's illegal due to the fact that he resisted arrest, and as far as they are concerned he could have a bomb trigger on his pocket.
  • Viet · 7 months ago
    No, they can't even if they saw it. They would have to ask permission from an occupant of the home first and if denied, they would have to come back with a search warrant. If not, then the search and evidence is completely false.
  • Stormhame · 7 months ago
    You are wrong. If a cop comes to your front door and smells mary jane, he cannot search your home. He has to go to the judge and present probable cause to get a warrant to search your home. Take a government class. Cops can't just do anything.

    Now, with a car, its different. If they find probable cause they can go ahead and search your car without a warrant. While I think that the guy should have just got out of the car, the cops went way too fucking far and I hope they get their asses kicked.
  • Robby · 7 months ago
    You're getting some fucked up information if you believe that bullshit.

    A cop can't just go into your house for smelling marijuana.

    Look it up.

    In NO case does your 4th amendment become "un-applicable".
  • RKDN · 7 months ago
    Hey look ma!

    Another idiot.
  • mikefromamsterdam · 7 months ago
    I totally agree with you, don't make it to hard on yourself. That the police did was right, maybe a little to hard but if you look suspicious action needs to be taken
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    I have rights just as all you have rights, And I'm not going to let those go just because it's easier, and the people who do are the reason some cops think they have ultimate power over us!
  • Redsight88 · 7 months ago
    Getting out would've solved the problem only if the cops were reasonable, which they weren't.
  • Nick · 7 months ago
    Contact the Border Patrol and Arizona Department of Public Safety and let them know what they did to this guy or any person is NOT okay.

    http://www.azdps.gov/

    http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/border_security/bord...
  • TheStig · 7 months ago
    That is why ya have to shoot the police first
    and deal wid every thing else later lol
  • William · 7 months ago
    Shoot the police first?!?!?! are you stupid? first of all if the guy dies it is murder and you will be known as a cop killer. If he doesn't die then you will be charged with attempted murder along with felonious assault (depending on the state laws). I know that you have a right to say quite a bit in the united states that is protected. But one thing that you should not do is piss off those whose job is to protect and serve you. The Highway officer was doing what he felt was right because he was told that the man in the car had some kind of contraband in the vehicle. From that point on you MUST listen to orders and do what is told of you. He is an officer of the law and is given the right to force you out of the car if you are being uncooperative...listen to the police at all times.

    If he was wrong in taking you out of the car then go to court and see what you can do. But until then the law tells you to listen to the officer. DO IT!
  • Dane · 7 months ago
    Fuck, im glad i dont live in the US o.O

    This would never happen in Denmark,
    and even if it did, the damage done to the poor guy wouldent be half as bad, and there wouldent be people sticking up for the violent retarded cops.

    Its funny that i just saw Bowling for Columbine today.... Was wondering if America really is a country in fear. Apparently it is. They wouldent have beat this guy up if they werent afraid of him, and some guy in a car refusing to get out isnt fucking scary to me.....
  • Catherine · 7 months ago
    They just want power. If you stand up for your rights, that means the cops have less power, which is pretty fuckin' scary when your a power-hungry pig. But at least there are good cops here, too (But these guys sure as hell aren't among them).
  • Darcy · 7 months ago
    Just clearing up some misconceptions:

    1) Police may search your car without a warrant. They cannot do so without demonstrateable reasonable expectation of evidence of a crime being present. A positive K9 inspection is acceptable.

    2) The pastor has the right to observe the police. This means he has the right to videotape, and he also has the right to witness a K9 inspection before the police may search his vehicle.

    3) The police may detain the pastor for up to 72 hours in most states, without arrest. However, if the police office states his intent to arrest vs. detain, than the pastor has the right to know what he is being arrested for. The cop must announce a specific criminal offence as defined by the state's criminal code.

    4) The pastor has no right to resist arrest, even arrest he feels is unlawful. In this situation, once the police chose to declare their intention to arrest, the pastor has the legal obligation to comply. His proper response to such an unlawful arrest is not to refuse it, but to bring it to the courts formal attention. This can be done by a complaint with the police department, state department or court system, and/or through the placing of criminal charges and/or civil lawsuit. Of course, always speak with your lawyer.
  • treppab · 7 months ago
    I am so glad somebody knows what they are talking about.

    while the pastor thought they were wrong in asking him to step out of the car, if he had nothing to hide, then why didn't he just get out of the car and let them search it.

    If you start the show the cops a little resistance then they are going to get pissed off and get angry and force will be used, but if you are nice to them and let them do their job (which we all don't agree with and power is an issue) then things will go a lot smoother.

    was force used - yes, but the pastor also should not have let it get to that point. He is making it seem to the officers that he has something to hide.
  • chuck · 7 months ago
    I totally agree with you!
  • Conscript · 7 months ago
    thank you that helps alot and haha he was lucky he had a camera , i never heard anyone scream like that being tazed before
  • stever · 7 months ago
    Thank you.
  • Hellohithere · 7 months ago
    I truly appreciate an informed response for once in an Internet argument, but don't #3 and #4 conflict a bit?
  • Someone else · 7 months ago
    Kinda funny that he's all like " Wake up America!".. If he was black he would have been tased, maced and shoot.. Then they would have planted crack on him

    Anyhow its wrong and i hope those cops gets anally raped in prison!
  • Thomas N · 7 months ago
    Not just if he was black. They prolly just didn't have any crack at the time. My dad and uncle have both had shit planted on them. We're white.
  • anon · 7 months ago
    Fucking spic ass cops fuck these gay fucking cops
  • shells22 · 7 months ago
    This is ridiculous. It doesn't matter if he was a pastor or not the police shouldn't have tasered him as much as they they. But I think if you had nothing to hide you should have let them search your car. It makes you look suspicious...
  • Bobby · 7 months ago
    He shouldn't have to.
  • l0ms · 7 months ago
    Yes he should, have you forgotten the last time we got lenient at these check points?

    O right 2,974 people died on 9-11.
  • Viet · 7 months ago
    9-11 is nothing the same. The terrorists on those planes had nothing really suspicious on them which gave airport security no reason to suspect anything unusual. It was the fact that the terrorists used household supplies and common items which misled the airport security. This is, essentially, police brutality no matter who the person is. They should've brought back the K9 when he asked them too if they had nothing to hide.
  • mark · 7 months ago
    if you trade your freedom for life you deserve neither
  • Jay · 7 months ago
    everyone here arguing that the pastor got what he deserved is suffering from the Just-World hypothesis, which is when people think that bad things happen to bad people to justify that they themselves wont suffer a similar fate.

    it's the same thing as when people blame rape victims.
  • kepin · 7 months ago
    i smell a lawsuit
  • randy · 7 months ago
    There are two points here:

    1) If he did nothing wrong, and the police officers and boder patrol truly had no probably cause to arrest him, he has the right to leave.

    2) If they DID have probable cause, they should have stopped after one taser, and handcuffing on the ground. Even then, i don't see the reason for using a taser. Just because it's "non-lethal" doesn't make it your toy to use on people whenever you want. And there have been deaths connected to cops tazering people, so its not 100% safe. What if the guy has a heart condition? You'd feel pretty fucking dumb after finding he was innocent, AND a pastor.

    I'm surprised there hasn't been some crazy guy going around taking revenge on these idiots for abuse. The suspensions, fines, firings, aren't enough. Take the cop in a back alley and taze his ass 4 times, step on his head with your boots, and ground his face into broken glass. Then maybe break a bone or two, leave him with a souvinear.

    Randy
  • rufio · 7 months ago
    Couldn't agree more.
  • Rickards · 7 months ago
    man you read everything out of my mind, except.... i would do more than torture the cop in the alley. i would get black guys to sodomize him
  • alexis Marrero · 7 months ago
    gods bffl was wrong for being so persistent, he shouldve gotten out of the car. so shiz, police can do whatever they want unfortunately. they abused their power
  • balla · 7 months ago
    what a pussy move the guy that got tazed wasnt even looking.
  • Alesia · 7 months ago
    Alright, my dad's a cop, and yes, I know some cops can abuse their power, but I believe the pastor put himself in that position.

    As we all saw and heard in the video the cop asked him to exit his car due to the dog alerting them for whatever reason. Those who have nothing to hide, and those who are not thinking they are above the law, would have gotten out of the car to prove the cops wrong.

    Dogs (regardless of what they are trained to sniff out) can make mistakes (although very rarely due to their training). He was told the dog smelt something, and with the drug issues in Mexico the border control are cracking down on drugs (and always have).

    All of that could have been prevent if he got out of his car. And becaue he was being beligerent with the cops and not doing as asked, they had every authority to tazer him. When it comes to uncooperative suspects and in situations as his, it's taze first, read him his rights later (regardless of location).

    I personally believe he was putting the border control to the test. It was almost like he was testing them to see how serious they truly are.

    I have no sympathy for him.

    As for the cop who was speaking to him, yeah...the cop should have chosen better words to get the man to listen, but he did nothing out of regulations. And because we did not see inside the car as the pulled him out, we do not know if he is fabricating them beating him or if, when drug from the car, he cut his forehead on the glass that would have been on his seat and floor.
  • Alesia · 7 months ago
    Oh, and let me add, the cops didn't need a warrant to search his car because there was probable cause.

    Come on people, think about it! I'm sure everyone has watched an episode of COPS before. When have cops EVER needed a warrant to search cars in the US during ANY pull over? If they smell something on the people breath, they tell them to get out and they search the car.

    In this case, they dog smelt something. Which means they had probable cause.

    Stop blaming the cops for the stupidity of this man. I still say he was testing the system. I have no sympathy for someone who is asking for consequences.
  • rufio · 7 months ago
    I am sorry but I'm afraid laws don't excuse those mother effers to do what they did.
    We're not saying your father is the same as these guys.
    We're just saying this is total BS.
    How power can't put people's head over the sky.
  • robin · 7 months ago
    we have a saying

    ACAB

    All Cops Are BASTARDS

    video proof above
  • Richard Mouat · 7 months ago
    If that had fucking happened to them I would hold the tiger on them, AND HOPE THE GO TO HELL, they have no right to do this it is time for Obama to get his ass up and get rid of the fuck dam things it has killed over 10 people this year...
  • f**kthepolice · 7 months ago
    Ya this is totally bull. They are totally abusing power and I would sue them so badly.
  • Noelle · 7 months ago
    jesus.
    this is wrong on so many levels.
    i don't think he was being an ass, i think he was trying to reinforce his rights.
    they couldn't even give him a reason why they were arresting him.
    i hope they felt EXTREMELY stupid when they found nothing in his car.
  • isaaaac · 7 months ago
    fuck the cops
  • iampapasmerf · 7 months ago
    cops are tools
  • Jerry · 7 months ago
    OMG you seriously do not fuck around with the Arizona Dept of Public Safety, those goons are all on a complete power trip. He should have know this since he lives in Phoenix, plus driving on Highway 8 that is know for drug trafficking and other illegal actives. I know it's an inconvenience but I'd do what the officers want just to get my ass home without trouble.
  • Mal · 7 months ago
    I think the Pastor is just standing up for his own beliefs and for his rights. If he knows the police have no warrant to search his car, then he's going to tell them they can't. He's obviously stubborn, but does that make him a bad person? The man just wanted the police to know they can't do that, and that he won't obey their commands, because he doesn't have to. So the police got angry that this person was refusing to be arrested for nothing.
    The police officer gave no specific reason to place him under arrest, and then ended up saying "I'm an officer you have to obey me." "I'm placing you under arrest for resisting arrest." (Being arrested for resisting arrest for what though?)

    Now I see that because the pastor was stubborn and refused to let them search his car, that would spark suspicion and all, but to taser him as much as they did? It kind of reminds me of that situation in Vancouver airport where the man died because the police did not handle the situation correctly (from what I heard anyways.) Then to proceed to assault (with another taser) and push his head into the ground with glass on it. THEN to go and mock him? Who knows what the police said, but I am so far on the pastor's side. Having been through a similar event myself, except i was labeled a criminal for BEING assaulted out of no where since I was 18 (being a teenager was good enough reason for them to not take me seriously), I can see how frustrated, angry and hurt he is. He probably is in a state of shock over it. To have been violated like that takes time to sink in, in some cases.

    Excessive force, abuse of power. The pastor was stubborn, and confrontational of the police officer's motives. It's difficult to say what'll happen, because there is only one victim, and will the police officers bull shit their statements to make them all pile up against him? I'd hate for that situation to turn from bad to horrible.

    We are too obsessed with power, we are too greedy once we have it.

    OR.. perhaps it's all one big misunderstanding and they will go out for a beer and be merry.
  • Matt · 7 months ago
    Man, that was some bitch ass screaming. lol
  • Cessana · 7 months ago
    How about we taze you on video? You'd probably scream like a little bitch with a skinned knee.
  • Swampler · 7 months ago
    Both sides are at fault here. The only thing he had to do was let them do a search and he would be on his way and he wouldn't have been beaten, that's where the police are at fault.
  • CornellLawStudent · 7 months ago
    Ok I'm a law student at Cornell University and here's the low-down on what happened.

    1) Refusing to answer questions (we're talking about the ones they initially asked such as what are you doing etc. etc.) gives them probable cause. Just because you refuse, does not mean that they can let you through. That makes them suspicious and gave them the right to bring in the dog.

    2) Dogs do not need to make a noise when they find something. They often will mark the drugs by pawing at the spot where they are hidden. If there was nothing illegal and they did lie, then they acted wrong

    3) Resisting Arrest is a crime you can be charged with and arrested for. They did have the right to taze you THE FIRST TIME. The beating and glass in your head and additional tazes were not called for because you ceased to resist.

    Tally : Pastor 1 Cops 1

    4) Mocking you was not called for though they will get away with that.

    5) You were obviously in a poor state medically and should not have been slowed in the process of receiving medical care.

    Tally: Pastor 2 Cops 1

    Summary: You will be most likely be found guilty of resisting arrest. Your lawyer may be able to determine that the original charge was false but that may be hard. Sue as soon as you have the chance for damages against the police department because they did act wrong.
  • jay · 7 months ago
    he should have just gotten out of the car and just spend 10 or 20 minuites talking to the police if he didnt have anything. but the tazing was not called for.
  • Luke · 7 months ago
    If that had happened here in the UK there would have been hell to pay for the cops. It is the right of every free citizen to deny the police unless they have probable cause, which in this case, if we believe the pastor, they did not. Unfortunately for him the videos do not prove this. It makes me sick that some cops are such power abusing assholes, I hope they all get the shit kicked out of them until they scream and whine some day so they know what it feels like.
  • mitch · 7 months ago
    WHAT THE HELL?!?!? i've studied the bill of rights, and he had his every right to do what he did.
  • josh · 7 months ago
    Well he should of just complied if he had nothing to hide? he brought this on his self. NO the cops should of explained better but still....
  • Silvey · 7 months ago
    It would've been better for Pastor Man to just get out of the car when he was first asked to rather than refusing, no matter what the situation. If you have nothing to hide, get out of the car and let the police inspect it. Once they believe that they have 'probable cause', your resisting only makes matters worse.

    That said, and while I believe both parties were in the wrong, those police officers had absolutely no reason to taser the Pastor more than once, if at all. He obviously had no weapon, he wasn't trying to hurt anyone, and the police just used excessive force. You also don't grind an unarmed person's face into broken glass, OR try to crush their head into asphalt while they're being cuffed.

    While Pastor Man should've shut the hell up and just gotten out of the car, the police abused their power, and made a routine stop into a nightmare for this man.
  • MisanthropicFlame · 7 months ago
    Why? It happens because cops love to abuse their powers, doesn't matter what country you live in they love power and they don't care how they use it. People should just revolt against cops and show them what abuse of power feels like.
  • Tyler · 7 months ago
    why didn't he just show them there was nothing there? whoopdeefucking do they may have had no right to search him, but i'd just let them look, i don't have anything to hide...
    were the police wrong, yes, was he wrong, yes
    none of this would have happened if he had just opened his trunk and said "look, there are my clothes, no drugs"
  • Out of the USA · 7 months ago
    i come from new zealand and we have no official rights such as the constitution BUT if he cops did that here not only would they loose there jobs they would have 2 pay for health care damages and make an formal apology
  • Matt · 7 months ago
    Well, I am pretty sure the guy is retarded...
    People just need to comply to people who are hired to protect the safety of others. So I feel like they had probable cause.
    But, for getting tased. I think it's funny!!! That's what he gets for refusing to cooperate and get it over with. D-Bag = yes.
  • Jeff Holmes · 7 months ago
    This Pastor does not have the right to refuse to disobey the police in this situation. They told him a police dog alerted at his car. This is what is known in legal terms as probable cause this gives the police the right to conduct a lawful search of the car. Therefore the 'Pastor' was obstructing justice or at the very least interfering with the police in the performance of their lawful duty. If I was paying correct attention he was at some kind of border crossing and there are signs everywhere at most border crossings stating that random searches are authorized.

    The police were just doing their jobs and the Pastor should have known better than to let it go that far. If I didn't think that anyone could be that stupid, I would say he did it just to see what the reaction would be and possibly get his 15 minutes of fame.
  • Sammy · 7 months ago
    I watched the video of the incident and him explaining.

    What happen off camera I can't really say anything about because he can just be making stuff up... But from what I saw from the incident wouldn't have it been easier for him to just have come out of the car? I think they would have just asked a couple questions searched the car and found nothing and let him on his way.

    I would have liked to see what happened in the very beginning.
  • scott · 7 months ago
    lol 1:08 the door appears to be unlocked.
  • Daniel · 7 months ago
    If you look at his other vid there all disobeying cops with some stupid sermens he deserved it.
  • Supernewman · 7 months ago
    You do realize all of you commenting are either arguing on the two points of; The Pastor is mostly to blame because he could have made it easier if he just didn't exercise his RIGHTS, or The Cops were mostly to blame because they acted outside of their authority with excessive force.

    Everyone has a right to be an asshole, and frankly the guy has an explanation video up the next day, obviously he wasn't charged with anything, meaning they didn't find anything. Taser's aren't meant to be used in that situation, he was highly outnumbered and the officers had an advantage on him, regardless if he had any weapon.

    Frankly it doesn't matter who he is, there have been a number of people who have died from Taser's, in Canada there was one recently that I remember. And he had a lot of media coverage, so it doesn't change things that he's a pastor. If he was there over an hour, why didn't they acquire, or at least try to acquire, a warrant? If they think they had a right to arrest him, shouldn't they be able to get a warrant?

    Legally he did nothing wrong and the cops are completely to blame, also he wasn't belligerent. Belligerent means he's warlike or aggresively hostile.
  • Jeff · 7 months ago
    How dare this guy actually ask the cop to tell him what law he was breaking? Doesn’t he know the cops can do what they want because they want? I mean WTF does guy think is in the USA? P.S. If you get your ass kicked for using your right, then you don’t really have them !!
  • Jesus · 7 months ago
    The guy is stupid he could've just gotten out of his car let them search find nothing there and he could be on his way. But noooo he has to be a little bitch. This video doesn't exactly helps religion's image.
  • ihavenoidea · 7 months ago
    Well, from what's shown I would say the force is excessive, but if you go look at some of his other videos he's getting in an awful lot of similar situations. I think he was trying to start something by being belligerent, and got more than he wanted/deserved. I don't know what the regulations are at these checkpoints, but I kinda get the point he's trying to make in one of his other videos when he asks what he's under suspicion for and the cop says he has no idea. I started off sympathetic for the pastor, but I see why the police were suspicious too. Don't know why the fuck they'd rough him up that bad though.
  • wooday · 7 months ago
    what i find funny is normal people have worse consequences, i mean this guy clearly did nothing wrong but because that retard thought he did he gets tasered.. and also if a person punches someone else they probably get a night in a cell and a slap on the wrist, punch a police officer and its a whole other crime, since when were they kings of the planet?
  • Funk_Masta_T · 7 months ago
    The pastor was completely in the right. The police were abusing authority given to them. Granted, if he had nothing to hide, it wouldn't have mattered if he got out of the car, but it was his right not to, and also his right to tell the cops to go shove it.
  • matt · 7 months ago
    what the fuck is this these arent even cops there just power trips i hope you sue them sooo bad
  • Vanessa · 7 months ago
    What the hell is America [or whatever this took place ]coming too!!!! I think the government should question their own law enforcement, They are human also, and take adventage of a lot of things.... This is stupid, and I believe the guy should sue. This is unreal. It's sad. And fucked up beyond anything else. They found a reason to arrest him after he didn't want to get out of his car. Wow.....life now a days...it's stupid. and it sucks.
  • Wes · 7 months ago
    i would sue them for all i could!
  • dj · 7 months ago
    I hate to say it, but this guy is retarded.....The police dont need to bring the dogs out again...just listen the first time....if you have nothing to hide, then you are back on the road in no time....instead hes got to be a problem
  • You've been · 7 months ago
    Abused.
  • Effyness · 7 months ago
    Okay, this is obviously a two-sided issue.

    Firstly, I'd like to mention that the police DID use excessive force. I do believe that they had no need to taser him. The rest of his story has yet to be proved, but if it does turn out to be proved, then the police were also wrong in hurting him even more.

    Secondly, there's the issue of whether or not he deserved it. Well, this in itself is a stupid question. Whether or not he deserved it, if we could all go around shoving tasers at people who we thought deserved it, this country would be more chaotic than it already is. No, the real issue is: could he have avoided this by simply complying with the police?

    Some people say that "if you are so willing to give up your rights, then maybe you don't deserve to have them". Oh please. This strikes me as incredibly naive. Think about it: surely there has been a time in your life where a teacher or another authority figure has asked you to do something. You say no and argue that you have the right not to, but in the end, you simply end up in more trouble.

    Do you get my point? Surely, a police officer is different from a teacher. But think about this from the officer's point of view: this guy might have something suspicious on him, and he refuses to let you search his car. Obviously, you would think something's up. Of course, in the end, there was nothing to be found. But the police have to operate as if every scenario were a worst-case scenario, for our safety. It's like someone said before, would you feel very safe if airport security let someone onto your plane who wouldn't let their bags be inspected?

    In the end, it doesn't come down to all the technical mumbo jumbo involving rights and rules and yada yada yada. It comes down to COMMON SENSE.
  • Joe · 7 months ago
    you know, I dont know much about cops authority and all that stuff, but I think cops dont do their job very good, I got a ticket the other day, for changing lanes.... like seriously? like, the closest car behind me was about 6 car lengths away and the ones in front were about 5, and that was throughout all 4 lanes, so Im on the far left, trying to get to my exit, which is 2 miles away, so i turn on my blinker, and within like 1/2 a mile i go all the way to the right lane, the cop turns on his syren about 1 mile away from my exit, and says, i was changing lanes very aggressively, on the ticket, it says, "changing lanes while unsafe" and there was nothign else, he didnt put my speed on there, or anything, and I never really do anything bad, like some of these jackasses who think that the far left lane is for going 10 miles over the speed limit, and i dont see them getting pulled over... shesh, if i was the pastor, i would sew the piss outta them
  • Kev · 7 months ago
    Jason, seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? This guy followed HIS RIGHTS which govern what he or cannot do in America, and he was Tasered for it.
    Sure he was being a prick, but the cops could see his hands, he wasn't acting in an aggressive but overly defensive manner.
    Shut the fuck up when you say this is fine.

    No fucking way is this allowed.
  • Cessana · 7 months ago
    Thank you. There's a huge difference between resisting and questioning.
  • chuck · 7 months ago
    Why was this guy an ass? He brought this problem on himself. He was crossing a border. If he would have just opened his trunk to show he has nothing to hide he wouldn't of had this problem. Maybe the dumb ass will learn something from this..
  • hogy · 7 months ago
    why was he so resistant in the first place? sounds to me like he was being a fuckin sap in first. he was so stubborn that he sat in his car for an hour until he got himself beaten up pretty bad.
    granted, its was quite an overreaction by the police, but by the sounds of it thats all they did wrong.
  • M · 7 months ago
    WATCH HIS OTHER VIDEOS. hes asking for trouble, deserves what he got. The police definitely reacted over the top with excessive force, but c'mon - the guys a douchebag and that would never have happened to anyone else.
  • zenshino · 7 months ago
    i think this is wrong police are getting rediculous like some people don't do shit and they use the same things over i can't pick five cases of arest where they say he was resisting arest when the person asked simple questions i bet anyone $5 american or canadian that this is in there training guide...


    if a fagget ask you a question pepper spray or taser his ass!
  • Yamonie · 7 months ago
    Fuck ze poe poe!
  • patty · 7 months ago
    well not that im siding with the police, because im not at all .. But why didnt you just let them search you? If there was only tools in there why didnt you just let them see that? When you say no they are going to be suspicious :P
  • 3L6U5AN0 · 7 months ago
    There was no abuse of power. He does not have the right to refuse compliance when a police officer says you are under arrest. He did just that, and that is why the police officers used the force that they did to gain control of the situation. If he believes his rights have been violated, he can take it up in court later.

    If a police officer comes around a corner of a building and points a gun at you and says "put your hands up, you're under arrest", you do not have the right to refuse to his commands, even if you just happened to be walking by and know for a fact you have done nothing wrong.

    These secondary border patrol checkpoints were put there to deter the illegal trafficking of drugs and illegal aliens into this country that get past the primary checkpoints. Not everything gets caught at the primary checkpoints, the evidence being all the illegal aliens and illegal drugs in this country that do come from most of latin america.
  • 3L6U5AN0 · 7 months ago
    One other thing that people don't know from this person. Baptist Pastor Steven L. Anderson is out to make a name for himself. This is not his first time run in with the law, he has quite a few videos of him confronting, not just the border patrol, but police officers in other circumstances.


    Don't take my word for it, go look at the videos yourself, his username on youtube is sanderson1611

    The videos I recommend you seeing are the following,

    "Abusive Border Patrol Agents w/ Nun Chucks at NM Checkpoint"

    "Policeman with a Machine Gun harasses US Citizens at PHX airport"

    "Another Cop Harrasses me for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON *Minnesota"

    "The Coming American Police State"

    You should also see some of his sermons on the same channel to understand where this pastor is coming from.


    He has a big problem with authority and you can see this in his videos and how he talks to the law enforcement.

    In one of his videos he walks up to a cop at night shining his light at him and refuses to stop shining his light at the cops face.

    Now I ask any of you, who in their right mind thinks any citizen can do that to a police officer?



    GO CHECK OUT HIS OTHER VIDEOS BEFORE YOU PASS JUDGEMENT OVER THIS VIDEO!!
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    Wow, I had no idea.
    I went and looked at them, and now this just seems sad.
    However most of the cops are just as wrong as he is, they get angry and make rash decisions. He intentionally argues with them until they snap.. This guy must be brain damaged.
  • Skyu · 7 months ago
    hold on a second. FIRST off he had NO weapons or any sort of defense he was just ONE guy asking WHY he was being searched. He even asked them to bring the dog out and tried to prove him wrong instead "I'm a cop you have to obey me." It's like some random older guy talks to your daughter and says come with me because I'm older than you. Would you let him take your daughter? I didn't think so.

    Even if he does have a problem with authority I don't think you deserve the punishment he got. Flashlight in your face? What will that do? Beating your ass till your face was covered in blood could have caused some sort of head trauma.

    For fuck's sake he didn't even need to be tazered! Break the window, unlock the car door and get him out as if he would stop that...there was like 10 of them.

    Seriously he did NOTHING wrong, he asked the right questions and didn't get his answers.
  • Antony neal · 7 months ago
    What a load of shit. So your basically saying cops have a the right to tell you do what ever they want? Maybe they do legally, i don’t know I am not a lawyer with training in the USA. But if you think that there behaviour was ethically acceptable your mind is fucked. From the story it looked like the cops didn’t like that he wasn’t letting them fuck with him so they decided to torture him for a bit for fun. But even if they had a good reason to believe he was breaking the law there was no reason they had to tazer him 3+ times or fuck up his head like that. They could have just dragged him out of the car there where like 5 of them or if they where worried about him stabbing them or some thing a single tazer would have been enough to incapacitate him.
  • Supernewman · 7 months ago
    It is an abuse of power because of the force they used to "gain control of the situation." Cops are trained to only use tasers as a less lethal alternative to guns, even in Canada RCMP officers are pepper spayed during training, so they understand it's power so they don't just go around spraying people. And I'm pretty sure the same usually goes for tasers.

    They are trained in far more things then the weapons they carry, and when it comes down to it, tasers haven't been positively portrayed in the media lately, so it's just a stupid move for the cops to make. We live in a digital age where all information spreads like wildfire, and they use a weapon under-fire across the world, that the UN Committee Against Torture even declared the use of as an act of torture that can lead to death.

    The officers were wrong to do what they did, it was more or less arbitrary arrest and detention which is protected against. People think cops have WAY more power then they really do.
  • Zippyking · 7 months ago
    The only thing you forget is that if a cop did in fact walk up to you and said you're under arrest, you have the right to ask for what.
    And if they don't tell you, you can file a complaint against the police officer.
    But you should never argue after a police officer declares his intent to arrest, otherwise you are potentially resisting.
  • patty · 7 months ago
    sorry, i didnt mean to make a happy face, i mean to make a sad face.

    my bad.
  • tyler · 7 months ago
    fuck cops they are all fucking assholes
  • rufio · 7 months ago
    FUCK THOSE COPS.
    I HOPE THEY BURN IN HELL.
    What the fuck is wrong with people, to get to the point of doing this kind of shit?!...
    I really hope they die in BIG pain and slowly.
    Excuse my bad english, I'm brazilian.
  • Tribble · 7 months ago
    For all you wondering why europe thinks badly about the US, there it is... nothing bad with america, but stuff like that, well it's pretty f'd
  • pedro · 7 months ago
    I agree that there was excessive force. But why did he refuse to answer any of the police officer's questions? Was he trying to hide something? This was before they asked to search his car. If he had simply answered the questions they probably would have let him move along without having to get the dog, asked to search his car, and taser him. Of course it was outrageous what the cops did, but seriously, answer the questions (if they are reasonable, he never specified that) and get on with your life.
  • Steve Gagnon · 7 months ago
    I am afraid that everybody should seriously consider knowing its rights... since the patriotic act and all of the other new tactics and laws that invade someone's privacy or prohibits ones' freedom and liberties I feel as though America is falling into a trap of world governement. People have to wake up, this trouble asn't just started, it's been going on for a while I'm afraid. There is too many things going on to justify one's loss or continuous reduction of privacy.
    Looks like an agenda is being followed and it's scary.
    YES, America should and has to wake up.
    The idea is be aware and blow the whistle when necessary, it will all lead to a better life for everyone.
  • foxy · 7 months ago
    anyone hear what came of it, far as i can figure that was a month ago. (im not used to the american date, to me it looks like the 4ty day of the fourteenth month???)
  • Matt · 7 months ago
    I was pulled over by a power tripping cop, and then told them I was calling the police. Then called the police the police that pulled me over was arrested and sued.
  • xDJx · 7 months ago
    this is such bullshit i hate stupid power obsessive hick ass cops like that. Its completely ridiculous that this can happen in our country. i hope they're all arrested and sodomized in jail.
  • nicole · 7 months ago
    There are seriously too many cop stories I'm hearing about. After all of this, I'm really not trusting the police anymore. Not just this story, but tons of other ones. It's really getting ridiculous. I'm on the Pastor's side on this. Sure he could have answered the question, but the cops didn't need to be douchebags. That's really messed up.
  • nicole · 7 months ago
    And also, I think those cops were a little too overpowered. The only reason you should taser (dunno what to use, i know that sounds stupid) someone is if they have a weapon or there's more than 2 people involved. I could understand that.
  • l0ms · 7 months ago
    It's too hard to tell what was really going on, the view is too far away.
  • matt · 7 months ago
    hey remeber the 8th amendment "no cruel or unusaul punishment
  • nicole · 7 months ago
    definitely excessive force. that is just awful.
  • taylor · 7 months ago
    these cops were power trippin douchebags no doubt, even if the guy had nothing to hide, its the principle of being forcibly searched for no reason, and for having done nothing wrong that makes his decision right in my mind
  • Valerie · 7 months ago
    If he was at a checkpoint and the dog alerted he can't just drive away, as it appears on the video. That is federal property and the Border Patrol Agents are government employees.

    He refused to get out of the car after the dog alerted. The Border Patrol at that point has every reason to then even strip down the car. The guy should have gotten out of his car and just listened to the police officer. They had every right to taser him. He wouldn't get out of the car and they didn't know if he had any weapons in there.

    Even if he said I don't have any weapons, they are suppose to just believe him? Yeah, I think not. They had every right to protect themselves and take measures to make sure everyone else stayed safe.

    The only reason this is big news is because this guy is a Pastor, if it was any other person it wouldn't be a big deal.
  • Martini · 7 months ago
    I love how the cop said that he should get out because he's "a cop that's ordering him to get out".

    I just wish the pastor could have been like "Well, I'm a messenger from God and he's ordering you to leave me alone."
  • Iseph2000 · 7 months ago
    It just amazes me how society is being demoralized...
  • Jeph · 7 months ago
    ummm...why did he have a camera on him, and recording when he was getting pulled over?

    Is it standard protocol for Baptist Pastors to carry video cameras around with them??
  • kevin · 7 months ago
    they would fuck up ur car if they search specially at borders
  • MasterYoda · 7 months ago
    I'd have to see the other side of the story before i can make a decision. The only stories i've seen mention the pastors side, and not the police side.
  • pmf026 · 7 months ago
    Fuck cops! They're all the same.
  • BC · 7 months ago
    I think the police are right. They did ask him to step out and he did mention why. I am more curious why the guy in the car was filming this.

    By the way, what is the song played in the second half of the video?
  • Brett · 7 months ago
    FUCK THE PIGS
  • TALENT · 7 months ago
    if he didnt have anything on him or in his car he should of just let them search it, but it was a disgrace how they treated him
  • G · 7 months ago
    well he's a douchebag for not letting them search his car cuz apparently "didn't have anything in his car" but they cops did excessively beat him i do agree with that
  • Kennyboy! · 7 months ago
    they looked in his car later after beating him and found..... nothing!

    "Guess hes not a terrorist! Oink Oink Oink!"
  • oompa · 7 months ago
    refusal to search without a warrent is a right you have dumbass!!
  • matt · 7 months ago
    He was COMPLETELY WITHIN HIS RIGHTS. What the police did was actually illegal, since they did not bring out the dogs. They didn't have reason to suspect him of anything, and without the dogs, they had no reason to do anything to him. If I was taking a long trip, I wouldn't go through all the searching and stuff either. That was completely unnecessary.
  • Moose · 7 months ago
    everyone has the right to not have their property searched, though. it doesn't matter what the circumstances were.
  • chris · 7 months ago
    how is he a duchebag...he has the right to not let them search his car.
  • mango · 7 months ago
    He has the right to refuse a search of his private property.

    If they had a warrant he would be a douchebag for resisting, he did nothing other than assert his rights as an American citizen.

    The fact that they found nothing proves the comment about the dog is bullshit, hell they can make the dog alert on cue, regardless of whether it picks up a scent or not.

    I'm shocked at all the people here who say he should have just complied. He had no legal obligation to comply.
  • angr · 7 months ago
    NO!!! NO FUCKING WAY!!! You had better stow that bullshit immediately. It is people who believe that way who are giving these motherfuckers the power that they want so badly. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO SUBMIT TO SEARCHES OF YOUR HOME, YOUR VEHICLE, OR YOUR PERSON UNLESS THERE IS A WARRANT INVOLVED OR THE POLICEMAN CAN CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE CAUSE TO DO SO! Damn.
  • mango · 7 months ago
    ^^^ This.
  • Grimwell · 7 months ago
    The just cause was the dog indicating on his car... get a clue. When a police officer asks you repeatedly to get out of the car.. just get out of the car.. damn.. get a clue
  • Brad · 7 months ago
    probable cause is required for entering/searching a vertical/home such as if drugs are detected in your car or a person running from the cops enters a house. A judge can overturn evidence at a later date if the probable cause is weak .

    Probable cause is needed for a warrant just a warrant is more for a criminal investigation(as in they can destroy walls/wire taps) probable cause is for on the spot things like traffic stops were they cant take your car apart piece by piece but they can break windows and stuff if there a suspect inside.
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    And a dog wagging it's tail isn't cause to do so!
  • Paul · 7 months ago
    G.. your the douche bag. Maybe you need to go back to Russia where they do this shit regularly! We have a Bill of Rights and a Constitution that protects us from this shit! But I must say, this is what Bin Laden has turned us into, this is your tax dollars hard at work at the wonderful "Home Land Security"! He was right, he has already started to destroy us from the inside out.
  • Brendan · 7 months ago
    He's not being a Douchbag because the Police had no probable cause to search his vehicle.
  • Adam ELsea · 7 months ago
    Sorry but this guy is a dickhead. It seems as if he goes around pissing people off until someone over-reacts. Granted, the police did you excessive force but there is no reason for this guy to be such an asshole about everything. This is based on the other videos he has made, and from what it seems, he intentionally pisses people off. Sorry Phil, you got the wrong person for the douche bad of the day.
  • dakota · 7 months ago
    whats the point? he was not under arrest and they did not have any cause to search his vehicle it is well with in his rights to ask for the dog to be re-led around his car. The point is power corrupts and every cop iknow is a total asshole they just are.
  • Travis · 7 months ago
    That deutsche bag should of gotten out of the car. I would of done the same thing. In Texas - where I'm from and currently live - not obeying a direct order of a peace officer is against the law. The police don't know who their dealing with... he could of been Timothy McVeigh for all the know and so that is why they respond with the force that they do. All he had to do was get out of the car and obey them.... I wonder what he was hiding?
  • Billy · 7 months ago
    He had every right to refuse the cops search. Under the 4th amendment he has that right and of course cops like this who abuse their power don't care! I hope every single officer who partook in this is charged with assault.
  • Compuiz · 7 months ago
    Unless they have probable cause, he does not have to open his trunk.
  • Ike · 7 months ago
    you know what "G" its ignorant people like you that allow the govt to extend its control into every aspect of our lives. You are definitely the douche bag. Fucking moron.
  • TTP · 7 months ago
    In this case both parties were wrong. It was improper of the pastor to refuse to answer question (note: he never explains which questions he refuses to answer) the police are there to do a job. And it was improper of the police/border patrol to exercise the forced used. Calling it right now... GIANT LAWSUIT.
  • brad · 7 months ago
    they never asked him a question, they said the dog smelled something. thats the lie he cought the cop on
  • dakota · 7 months ago
    wrong dude, if the cops or the government can go any were and do anything, then we have NO RIGHTS.

    "If you can take them away, then there not rights, there privileges." Goerge Carlin
  • ummmm? · 7 months ago
    he never refused to answer a question
  • kENAN · 7 months ago
    However much he gets paid isn't enough he should get to taser them
  • sammy · 7 months ago
    Your a retard imagine if the pastor was accually a murderer. They had no proff that he wasnt and he was resisting he wouldnt get out of the car the police men had the right to do this. The police men where not in a safe position there safety was at risk because he wouldnt get out of the car if he was a murderer he could have shot them all if they hadnt done this.
    Moral of the story if u have nothing to hide cooperate
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    You gotta be kidding me. He sat in his car for an hour and refused to be searched and never once got hostile. BUT HE MIGHT BE A MURDER SO TAZE HIM TO BE SURE! Goddamn you're retarded.
  • Sean · 7 months ago
    I know this dude personally. He's a total drug addict. Total lies.
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    FU
  • Tiffany · 7 months ago
    how do you know this person? and why would a pastor not just let them search his car? i totally agree with "casey". he would have been on his way if he didn't refuse. if he had nothing to hide, he shouldn't have been worried about his rights. apparently border patrol is given access to bypass the 4th amendment in efforts to protect this country if necessary. should a terrorist or murderer be extended full rights? i think not. it seems the cops just hadn't messed with anyone all day, and jumped at the chance.
  • LeadRamp · 7 months ago
    and for some reason i just don't believe you
  • matt · 7 months ago
    that's a fucking lie
  • ADM86 · 7 months ago
    Dude stfu ,go with your childish lies another place.....you are one of those people that make smart people go.....(face palm) idiot!
  • James Garcia · 7 months ago
    I cant believe that things like that happen to a Pastor...I mean seriously...those guys used severe force against a person...they need to be suspended from their jobs.
  • Luke · 7 months ago
    Fucking Piggies.
  • Rev. Mac · 7 months ago
    it looks like he got the be-jesus knocked out of him. Seriously guy, yes as american we are supposed to have right, and in a perfect world that would be the case. If I can not give any other advice, do what a cop tells you. Rather you are guilty or not, don't be a dumbass.
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    this pastor is a hero
    this pastor is a man

    the reason the new world order has gottenas far as it has is because little wussy boys like you roll over and lick their boots
  • angr · 7 months ago
    WTF?!?!?!! IT'S FUCKING RAMPANT!!! No wonder they do things like this when 90% of people just bend over and take it in the rear. Good luck to you. Phil, dbag of the day to all the people who believe that we should just do whatever the police want and give up what few remaining rights we have?
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    You're a dumbass for saying 'rather' instead of 'whether'. Stop talking IDIOT
  • Cyril · 7 months ago
    I completely feel as though the officers used excessive force and did not address the situation appropriately.
    HOWEVER, I would think twice before having so much sympathy for the pastor. The man seems to get in a lot of these altercations...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sl84DU77k7s

    I can understand his frustration with law enforcement and our government but jeez dude have some respect.
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    another wussy chicken boy here

    women don't like cowards
  • b · 7 months ago
    yeah he does seem to be an instigator - maybe trying to spread knowledge of how police abuse people's ignorance of their rights though - nothing wrong with that - as long as he's willing to go through the pain of doing it
  • Ryoura · 7 months ago
    I can understand this guys point of view; he hadn't done anything wrong and he didn't feel he needed to comply because of that. However, he could have been carrying something and the officers were oblidged to check. Just refusing to let them search made him look more suspicious.

    BUT, those officers used excessive violence. They may have had to taiser him to get him out of the car but not to that extent, and the violence afterwords was not necessary.
  • Roggen · 7 months ago
    This pastor was just being stupid. He was informed and then he was just making trouble. If the dog alerted just step out of the car and proof them wrong. You can't just ignore the law and the officers whose job it is to serve and protect, no one is above the law! These men had a canine alert to a bomb and then the man driving the car refuses to get out. Wouldn't you think that was slightly suspicious? THe pastor is filming the thing for gods sake! He just wanted attention. YOU CANNOT IGNORE POLICE OFFICERS OR THEY WILL TASER YOUR DUMBASS
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    are you new world order brainwahsed scum?

    that's what a public education will get you

    yes sir nosir whatever you say sir i am your slave i have been taught so well to be a slave

    let me edeucate you, boy....these guys are supposed to be working for us not the other way around
  • Steve · 7 months ago
    Sure maybe the pastor should of just let them search it, but still these power tripping mother fuckers had no right to taser him and smash the shit out of his car
  • Niggerfucker · 7 months ago
    LOL CHRISTIANS
    Fucking pastor got what he deserved, hope he's enjoying that nigger cock in prison.
  • Catherine · 7 months ago
    Why has this country gone to HELL? The cops were being assholes. If the dog really barked, then they should have brought the dog out! But they didn't. They denied a man the right to prove himself innocent, even though, in our law system, we are SUPPOSED to be innocent until proven guilty.
    Not only was he denied his rights, he was beaten unnecessarily. The man CRIED! There were enough cops there to force him out of the car and the others to search! WTF is WRONG with these sadistic bastards?!
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    Well, it's plain to see this woman here has more guts, common sense and fortitude than most ofthe men commenting here.
  • Uncle Sam · 7 months ago
    We don't have rights. We just think we do. Unknown to most, we let an Act pass into law on October 26, 2001. An Act that protects but also restricts/revokes some rights we have as citizens. If you stand up to "big brother" they now have the right to bitch slap you and take everything you have.
  • angr · 7 months ago
    AMEN PLS!!!! Why is it that so few see things this way? IT'S IN THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION U MOTHERFUCKERS!!!
  • Cancer · 7 months ago
    He even says he refused to awnser questions when passing through. I think if you avoid awnsing questions at a spot like that, is enough just cause.

    But the cops did go a bit to far, no need to tase the guy.

    Both of them should have just shut up and taken turns talking.
  • cam · 7 months ago
    he does have rights, and maybe perhaps he should have just cooperated initially, but seriously?

    the cops 1) jammed his head into shards of glass after tazing him from 2 sides, 2) stepped on his face while on the ground in the dirt and glass, 3) tazed him while he was on the ground writhing in pain....the list goes on

    anyone who thinks this is justified needs to check into a mental hospital.

    these cops need to be shot.
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    jack booted thugs

    hitler would have been so proud of this brood of vipers
  • Bored · 7 months ago
    retweet
  • Casey · 7 months ago
    The guys kinda made his own bed in this one. Yes excessive force was probably used. Yes, in reality they have no right to search his car without a warrant. However, I agree that we need to be careful. Clearly they didn't pull him over just to mess with him. It sounds to me like if he would have just let go of his pride and gotten off of his high horse, he would have been fine. It's really just like at the airport. No moron in their right mind would refuse a secondary search at the airport checkpoint, why is this any different. My feeling is, if you want this country to protect you, you have to let it. Sorry pastor but pride comes before a fall.
  • Fracturemaster · 7 months ago
    sue the shit outta those fuckers
  • Seth · 7 months ago
    thats fucked up
  • Jenn · 7 months ago
    great.. swore to protect and serve. how much protection is needed from a baptist minister? fucking yanks
  • Blaze · 7 months ago
    Mother fuck the police is all i got to say.
  • Jon · 7 months ago
    The cops were right in this video. They told him why he was going to be detained/arrested (the K-9 alerted to something in his car). He should have gotten out of the car then, but since he failed to do so, he is now resisting arrest. It seems bad, but he should have followed the law and would have been able to go on his way without a broken window and his girlish screams on the internet.
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    listen up!!!!!

    the cops were not following the law in this case

    this country is full of little wussy men who don't know their constitutional rights and are not strong enoughto stand upto these unconstitutional thugs
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    Okay first of all NOYB is clearly a lesbian...
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    asdf
  • azzwiper · 7 months ago
    ur fuckin retarded
  • ummmm? · 7 months ago
    the dog never did alert. if it did why didnt they just bring it back out to prove to him it did?
  • Blah · 7 months ago
    Jenners is either a lying ass cop or he/she is too uneducated in life to make a logical opinion.
  • blah · 7 months ago
    god fucking damnit these police assholes
  • Skippy McGee · 7 months ago
    Ok, yes, the pastor was being a bit of a douche, and yes, he goes around looking for confrontations with officers. However, regardless of how much of an ass he may be, he made no threatening gestures, his car wasn't running, so he wasn't about to drive off. Frankly, the police had NO JUST CAUSE to tazer him. Tazers were designed, not to deal with somebody being loud and annoying, but as an alternative to using lethal force in the even of a threat being posed by a suspect. Breaking his window=fine, pulling him out of the car and handcuffing him on the ground would've=fine. Tazering him and beating the crap out of him=lawsuit time.
  • Lindsay · 7 months ago
    I totally agree. He was being rude but he wasn't threatening them in any way. They were taking out their anger on him for being so obnoxious, not because he was deemed violent or because he even had a weapon. This whole situation just really chaps my ass.
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    OMG i think we found the 3rd man in this country

    my husband, this pastor, and you

    congratulations!

    too bad we can't have you over for supper some time. we'd love to meet you
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    And second of all someone needs to tell NOYB's husband that his wife is a lesbian...
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    asdgSB
  • rocket61 · 7 months ago
    i dont know about the states, but in canada during a mandatory stop on the road, a lot of your rights are taken away and you have to cooperate. This isn't if a cop pulls you over, im talking about when the cops are set up on the road, doing random checks. you have to cooperate.
  • Jns · 7 months ago
    Might be time to FIGHT THE POWER!
  • Kev · 7 months ago
    thats fucking messed up!
  • Anthony · 7 months ago
    The dude says it within the first few minutes of his video.
    He REFUSED to answer the BASIC questions that the border wanted to ask, the process could have taken 2 seconds.
    As a few people have noted, he was outside his rights, and he has a documented history on his youtube channel of looking for trouble with the police.
    I understand why people are going to side with this bloke, but seriously, if he wasn't a douchebag from the get go none of this would have happened.
    Its the same as customs at the airport, if you're a douchebag, they are going to take you aside.
    This guy is my DBOTD... Hands down
  • coopaloop · 7 months ago
    bottom line:
    there are too many power tripping, obey me, i'm the law cops. not every cop is all that bad, but there are too many that are. so fuck those cops. the cool ones can stay. and they are invited to my birthday party.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    "Funny how they put my face out of view, it was completely covered in blood"

    Funny how they restrained you calmly and effectively, and provided you with immediate medical attention right there in your video.

    Next time do what you're told and bitch about it later. Or get tased again, whatever works for you.
  • spyder · 7 months ago
    I thought that cops were only supposed to taser you if they felt in dangered. And this is the first pastor that I've seen that would take matters into their own hands instead of letting god haddle things.
  • Natalie · 7 months ago
    I hope justice is served with this. I like the police most of the time but some of them are just so freakin stupid and think they have the power to do anything
  • Phil make a SFA channel! · 7 months ago
    There's something called RIGHTS! Yeah he refused to step out of the car because there wasn't evidence of ANYTHING!!!
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    OMG! there are 4 men left

    i bet you wouldn't have just gotten out of the car for these scumbags, either.

    we have to stand up against this or we will all end up like that poor Canadian person who posted a couple comments back. yeeesh
  • Code · 7 months ago
    Part of me feels you should have gotten your ass out of the car, to avoid getting 11 stitches and going through excruciating pain. If you had nothing to hide, you should not have worried. Part of me says these cops were brutal, absolute dum asses and should be put into jail. Bravo for standing up for your rights
  • Jesus · 7 months ago
    if theres footage of the court shit, make sure you post it i wanna know what happens
  • Seth · 7 months ago
    I wonder if it's just the camera angle, or if there's a minimum weight limit of 250lbs to be a border patrol guard?
  • Senyeh · 7 months ago
    The only "rights" we truely have left in america, is the right to do what we are told and to not question it.
  • angie · 7 months ago
    no these dudes are just fucking power tripping asswipes that when opposed will do anything however illegal it may be to get their way. i know because my asshole stepdad is a border patrol he's gone to such disgusting lengths even in my own home to prove he's right.
  • non of your business · 7 months ago
    sadistic f**ks

    no doubt they treat women and children badly

    these are animals, not men

    i would not let one of these guys near my children even at church

    these are the kind of rats that infiltrate peaceful places and spread their curruption
  • Stephanie · 7 months ago
    DUH of course he didn't want to get out of the car! look what happened to him once he was removed from the safety of his car?!
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    I think the guy was probably a bit more rude than he had to be, but he'd been driving for hours, was held without cause, so it's understandale. And no matter how rude someone may be, unless they're physically violent, a danger to the police officers, then police officers shouldn't use tasers or physical violence towards the person.

    Dogs alert in ways that are clearly seen or heard, such as sitting, barking, etc. so I think I would've been asking for the dog to be brought back out if I hadn't seen/heard it alert, too. I mean, one this guy knew there was nothing in his car to alert to, and seeing as he didn't catch the dogs alert, I'd probably have done the same thing, though it's much easier to just let them search if you have nothing for them to find, but it's the principle of the thing. This guy may have been stubborn, but I wouldn't been to, if I was being held up by someone wanting to search my car with no reason. If the dog had made a mistake (which dogs don't do often) and alerted, I'd be more likely to say, okay, well they have a reason, so let 'em look. But if they brought out a dog who i didn't see alert to anything, and they STILL wanted to search my car with no reason, they don't have the right, and I wouldn't waste my time letting them.

    While this guy may have been a bit rude, it was perfectly within his right to not let them search without them having probable cause or a warrant. And I think what they did to him, was absolutely HORRIBLE. It's an abuse of power, and it happens far too often in this country. Some police officers these days seem to think they're so high and mighty that the laws don't apply to them and they can do whatever they want with no reason. And when someone questions there authority, implies that just maybe they DON'T have a probably cause or warrant and just wanna search for the heck of it, they get offended and mad. But they should know the law, and they should obey it, they should keep there cool, and try and give the person as much information as they can. They usually even tell criminals who are pretty much clearly guilty, caught in the act, what they're being arrested for, so they should definitely try to make it clear to someone who may be more confused about what they've done wrong.

    While overall, a bit of blame can probably be placed on both parties, though I'm not shocked, I feel that it's horrible for law enforcement officers to be that violent with no real reason, and to try and dance around questions that they should have a definite answer for before they want to search or arrest someone. I mean, the pastor is only human, and some humans are stubborn and hate people implying they did something wrong, and feel the need to challenge them. While the officers are only human too, they go through training to know how to d their job right, and should be able to handle situations such as this better. And beating the shit out of someone isn't just a "human" mistake, not like being a bit irritable, having an off day, no one can beat the shit out of someone, and say "oops, I'm only human".
  • Sadie · 7 months ago
    The police is retarded but the Pastor is retarded as well.

    1. The police did tell him BUT you also have to understand that Pastor wanted to make sure that the dog really had a response to the "drugs/body" and the cops weren't just making some excuse to pull him over.

    2. They only kept bitching at the Pastor cause he refused to roll over like a bitch and do what they said. I'm pretty sure it had nothing to do with "resisting." Personally, I think it just had to do with "respect/fear" the fact that the pastor had this "i'm not gonna take shit from you attitude" and they didn't like that. They can say that was "resisting" when really the pastor just wanted to make sure these guys weren't going to screw him over.

    3. Why the fuck did they tase him? Don't they atleast use "human" force first? (Pull him out by force?? I mean there were 5 guys there it's not like they couldn't do it)

    4. He should've just walked out and let them search it, because honestly he had nothing to hide. I think the point the Pastor is trying to make is that "I shouldn't do whatever you say just because you're cop. You've got to have a justifiable reason"

    But that argument can be destroyed with our little "legal" lesson from Darcy.
    He should've just walked out and let them check it cause he had nothing to hide. But he demostrates a point that cops put us in a vulnerable position where a cop CAN infringe our rights if he choses to do so.

    Which means we have to make sure there aren't any crooked cops. ANd we can't just let "anybody" sign up when there's a cop shortage.

    And legalizing drugs would've solved this problem because cops would go out looking for real criminals instead of wasting their fucking time with non-violent criminals (drug users)

    And then we wouldn't have fat cops cause they'd all REALLY be doing their job. I hate fat cops. If these guys really do 'protect and serve' they'd be in good shape like army men.

    "fat" or "out of shape" cops proves that some cops don't risk their lives like others and are pretty much useless. They might as well be secretaries or something. Anybody can give out a ticket. But not anybody can arrest a killer and save lives.

    And cops aren't so greatly paid for what they do (not the fat ones, the life risking ones) just like teachers. I think EFFICIENT cops and teachers should be better paid. but they're not cause it's a gov. job.

    or we should get rid of money so that people would do it from the heart.

    GOD I hate a lot of the retarded things in society.
  • Brad · 7 months ago
    tazors are considered humain force because they are no long term effects. It is also safer for the cops because if he has a weapon he wound be able to hurt/kill one before they got a hold of him. with a tazor there is no risk to the cop of him pulling a weapon.
  • arisa · 7 months ago
    That is so wrong, it kindof makes me want to vomit. And move to a remote island and live as a hermit with no authority figures.
  • THE TRUTH · 7 months ago
    After the cops held his head against the window and against the glass on the ground the cops should have threw his head through the all the windows to try to get the stupid out of him. Any retard that will not get out of the car for police and records it on video should get the retard beat out of him.
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Um, I'm pretty sure it's within his rights to refuse, if they have neither a warrant nor probable cause. IF the dog did alert, and the man didn't catch it, they should have just brought the dog back out, because IF the dog did not alert, they have no right to search his car. He may have been stupid by not letting them do it, sure, because he didn't have anything to hide, but it was a waste of his time, and more importantly it violated his rights as a U.S. citizen. He's not a retard. In all honest, if you continue to let officers of the law abuse their power, they will continue to do so, so while it would've been easier for him to just let them search, if he had, they would've continued to abuse their power and search whoever they wanted whenever they wanted. They can't just stop someone and search their car because their bored, U.S. law states they HAVE TO have a warrant or probable cause in order to do so, and assuming the dog didn't alert (which since the guy didn't have anything illegal in his car, is HIGHLY improbable), he doesn't have to let them search. He's not retarded because he aspects officers of the law to respect his rights as a citizen. Sure he was rude, but he'd been driving for a while, was probably tired, and wanted to get home, but he was not by any means breaking the law, while the officers WERE breaking the law...
  • Tom · 7 months ago
    Everybody bitches about rights until a group of people get on a plane, hijack it, then fly it into a building. Then they bitch about the police not doing there job. Take your pick! We have rights but we also have rules! They were trying to do their job! If they say we would like to search your car more thoroughly then guess what....you let them! It's what they do! They will make mistakes by searching many people who are completely legit but that will also help them catch the people who are not!
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Yes, we have rights and rules. Which none of them really contradict. It's a LAW (rule) that cops cannot search a car or a home, etc. without a warrant or probable cause, so if the pastor didn't see the dog alert (and since he didn't have anything illegal, it's highly unlikely that it did), the pastor was aware of no probable cause, and the police hadn't presented a warrant, it's his RIGHT.

    He had a right to stay in his car and refuse to let them search, and he was not breaking any law or "rules" by doing so. I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about when you imply when have to have our rights violated in order to remain safe. Because one, that man wasn't breaking the law, I doubt he's much of a threat to ANYONE. There are rules for a reason, yes, sure we want to stay safe, but that's no excuse for officers of the law abusing their power and violating a person's rights. It's illegal. The officers were breaking the "rules", not the pastor.
  • Noel · 7 months ago
    DAME! this cops are some crazy ass mo-fos
  • tupNtess · 7 months ago
    To quote the Sarah Silverman Program...

    Police Officer: Do you know why I pulled you over, ma'am?
    Sarah Silverman: Because you got all C's in high school?
  • banshee · 7 months ago
    Not gonna lie, this guy is pretty stupid.

    I understand he has rights and shit, but is it worth being tazered and beaten when the alternative of just standing down could save you trouble/time/harm?

    If you've got nothing to hide, just let them search the car and go on your merry way - 4th amendment or not.

    Why bother "defending" your rights when the alternative of just standing down (for once)will get you less trouble/harm?

    seriously, i don't feel sympathy for this man. He should've just listened to them calmly.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    If you don't stand up for your rights then who will? They'll just keep getting taken away until the government puts a camera in every room in your house to keep you "safe".
  • JT · 7 months ago
    You got what you deserved. They had all the PC they needed. If you weren't such a douche bag, you could have gotten out let them look and be on your way. It's morons like you that make the Police Officer's jobs that much more difficult. Best part of the video is listening to this guy cry like a little bitch. IF THERE IS PROBABLE CAUSE (the dog) THEN YOU HAVE TO OBEY THE ORDERS! Stupid fucking idiots, does this mean if you don't think you were speeding then you don't have to stop when a cop tries to pull you over?
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    But there's the issue of whether there was truly probable cause or not. If the dog was brought out, and the man didn't see him alert(assuming he's telling the truth), and the car was clean, chances are the dog DIDN'T alert, and then they DON'T have probable cause. If the pastor didn't see the dog alert, they should've had absolutely no trouble bringing the dog back around to prove to him, but the fact they didn't is yet another reason why I don't think the dog DID alert to anything. And without that, no probablee cause. It's pretty iffy, I suppose, seeing as far as the dog goes, all we're given to go on is the man's word and the police officers word, but seeing as using such excessive physical violence is an abuse of power anyway, it's really easy for me to believe they abused their power before, and lied about the dog.
  • l0ms · 7 months ago
    He deserved it. It's obvious he was trying to cause trouble, and was trying to receive a response from the police, hence the camera.
  • emiliano martinez · 7 months ago
    dude this guys like the rodney king of border patrol

    he should sue for a ass load of cash
  • IMPORTANT · 7 months ago
    why wouldnt this guy just press charges and sew these officers or state of AZ for 4th amendment violation?... shutup and make some money already
  • Kip · 7 months ago
    Ok well...Even if the dogs had found something in the car, was it necessary for the cops to break down his window, and TASER someone who wasn't a threat at all?
  • Wayne de Who · 7 months ago
    I saw the video of the Pastor. YOU MUST MUST see the rest of this nut job's video. This guy set himself up. Gave TOTAL attitude, he gave the first cop that approached him a terrible time. THIS guy is an over the top OPPORTUNIST. He film himself getting pulled over...but that was AFTER he RAN through the border. YOU MUST see how this guy goes door to door and pounced on people about going to hell. Yells at anyone that disagrees in his parish. I would say the police went easy on him.
  • Hunter · 7 months ago
    thats an exelent reason to NOT argue with the police they will fuck your shit up
  • Sara · 7 months ago
    they will have sexual intercourse with your feces while levitating
  • Tyler · 7 months ago
    why not let the cops search if you have nothing to hide? fuckin dumbass religious cunt
  • Taylor JP · 7 months ago
    The police dogs alerted the cops for drugs. That's all the cops need to arrest him. They told the man why he was being arrested, he should have gotten out.

    Him being a douchecunt and saying no, I'm not answering your questions, no, you can't search my car. He's acting like he didn't do anything wrong. Let them search. Just say yes, you can search, and there's no issue. Stupid fuck.
  • catonswg · 7 months ago
    ok if you want to piss off a cop you need to know the law. if you get pulled over and you are told to get out of the car you must obey the officer. when the k-9 alerted to his car that was cause to search the car at that point. when he did not get out of the car he resisted. look im not a fan of the cops but they did nothing wrong
  • Joe · 7 months ago
    This guy spreads lies for a living...
  • Eagle2814 · 7 months ago
    The police shouldnt have taken unnecessary precautions like tasering him and stepping on his head with glass on the ground. But from what I hear he has a history with messing with the cops.
    Theres no way he just so happens to run into unfair cops all the time.
    I ve seen cops get mad for not catching real criminals that get away and they start arresting everyone in sight including innoccent people.
  • Carlin · 7 months ago
    fuck the police
    I really hope he sues their asses
  • Jon · 7 months ago
    In this situation it seems that there is not enough tape in the page above to get a complete idea of what happened. That is not to say that a decent idea of the situation cannot be concluded but without video of the prior events that we are told of in the pastors interview i.e. the dog sniffing the car. It is hard to say definitively if the dog did or did not alert the officers to the presence of contraband human, drugs, or whatever it may have been. Dogs can be trained to alert their handlers in passive way, organizations such as the USDA often use this method. “USDA beagles have been trained to simply sit down when they smell fruits or vegetables.” (http://people.howstuffworks.com/police-dog4.htm)
    This is not to say in any way that the officers involved were justified in their actions. The use of force was excessive for the situation. For entering the vehicle a set of slim jims (the tools not the food) could have been used. Even if the window had to be broken he could have been removed in a much more civil manner. The use of the taser seems to me to be unjustified for the situation. Although I think that if the officer had clearly stated what the charge was. He could have said something like “resisting arrest” rather than “disobeying me”. Just as easily the dog could have taken another pass at the car.
    The 4th amendment reads “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution...) Now I don’t know what other loop hole and such that may be in place in that state or laws written on the subject other so I can’t definitively say. The 4th amendment says they do need a warrant and that in order to get that warrant they need probable cause. The dog would give them probable cause but I do not know if they had a warrant. However “The United States Supreme Court held that brief, suspicion-less seizures at highway checkpoints for the purposes of combating drunk driving and intercepting illegal immigrants were constitutional.” (http://www.srislawyer.com/CM/custom/TOCE-Newsle...)
    Regardless of how this plays out in the inevitable legal proceedings both sides could have handled the situation better. The use of excessive force is hard to ignore in this case. Weather or not the search was warranted I doubt that the pastor will suffer any legal consequences from the event, I can’t say the same for the officers.
  • Hunter · 7 months ago
    im sorry but this dudes a fucking idiot

    if you have nothing to hide then why bother refuse to let them search your vehical ?

    when you refuse to let the cops search your vehical they know from experince that your hideing something

    the police in this situation did go overboard but bottom line is he WAS resisting arrest and he refused to let the poice in his vehical so they let themselves in
  • Sean · 7 months ago
    That dude had that coming. Here's a list of reasons why.

    1. "I asked them to tell me what the dog had done..." They're not required to tell you what the dog's alerts are.
    2. "I asked them to bring the dog back because I say it didn't happen..." That doesn't matter, and they aren't required to do so. If you get pulled over for speeding, you can't say "let me drive by you again because I don't think I was speeding." Well, you can, but it won't do any good.
    3. He was told that he was being placed under arrest. He asked why. They told him. He still wouldn't get out of the car. At that point, he was resisting arrest, which is a crime. If they had simply said, "we're detaining you for an investigation of a possible crime" and he refused he would be arrested for obstruction of justice.
    4. "Oh, so I have to obey you?" Yes, you moron, you do. That's the way it works in these United States. As a society we require you to comply with police officers, that's how we keep social order.
    5. Excessive force? Not at all. This man had already shown he was going to be defiant, and tazing him the officers insured that he wouldn't physically resist and possibly hurt one of them.

    This dude should listen to The Clash... I fought the law and the law won.
  • Josh · 7 months ago
    #1. Actually, I don't know where you're from, but he has every right in the world to have them come back if the dog didn't suspect anything and they still accuse him.

    #2. Look above.

    #3. No, actually they didn't tell him. All they told him was that he was under arrest for a "suspected human/cocaine" in his trunk. Which was already stated that he didn't hear the dog even make a sound when they sniffed the trunk.

    #4. Actually, no he doesn't if they don't have a valid reason to arrest him.

    #5. You're completely wrong, if I'd judge by what you just said right now, I'd say YOU'RE ONE OF THE COPS THAT DID THIS TO HIM!

    All the guy did was stand up for himself and state his rights. Didn't have a gun, or a bomb so there was NO need for all the beating up on him that they did.
  • The Dude · 7 months ago
    The cops will likely win, based on his own video. Check out the ACLU's website. When an officer gives you an instruction, you must follow it or potentially be arrested. They did NOT have to show him the dog alerting to his vehicle. He could have fought the search in court with a judge, but not the cop on the street. According to the ACLU, you can refuse to allow the search, but that doesn't mean they can't search, just that the burden in on them to prove probable cause in front of the judge (not to you on the street).
    Wishing for something different doesn't make it so.
  • Sean · 7 months ago
    And out come the brass knuckles. Didn't they tell you it was a gunfight?

    Josh:
    1. Learn to read. I said they are not required to tell you what the dog's "alerts" are. The pastor says that the dog didn't make a noise, and it probably didn't. Police dogs are specially trained. The dog's alert to contraband may not be, and probably isn't, an audible response. The dog could be trained to simply sit down and stare at the suspect area, or roll over and play dead, or sniff its ass, or lick its balls. The fact of the matter is that the police aren't required to explain to you exactly how the dog was trained to alert to any specific type of contraband. My first point, which you so widely missed, was not a matter of rights. I simply stated that they aren't required to disclose how the dog is trained to react to something.

    2. You're right, he can request that they bring the dog by the car again. They aren't required to. One "alert" from the animal is probable cause for an investigation. If "I think the cop is lying" was an effective way to get out of being investigated or arrested the entire criminal justice system would crumble. Imagine how great it would be:
    Cop: Sir, we're placing you under arrest for murder.
    Suspect: But I didn't do it.
    Cop: We have evidence that implies you are guilty.
    Suspect: The evidence is wrong.
    Cop: Okay, sorry about the inconvenience. Have a nice day!

    3. You said, and I quote, "No, actually they didn’t tell him. All they told him was that he was under arrest for a 'suspected human/cocaine' in his trunk" Read that four times. By "they didn't tell him" were you referring to the part where they told him he "was under arrest for a 'suspected human/cocaine' in his trunk?" You might want to read over that a couple more times just to make sure you know what the fuck you're talking about. Oh, and don't forget the part where the officer told him he was being placed under arrest for failure to comply, which we'll get to next.

    4. You can contest this all you want, but you can also contest the law of gravity by jumping off the Empire State Building. The results will be similar. It's important to keep in mind that an arrest does not mean guilt, we have due process to determine that. Given that concept, a canine alert and obstructing an investigation add up to more than a "valid" reason for an arrest. Once you've been placed under arrest you are, get this, required by law to comply with police officers.

    5. "You're completely wrong" isn't much an argument, buddy. I'm going to need something a little more substantiated to shove back down your throat. So far all you've done is dry heaved.

    Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week. Make sure to tip your waitress.
  • Paul · 7 months ago
    This guy is a real US hero. He may be a little over the top in his confrontational style, but he spoke the truth to the officers. They just didn't know what to do with a real American who knows his rights. If it seemed a little much, it is because the rest of us being ignorant of our rights and too cowardly to stand up to them create a climate in which just affirming what should be universally understood and respected rights, seems exagerated. What would have happened if someone did that in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia? Those who would say you have to roll over to authority because it is authority need to study some history at least. Thank you, Pastor. You may be to me and others disagreeable, etc., but in the USA, you have a right to be a nutcase because we have one unifying social pact in the CONSTITUTION with the Bill of RIGHTS. When the "law" gets to the point where uniformed gun-bearing agents of the state think they can justify arbitrary search and siezure with lesser laws than a clear reading of the B of R, then the system needs to be renewed. And remember violence is not force, it is force in v.i.o.lation of human rights; force that violates human dignity. I think this guy is a nutcase, and I want to send him a donation to keep up the good work!
  • DuckyPorkchop · 7 months ago
    They aren't required to answer his questions about the dog but when the police officer himself asked the border patrol to bring the dog back out that shows doubt. And yes he resisted but that still doesn't change the fact that it could have been handled much easier without so much force. The guy covered his eyes but they still used two tasers?!? and shoved his head into the glass while he was being tased...c'mon. Both sides were on a power trip but the police and border patrol are going to be hurting once this goes to court. They changed their story, used more that excesive force, and the police even doubted the border patrol.
  • Hoover · 7 months ago
    Yo De Franco!

    It is obvious that this man is sincere in his accusations against the border patrol agents. Our American culture is on the brink of failure as our liberties and freedoms are slowly eroding away. I would fully expect these things to gradually get worse as we progressively and willingly forgoe these freedoms in the name of safety and security. WTF? What are we gonna do? Those officers fully deserve breaking and entering charges, unreasonable search and seisure, assault and battery, loss of there jobs and at least 10 years in prison for the atrocity they have committed. We are all human beings dammit.
  • Josh · 7 months ago
    100% agree with almost every comment on here. It is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that he got so much pain & suffering just for standing up for himself and stating his rights.

    Why would they search the car w/ a k9, say he has cocaine/human in the trunk of his car, and not bring the k9 back out to see the dog again if he didn't hear anything?

    That's a fucking joke.

    "Cover your eyes." Why...just tell me why would you just cover your eyes. Why do they have the right to just smash both the passenger and the driver side windows and tazer him and hold him down against GLASS.

    And ontop of all that, what is the need to pull him out of the car, stomp on him a few times, and then tazer him some more...FOR STANDING UP FOR HIS FREEDOM/RIGHTS.

    It's not like he had a fucking gun, or a bomb...obviously. If the dog smelt nothing, why didn't they just let him go...

    I will never understand what goes though some people's heads in this world.

    My suggestion: Sue the living fuck out of them. They really should get a death penalty, or something similar that happened to him happen to them.

    I feel terribly sorry for this man, listening to that screaming when he gets tazed really scares me.
  • nojaz · 7 months ago
    what a crybaby
  • Stewart · 7 months ago
    WHY WAS IT SUCH A BIG DEAL IF YOU DIDN"T HAVE ANYTHING IN YOUR CAR. THEY CAN SEARCH YOU IF THEY WANT. THEIR JOB IS TO ENSURE SECURITY. YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF THERE QUICKLY IF YOU WOULD JUST HAVE LET THEM FIND NOTHING IN YOUR CAR. CONGRATS, YOU BROUGHT THIS ON YOURSELF
  • DuckyPorkchop · 7 months ago
    The man had every right to refuse having his car searched. Unfortunatly denying the search gave police a probable cause which to me doesn't make sense. Why do we have the right to refuse if that then gives them reason to search especially when he asked to have the dog brought back out because it did not alert the border patrol as they had stated? He had every right to make that request. The biggest thing this guy has going for him is that police/border patrol changed their story from the dog to him not answering their questions. Secondly it is 100% excesive force. He has not shown any agression so using two possibly three tasers when one will easily take down a grown man is crazy. They could have killed him. Also breaking both windows; police are trained to proceed in a way to protect themselves but also the least agressive. They could have broke the side window and unlocked the other doors that way while he was tased; or even better just unlocked and pulled him out without tasing him. He did after all close his eyes. Very sad how police are abusing their power.
  • Tone · 7 months ago
    After watching both videos i feel as if all this would have been avoided if he had just let them search his car. It would have taken 5/10 minutes to prove that he didn't have anything with him and it would have been over. But he refused (because it is his right) and that made it seem suspicious to the officers so they acted upon that. And the camera and hostile tone he has in his voice did not help. I know he has a right to refuse to let them search his car but if he didn't have anything illegal why not just let the officers do their job? Let them waste their time searching a car that doesn't have anything illegal in it. But like i said, all could have been avoided. Good luck to him and whatever claims he has against the officers.
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Sure, it could've been avoided, but at this point, you've gotta put yourself in that situation and realize how pissed you'd be after them lying to you, violating your rights, and you're not breaking the law, you're just trying to get home. So he probably was a bit more hostile than he need be, and perhaps he should've just let them, and that'd be the easier thing, but I think I would've done something similar, because I'm sutbborn and hardheaded too...
  • Niqla · 7 months ago
    Seeing things on a long term basis, you should not restrain yourself from arguing with the police. Stick to your rights like this man did. He obviously faced excessive consequences to resisting authority. This video will most probably influence choices made by other police men when facing a free individual refusing to waste his time with their random inspections. They will think twice before taking out their Tazers. The lawsuit that will be filed against them will make these pigs regret this abuse of force. Hail to this man.

    But i'm wondering about one thing... How come the police did not erase the Video? They are definite dumbasses. First thing after a criminal offense (this was a criminal offense against a passive american. Not because your dressed up in a silly uniform with a badge stuck on it that your allowed to beat up people.) destroy the evidence! The guy filmed the whole thing. They didn't even erase the video. Then the question appears: Did they really search the car afterwards or did they get their fix of power after beating him up?
  • Rio · 7 months ago
    the more he refused the more the police suspects that something is wrong

    i think the pastor just wants to see his face in youtube
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    It's not really resisting when they have no proof of probable cause nor a warrant, it's just enforcing your rights...

    And it's stupid to think that, ANYONE can be on youtube. He'd risk his life, have the hell beat out of him, have to get stitches to do something anyone can do? Seriously? If he's at fault, it's most definitely not because he wanted to be on youtube, thinking that is just retarded. If he wanted to be on youtube, he could've made a video about anything, at any point in time...
  • Joseph · 7 months ago
    Just because he is a minister, he thinks he doesn't answer to the law enforcement. If he would have just gotten out of the car which you are required to do when an officer asks you, this most likely wouldn't have happened. Ministers are some of the worst terrorists in the world. If he had nothing to hide, why didn't he just get out of the car.
  • Jaron · 7 months ago
    Have you ever considered thinking about what you say before you say it? You are a complete moronic idiot.
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    What does it have to do with him being a minister? Terrorists? Are you kidding me, ministers are TERRORISTS? Maybe some aren't the best people in the world, but grouping all ministers together like that is plain ignorance. Like saying all Muslims are terrorists... it's just not true and the stereotype (though I've never heard ANYONE say anything close to "ministers are terrorists) has little basis in fact.

    And just because he's a minister doesn't mean he doesn't have rights. He had the right to refuse to let them search his car. He should've gotten out perhaps, but what keeps them from throwing him to the ground, handcuffing him, and breaking the law by violating his rights if he does get out of the car. He's just trying to protect his rights, which, while he definitely isn't the most pleasant person in the world towards the police officers, he still has. He didn't do everything right, sure, but the officers were violating his rights. They were taking something away from him, and to lots of people who are aware of the law and their rights, and who are law abiding citizens, and not cowards who would let anyone break the law and run over them for no reason, their rights are extremely important, and when someone tries to violate their rights, it's a boundary crossed.

    While I respect the people's opinions who disagree with mine, I'm not so sure I repsect yours. Ministers are terrorists. God, I can't stop laughing. Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. You seem like a pretty ignorant person, to be honest. Maybe trying being a bit more open minded, and not assuming everyone whose views don't match yours is a "terrorist".

    Firstly the definition of terrorist is: the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.

    This man used no form of anything that could be mistaked as terrorism in these videos, so maybe your opinion is based on outside experiences. Maybe you know one minister who could be considered a "terrorist: to some extent. That doesn't make them ALL terrorists. Assuming such is just idiotic.
  • Squeak238 · 7 months ago
    Look, this shit is not uncommon. Just because the cops said the dog alerted them doesn't mean it happened. Something to a lesser degree happened to me where I was held in custody while two cops spent an hour searching my car and when I asked why I was pulled over they told me I didn't turn on my blinker when I turned. Great, that's fine, only thing is the only time I turned while the cop was behind me is when he pulled me over and I had been driving a straight shot for ten minutes or so. What a load of horse shit, arrested maybe, but beaten into the ground? THAT is excessive force. The guy didn't show signs of violence and he threatened no one. Bottom line this was an abuse of power.
  • Brian Fuckin Martin · 7 months ago
    I would kill them.. I think everyone needs to wake up and start killing these pigs
  • dannnny4 · 7 months ago
    wow some of you guys are retarded go back and learn your rights, 1st of all HE DOES have the right to refuse them to search his car and that probably is why they got so mad, 2nd obviously he caught the cop in a lie in the video and 3rd a dog is trained to think that there is a toy (if he sniffs drugs or a dead person) the dog doesnt just sit there like a retard and cops all of a sudden know theres something in the car, so there again the pastor has the right to ask the cops for the dog to come back and sniff cuz obviously he wasnt hiding anything!!!

    BUT im not saying it woulda just been easier to let them search but thats why we have ppl that know their rights so that america can wake THE FUCK UP
  • cassie · 7 months ago
    This guy was just asking for it. If you look at his youtube channel, he has another video where he is refusing to cooperate at the same checkpoint and he is let go. He wanted to instigate something.
  • devin · 7 months ago
    ur dumb as fuck was there anything in his car no unless the dog winked at the officer or gave him some sigh language there was no probably cause i want to be a cop but this is just a disgrace a nation that dosen't know what to do about anything
  • livelove · 7 months ago
    The world's problems will inevitably get worse. So lets put faith in Obama. Who else can we trust to make things right in these times?
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Sure, we should trust Obama, but we still need to do what we can. The people of America need to do what they can to protect their own rights as well. Obama is one person. He may be the president, but he's not all-powerful, he can't do it all, he's only human. So while we should trust him, would should BLINDLY trust in him, and we should take it upon ourselves to what we know is right to help correct these kinds of issues in our country.
  • Andrew · 7 months ago
    My mom knows a guy that is in the police academy, and he had to get tasered, when he did, he didn't even flench, they thought the taser was broken, so they tased him again, still he did nothing, finally they knew that the taser WAS not broken. lolll thats just funny :P dudes tough as hell i guess. i still hate him.
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Um, I think I'm calling BS on that one, if you didn't see it, I wouldn't believe it. Unless that guy has some kind of neurological issue, when you're shocked like that you CAN'T not move. Not only is it the body's natural reaction to pain to flinch away from it (and with that amount of pain there is literally something medically wrong with you if you don't), but it's electricity, you lose control of your ability to move , or in this case not to. People don't just flail when they're tasered because it hurts, but because they literally no longer have control. If this story is true, I think you should suggest to this dude to get a full neurological work up, because something isn't right.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    To put this in the worst possible way; to all the idiots.

    Yes, he was resisting the police. That doesn't mean the inhumanity of prick cops should rule. They should lose there jobs and be thrown in jail.

    If you think theres nothing wrong here, your a fucked up person.
  • Andrew · 7 months ago
    Just makes me thankful to not live in the states, if the cops can get away with that...
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Well, technically, the SHOULDN'T be allowed to get away with it, since it is illegal, but with so many people in the States and so many laws being broken, it's hard to enforce justice on everyone, though it shouldn't be like that. But people break rules/laws all over the world, so it's not just the U.S. People all over the world do horrible things and get away with it. It's not right, but you can't escape it unless you completely lock yourself away from everyone.
  • JPreston · 7 months ago
    I dont get how he fillmed it when he was in his car. HE said he had his hands infront of his face yet somehow the camera was being held out towards the passanger side?

    I suppose there are ways to hold it with your arm maybe but I dont know. There seemed to be lies on both sides.
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Idk... that is a good question, which we can't know for sure, but I imgained it was one like with a hand strap and he turned the strap to the opposite side of his hand, so the palm of his hand was free, and that's why the camera was facing the opposite way after he covered his eyes. It makes enough sense, I guess, but there are a bunch of different ways depending on the camera type and whatever. Honestly, thinking of a way that makes pretty reasonable sense, kind of makes me feel like Sherlock Holmes. XD jk... but even though it makes sense to me (though with my horrible explanation, might not make much sense to you, so sorry for that), my chances of being right aren't very high. But still, just an example of one way he could've done it...
  • David · 7 months ago
    wow that officer should have at least told him what was going on. That is pretty gay that they tazered him.
  • Ron · 7 months ago
    well, i'd just like to say, i'm glad there are people who are willing to stand up for their rights in the face of completely fair circumstances, it just makes sure that our government won't become fascist. (and trust me, our government isn't fascist, look up the word before you use it)
    and really, i'm just gonna put it out there the pastor knew what was going to happen and could easily have avoided it.
    "if your dumb you gotta be tough"
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Yeah, our government is pretty fair compared to some, but a a lot of authority figures, such as officers of the law, do abuse their power, and if no one stands up for their rights, it will continue to be done, so I'm glad to see that there are some people willing to question officers about things, and do their best to stand up for themselves when someone tries to violate them. I'm pretty sure a good number of American citizens would stand up for their rights if the opportunity arose, and I don't think we have to worry too much about the government stepping too far out of line, because someone is always there too question whether what they're doing is right, and though sometimes it may not seem like it, the people do have a fair bit of power, and we can't expect anyone else to stand up for our rights when we're not willing to do it ourselves.

    It's a pity to see law enforcement officers act in such a manner, though. Police officers should be understanding, but firm, they should remain calm, and only use as much force as necessary, and they shouldn't abuse their power. A lot of people say, if you're not a criminal, you shouldn't be afraid of the police, but when some of them act like these men did, it's reasonable to be afraid, and it's hard to trust them to keep us safe from REAL threats when they're wasting time punishing some innocent citizen because he pissed them off.

    While, I will admit, I'm not a huge fan of this pastor, as I've watched his other videos and he's not exactly a ray of sunshine, in none of his videos is he breaking the law. On his account there is another video (at least one other than this one) in which he seems to be antagonizing officers, such as others on here has mentioned. And he probably knew something like this would happen eventually when he goes around looking to fight with an officer, but bottom-line is, while he is rude and obnoxious towards officers of the law, in neither video is he breaking the law, and the police officers have no right to be unprofessional about it. (In the other video an officer went so far as to say "i'm pretty sure your a terrorist", and while no where near as awful as what the officers in this video did to him, I find it rather unprofessional of an officer to lose his cool while on the clock and acuse someone of being a terrorist, no matter how annoying they're being.) I think officers should be better trained to handle such situations with dignity, and to remain calm. It should be part of the training for them not to lose their cool with people, because while they may get angry with someone on the job, that anger can go too far, and someone seething with anger who has power and a weapon is DEFINITELY not a safe mixture.
  • Tiffy · 7 months ago
    It's ironic to me that the job of protecting and serving has been twisted into this. I am ashamed that this is where my tax dollars are going. Those flipping cops caused more harm and disturbance in this situation than the civilian. And yeah, maybe the pastor guy didn’t handle it the best in the world.... be seriously? Aren’t cops supposed to be trained experts in handling situations professionally and peacefully? Very proactive cops!!!! …Taser someone who asks legit questions. If I didn’t see a dog search and react to my car I would ask for a re-examination too before getting out of my car and being arrested. Especially with maniac arresting-happy tasering cops running around! I feel safe with him carrying a gun!!! ... NOT!
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    And somehow I have the feeling if he still had the attitude, but had complied to get out of the car of his own will, they still would've tasered him. It's pathetic. He did not threaten them, nor show any signs he would be physically violent towards them, and so he shouldn't have been tasered, or shoved to the ground in such a violent mannner. He may have been resisting, but they failed to present him with a warrant or a probable cause, since he did not see the dog alert (chances being it didn't if his car was clean) and they refused to bring it back out, so it was within his right to refuse to let them search his car. It is sad to see officers behave in this manner, and I really think they should have better training, especially behavioral training to teach them how to handle situations like this professionally, and they should also be inform that just because they're an officer they're not above the law, and just because they don't like someone (or even if the person is a suspected criminal) the person still has rights.
  • Squeak238 · 7 months ago
    I'm sorry? Did you hear the dog bark? Was there any evidence that the dog reacted? I don't think so, so stop being a stupid douche and quit living in La La Land. Denying a cop the ability to search your car doesn't give them probable cause.
    What so the cop can just go 'uh well the dog uh, smelled something lemme search your car'
    Where's the proof? As an American citizen that pastor had the right to have it proven to him. The cops didn't grant him his rights and used authority and numbers to force him to submit. That is called abuse of power.
  • Bob · 7 months ago
    the dogs don't bart when they smell drugs they sit and don't make any noise at all Squeak238
  • Brad · 7 months ago
    Seach dogs NEVER bark when they find something they SIT next to the area were they suspect something. and look up at the cop
  • Taylor · 7 months ago
    Dogs CAN be trained to bark as an alert, but they usually are trained to sit. Regardless, the man claimed the dog did nothing and alerts are pretty easy to identifiy usually. He said the dog walked up, walked away, no sitting. And unless their training dogs to alert by telepathy these days, from what we know, the dog DIDN'T alert, and if the dog did alert, and the man didn't see him alert, he wasn't presented with any warning or probable cause, so they should've just brought the dog back out to prove it, or let him go, because it's highly unlikely a well trained dog alerted to a clean car.
  • Spazzzzzz · 7 months ago
    Personally, I think both of them are idiots. The man should just have gotten out of the car and let them search his car. The police were just doing their job, and wouldn't it be terrible if he DID have a body? I mean, they are just trying to keep america safe. But then again, the police went to extremities when they tasered him numerous times, then mocked him. And I think they should have brought out the dog again.


    AND, because they found nothing in his car, he should plead not guilty
  • Squeak238 · 7 months ago
    And whether he was testing the system or not is irrelevant. Regardless of his stupidity he still has rights
  • DeathWard · 7 months ago
    your right but if he asks you if he can search your car and you have nothing then you shouldnt feel the need to deny getting out of the car to talk with him. he wouldnt of arrested him if he just complied and then discussed it
  • mark · 7 months ago
    sue the living fuck out of the power hungry ass ramming whores....they act cool when their at work bc at home they get beat excessivley by their 9 year old son....
  • Awesomeman · 7 months ago
    WTF IS HE IN THE FUTURE?? HE'S IN THE 15TH AND IT HAPPEEND ON THE 14TH.. CRAZY P;OWERS
  • Awesomeman · 7 months ago
    AND Y DONT U JUST LET THE DAMN PPL SEARCH UR STUFF SO YOU CAN GO..... I DONT GET WHAT'S SO BAD ABOUT IT? TELL ME SOMEONE PLEASE... AND AMEN BROTHA!! COME TO CANADA WE RULE!!
  • Jillian · 7 months ago
    I think the tazing is a bit much, but they were probably asking routine questions and the pastor like all these assholes do, was probably like "I'm not going to answer that, it's none of your buisness". It's his job, when you refuse, it looks suspecious.
    When you get hostile, it draws unwanted attention.
  • style32 · 7 months ago
    That video is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in civil court.
  • feraligatr8 · 7 months ago
    "don't tase me bro" It's almost the exact same story.
  • Andeh · 7 months ago
    The Tazer and beating was completely unnecessary. He was not even physically resisting or threatening them...
  • Andeh · 7 months ago
    Well maybe he physically resisted if he locked his car doors... but Tazer was still unnecessary.
  • Luke B. · 7 months ago
    Happened to me to. It's a really ridiculous system of "justice" that we have. I stopped being a criminal justice major because they talk openly about all the police corruption in class, saying that it's just a fact of life.
  • Gary · 7 months ago
    You know, I hear a lot of people saying 'just let them search you, just let them search you'...so what you're saying is that in order to not have your rights violated you should...give up your rights? what the fuck?
  • Bob · 7 months ago
    cops at the boarder can search your car for no reason thats the law. when they tell you something do it or you get what coming to you. he's a a fucking idiot.
  • Jason · 7 months ago
    If you have nothing to hide just comply. As an American your rights are revoked if you become a suspect. Check out the Patriots Act! Being a pastor he should have followed his teachings and comply with government. Acting like a jackass near the boarder is not recommended. He looks like a meth-head. Pupils are pretty dilated and he's pretty energized for just getting the sh*t beat out of him. He got what he deserved. The authorities did nothing wrong, he's still alive! Next time, maybe he'll be smart and comply. Don't let a 10 minute search turn into an all night party!
  • Jane · 7 months ago
    I get the sense he was kinda wanting the cops to do something like this... he was talking to the cops through his window, he should of rolled the window down...


    Also, when you cross borders from state to state, they patrol officers do have the right to request a search of your car. IF YOU ARE CROSSING THE BORDER!

    Anyway, what happened after though was ridiculous..... Yeah this dude probably provoked them a bit, but police officers are outta control. They shouldnt have done the crap they did.
  • DeathWard · 7 months ago
    Well hes sort of an idiot for refusing to let them search his car.
    I know that its really annoying when they do and you know you dont have anything, but its a process you must follow, and when they taser you and drag you out they figure because your refusing their simple demands that you must have a weapon of some sort.
    it was wrong of them to apply so much force upon you, but how do they know you dont have a gun..
    basically dont be a shit head and you wont get your ass kicked
  • B · 7 months ago
    I realize that the cops had no right to do that and that they lied about the dog but if i were him i would have just let them search the car and been on my way in 10 minutes
  • USMCpvt.McDonald · 7 months ago
    we as citizens have certain inalienable rights. if we to do not practice the use of said rights what is the purpose of having them?
    whenever i'm home from tour of duty if there is a situation where i get pulled over i abide by the officers' requests to an acceptable extent. although i do practice my full rights while doing so. as far as i am aware there are only a set of questions that you are legally obligated to answer at routine checkpoints and after being pulled over, in my state we have no law stating that we are obligated to answer any other answers than the norm at state borders. as far as i'm aware the pastor was abiding by the law, and even requested requisit proof of the officers claims when another branch of law enforcement arrived ( which is another inalienable right.) unless something else occured in that situation that i'm not aware of the pastor was within his full rights. i didn't enlist in the usmc to watch our freedoms to be trampled upon or bastardized. unless law enforcement officers can prove otherwise they should all receive reprimands for use of excessive force and gross dereliction of duty.
  • zombi · 7 months ago
    the cops are way out of controll these days and they need to be stopped and re-assessed cops are all assholes evcept for the cool ones. way out of controll PIGS
  • Kevin · 7 months ago
    He is obviously exaggerating. If he were tazered over and over again, he would be dead. He's an idiot who is just out to get cops who are doing their jobs.
  • Jacob · 7 months ago
    Well that's what you get, you fucking idiot.

    But the cops were still wrong.
  • JBlink · 7 months ago
    This is not POLICE.
    They are BORDER PATROL. They are not held to the same standards that police are. They have full rights to ask ANYONE to step out of the vehicle and search person and car for ANY reason. They have the right to take your car apart piece by piece and if they find nothing, simple say "have a nice day." and are not required to put anything back together. Border Patrol is on a federal level and this guy will lose. If you think you are being wronged, you comply now, video tape it, then present your argument to proper authorities. This guy was asking / begging to have this done. I live near Detroit and have crossed over into Canada many times.. Border Patrol is not people you screw with. Hell, they should have simply denied him access into the country. You don't like what they were asking, go back to Mexico.
  • Lumis · 7 months ago
    Regardless of what everyone believes, stupidity doesn't void rights granted to you by the Constitution. These officers CLEARLY (if I could emphasize the word CLEARLY any more, I would) used excessive force. There is simply no excuse for it, and anyone who tries to fault the Pastor for attempting to exercise his rights is a fool and I hope that you're never in a position of power.

    Think about it like this; they had the Pastor in holding. Why couldn't they have called in a warrant to search the car, had a judge sign it, and then FAX IT to the checkpoint? Seriously. Why didn't this occur?
  • manstick1986 · 7 months ago
    WTF...i mean if i got pulled over and had nothing to hide i would let them check my car, but we do have rights. Tho law enforcement have to do there job which he was stopping them from doing I feel excessive force is an understatement. He got both windows broken and tased from both sides, one those things can put a guy on hard drugs down and he looks like he weighs 160 pounds wet. That is some fucked up shit.
  • Evan · 7 months ago
    Am I a bad person cause I lol'ed at him screaming when hes being tased?
  • Alex Z · 7 months ago
    this is just disgusting.
    the pastor had the right to know why police were arresting him.
    this is why i fucking hate authority. they are suppose to keeps us safe. is that how they do it? there mother fuckers should be in jail.
    I don't like church either, but the pastor was completely right.
  • AJ · 7 months ago
    Yeah I think both of them where stupid, HOWEVER the paster was only doing what he believed in.

    I mean I dont think not answering a question deserves his car to be shattered and him to be beaten to death.

    Thats why I do NOT want to move or even live temporarely in the US because their cops are just plain out right stupid...

    Atleast in Australia our cops are well trained, and only bring force into the eqasion if its needed, not just because someone wont answer a simple question!
  • Dylan · 7 months ago
    i hope this guy gets paid mad $$$$ and the bitch high school drop out cops go to jail for a couple years
  • Jesus · 7 months ago
    It doesn't matter. New police tactics are torture and cruel punishment until they find something that might be illegal.
  • Adam Fox · 7 months ago
    Lawsuit waiting to happen
  • angr · 7 months ago
  • Charmander · 7 months ago
    if you were a cop and someone refused to answer your questions would you say "o... ok i gues you can go them...". No. this guy was being a douchbag and he gave the cops no other option
  • kenrutl · 7 months ago
    this is like a cry for attention, what kind of weird sense of self righteousness do you have to have to not answer any questions from the police- like, seriously, who gets that offended when a policeman asks questions, its his damn job. how do you assume someone being so difficult isnt trying to conceal something ? id laugh at him to if i were one of the officers and he voluntarly put himself through that.

    The tazing was completely unnecessary and cops are never very smart, thats why they are police and not doctors, but it should never have gotten that far, and now this idiot is going to get paid by my tax money for being a dick.
  • Bryan · 7 months ago
    i think it was the police mens fault they did not have a legit excuse. they also did not tell him if he did not obey they would brake his window and taser him. but also he could of stopped all of this by just letting them search the car.
  • Richard · 7 months ago
    Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which upheld the warrantless search of a car, noting that probable cause existed and the mobility of the automobile made it impracticable to get a search warrant.

    This warrantless search of an automobile is known as the automobile exception. The decision rested on the distinction between stationary structures and movable objects/vehicles. Not only is an automobile movable while stationary structures are not, there is also less of an expectation of privacy in automobiles. This case has been used to increase the scope of warrantless searches.

    Due to a recent decision rendered by the US Supreme Court in Arizona v. Gant, there may be new restrictions on warrantless searches of automobiles under certain, limited circumstances. Arizona v. Gant does not automatically preclude Carroll v. US and does not repeal it.
  • Tang · 7 months ago
    That's police harassment/brutality. Those pigs were so far in the wrong that they ought to get 10 years in a prison full of people they've arrested. ACAB
  • Roisin · 7 months ago
    Group of bullies. An example should be made of these police officers.
  • Corey · 7 months ago
    Did most of you even watch the video? He resisted arrest and refused to get out of the car, so the cops tased him and removed him from the vehicle. They DID NOT beat him, nor did they use any unnecessary force. Tasers are made for situations where a suspect is not compliant and you need to detain them. They had just cause. (Dog alerted to something) Cops do not have to prove to you that the dog alerted on something. They have to have probable cause, which in this case, was present. Knee jerk reactions from the children and hippies out there are hilarious.
  • GreySquirel · 7 months ago
    fucking cops are such dickheads these days. they had no reason at all to search his car. and they didnt answer why they wanted to search his car.
  • Corey · 7 months ago
    Oh, and in case you all care:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_t...

    Border patrol DOES NOT require a warrant to search. Enjoy.
  • coopaloop · 7 months ago
    FIRST!!!!!!!!!!! hahahahahahahahaaha sorry guys i had to do it. carry on.
  • Blake Andujar · 7 months ago
    Someone get the phone number to the department in charge of the cops and lets make some million or so calls.
  • Tom · 7 months ago
    Honestly.. i think if someone denies the cops of searching their car that should be evidence that there may be something wrong/in the vehicle.. the idiot should have let the cops search the car.. instead of arguing like a moron.. BUT the cops should not have been that violent about it.. and the cops gave him a chance to get out of the car... but clearly the pastor isn't to intelligent.. obviously.. both were idiots in this situation..
  • michael · 7 months ago
    refusal to search does not give permission to search, unless there is probable cause.
  • Catherine · 7 months ago
    i believe him!
    look at his face dude!
    that looks like it was rippin blood man!
  • N0z · 7 months ago
    fucking cops abusing their powers on inocent people they should get shot!
  • Pill · 7 months ago
    Yeah,
    Lets look at this. Yes, the guy should have answered the questions, which he does not have any video of, WHY???? I don't know....

    DPS is the group that made the arrest. It was the DPS who made the arrest based on the info they were given from the border patrol. The border patrol told the DPS that the dog gave a sign of drugs or a body, again he has no video of the dog. WHY????I don't know. So the DPS only acted on the info they were given and they had all the right in the world to remove the guy from the car. At the end of the day the only one that is at fault is the dog for telling the border patrol that there was drugs or a human body in the car.

    Tasering him was wrong. But lets be honest, listening to this guy telling his story, don't you want to taser him???? I mean fuck, next time anser the question. f

    The only question I have for a man of the cloth is, were there any photos of naked boys in your car?

    The USA is a police country with a militirized back bone.

    Again, next time just answer the fucking questions. hell, make up a fucking lie if you have to.
  • Brad · 7 months ago
    they guy did not ansure questions asked by the cop. Drug/Bomb sniffing dogs do not bark when they detect something they sit down and wag there tail(because there favorite toy smells like the drugs so they think there going to play feach). They do this so it dose not contamnate the area and barking generally excites both people and the dog. anyway the dog gave the cops probable cause to search his car (he got the 4th admenmit wrong its the rights agents unrepresentable search and seizures not searching without a warrant). From his own testament the cops gave him a hour to comply. i also dont think the cop pushed him into the ground with his foot. My guess was his knee on the back of his head while reaching for his hands to arest him. The cop was not caught in a lie he was mearly stating if you were not a dumbass and answered questions from the start you whoud be on your way but you made this what it is now.

    odds are this will end up with him wining a brutality lawsuit despite his part in this.
  • common sense · 7 months ago
    i hate fucking stupidity it was totally stupid of those officers and if they get away with that stupidity ill be so pissed
  • Lowkey · 7 months ago
    Alright one think, weather there was a dog, each one is trained to react differently, some bark, some scratch, some just sit. They all react differently. All the dogs will only react if they smell it. Weather it is in the suspects clothing or the car. Weather theres a baggie or not of drugs thats a different story.
  • Cade · 7 months ago
    After reading most of the replies to this, I must ask, what kind of a fucked up country are we living in when there are fucktards like those here who think the pastor did ANYTHING wrong. The officers were clearly in the wrong on this one. You don't have to give them any information if you don't want to, and from the video, they did NOT have a search warrant. I can only hope I end up in a situation such as this. Not only is he completely justified in a major lawsuit, he should demand the pricks lose their jobs as well. They've ruined themselves and their careers and should have to live with the shame.
  • shane · 7 months ago
    heres a few common sense things you should know.... 1) If a cop asks u a question, dont be a d-bag and refuse to answer. 2) If they say "get out of your car" then u should get out of the damn car. 3) If a drug sniffing dog alerts at ur car become more of a d-bag, just get out and let them have a look. 4) no one ever gets tasered for following instructions. 5) If anyone (regardless if its a cop) says they will use force if u dont comply then its a good idea to do what they want u to.

    Also less common sense but good stuff to know.... 6) drug sniffing dogs dont always bark to alert so as to not alert the person being searched. 7) if someone pulls out a night stick and tells you to close ur eyes, ur about to have shitty day unless u do as ur told. 8) dont make videos like this and leave out the beginning that probably showed how wrong you were

    as for excessive force... im all in favor of morons like this gettin beat up cus its a lesson to just do what ur supposed to do and is a deterrent to future morons
  • shane · 7 months ago
    correction... meant to say in #5, anyone armed. cus if they have a gun ur prob not guna win a fight with them
  • Firefighter · 7 months ago
    If you had nothing to hide, why did you refuse to let them search your car? That only gives them a reason to bring the drug dog over. As for your skepticism of the dog, some dogs are trained to alert by scratching at the vehicle or simply sitting.

    They certainly used excessive force, but you could have avoided the entire situation by complying with their request for you to step out of the car. Failure to obey a lawful order is a crime, and gives the officer cause to arrest you. If you believe the officer is in the wrong, you take action later through the courts, not with the officer at the scene.
  • Randy · 7 months ago
    Meh, in one case he should of complyed to avoid trouble but in another case the police used extremely unecessary force
  • Karma · 7 months ago
    Cops have been doing this type of shit for years. Now it's a problem because it's being done to a white man. The bottem line is These Cops need to get there shit together. It's Wrong . I guess since they don't get paid enough they take that shit out on the people.Don't get me wrong. there are some good cops. I dated one ..But, he was slick and had drinkin problems. That's why we are not together. I say 90% of cops need to talk to a Shrink.
  • 2n00b2die · 7 months ago
    acab man! police aren't super humans that you have to answer everything to. the only problem is not enough people question their self given rights. in a perfect world these guys would face a court with assault or whatever its called in english and if found guilty, put in jail. but they probably will get 2 week suspencion
  • reannda · 7 months ago
    what the fuckk. what a asshole..
    i think cops just enjoy tasering people, because now they do it for no fucking reasons at all.
  • wcsminorcircuit · 7 months ago
    If I was him I would've just let them search my car. That seems like the sensible thing to do. He did act suspicious, that is no doubt. However getting his ass whooped that hard is out of the question. Those officers should get fired. He's lucky that he's white. If he was any other race he might've died, which is bullshit but probably a reality nonetheless. This whole story shows how our government is becoming a totalitarian regime even under the auspices of Obama. Some change really needs to come.
  • mark · 7 months ago
    I think the most important thing we're forgetting here is that he's a leagal white male...so he's pretty much screwed by his own system. I think the cops will get a slap on the wrist for this. he was resisting the arrest by not getting out of his car, whether the arrest was valid or not is a different subject.
  • Elementalist · 7 months ago
    He may be charged with resisting arrest, but that doesn't change the fact that the police were (seemlingly) lying about the whole thing AND they used excessive force. So it doesn't matter if he was charged with resisting arrest. What matters is that the cops need to be charged with their crimes.
  • mark · 7 months ago
    At 1:19 you can see the cop/border guy smiling as he tazers the person in the car.
  • chris · 7 months ago
    You are wrong. I study criminal justice and there was not one time he resisted arrest by law. As he said he had every right as of the fourth amendment to refuse a search with no probable cause at point. The police officer admitted not willing to bring the dog back down and if the dumb ass cop knew he job and the right of civilians, he should of let him pass. Yes, he could of gotten out of the car and made it much more easier, but its the fact that he as that right to refuse since its his right to do so. Those cops should not get a slap on the wrist but be fired from the job they could not upheld. If the man is smart, he will get all video records from the entire scene, turn around and draw a civil suit and sue the shit out of them and will win with no questioning. And if you do not understand or believe what i have said, pick up a criminal procedure book and read it and understand your rights. This man is not at fault by no means.
  • jacksaxhat · 7 months ago
    The worlds Gone to the dogs
    and where was god ?
  • john · 7 months ago
    Whoa!!!
  • mikez · 7 months ago
    the fact is, mark. they need grounds to arrest him in the first place and they didnt have any. therefor how can they say they're arresting him for resisting arrest when by law they cannot arrest him in the first place?
    this is da most outrageous abuse of authority i think i've ever heard of and i hope these officers are jailed and this guy sues border patrol!
  • Wren · 7 months ago
    This is what I can't understand...He feels like they were wrong stopping him, great step out of the car and let them do whatever they need to do and when there done complain. Why waste an hour fighting something that was going to happen from the onset of the stop. More importantly, fuel their suspicion by acting like a complete jerk.
    Do I think he has the right to refuse answering question and having his car searched? Absolutely, but when a routine stop has escalated to threatening arrest you are just making this into a fight (hence the camera). I don't know about you but I don't just keep a camera with me at all times and when a cop comes to my window think "hey this is going to be great video footage"(totally excluding Phil from that statement).
    Just a note on the officers, come on people… Nobody likes cops but I do not see you stepping up to protect the rest of us and at the end of the day, you just can’t be overly nice in a job like that. They did let him sit in his car for an hour before removing him…don’t you think that counts for something.
  • some random guy · 7 months ago
    You cannot say that this was resisting arrest i do not understand how everyone can not just agree that these cops are a bunch of fucking idiots who in my opinion need to be punished,
  • J · 7 months ago
    How is that resisting arrest? He wasn't under arrest.
  • !!!!!! · 7 months ago
    He should of just got out of his car and they'd verbally talk about his alleged charges. You won't win a battle with a cop; if they want you they'll get you and especially in that situation.

    The Taser wasn't needed tho imo; that was excessive force and something should and could be done, but I'm sure its nothing new for them =/
  • Uraikol · 7 months ago
    From all of the things i've seen from american cops, this is my opinion:
    YOUR SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK YOU MORONS!
    Almost every single one of your bloody cops use UNECESSARY MUCH VIOLENCE! And why in hell were they MOCKING him afterwards!? I might not belive in god or any of that stuff but this is a VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS and more PROOF THAT AMERICAN COPS USE THEIR POWER IN THE WRONG WAY! And they did not even have a proper reason to arrest him or search his car! Now to THE BIG QUESTION, why do the government of the United States hire theese SICK PEOPLE to be men of law? And if you still think i'm wrong just check some episodes of cops or something. That's all for now.
  • shocked in mobile · 7 months ago
    how in the world can you say this was good cop behavior?! they should be punished, and the border patrol needs to take responsibility too, someone get this in the hands of the major media outlets or in obama's hands or at least in the hands of someone who can do something about it!
  • DjQurt · 7 months ago
    it doesnt matter if he resisted, they did not have any reason, a common mistake made by people is thinking they have to obey everything a cop says which is fuckin false. they had no probably cause, lied about the dog which they always do. cops are totally wrong in this situation.
  • Olly · 7 months ago
    Since when did it matter if cops were in the wrong..? He wasn't going to change the guys mind the cops were obviously board assholes wanting a bit of drama. If the guy wasn't doing anything illegal he should have just got out the car, made sure he made it known he objected to the search without a warrant when they arrested him. If they continued, he just takes them to court on the violations to his civil rights. Which is what he did now minus pain and bleeding.
  • Olly · 7 months ago
    What a stupid thing to say... "He got screwed by his own system" if anything this vid shows that there isnt any system you moron.. There are just people some are assholes who clump together and use ANY KIND OF REASON to do this shit... Stop acting like a whole demographic's all in on it...
  • Zinglogo · 7 months ago
    Damn ass border patroal
    what dicks he did nothing wrong
  • Andy · 7 months ago
    All he had to do was get out of the car, this is his fault they did everythung by protocall.
  • Laura · 7 months ago
    uh.... learn how to spell.
    and it was not a Border Patrol who tazed the arrogant Pastor. It was an Arizona Highway Patrol officer.

    watch the damn movie again and listen to him freaking refusing to get out of his car...
    and they would be on alert because they're trying to keep terrorists out of the country.
    and yes... how could he be a terrorist if he's a pastor?

    uh... how the fuck are they supposed to know his life story.

    know the facts before you freaking comment. and pick up a dictionary while you're at it.
  • AGuyOnDaCouch · 7 months ago
    WOW. And to you 'G', it's called our 4th ammendment right to protect us from illegal search and seizure so shit like this don't happen. I hope he sues the shit outta them. One of these days the renegade cops are gonna lose their power. I Just hope i'm still alive to see it.
  • Elementalist · 7 months ago
    excessive force was definitely used. They break the window and instantly taser him while he has his eyes closed nonetheless. It sounds like they got all pissy because they weren't being listened to, so they wanted to abuse their power some more. It's too bad all the good cops get bad reputations because of douchebags like these.
  • Jesus · 7 months ago
    When I find the cops who did this, I will watch them bleed. I will hear them beg.

    Federal Border Patrol. Lol. A bunch of fat fucks.
  • Julian · 7 months ago
    LoL BECAUSE OF HIS 4TH AMMENDMENT RIGHT, what a fucking joke, if he let them search his vehicle everything would have been fine. but he just had to be an idiot.

    ALL HIS FAULT.
  • Crozic · 7 months ago
    this kinda shit makes me so fuckin angry.
    i hope those cops get FUCKED UP.
    like go to jail for 10 years and get raped every fuckin day.
    i hate that kinda shit man... fuckin arrogant assholes
  • Edward · 7 months ago
    Woah, woah, woah! Why such anger? Seriously, that's a LOT of hatred for one person.
  • Thetter · 7 months ago
    Exactly - the insecure morons otherwise known as the cops/DPS in this situation need to see the other side of what they are doing to innocent people - the "wrong side of the law", in other words. What they are doing to people here, and everywhere, everyday is completely outrageous. And they almost always get away with it - they think it's their god given right as cops to treat people like this - and we better just bow down to them because they are the almighty authority over us.

    It's like every insecure idiot that gets fired from normal jobs or kicked out of the military becomes a cop. Not to say that all cops are bad or evil, because I know plenty who are not. There are lots of great cops - and I have nothing but the utmost respect for them. I'm talking about the others here. Way too many power tripping or insecure pricks with a chip on their shoulder become cops and are looking to take their problems out on innocent citizens. Many seem to do it for nothing but the power. There should be some filtering mechanism in place to keep these degenerate scumbags from ever getting hired into a position of such great "authority" and power - or at least to get rid of them quickly and permanently. In my experience, it seems that a huge percentage of all officers fall into that evil category we are seeing here. Many politicians too, come to think of it.

    All of that being said, this is still the best place in the world to live, by far - which seems a bit scary at times like this...
  • Jingy · 7 months ago
    well, hge should've atleast stepped out if his car.. maybe they had mistaken him for someone. don't blindlessly judge them because you just hate the uniform
  • anon · 7 months ago
    @mark:

    you incredible son of a bitch, they use force you idiot, NO ONE can abuse their power in a way like that.

    If you REALLY think that:

    "he was resisting the arrest by not getting out of his car, whether the arrest was valid or not is a different subject."

    you are full of shit, or either you are a 15 fucking years old.

    Really dude, get some common sense for fuck`s sake
  • Peter-Jay Linton · 7 months ago
    He did absolutely nothing wrong....They love to abuse there authority its sickening to see this. Bullshit about under arrest he has a right to know what the fuck hes being arrested for..they didnt give him a reason so fuck them.
  • MiTHMoN · 7 months ago
    Too right.
    If what happened in this video was allowed to happen, then police could go up to someone and ask them to come with them for almost no reason, and not let them know why.
    Just imagine, you're walking down the street and a candy wrapper falls out your pocket.
    "You're under arrest."
    "Why?"
    "Come peacefully, you're under arrest."
    "Tell me why."
    *TAZER!*
  • Sak · 7 months ago
    MiTHMoN:
    Alot of police think that's the law.

    But there was excessive force in that the person was tasered twice and stomped on.

    Taser pain is the most excruciating pain ever. That is because tasers give so much electricity, the person's entire nervous system is on fire and they collapse and convulse. So Amnesty International and the UN say tasers should only be used when DEADLY FORCE would be allowed.

    This guy should sue because he was not an agressive subject, so tasering and face stomping violated excessive force rules.
  • Alesia · 7 months ago
    You know...I was finally able to see the pastor's video...and I seriously think he's fabricating most of this...We don't get a good view from the servailance camera, so how do we truly know if he's not lying.

    Also, he's a pastor, and you know...someone who is supposed to be a man of God would have already forgiven those men because it is not God's way to be spiteful, vendictive, hateful towards other even after everything that's been done. The whole, turn the other cheek thing.

    ALSO! How the HELL did he get the other camera's? Something is fishy here...

    He's just a big baby.
  • Alesia · 7 months ago
    Okay...I'm going to take back that "big baby" remark...but even still...I really think he is looking for sympathy of something that he is exagerating. I know people are disagreeing with me 100%, but that's fine. I was raised around Police officers and I know when things are being fabricated and when cops are breaking their regulations.
  • MattWehrle · 7 months ago
    I doesn't matter if he's a pastor. The dude's not Jesus. He has no ability to live with holes in his body, nor to have the piss beaten out of him and not be upset. I was versed and raised in the Christianity. You turn the other cheek, but that doesn't mean you don't put your hands up to stop the beating.

    That cop didn't really seem like an asshole. Personally, I just woulda let the search my car, insult them when nothing was there, THEN go on my way. But the pastor DOES have rights so. Those cops were definitely in the wrong imo.
  • JESUS · 7 months ago
    ya but they had no reason to tase him and beat him, he wasnt resisting, just sitting there. these cops are breaking regulations, im an explorer (cop in training) and they are total douches and should be arrested themselves
  • Nathan · 7 months ago
    Yea... christianity is based of off a zombie coming to life to kill all the people that don't believe in him... Okay...
  • George · 7 months ago
    then you're not the type of person america runs on. sure as soon as anyone is told by the police that a dog is sniffing drugs in your car you would just let them see that there is nothing there. but you should still have the right to privacy when they arent showing you any dog at all ,and it could be just made up to get you to allow them to search.
  • Donut · 7 months ago
    i didnt realize that the scars from 11 stiches and glass wounds was an exaggeration
  • Nathan · 7 months ago
    He was right though. Even if they have probable causes to search your car, you still need a warrant. Sure, he was fabricating the story a bit, but they still broke the law and assaulted a man. The worst thing is that they will only have pay a fine.
  • dave · 7 months ago
    Why do people who know nothing about Christianity always talk as if they knew? Vengeance belongs to God, but that doesn't mean no one should ever feel anger. In fact, you are not a true Christian if INJUSTICE does not anger you! You're buying into the whole "touchy-feely, lovey-dovey, ignorant" Christian stereotype. Christians are called to be people who reflect not only God's love, but also his justice. You can't do the latter if you don't speak up for what is right.
  • Phil · 7 months ago
    This happened in the land of the free, hmmm.

    It's quite amusing that the border guards have Mexican surnames.
  • Jimmy · 7 months ago
    Alesia well if you were brought up by police officers I guess that's why you are such a dick nowadays
  • Michael · 7 months ago
    Alesia, are you serious? First off have you read the Bible? That god is a vindictive S.O.B. Secondly, my mother is a police officer. Tazering a suspect isn't used unless they are fighting back. not on someone that is passively resisting. In order for him to be arrested for resisting arrest they have to actually tell him that he is under arrest for something. This is a clear case of abuse of power.
    I have nothing against cops. Most of them are good folk trying to do what they can to protect us from criminals. But a few of them are just serious fucktards.

    And what the hell is there a "border patrol" doing between sanfran and pheonix?
  • KEVIN · 7 months ago
    YOU FORGIVE A PERSON FOR CALLING U A NAME OR FOR LYING TO YOU , BUT I'LL BE DAMNED IF I FORGIVE SOMEONE FOR BEATING ME ABOUT FOR NO REASON.HOPE THEY BURN IN HELL .
  • Freddy · 7 months ago
    Oh hey look, your already following in your dad's footsteps, telling people how they should act, and what they should and should not do, simply because you say so, even though you are probably wrong more than most people. But hey your the daughter of a cop, so your above other people right? Your better than everyone else I suppose huh? Heck you might even have a little shiny badge to prove it haha.
  • Vincent · 7 months ago
    He was able to get the other videos because he was suing them for excessive force, assault, and a couple of other things. I've followed this guy's videos, and he's not faking. As for the whole "man of God" thing about not being vindictive and spiteful, this isn't about spite or getting vindication. This is about his rights and liberties... both of which were clearly violated by the border patrol and then by the state trooper. He has every right to be told why he's being detained.
  • chimmy · 7 months ago
    you are a fucktard, and its called asking for the security tapes as evidence for a court case. damn you are stupid
  • frank · 7 months ago
    i wish this would happen to u so u could no how it feels...it doesnt matter if hes a pastor they violated his rights...and didnt tell him y he was being arrested...and used excess force man theres got to be something wrong wit u if u puit any if or y's to this vid...this is some fucked up shit
  • KJCavalier · 7 months ago
    OK here is the rest of the scoop. Pastor, I do believe you would have been proven innocent in a court of law and in turn, you could have sued for false imprisonment. instead you chose to refuse a direct command from a law enforcement officer, this constitutes resisting, and since this was an arrest being put into place, resisting arrest was the call. You are in a moving vehicle and refusing to exit, thus the use of a taser has become necessary. Your vehicle could have very easily been used as a weapon, Your actions and decisions caused the response you received. Had you cooperated, the entire matter probably would have been over sooner, and you wouldn't have made a reason to sensationalize another brutality story.
  • DJRecreation · 7 months ago
    So...what do you know about cops fabricating things? ;)
  • gil · 7 months ago
    what wrong with our country? sheeple like ALESIA
  • Andreas · 7 months ago
    Alesia, are you retarded? No offence.

    Does it matter if he's a pastor or fucking hugh heffner? The point is that the Cops are idiots. Turn the other cheak? lol Does that mean staying quiet and taking shit? Your not thinking at all.

    The police are supose to BE THE PUBLICS safety and they act like this? What this man is showing by this video is how totally fucked up american cops can be, awareness. If he was trying to get back at them he would go there and beat them. This isn't about him. Police need to face justice aswell. Should he just let them get away with this? so they can keep on being asses to other people? That would be a crime.
  • bloopy · 7 months ago
    sorry guys but you have the right to not exit your vehicle in any situation where you are pulled over. until the officer provides a warrant and cause + Myranda rights. so the officer should be fired.
    know your rights people!!!
  • Alesia · 7 months ago
    1) Probably cause means no warrant needed at a routine traffic stop

    2) Myranda's are read after the person is being placed into handcuffs and told why he is being arrested. They told him why they were arresting him (border control doesn't play), but they didn't have him out of the car with cuff on, so they couldn't Myrandize him.

    And how do I know...because I'm a cops daughter and growing up with a cop as a dad taught me many things in the law enforcements' lives.
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    I'm sure your dad does a great job as a police officer, but that does not mean that all cops do. Not only that, but I'm sure that some of what you've learned from your father is somewhat of a biased take of what the law actually is, which is understandable.
    The officer's involved in this video did not have the right to search the man's vehicle (a dog wagging it's tail is not probable cause) nor did they have the right to use the excessive force that they did on that poor man.
  • cars · 7 months ago
    they had no probable cause from what i saw
  • Freddy · 7 months ago
    First off your growing up with law enforcement just makes you blind to the corrupted side of it. Secondly, to have probable cause, you actually have to have a probable cause, not just, I'm a cop and I said so because I think I'm better than everyone else. Thirdly, he obviously didn't try to run away or resist arrest, and he obviously had huge gashes in his head, so your an idiot for even thinking he was way over exaggerating. Cause if you ever got a gash in your head you would know that it bleeds like hell. And I think cops just think its funny to taze people know. Even if it was just once it was way more force than necessary.
  • Freddy · 7 months ago
    What I'm saying is that your a fool, because even if it was way over exaggerated, it is clear from the video, even just the first one, that the pigs were abusing their power. Not that I'm saying it was way over exaggerated, to him everything probably was that bad, seeing as his muscles were going through uncontrollable spasms during most of the arrest.
  • KEVIN · 7 months ago
    JUST CAUSE YOU LIVE WITH COPS OR KNOW COPS DOESN'T MAKE THEM ANGELS . THAT WHY THE ONLY PERSON IN A BADGE I TRUST IS I.A.D..PLUS THEY GET TO BUST ASSHOLE COPS .
  • Vincent · 7 months ago
    probable cause has to have a stated reason.

    For example, if I wanted to search your vehicle because of probable cause, i HAVE to tell you why i have probable cause. If i don't tell you, then i don't have probable cause.
  • chris · 7 months ago
    your definition of probable cause is not complete. Yes a officer can search a car with just probable cause, but it has to be reasonable and they must tell the suspect before any action. Now, they lost their probable cause when the refused to bring the dog back down for confirmation. Now if you want to number and define probable cause, let me show you what the true term of probable cause is and if u think i am wrong, ask your mommy and look at the criminal procedure for the criminal justice professional by John N. Ferdico.
    1... probable cause, exists when the facts and circumstances within a person's knowledge and of which he or she ahs reasonably trustworthy information are SUFFICIENT in themselves to justify a person of reasonable cautin and prudence in believing that something is true. It means something less than certainty, but more than mere suspicion, speculation, or possibility.
    I can keep going but i might, hopefully you understand. Just because you are a daughter of a cop, doesn't mean you know ANYTHING about the law. Study your shit before you preach it. Oh, I am a criminal justice major so please try to lecture me.

    two, they never told him why he is being arrested. when he asked them, the officer could not come up with anything. Now with time they will come up with some stupid reason which will be through out due the issue at hand which should and if he's smart lead to a civil suit. So those Miranda rights that were read to him will be admissible in court, promise you, that is why it will be dismissed and those cops and county will suffer them losing their jobs and a hell of a civil suit.

    Read you stuff before you preach it, and so you know, if you decide to read it, try to understand your Fourth Amendment rights and the entire CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAM.
  • Infernal Shotgun · 7 months ago
    He's claiming that their probable cause is bullshit. Their probable cause was the dog barking, which, at the very least, he didn't hear. And considering that they refused to bring the dog back, of course he's gonna claim that they're bullshitting him.

    But you are right about probable cause allowing you to search a car without a warrant. Something about it being considered a "mobile crime scene", I think.
  • platinum6string · 7 months ago
    first, most drug dogs dont bark... they sit and point with their nose... and why the fuck would he make the dog come sniff it again when he doesnt need to. regardless of whether or not this dumbass believed the dog signaled the car, when the officer says the dog did and asks you to get out of the car... you get the fuck out of the car.... it wasnt a get out if you feel like it... it was get out of the car... so you get the fuck out...
  • CJ · 7 months ago
    You sound just like one of these police men, going for the kill, and then asking the question. We're talkig about a person which is asking the police (who should be protecting him) to show him what he did wrong, and they didn't want to, so no, i don't have to got out. It's not enough to tell me, show me, I do not take arders from the police.
  • Zac · 7 months ago
    dissagreeing with an officer does not equal probable cause. If we allow shit like this to happen without consequence we will end up with absolutely no rights as citizens. There were better solutions to solving what they considered to be a possible or aparantly more like absolute and life threatening situation. Give an asshole a weapon and any amount of legal reign and you can be sure he's going to abuse the use of both of them. Cops don't give a shit about the public. The don't work for the public. Cops only protect other cops and laws. They don't deserve a cent of the tax money they get. We're supposed to be paying them to protect our best interests as a nation. Not penalize patrons for breaking laws that for the most part are created through prejudices or to make them money and keep them out of trouble when they get caught abusing their "power". If not then tell me why fines are raised regularly or why state wide stings occur or laws keep getting ammended to allow government officals more and more power over the public. When was the last time you actually sincerely thanked a police officer for anything he had done for/to you? Cameras don't lie these fuckers need delt with. Too bad it's almost certain that a slap on the wrist probably more painful than what these guys are punished with. if anything at all.
  • PigBisquitNow · 7 months ago
    I just cant wait till this shit happens to one of you who are acting like the pastor got what he deserved. He did nothing and was tazed and beaten. But it doesnt matter because "my dads a cop and I'm on their side. Quit taking sides and look at the facts. And if you think this is justified dont come crying to anyone when a cop does this shit to you. you never know, he might not know your Daddy and end up tazing you.
  • FNG · 7 months ago
    actually bud drug dogs go nuts when they find drugs, it the bomb dogs who sit and point for obvious reasons.
  • theguythatgottasedisadouche · 7 months ago
    the thing is those dogs dont need to bark all they have to do is point, officers are trained to know the very subtle signal from the dog. If the dog goes off and it is a criminal trafficing drugs what do you think will happen? He will sit there and not try to run? Its just logical that the dog wouldnt make a noise.

    As for nothing being found in this case, Yea cops bad... but he still shoudlnt have refused.
  • Cowboy · 7 months ago
    Oooohhhh, okay I get it. If a dog sits and points it's nose, that means that there's drugs or maybe even a human hidden where the dog's nose is pointing. So that must mean that I have drugs or a human hiding on me right now! Thanks for explaining how advanced these police dogs are, I totally get why they suspected this man of carrying contraband...because the highly trained dog sat and pointed it's nose.
  • DJRecreation · 7 months ago
    Who told you drug dogs don't bark? Of course they do, they're supposed to in order alert the officer thats there are drugs there. They also scratch pretty hard trying to dig in if they find any drugs...I know this through experience lmao.
  • Lestat · 7 months ago
    My dad owns a drug dog and when he does the training when I'm around his and all the other dogs that his colleges own, sit rather than bark and they aren't taught to scratch, so if you correct them for scratching they wont do that either. l2traindogs.
  • Kainsshadow · 7 months ago
    a cop arriving on the site, being told the information, but then having it refuted by the person in question should have followed common sense just to have it checked again. It was nothing more then having the dog come over again for 1 min...

    Also they can check with "probable cause". but they still need to state that. And they also must be told what they are being held for.

    It is also an excessive use of force, even on an aggressive suspect to use that much man power, the tazers, and braking the glass on BOTH sides.

    Lastly, just got to point out, your quote "I was raised around Police officers and I know when things are being fabricated and when cops are breaking their regulations." Do you really listen to yourself?

    Seriously, if this was you walking down the street, and cop pulls you aside, and wants to see whats in your backpack. You got your your favorite sex toy in there, or something else equally embarrassing, you'd certainly want to know why he wants to look in there. After about 20 mins of asking, he says cause he asked some kids mom something, about as reliable as the dog, and then decides to hell with it, whips out the Mace, the nightstick, and mighty boot. Eyes red, hand broken, face on the ground and slowly dragged to the nearest clinic, which you have to wait in line. Hell, that's even been than this guy. This story only had one Cop (if you can call them that when they do this sort of thing).

    Even if what he says is a stretch, both the cams in the first video go together. There is no doubt that they did break both sides, and dragged his out of his car, and had to drag him into the office.
  • Melissa · 7 months ago
    Both my parents are construction workers, doesn't mean I can build a house. Being a cops daughter doesn't make your opinion

    a) any more viable than anyone else's
    b) right.

    If YOU were a LAWYER, I would give your OPINION more weight. A cop's daughter should know that hearsay is inadmissable.

    First, you DO have the right to know why you're being searched and why you're being arrested. I believe in this case he was told the search was for suspicion of drugs, which they legally can search his car for. But they gave no reason for the arrest. While I'm not sure about the dog thing "My drug dog barked" seems highly suspicious and, you DON'T HAVE TO CONSENT TO A DOG SNIFF ANYWAY! It's a form of searching.

    While I am not a lawyer, I got all of my information from flexyourrights.org
  • PigBisquitNow · 7 months ago
    Like that cops are bullies and there job is to pick on and ticket the free citizens of this country. Oh and to taze you.
  • Rex · 7 months ago
    And any good upstanding cop would know that this right here, what just happened, is FUCKED BEYOND BELIEF! This is complete group of fucked up power hungry psychos who all deserve to be shot (And yes, they will get their dues), for desecrating all that law enforcement stands for! This is bullshit, and it will be taken care of...either by god, or some pissed off individual. If this is what law is now, than I can see why there's so many cop killers.

    To those cops who are still legit, more power to you. We are few and far between in this world. And to these guys...just burn.
  • Swappy · 7 months ago
    Actually you do not have the right to stay in your car if a police officer pulls you over and asks you to exit your vehicle. Secondly, a warrant is not required to remove someone from a vehicle. Know YOUR rights! It's called listening comprehension skills. If the guy would have done as instructed none of this would have happened.
  • FNG · 7 months ago
    Bloop you are soooo wrong my friend.
    A:"but you have the right to not exit your vehicle in any situation where you are pulled over" If a police officer has reasonalbe suspicion he can remove you from your vehicle.
    B:"provides a warrant and cause + Myranda rights". In the case of a traffic stop where a police officer has reasonable suspicion or proabable cause there is no need for a warrant. In the case of Miranda, that only has to be read where, after being arrested/detained, he is being formally interviewed, not during the onset of an incident like we have hear.

    The police were a little excessive maybe, but a passive resister is still restisting a lawful order given by compitent authority, right or wrong, he should have complied to that authority end of story.

    In the video he asked that this dog that hi on his car be brought back out, um no he has no right in that instance to make that requests until he is safely out of the vehicle where a proper search can be conducted.

    Do you think the freedoms you enjoy are actually free? With the always present increase in terrorist threats coming from our borders there is to be expected some loss of the freedom you once enjoyed crossing that border.

    Short of it, the pastor was in the wrong for not obeying a lawful order given by compitent authority, If the officers could not access the man because he lockd himself in his vehicle they have the right to remove him by whatever means is necessary and available to them.
  • Zephos · 7 months ago
    Shoulda gotten out of the fucking car you dumbass.
  • Zephos · 7 months ago
    You also have the right to not take a breathalyzer, which means they basically arrest you immediately. Give me tazer i'll shoot this guy myself.
  • Jared · 7 months ago
    yea a lesson to just listen to the under educated police/ border control personals, as they want to beat you up so don't give them a reason :)
  • Peter-Jay Linton · 7 months ago
    Alesia you need to shut the fuck up
  • Pwnmachine · 7 months ago
    THANK YOU.
  • Joe · 7 months ago
    yeah no kidding, she's a fuckin idiot
  • wolf · 7 months ago
    she was the only one who made sense.... so how about you tards stfu you're the idiots
  • The TP · 7 months ago
    I agree that she's an idiot. I'm mean who can listen to someone who cant even get her spelling correct. I mean "probably cause" WTF If you are going to try to school someone, you might want to actually show them you are somewhat credible (or at least know how to use spell check). Being a cops daughter just says that daddy's not around much.
  • Peter · 7 months ago
    and stop defending the fucked up police
  • gaby · 7 months ago
    i understand your point of view, but why be so difficult. if you have nothing to hide just let them search you and you would have been out of there in a heart beat. sometimes you just have to be the bigger person...
  • Troy · 7 months ago
    You guys saying he is fabricating it. Look, that'd be honest assumption, I suppose. Except you are forgetting that they busted the windows of his car, which we can clearly see, shot him with tasers, we can also see, and left him with a wound for 11 stitches. Even if he fabricated great parts of this, there's no way around that.

    To the camera's question. On google nowadays you can get camera access into pretty much anything. With the right codes you can get into almost any camera.
  • The Truth · 7 months ago
    I Dont give a shit if this guys a pastor
    it was his fault this happend
    for resesting if you wanna see a f'd up video
    watch the one that the cop kicks the guy in the head this was his fault hes just
    trying to get some money
  • Sonicboomin1 · 7 months ago
    The police told him what to do, and why they were doing it. He refused to unlock the car and get out of the vehicle. The taser was used to ensure the safety of the police officers. Whether or not excessive force was used or not, isn't clear. The cuts on his head could be from when he was being tasered, or handcuffed.
  • Kayzilla · 7 months ago
    Legally, he did nothing wrong. Cops at faulty for this one. *BUT* he kind of messed up on the common sense department. You could tell in the video of the action that he was being condescending and an overall hassle, eventually someone's going to get pissed off and try to take advantage of their authoritian position.

    The smart thing would've been to just let them search his car, answer the questions, and he probably would've been out of that stop in less then 30 minutes. While it wasn't *right*, the guy had it coming.
  • King · 7 months ago
    They ask him several times to get out. And he said no.
    Who knows what he was hiding inside the car.
    Could have been drugs or guns

    EXCEPT for the beat down that was over the top.
  • Mikell · 7 months ago
    Ok, this is is a nutcase. I think he was looking to start this from the start. Check out the following links to other things this guy has done. I was on his side at first, but then after looking around I found some info i think we all might want to see.

    This one is of him harassing other cops
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=queM4c-W048

    This one is of him saying that Obama is the devil and cussing in his "church" when someone challenges him.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=queM4c-W048
  • Mikell · 7 months ago
  • Bob · 7 months ago
    The "pastor" is a fucking cunt. If you watch his other videos, he seems to try to get himself in that kind of situation. All the local law enforcement agencies probably know his car. The DHS cops fianlly made up a bullshit reason to beat the fuck out of his punk ass. The prick is wasting OUR tax dollars by distracting cops to put up with his shit. Theonly thing the cops did wrong was not break his camera so he could not make any more whinning videos.
  • cars · 7 months ago
    this is rediculous. police do not have the right to do that. if i get pulled over i never roll my window down mor than a quarter of an inch and always stop in public places.
  • ana · 7 months ago
    so this isnt the first time he has been stopped by border patrol but in other videos he is instigating the officers
  • random guy · 7 months ago
    yeah alesia please shut the fuck up do u think people care that you grew up round cops?
  • ana · 7 months ago
  • salva91 · 7 months ago
    why won't you just friggin let them search the car if you didn't have anything in there???
    come on sense people
    i wouldn't have resisted
    you're a dumb ass...
    and you call yourself a pastor?
    i don't know what to say...
  • Andrew U · 7 months ago
    lol that sucks. im feeling this is ganna be up on FML :D haha
  • Mercy · 7 months ago
    i'm curious as to what the boarder patrol has to say...but i'm guessing "no comment"
  • Pwnmachine · 7 months ago
    Alesia, people like you make me so mad, you're a joke.. you are the reason why important things like this don't get checked and taken care of in this country. I've been in situations like this with policemen before they think they own everything, they tell you how to speak to them, they believe they are on a higher level than you, apparently not even human. Don't forget, like he was saying.. they love to mock and make fun of you all they can, and treat you like garbage because some idiot decided to give these backwards people a LITTLE bit of power and the worst part is they get away with it. In my opinion terminate them from there jobs, don't allow them to ever get another job involving any type of law enforcement, make an example out of these clowns.. allow this man to press charges on the ones that tazered a PASTOR multiple times while on the ground and obviously showing no sign of hostility or weapons in possession with his hands on his head, well.. one on his camera and one on his face obviously. This guy deserves justice there is an example to be made here. People are Disgusting.
  • Gerry Owen · 7 months ago
    First off, ALWAYS remember that the Border Patrol is NOT governed by the same rules and regulations as normal police, or even as the FBI. Since they are covering entry/access ports, the rules are different in the Customs Zone. People crossing in can be detained for pretty much anything, and this Customs zone extends 20 miles from the border.

    Granted, the Border Patrol personnel involved in this case were led by and possibly included a couple power tripping assholes, but that does not change the fact that they were perfectly in their rights.

    Things are different along the border, your rights don't automatically apply just bcause you are a few feet in....
  • spence · 7 months ago
    fuckin asshole cops think they can do whatever they want. i hope their assholes get torn open 5 inches wide from bein butt raped every night in jail for 10 years
  • M.J.A · 7 months ago
    when the cops ask you to get out of the car, you get out of the car even though you know there is nothing you did.
  • tallgeese · 7 months ago
    and get robbed right? If you have rights you CAN use them.
  • Ken · 7 months ago
    Umm.. no. I agree with bloopy and say KNOW YOUR RIGHTS. the 4th amendment exists and SHOULD be enforced by every day people when this shit goes down. Blind acquiescence is not being a lawful citizen. Even if "legal white males" seem to fucked over by "the System", this is not a loophole for anyone who went to Academy and now has a badgegun to do whatever he/she sees fit.
  • Ken · 7 months ago
    having said this, I have been in situations like this before and I have more often than not complied (although I DO think police use their position to pass PERSONAL judgements on citizens before ALL the FACTS are at hand...) Respect breeds respect, but FUCK if some cops don't resort to HUMILIATION to make a "point".
    Remember, they're called "Peace Officers".....
  • PigBisquitNow · 7 months ago
    You do. I dont. They ask you to get out so they can taze you and or beat you and or put you in handcuffs. Otherwise why do I need to get out. You go ahead and just do whatever some random guy tells you. Me, I'll think for myself.
  • Chris-Staples · 7 months ago
    You know after watching this I'm on both sides here. First off he was resisting and if there is nothing to hide then let them search(period) But it does seem like the Officers did take it way too personal. I'm sorry pastor but you are in the wrong! There is no need to be so defensive when you have nothing to hide! Remember do un to others!
  • Katie · 7 months ago
    Theres no reason he should have been tazed and given a gash in his face big enough for 11 stitches.. especially when in the end nothing was found.
  • theguythatgottasedisadouche · 7 months ago
    he should have gotten out of his car. end of story... if he had nothing to hide... why refuse and look suspicious.
  • spence · 7 months ago
    btw alesia's a fuckin retard, show this to your bitch mom see what she thinks
  • JoJo · 7 months ago
    ugh....cops do this everyday, and they hate to punish 'one of their own', I'm sure nothing will happen. Altho something should. I'm so glad the cops here in Hot Springs were given tazers..yay...now they can practice this, I'm sorry I would rather them just have a gun, they at least can have some kind of moral judgment and feel bad because if they shoot and kill someone it might haunt them. Were as these tazers turn them into super cops, who shoot first and ask questions later.
  • Markymark · 7 months ago
    Tasers can kill too.
  • me · 7 months ago
    Way to just take peoples words for fact. Lets all jump on the bandwagon for hating cops cause those stupid bastards are just out the getting paid like shit to fuck with us right?
    So this "pastor" started recording right as some bad stuff starts to happen? Thats convenient isn't it? I've been stopped at checkpoints before and guess what, if you have nothing wrong your gone in less then 5 mins?! So are we supposed to sit here and bitch about our rights, or could you be enough of a citizen to let the police do there job and prevent really bad shit from happening. What a piece of shit this guy is
  • KEVIN · 7 months ago
    THINK THE COPS & BORDER AGENTS SHOULD ALL BE FIRED ,ALL PENSION & BENIFTS STRIPED .THEN TASE THEM .THEN PUT THEM IN JAIL FOR THE CRIME OF THINKING THAT BADGE MAKES YOU BETTER THAN EVERYONE ELSE & FOR BEING FUCKING ASSHOLES.
  • Eric · 7 months ago
    My dad was a cop for 18 years, he retired last year. Now he's doing carpentry. My uncle was also a cop for, Jesus, i think 23 years, he was a chief, as well as a volunteer fire fighter, so i have law enforcement blood. I'm definitely gonna show this stupid shit to my dad. This really pisses me off, and Alesia, your just an idiot. why on God's green earth would a Baptist Pastor LIEEEEEEEEE about being beaten by cops? Do you think he wants to go to hell?!
  • Jundas · 7 months ago
    When a cop tells me he's going to break a window to get me I'll just open the door. My insurance might not cover it if it was done by police ^_^.
  • Cap Nemo · 7 months ago
    In reply to Jundas, The insurance wouldn't cover it if had the opportunity to avoid it, which he plainly did.
  • Trevor · 7 months ago
  • ac608 · 7 months ago
    .... just another wonderful reason to stay the fuck out of america.....
  • Kelsey · 7 months ago
    I have been to that same border patrol station back in January. Me and three of my friends who live in Chandler, AZ went to San Diego for the day and on our way back (around 1 AM) and the police there pulled us over and demanded to search my car. They made us wait outside in the cold while they searched my car and tore it apart. While we were sitting there they kept making comments on how their dog was the best on the force and that we couldn't hide anything from him and one of them kept saying that he hoped that they found something illegal so that they could send us to jail sense it had been a slow night. One of my friends asked for his jacket because he was cold and they wouldn't give it to him and made cracks about how it would be warmer in jail. When they didn't find anything they sent us on our way. Stupid pigs.
  • Michael · 7 months ago
    any idea why there is an internal boarder patrol? does that area crossover into mexico and back? if not then that is not a border to be used for search/siezure. we have the right in the country to freely move about the country without having to show "papers" or anything like that.
  • Swappy · 7 months ago
    Obviously they have the place there for a reason. It may not make sense to you but then again you don't work for them so you don't know why.
  • Kara · 7 months ago
    Oh well, he's a white man so nothing will happen. Now if he were a black man those cops would be screwed!
  • PigBisquitNow · 7 months ago
    Are you serious. If he was black we wouldnt hear anything. Because this shit happen to blacks every minute. Quit complaining that your white. You sound like a dip-shit. Blacks have it "SO GOOD" in America. Yeah.......Jesus, do you listen to yourself.
  • John · 7 months ago
    Are you stupid? Police brutality with a pastor is more important than with a black. It only becomes bad if a black person tells everyone. It wouldn't be any different if it were a black man. Okay? Ignorance is tolerable
  • hhhahhaa · 7 months ago
    hahha, he screamed like a girl
  • David · 7 months ago
    I think he should sue for billions out of these Mother Fudgers, and then taz their asses.......... as a punishment and get fired.
  • Kris · 7 months ago
    If he had nothing to hide he should have got out, he deserved to be arrested for being a smartass and refusing to get out.
  • Fallenangelz · 7 months ago
    I do understand why he was refusing to get out of his car, his rights and all that .. BUT .. if he had just stepped out of the car, popped his trunk so they could see "Oh it's Empty. Thank you for your cooperation." He would have been on his way without any of this.

    By refusing to cooperate with the police makes him suspicious and therefore the following occurred.

    If he had nothing to hide then honestly he had no reason to provoke the officers to forcefully remove him from the vehicle.
  • Chris · 7 months ago
    I understand why he did it, but i think that if the cops were about to break my window, i would have been like... ok F*** it im outta here.

    and I believe that a cop's "suspicion" is not probable cause.

    there needs to be set rules about probable cause if there hasnt been already. it seems too important to have such a large grey area.
  • Infernal Shotgun · 7 months ago
    While it would have (probably) turned out better if he'd just exited the car, allowing the cops to violate his rights encourages them to violate the rights of others. Now I can't claim that he was thinking that, but I hope he was.
  • Jakki · 7 months ago
    Well in that case any drug trafficer can say well what about this right you dont have a warrant at this moment you cant search my car. Than look what enters your country. When they have probable cause they than gain that right to search your car.
  • Infernal Shotgun · 7 months ago
    1) If the dog actually DOES bark, then the police have probable cause, which, under Carroll v. United States, allows the police to search the car without a warrant. However, the pastor said that the dog didn't bark, and he wouldn't get out of the car until the police officers came back with the dog so that he could see it bark.

    2) If the police don't know the guys a drug dealer (I'm gonna say that's another form of probable cause), and the dog doesn't bark, then cops had better not search the guys car.
  • Joe Sushi · 7 months ago
    Your kidding right? The whole "You've got nothing to fear if your innocent" argument has been used by totalitatrian governments and "secret police" since time immortal to control their citizens. Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Chavez they all did it, "We" probably do it in Iraq, and the British did it do the colonists. Thats why we have the 4th amendment.
  • Joe Sushi · 7 months ago
    lol, and the 2nd
  • gil · 7 months ago
    what country are you from dumbass. this isn't supposed to happen here.
  • lionpride · 7 months ago
    I listened to the pastor speak. Its cute to see how there are still some of these die hard idealistic Americans out there who still believe they are free and have rights. Listen people. Truth is, you ain't never been free. You've been treated like a mushroom from day one. Kept in the dark and fed a load of bull. But most people can't handle this truth so they keep the dream alive. Bottom line is...on the beat...on the street..doesn't matter if you are dealing with the crips, the bloods, border patrol or highway patrol. if there is more of them than there are of you, your'e gonna lose if you test these people. They are ego maniacs who got teased as kids in grade school and are now trying to make up for it.
  • Quenton · 7 months ago
    OMG... I hope those cops have gaping assholes for life because of prison rape to be abused like that. I'm sorry for that.
  • Travis H · 7 months ago
    This kind of stuff pisses me off to no end. I don't think it's so much about the legal rights of the situation but about the ethics of the officers. It doesn't matter if the pastor technically broke the law, what matters is that they stopped him for no reason in the first place. Then they pulled the classic power-addicted pig move, saying the suspect is resisting arrest. And the pastor wasn't even NEAR resisting, he kept asking what he was being arrested for in a calm voice. And for all you people that say the cops were justified in this situation your ALL ignorant ass-fucks that need to get your heads out of your asses.
  • Chris-Staples · 7 months ago
    After watching it again you are an IDIOT they asked you to conform and you DID NOT once again if there is nothing to hide why act like someone with secrets? Plus I would like to Know how you got the tapes from the state so quick! I also need you to prove you are an actuall pastor or just want simpathy! For some reason you just don't seem like a man of god! Your actions speak otherwise.
  • oRMAGAN · 7 months ago
    I understand that he was exercising his rights as an American, but I mean if he had nothing to hide, why was he refusing?
  • Dimi · 7 months ago
    Alesia ... I think someone should taser you and your piggy parent! Keep your personal attacks to yourself bitch ... im sorry were you actually in the car with him when it happened were you??? Or is this just what daddy told you?

    This guy is yet another person who has become subject to police brutality, thank god he had the balls to video it! Bring em down Pastor!
  • Meghan · 7 months ago
    The thing about these videos is that it is only this guy's word. We did see some footage from the border patrol, but there is no way to know what the officers' PC was or why the situation escalated to that point. In my opinion, from what I saw, I think that all parties involved handled the situation poorly.
  • dono · 7 months ago
    Thats fucken stupid there is no excuse for what those cops did. fuck em and i hope they loose their jobs and everything in their lives.
  • briggsy · 7 months ago
    I Hope this guy sues the police department for damages
  • TL · 7 months ago
    When your told your under arrest, then your are under arrest. This preacher is not much of a preacher if all he is going to do is cause problems. If he thinks the arrest is unlawful then he should go to court and fight the charge, and if he wins then he can sue later.

    I feel he was wrong on this, for the most part a dog alert is considered PC for a search and not cooperating is an obstruction of jan officer in the performace of his duty. He should have known why he was arrested as soon as he started demanding the dog come back out, ..........give me a break. The dog is a tool for officers to use, not a circus show.

    These type videos are all over youtube, it's starting to look like a fad. In fact it is very dangerous to play around with the police like that and to act like your an attorney. Those guys have a job to do and letting someone go after a dog has alerted is not normally part of the deal. He started acting like they were pointing a camera at him and they were avoiding showing his face, in fact the camera was a static camera. Your going to bleed if your covered in glass. He should have just let them in the car. You ask for trouble and you get it, in my opinion.

    My preacher would have just got out and started praying they didn't find anything.
  • Markymark · 7 months ago
    RE cyril's link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sl84DU77k7s

    I was going to sympathize with the pastor... until I saw Cyril's link. I'm surprised he didn't get arrested when he was following the police officer that had the automatic rifle. I'm pretty sure that falls under something like 'Disrupting a Peace Officer.' The other officer was right about the flashlight thing too!

    Now I think both parties were at fault here... I think the officers could have used better judgment, but refusing an order by a police officer does not help anything. Either way, I don't really believe we have the whole story here anyways. If I had been in his position I would have opened my trunk, regardless of my rights. I would have then asked for their name/badge number and ask for a supervisor to log a complaint or follow up with whatever legal actions were available to me.

    Remember people, theres always two sides to a coin.
  • Ron26 · 7 months ago
    He should of kept his window down. Step out of the vehicle when asked. Then answer all the cops question. I mean what does a Pastor have to hide. If you get chosen to get search just deal with it, instead of making life more difficult for everyone. Now some people may say its about his rights and the principle of the matter. when law enforcement ask you questions its best to answer them, obviously without incriminating yourself. I mean were only see half the story. I'm sure if we we're to see from the beginning of the events of the dog sniffing and questions being asked, many of our opinions would change.
  • Laura · 7 months ago
    honestly, the pastor was being a douchebag.
    all he had to do was listen and do what they said and he wouldn't have gotten tazed.

    fucking dumb-ass!! he deserves his own award of fucking dumbass douchebag of the day! anytime the FUCKING LAW tells you to do something, DO IT!!

    the pastor was a dick and they should've tazed him on his dick as well!

    Pastor who got tazed gets a nomination for DOuchebag of the Year!!!
  • TL · 7 months ago
    I agree with Mehan, it was handled poorly, on all parts. The preacher should have known when he entered the check point that it was there for a reason. In my state being arrested means your under arrest it is not up for discussion. You also do not have to tell them they are under arrest as long as it is implied. In this case the officer did say he was under arrest and he replied to the officer he wanted to see the dog again. I don't feel sorry for this guy one bit.

    Dogs can alert in many different ways. By sitting, pointing with the nose or scratch, bark or laying down. You won't necessaryly see it happen. In the preachers defense it does sound like the dog was used in an effort to meet the PC rule. He should have instead of refusing challenged the dog in court and sued.
  • Joan of Arc · 7 months ago
    Didn't really have time to read through the numerous comments, but the Border Patrol Agents had every right to search his vehicle due to the probable cause given to them by the canine handler. The dogs do not necessarily bark. If you look at the camera in the primary inspection lane, I'm sure you'll notice the dog changing positions or what not. Ask any canine handler, federal, state, or local. Barking is for Hollywood.

    The man had no right to resist the search. Under law, the Border Patrol Agents could tear his car apart until they were satisfied that there was no contraband or human presence in the vehicle. Who knows, maybe this Pastor smokes weed... it is not as rare as you think. He might have even run over someones joint on the road a few miles back.

    The Border Patrol Agents do not use Tasers... a police officer did. This is where it went wrong, so I think. He was not actively resisting arrest... only passively resisting. They had every right to bust in the windows, though. They should've sprayed him with OC.

    If anything, he might win his case on excessive use of force. But don't be blaming the Border Patrol Agents for abusing their powers. Try reading up on Immigration Law before you make baseless and unintelligent comments about your Constitutional rights. Let me help you:

    Immigration and Nationality Act of 1995. It's a good read.
  • chimmy · 7 months ago
    if the dog really did nothing as he said, they did NOT have probable cause and should not have done a thing. his rights would allow him to stay in the car. the cops just get super pissed when people actually do know their rights and they cant shove people around(the shitty ones anyways). there are corrupt cops everywhere though, i got searched after leaving the bowling alley for "doing something suspicious in the bathroom" which i never entered.

    p.s. hearsay =/= probable cause
  • Laura · 7 months ago
    Since when does a freaking pastor know what the fuck a search dog does when it freaking detects something?

    JESUS must have told him!!!
  • TL · 7 months ago
    To answer the question of "was excessive force used". In my opinion "YES". I don't think the preacher was right, but the officers should have only used enough force to effect an arrest. That normally means one step above the force he or she may use in resisting. They should have just simply grabbed him and a pulled him from the vehicle. The taser and the kicking or standing on his head etc was excessive if in fact it was true. If you refused to put his hands behind his back or just resisted the arrest by locking up then pain compliance techniques could have been used.
  • platinum6string · 7 months ago
    this guy is a moron. yes the first time the officer asks if they can search your car you have the right to refuse ( although who the fuck refuses, if you have nothing to hide or are just a jackass loudmouth like this dumbass ), but the second the dog sits and points to a specific spot of the car ( this guys trunk ) the officer has probable cause, you no longer have right to refuse... meaning get the fuck out of the car.... and when you resist arrest what would expect. duh you are the asshole making these officers jobs more stressful why would you expect them to give you hugs and smiles and not be a little rough with you. If you would simply respect the officer and be polite, the same would be given back. MORAL - dont be an asshole to people, and they wont be assholes back. And the fact that they found nothing in youre trunk doesn't mean jack shit... they cant know that without searching it... if a dog signals it than they have no option but to assume you are hiding something. and no the officer doesn't have to bring the dog out to show you it sniffing the car again. when the officer says get out of the car... just get the fuck out.
  • Infernal Shotgun · 7 months ago
    Except he didn't think that the dog actually DID point out his car, so he asked the cops to bring back the dog so he could see the dog indicating that there were drugs/people in his car. But they refused. Why, I don't know. I'd guess that it's because the dog didn't actually bark, but I'd also guess that someone refusing to get out of their car has something in their car that they want to hide. I try to remember that.
  • platinum6string · 7 months ago
    it doesn't madder if he believed the dog did or not. he doesn't have the right to demand to see it himself. the officer isnt required to show you the dog sniffing the car. and most drug dogs dont bark they sit and point.
  • anit-police-state · 7 months ago
    i bet you got swine flu from kissing pig's asses..
  • Michelle · 7 months ago
    Actually, the dog found absolutely nothing at this point. The main reasoning being the dog is either miss trained or that the dog found absolutely nothing. This isn't the first time that " cops " have actually wrongfully beaten or abused someone due to minor " resistance. " Now you saying that it's " alright " for the cops to say there is a " cause " for this then it shows there is none. This means there is none from the start of it. I've refused my car to be searched plenty of times. I told them to get a warrant and come to my home if they wanted to waste the time to search it.

    My grandmother got caught from speeding alittle bit, instead of the cop giving her a ticket. He demanded to see her insurance, she was about 62 at the time. She was digging it out but she has a very high stress disorder and had two years ago had a stent put in her heart. So she asked the officer if she could just go inside, he could come in aswell so she could get her medication. He told her if she moved ONE step he could legally have shot her. Mind you this is a 62 year old woman, with no criminal record whatsoever. The cop was fired about two weeks later due to my grandmother not the only one being tormented like this.

    I had an issue with cops when I was younger aswell. I had an emotional break down from the stress of school. They handcuffed me nearly to the point of cutting off the blood flow, then locked me in NOT a prison cell but a mental hospital cell for three days with no bed and only water and a sandwhich.

    I personally know how cops are and how they think they can do whatever they want. Our police department was taken to court, and we won.

    So, no. The cops can't do whatever they want because the " think " there is a cause. Not everyone is a sick fuck with drugs stored everywhere. I am personally sick of being told I am this person or " could " be.
  • John · 7 months ago
    The burden of proof is on the officers in this situation. Yes, the man in the car had a reasonable right to know what evidence was being used against him. It is arguably true that he probably did not have the need to see the dog point out his car/trunk. However, if they HAD found something in his car, what evidence would they provide to prove that they had reasonable cause to search his vehicle in the first place?

    Regardless, I'm siding with the man in this case. His rights were clearly violated -- whether or not he pissed off the officers in the first place is completely irrelevant. When in the heck are we going to start standing up for ourselves as a collective whole? Another gross violation was the use of a taser on someone that was clearly passively resisting.
  • randomdude · 7 months ago
    maybe he didnt want anyone searching his car because he was afraid of what they might do? as stated in an earlier comment...she said that while waiting for border patrol to search their car they completely tore it apart and heard quotes about how they wished they found something illegal so they could get put in jail because it was a slow night? How can you still defend them?
  • Manic · 7 months ago
    none of that matters the still had no right to use the fucking tasers, tasers cannot be used unless the person pauses a plausible threat to the police this guy didn't, yes they can use excessive force to get him out but the tasers (in this case) were way to fucking far especially on two sides i'm certain under any circumstance using two tasers on one person is illegal those officers should be stripped of there tittles fucking American pricks!
  • John · 7 months ago
    Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. This is undeniably an abuse of force. The man NEVER resisted. Not once! Tazers are intended to neutralize RESISTING suspects. NOT for people sitting in there car surrounded by agents with his hands covering his face. Unacceptable. Those of you who defend these cops are the same a-holes who would throw away all your freedoms for a false sense of security. I not only side with the pastor. I applaud him. Thank you Sir for standing up for OUR rights as citizens.
  • PigBisquitNow · 7 months ago
    What if I believe I should have the right to not have my privacy and belongings invaded by another man.
  • bluemustangxxxgt · 7 months ago
    this guy is an idiot and he got what was coming to him. if he wasn't being such an ass he wouldn't be suspicious.
  • Ralph · 7 months ago
    Clearly an abuse of authority and an assault on our civil rights.

    I hope all those fuckers are fired, as it is yet another example of police brutality.

    Doesn't matter what his race is or theirs.

    Sure he could have avoided that whole mess had he played their little power game, but the fact is, their probable cause claim was bullshit, and they played it to the bitter end.

    Tazzing him and stepping on his head where glass lay are just more reasons these fuckers should not be in law enforcement.

    Fuckin' punks with badges.
  • kbusses · 7 months ago
    Why didnt you get out of the car? It seems to me that a man of God would try to avoid confrontation.
  • han_yhn · 7 months ago
    first mistake is for him not getting out of the car he might have a law suit on his hands but he did refuse to step out of the vehicle his windows were up and he did say he didn't want to get out i think thats enough probable cause for an arrest so if any one else says im not getting out of the car the police have to assume he is a threat.
  • what · 7 months ago
    What do you mean, he had to get out of the car? What if a police officer came up to you, buck-naked, with a knife in one hand, and his own dick in the other? Should you still have to get out of the car simply because he is a police officer? Because he was given his arbitrary power over a body by another entity that has arbitrary power over some body?

    Those police officers are bags of vinegary cock.

    Everyone lives in a police state.
  • Bryan · 7 months ago
    The guy was an idiot. All the had to do was step out of the car, let them see nothing, and be on his way. Instead he was a stubborn idiot. Not only did he make himself seem suspicious by NOT getting out of his car, he didn't open the door, or hell even ROLL DOWN THE WINDOWS. Moral of the story kids, if you have the choice of getting out of the car or having the crap kicked out of you...just step out of the car.
  • Michael · 7 months ago
    so just because he didn't allow the cops access he is a threat? So if cops came to your home, told you that someone said you had drugs in your home and they wanted you to get out and let them tear your house apart trying to find drugs that aren't there (including but not limited to: throwing all clothes on floor, ripping open mattresses, tossing all contents of kitchen pantries/cabinets on floor, emptying/ruining everything in your fridge, tearing up carpet and perhaps even opening holes into your walls because they sound hollow and that is suspicious) You have no problem with that? If you hesitate you will think that they have the right to taze you repeatedly? smash your head on the ground so you have to get 11 stitches? Are you for that type of treatment?
  • Jakki · 7 months ago
    they have to alert all threats or do you knwo how many illegal weapons and drugs would pass through the boarder due to that one right? The guy was being an ass hole. I mean the guy in the car. If he had nothing to hide he should have let them do it. If they foudn nothing, his insurance would cover the damages.
  • FNG · 7 months ago
    A: The man was in a vehicle not his home. So yes he was resisting arrest.
    If the police come to your home looking for drugs they will have a search warrant and more likely than naught have more than ample evidence that you indeed have drugs in your home. Don't try to make brussel sprouts look like an apple.
  • duckinfuh · 7 months ago
    Refusing to let them search your car is not probable cause for them to search your car.

    That is all.
  • DJRecreation · 7 months ago
    Yeah he was being a dumbass but I dont think a taser should have been used. Honestly I hate tasers altogether. They just give cause for more aggressive behavior such as this.
  • Eric · 7 months ago
    I'll bet those cops have never felt what a tazer
    feels like. but really 2 or 3 tazers at the same
    time? They Really could Have KILLED HIM.
    His request was Bring back his Accusing officer( The Dog) To sniff again.
    So why before doing what they did, would that have been so hard?
    Here is why--------- My Friend is a cop he says Cops are adrenaline junkies They Live for the chase, The action,The pursuit, It becomes the next Fix like to a junkie. if a cop is bored and needs a fix...he will find it ONE WAY or THE OTHER!
    those cops need to be RETRAINED
    and alot of counseling and some tazing inflicted on them. Assholes with badges!
  • alex · 7 months ago
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFS7oZtE8Ks

    This guy does this just to piss off cops, it's not the first time. He video tapes himself to make it seem likes he's a hero for Constitutional rights. In these videos he's just being an asshole.

    It's true that they cannot search his car but once they have probable cause they don't need a warrant. With him being such a jerk they certainly have probable cause.

    Know your rights, but don't give this guy any credit for being a rights advocate. He's just an asshole with a camera and a copy of the Constitution.
  • Laura · 7 months ago
    Rights...

    Rights...

    Rights...

    In the end we really don't have any, so why try and have it your way?

    This isn't Burger King!!!
  • Chris · 7 months ago
    I see people saying that they would just get out of the car. Sure, it makes things easier however just because authority comes its way and tells you to do something doesn't mean you need to comply.

    If everything the pastor said was true then he was within his rights to refuse the officers. Especially after the second set of officers asked them to bring the dog back out and they said no.

    Some people say you've got nothing to hide so why not let them search. Well, if the dog did pick up something why not have the dog re-search the car in front of him to prove it? By law you must be proven guilty however that doesn't actually have to happen until court.

    Last thing I want to say is, that the cops used tasers on a guy who was just objecting to them. He wasn't yelling, swearing, or physically resisting arrest. I say they were in the wrong to tase the guy.
  • LJ · 7 months ago
    USA sucks every law is so fucked up in this country. why the hell do they give us amendments if we cant even use them. First chance i get im out of this piece of shit country.
  • sinsational · 7 months ago
    It is vitally important that a system be devised to limit or eliminate similar situations from occurring. A number should be posted to contact the supervisors or third party. Also a list of a persons rights should be readily on hand.

    In this case both sides have legitimate arguments. I understand the police search with probable cause, but a second sweep with the dog should have been made. As for excessive force, tazers were mostly not needed. It is hard to tell how many were used. A taser log would be a helpful tool proving or disproving police abuse.

    Again this is an important case in protecting peoples rights. I have often sided with security over unbridled freedom because I have rarely done anything incriminating. The need to protect rights is so severe due to human nature to fully exploit and take advantage of any system. There are no consequences greater than the lost of rights, especially when unequally lost.
  • jerrold · 7 months ago
    Pastor uh acting like smuggler that refuses like he did lucky he didnt getr worse. Those men see idiots after idiot trying to do bad acts towards the United States. This so calledpastoracts as if he doesn't want to have any border patrol andlet out borders be un protected. All this idiot had to do is yes I have nothing in my car search away. I bet this so called pastor had somthing else he didi not want them to see! Some of his gay toys!
  • Eli · 7 months ago
    It seems to me that the arrest and forced entry along with precautionary violence was necessary. Although not to this extent, they all seemed to surround him and to my understanding he was tazed far more than necessary but this is a shortened video clip. I saw this about a week or so ago and the guy had a longer video where he sat there for several minutes yelling the same questions at the border patrol and while they're trying to be reasonable with him he keeps interrupting them and repeating the same thing over and over again. now really this isn't a crime but as was stated by one of the officers in the longer video anything out of the ordinary is reason for concern and this guy was acting like he definitely had something to hide, Especially initially when he wouldn't even agree to lower his window at all upon request. Really the guy is just a douchebag it seems in my mind similar to something like seeing a police officer looking at you quizzically then you look panicked and run in the opposite direction shouting you didn't see me commit a crime. You look overwhelmingly guilty when you could have easily enough have just been polite, submitted to a bit of the officers suspicion, and moved on with your life. It's their job to investigate things and prevent problems.
  • Sveinung · 7 months ago
    What the hell has happened to the world? Come on, guys, this kind of shit only happens in movies and stories. I didn't know this was something that happened in real life. Yes, I know I don't know much about how things are in this world, but how the fuck this those cops get to be cops? It should be harder to be a cop, only decent people should be able to work as a cop. If I had the chance, I would beat those cops nearly to death. Just to make them sure of what it feels like. Bastards. And I'm not saying I hate cops, but I hate people that's using their power wrong.
  • Declan · 7 months ago
    what i dont get is if he has nothing 2 hide, then y did he refuse to get out of the car. i mean it sure as hell beats getting tasered
  • thy · 7 months ago
    wow. WTF bloody police... This gets me so fuckin pissed off.
  • real life superhero · 7 months ago
    wow that is messed up, if an officer asks you to step out of a vehicle, you must. but if they used that much force they can be charge with excessive force
  • Rick · 7 months ago
    Godamn fuckin pieces of shit! Who the fuck would do that to any man? If it were me, i would................sigh... well, look for yourselves. youtube.com/tactikalguy1
    This country has been pussyfied. Lock and load. I am a vet and americans are just civilians nowadays. If you were in the military or in the police force you know what i mean. Even though its wrong. Civilians are pussies that will never do anything but lick the hand that feeds them. I wish it werent so but for the most part it is.
  • pbash · 7 months ago
    keep your shit hidden well and if theres no dog jus let them search it..... if you let them the first time they ask they usually will do a light search.... glovebox, underseats, centerconsole, backseat, trunk..... best idea... they dont think u have anything to hide so they dont waste time lookin hard... give them a hard time and they'll spend the time making your life miserable
  • wolf · 7 months ago
    he was resisting arrest by not obeying the police officer and getting out of the vehicles... although the cops did not have to react quite like that.. fact is. both were wrong here but the pastor is an idiot..
  • Cop4Christ · 7 months ago
    Just wanted to say a couple things. First if the dog did alert that is enough probable cause to search ANY vehicle. His refusal to get out of the car and allow them to search is enough to arrest him for Disobeying a Police Officer. They were conducting an investigation of something "possibly in his car". I feel they did go a little too far with the arresting "actions" but I wasn't there. Also, police officers deal with people everyday with guns and drugs, you can't tell the difference between bad and good so just because he is white and looks ok doesn't mean anything. I know of 70 year old "normal" men who have been arrested for smuggling drugs! Finally, to the pastor: ROMANS 13 1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. 4For he is God's servant to do you good........Yes there are Officers who abuse their power...However, being a man of God if you submit to governing authority and they are in the wrong justice WILL be given to YOU by God! Respect those who are trying to protect you! We can not tell the difference between good and evil by looks so do what is asked and if nothing is wrong you will prevail! Laws were created by God so that we may know our sins! whether or you think they are right or wrong go to God in prayer and ask him to help you understand them so you can understand your own sins!
  • Wankuha · 7 months ago
    You know you could of just answered their simple questions from the beginning and go on your way.
    Did you really have to use your '4th amendment rights bullshit speech?
    I mean it's just a few questions.

    But the part where they Tazed you was Totally Wrong, they could just Smash the window open the door and Pull you out.


    But you had to be an asshole and just give them an excuse to do this to you. Now you are crying about the whole thing. You somewhat had it coming.
  • Rory · 7 months ago
    dude, a good pastor would have just let them search. this guy is not of god. he is just looking for trouble
  • ELH · 7 months ago
    Unfortunately, neither the cops nor this pastor were completely correct in their actions. Yes the Cops used excessive force, but the pastor wasn't completely correct in his actions either.

    The thing with the 4th amendment is that it protects citizens against unlawful searches or seizure. He is correct that he does not have to submit to an unwarranted search. That does not give him the right to remain in his vehicle when asked by authorities to leave. The proper handling of the situation, and something most people should know in protecting themselves, is to remove the keys from the ignition of the car, place them on your person, so in any pocket. Lock the vehicle and close the door.

    In evoking your 4th amendment rights it is safest to say "I do not consent to any searches" to an officer that asks to look in your vehicle. Since your property is now locked the cop will be breaking the law by forcing his way into your vehicle. Officers do have the right to pat you down and frisk you for their own safety and to check for concealed weapons. But they are unable to remove any item (such as the previously mentioned keys) and use them to gain access to your car.

    His mistake was not removing himself from the vehicles, but honestly the fact that people do not evoke their 4th amendment rights in these situations gives most cops the impression they are capable of searching anything they please in the vehicle. This is just untrue. Most of the people here saying you should just let them search the vehicle even if there is nothing to hide, seem to forget that you are allowed to not self incriminate or allow searches with out warrants. Even with probable cause, you can still request a warrant be issued before turning over the property to be searched.
  • ELH · 7 months ago
    So I totally didn't realize that this was a border patrol stop @__@. Smooth.

    Since this is a border stop most of the things I mentioned don't hold up. Since it is a search being held at a border patrol station, the need for a warrant due to probable cause is waived. An is dictated as a Customs search instead of normal law enforcement services. The only time a warrant would be needed in a border patrol case is that of privacy concerns, or cavity searches. But the vehicle and its contents maybe searched thoroughly.
  • someone · 7 months ago
    The cops told him he is being arrested for resisting... however, they did not identify what charge he was resisting. Therefore, strike one to the police. The pastor did refuse to have his car searched, but that is not the probable cause for him being removed.
    --- (This part is now three assumptions) A) the cops claimed to pull the dog out and did not actually do so. B) the cops did bring out the dog and that dog did not make a noise, nor any signals. C) The dog did signal ---
    The pastor, when told he was being arrested for resisting, he should have gotten out... as to avoid the beating. Strike one for the pastor.
    The cops should have taken proper steps by assuring the individual that this is a routine stop and that cars are being checked. They also should have stated that there has been smuggling of drugs into the country and that they are making sure that all these vehicles did not have said drugs. Since they do have a past of lack of brains and a past of doing things the wrong way, the do get a second strike.
    Third, after checking his car and finding nothing, they should have taken him to the hospital and fixed him up, along with the county or state repairing or replacing his car. However, they arrested him on false pretenses and treated him with disdain. Needless to say, strike three.
    The pastor should have all legal right to walk away from court with the arrest being taken off of his record, and be fully compensated for all damages to him and to his vehicle.

    That is why you do not allow bad cops to continue on the force. They give law enforcement a bad name.
  • Cap Nemo · 7 months ago
    He got what he deserved, Platinum6string says it all very well. If he had just let them look in his car there would have been no story. He is probably a publicity seeking jerk who has no one attending his sermons. Where he probably preaches about the cops not doing enough to fight the inflow of drugs, from over the border, that blight his community.
  • adam · 7 months ago
    Wow, i read all of the comments below and i agree with so many. Both parties were wrong in this situation... officers can be assholes but refusing to get the fuck OUT of the fucking car is enough suspicion for them to search. IF cops were just like, "OH i guess he says he has nothing and rly doesnt feel like getting out of his car, EVEN THO our dog signals theirs something in there, we should just let him go!!" NO thats fucking stupid. The guy should have just gotten out of his car, let them search, and be the fuck on his way. Yeah they didint have to tazer him and rub his head in glass, but refusing to follow a direct order from a police officer, who puts his life on the line to protect us citizens, is showing complete disrespect, id be a little pissed too. Honestly i think he got what he deserved.. almost... i mean itll teach him to not be stupid like this again. When a policer officer says GTFO your vehicle, you do it! I still feel like wow what asshole cops, especially taunting and razzing him. But if police officers werent rough, wed have more drugs and immigrants/crimianls in our state.
  • steff worthington · 7 months ago
    I'm not surprised at this. This doesnt really happen in the UK and if it does it's front page news and cops go to jail.
    But for America, I'm sad to say I think your govt these days (well, for the past 50 or so years) has just lost it. Many places around the world see America as being populated by mostly nice people but having a regime that thinks its citizens are a commodity to be used and abused at will.
    As far as US law goes the pastor was perfectly within his rights, unfortunately the police weren't aware of that as they don't recieve training in the finer points of the law... and that cop was just ITCHING to use his taser.
    In the UK we dont have tasers in common usage, the actions that cops took would have only really happened if there had been drunk driving or an accident where he failed to stop, and they would have taken the 'softly, softly' approach and asked nicely. They would have also said something along the lines of "I have reason to beleive there may be .etc" Although you can't arrest someone without stating why. (Im in a house share with a police seargent).
  • Josh Ashmore · 7 months ago
    I totally think this is bullshit. Every now and then, people on the internet attempt to make a hoax that they hope will be so big and widespread and scare so many people that it will almost indefinitely find its way into the history books. If you don't believe me, check out:

    http://whathappenedinpiedmont.com/

    But what's even scarier than someone trying to lie about something so serious, is that this guy doesn't even need to lie for it to happen; it happens all the time. Unfortunately.

    But the holes in these videos are:

    1. If you listen to the first words out of his mouth in the hidden camera video, (well, let me ask you this, are you placing me under arrest)

    This is something that most any director, amateur or not, knows is very common in a scenario such as this. You turn your camera on, and then get the, in this case officer, to confess to everything he's doing wrong while the tape plays; ask him in such a way that he almost definitely answers yes. "So what! Are you arresting me or something?!?"

    2. When a cop tells you to cover your eyes (especially after you suspect some shit is up), why in the FUCK would you obey. An officer has no right to tell any citizen to covers his/her eyes (let alone bust someone's window open for politely refusing arrest). The only time a citizen should cover his/her eyes is if national security (or something along those lines) comes into question by them seeing it. At which point, if something like this comes into view of citizens, your ass is grass officer friendly.

    3. How did he get the tapes back from these cops?

    Although, it's not necessarily unheard of for a citizen to have his/her belongings returned to them, if these are crooked cops, they would find a way to hide the camera. If they couldn't they'd be in more trouble than job-loss.

    Also, look at the second video:

    4. Why does the camera women/man continue to zoom in and out. For some parts, I can understand, but it's as if he/she is zoom-happy or something. Another thing most directors know the human eye can perceive without the audience realizing it.

    This just all seem so fake to me.
  • Lawrence · 7 months ago
    No offense, but he didn't have to be a douchebag for the first hour and just hide in his car. Border patrol has to do routine checks on normal white males so they aren't shown as racist. So who better than to pick a pastor?
  • steff worthington · 7 months ago
    Hang on...
    INTERNAL border checks? Suspicion list internal checkpoint?

    jeez guys, you need to sort your country out. It'll be gulags next. ... other than Guantanamo that is.
  • hakeem · 7 months ago
    do i think excessive force was used? yes.
    Was the pastor resisting arrest? yes
    was he violent or threatening ? no
    why in hevens name was he Tazered?

    if there are no other charges brought other than resisting arrest some attorney is going to have a field day with the cops after they get suspended with pay pending an investigation.
  • clint · 7 months ago
    i dont aggree with what the cops did or how they went about it but come on HOW arragent could this bloke be he sat in the car for over an hour it could have been dealt with in 2min had he hoped out the car and said go for it

    ONLY IN AMERICA
  • Argo · 7 months ago
    lol at Alesia.

    Oh is your dad a cop?

    o rly rly your so cool like.

    being a cop is probably the crappiest career of human nature.
    your mind is probably f'ed up since your dad was not able to afford the healthy food for children like you.
    This man was beaten up badly for a no reason detain.

    This whole footage is explained like this:
    "Oh, i dont like the way you talk so im going to drag the fuk out of there and beat the bloody crap out of you"
  • AudieHO · 7 months ago
    I think the non-cooperative bastard got a lot less than what he deserved. He obviously hasn't learned that he needs to cooperate with authorities.
  • cablejones · 7 months ago
    three things with this. one in the first video he said their was no dog second video he says their was a dog??, why doesn't he just answer the questions and be on his way like a normal person has he got something to hide?? no. thirdly the cops are ass holes border control cops are part timers, weekend worriers it makes them feel like a real man when they do this.
  • Ollie · 7 months ago
    If he had nothing to hide in his car he should have got out and let them check it. It seemed like he was purposefully being difficult to try and invoke violence and show them up. Why was he filming it all?! Hes definitely trying to show them in a certain light.

    That being said those border patrol guys were brutal. Smashing the glass was perhaps justified, and perhaps one tazer, but if hes telling the truth about the other tazers (not seen in footage) and the 'grinding his face into broken glass' (not seen in footage) then they were way over the top.

    The fact he is a pastor is COMPLETELY irrelevant.
  • Jakki · 7 months ago
    This guys story is overexaggerated. If he would have just stopped being an ass and got out and let them do a simple search, none of this would have happened. Second how can his face be pressed into glass on the pavement when the window was smashed from the outside.The glass would all be in the car. and very little outside. He obviously overexaggerated the amount of times he was tasered.... probably 3 not a torturous amount or how he described it. Than he goes to say at the end that they beat him? yea ok another exageration.

    The guy deserved it he was being an ass.... if trafficers tried to pull that right out of their ass while passing than guess what, patrol couldnt catch th drug trafficers because of that persons rights. The cop was being polite in the beginning also so w-e. The man of god brought it on himself.
  • Stefan · 7 months ago
    HE WAS FIRING HIS TAZOOR

    nah but seriously theres no way they're gonna get clean after this. Hope they get shipped to texas and gets the chair.
  • mccombbb · 7 months ago
    that made me pretty angry i mean am from england but did you hear that guy screaming what the fuck? do them police officers think there big or hard? it gives a bad view on copa who are ment to "protect you" not taser you for no reason :(
  • LadyLiberty · 7 months ago
    "Why is this happening in the United states of America?"

    Because americans are dumbfucks.
  • Andy · 7 months ago
    land of the free indeed.
  • Vinnie Chase · 7 months ago
    This situation does not reflect who was in the right or who was wrong, it is simply a reflection of how some people have too much power and decide to abuse it from time to time instead of using it for the better good of all. Instead of physically harming and possibly traumatizing the harmless twit, the police could have just as easily placed him under custody by smashing the window and grabbing him without paralyzing him first with a stun gun. This video can also be used to show us how in today's America, attempting to get political with police will only turn you into an unwilling participant in the business of martyrdom. Another interesting point is how drug dogs are can be lead by their handlers to react even when no narcotics or in this case, dead bodies are present.
  • Muslimgirl · 7 months ago
    Oh my God.
    What the hell is this? How on earth can this be happing? These offiicers are not supposed to work in that field at all. They are a threat to society. They are incompetent to be protecting citizens. Damn them. I'am so angry! May God protect every person in their custody. Hope they will be jailed any time soon.
  • Carlos Rivero · 7 months ago
    This guy is a major league DICKHEAD, first of all this asshole is close to the Mexican Border where there's all kind of stuff going on right now. You have to be an IDIOT to not know that law enforcement is at an extreme level in this country right now, plus if you have nothing to hide whats the problem you whiney a**hole, just get out of the car let them look it over and be on your way. It's guys like this that make law enforcement be the way they are with us, you sir are a problem. Plus not for nothing but he looks like a Timothy Mcviegh or something. I think this RETARD got just waht he had coming to him!!!
  • john · 7 months ago
    and i dont think he was being a dumbass. he was standing on his rights as a human being and an american to not be fuked with for no reason. since "he was being a dumbass" all they had to do was get a damn warrant. but a judge would have told them to take a dick in the ass had the tried to get a warrant to search his shit on the "probable cause" they were suporting. fuk the Border patrol anyways. its half fukin mexican anyways! not racist but why hire pdros cousin to watch for pedro?
  • sigginator · 7 months ago
    this is not a regular cop behavior they shouldnt just taze him he was defence less there with his eyes closed and he was only a suspect they had nothing solid on him
  • Mark · 7 months ago
    Sorry to hear you got treated so bad . This shouldn't have happend.
  • M.J.G · 7 months ago
    Just look at 1:18-1.20 what a sadistic smile that Police Officer has on his face. What an A-hole
  • Paddy · 7 months ago
    They are thugs in uniform, nothing more nothing less, just like here in the UK.
  • peter · 7 months ago
    He look like Jack from lost :O
    poor man though. The border control is doint this wrong.
  • Martin · 7 months ago
    It's obvious he didn't do anything wrong. As an american citizen he has a right to know what he is being charged for. How hard would it have been for the cops to bring the dog out again and check the veichle before making something like that. Makes me mad as hell to see stuff like this, right now I feel like beating the crap out of the cops, or as someone above me stated: Put them in jail and let them be assraped for a while.
  • Emma · 7 months ago
    Why didn't he just answer their questions in the first place? I feel like, perhaps the border patrol used excessive force, however, if he REALLY just wanted to get home he probably could have just complied. And, the fact that he had his camera on kind of proves, at least in my opinion, that he thought something was going to happen.
  • svullo · 7 months ago
    In sweden, a lot of the guys involved would have lost their jobs and some would be going to jail for a long time.
  • Ryon · 7 months ago
    What people seem to be forgetting is at checkpoints any vehicle is subject to being pulled over. When the "Pastor" refused to answer the questions and refused to get out of the car, he was impeding an investigation and relinquishing his right of search and seizure.
    They had enough probable cause when he refused to answer questions and get out.
    I am glad he rode the lightning.
  • Putty · 7 months ago
    DUDE you are WRONG!! Do what you are told and this wouldnt have happened. So we should just let people comeing over the into the state just come in??? COME ON IN!! IF you had nothing in your car why didnt you just let them look??? They have to have some sort of control dont they? You abused that control? You call your selt a pastor??? A real pastor would have respected them and do what you were told. They dont know you???
  • Shin igami · 7 months ago
    get a lawyer, immediately
  • Alex · 7 months ago
    Wow, the sounds he was making while he was getting beaten and tasered were fuckin scary dude...

    He should just sue the state police department for destruction of property, unlawful use of force, etc.
  • FNG · 7 months ago
    He wouldn't win it. His own video shows him resisting a law enforcememt officer in the performance of his lawful duty. The preacher man would FAIL
  • Valeur · 7 months ago
    This guy is a complete fuck-head. If you have nothing to hide then just go pop your fucking truck save 9 hours of your lives (and the border patrol's lives) so you can get on your merry way. When it comes to the police, just STFU and nod your head - and oblige.

    What the fuck would you think if you were an officer and you asked a man "can I look what's inside your trunk, real quick?" and he says NO, NO NO NO I'll rather wait here for HOURS than let you search my car.

    Smash his head and leave him to die. End of fucktard.
  • Gerry Owen · 7 months ago
    Everyone keeps saying "police". These weren't Police, they are Border Patrol.

    If they were police, he would have a case.

    Just the act of crossing the Border does not confer Rights like needing a warrant, etc. They don't have time for that, it is impractical.

    The Border Patrol isn't the police, they regulate who and what comes into the country.
  • Matty · 7 months ago
    What the flip!!

    This si rediculus. By thenames they all sounded mexican so they were probably just beating him up cuz he was a minister/chritian

    Absalute hecktic
  • Paul · 7 months ago
    Police are nothing more then gangs in uniforms that work for the government.The modern day minion for the new order.I never fell sorry for cops anymore they deserve what they get and this Video is proof of that. They kill the innocent nearly everyday in American.
  • Terrapin Flyer · 7 months ago
    All of you saying he should just let the officers search his car are willing to bend over and take it in the ass like a good little obeying citizen. His rights were being violated. They cannot just arbitrarilly search an American citizen based on bogus charges. The fact that they refused to bring the dog back and that they found nothing in the end leads me to believe that they were bull shitting. Also, those officers used entirly too much force. There were like seven of them vs. one skinny white guy. Give me a break. It was just a chance for those power tripping officers to use their toys and feel superior.
  • Annonymous · 7 months ago
    I want to be sympathetic towards this guy, but I just can't. Imagine if he did have a human body in the trunk and the cops just let him go, because the dog's alert wansn't big and loud enough. If the police have any suspicion (even if cause by a dog) they can search your car. If you refuse, you get arrested. If you resist arrest, you get what this guy got. Did the police go too far? Probably, but that doesn't make the pastor right. Besides if he had nothing to hide, why didn't he just open his trunk? He said he was eager to go home. Cooperating would have gotten him home a lot faster than talking back to police.
  • DJ · 7 months ago
    "Why is this happening in the USA?" Because idiots like you think you should "test" law enforcement, who are trying to keep the country safe. If law enforcement asks you a question, answer it. Not answering that question makes you look guilty. Guilty or not, you look guilty. Which in turn brings the dogs over, which in turn leads to them busting out your windows and tasering you when you refuse to get out of the vehicle. If you had just answered the question to begin with, you could have saved yourself all that time and pain.
  • Courty · 7 months ago
    WOW, you know when the cops are acting that messed up at the beining, you should say what he said...like once...then just listen to the cops cuzz you'll just end up lookin like that in the end. I know its not fair, but thats way she goes.
  • Andre · 7 months ago
    That's why I love my country: Canada!
    Poor dude. I hope the cops got fired.
  • Jesuit · 7 months ago
    Here we are.. land of the free, turning into the EU.
  • Abro · 7 months ago
    One thing I still don't understand is if the guy had nothing in the trunk but tools, what would make him not want to click the trunk latch and have them take a 30 second looksy? I know we all have "rights," but what makes some people think they are special enough not to listen to a cop? Did he think theyd find something personal and laugh at him for another reason?
  • JMR · 7 months ago
    ..or he could have just answered the questions and not gotten himself into the situation in the first place.
  • Aaron · 7 months ago
    1. The dog singled out his vehicle. Plain Sight, Plain Sniff, Probable Cause.

    2. He refused to remove himself from the vehicle. Resisting Arrest.

    3. In the United States you can be arreted and held for 24 hours without being charged with anything. Resisting arrest on a probable drug trafficing violation is plenty reason to arrest someone.

    4. Being a Pastor doesn't guarantee that you are not in the wrong, being a cop does not guarantee that you are in the right.
  • kommonsense · 7 months ago
    this retard clearly has never worked with very many work animals...most animals today are trained when the detect something to sit down and stay there till the handler gets there and releases them. so for him to say the dog didn't detect anything is stupid. secondly when an officer who has already told you he has probable cause to search your vehicle just get out let them search it and then leave 10 minutes later, instead of being stupid and waiting 2 hours then getting beat up. maybe if you weren't a redneck hillbilly you would understand that
  • eric · 7 months ago
    We've know for many years that cop are dirtier then the ave person. They protect each other, even when they see something they know is wrong. Some of the most deceptive people I have ever had the pleasure of knowing are cops. I even know a few people who left the force because of the stuff that other cops were doing, and they couldn't do anything about it.
    The only difference now, is the commonality of video cameras and the internet. I just wonder how much of YOUR tax dollars go to the victims of police brutality and misconduct. So many states are broke, and this guy will most likely get a FAT settlement. Kinda makes me want to drive along the border, acting "Suspicious" in hope that I may run into one of these DICKS, so I'll get PAID!
  • Del Rae · 7 months ago
    I do feel bad for the guy. Variations of this happen frequent enough to be worrisome... but we don't listen when they are nonwhite.
  • kieran · 7 months ago
    the pastor should have eventually just gotten out but he does have the right to stay the fuck in his car, the tazer was waaaaay overkill. makes me happy when i hear about cops being killed after that video
  • snackland · 7 months ago
    WTF didn't this man of god get out of the car? Does he not trust his won people? That seems very weird he would resist just getting out of the car with all of those police officers around. This is the boarder not just a fun station stop!
  • igli · 7 months ago
    I would not have closed my eyes....... that's for sure XD
  • snackland · 7 months ago
    Man of god... why would you not open the door man. Do you not trust people especially police....You sat there for 1 hour and that would alert the cops to something...Right? I rather be protected from bad people and they gave u so much time to open the door..... This was resisting arrest. You were wrong and wasted so much time and money. Sorry father but you were wrong.
  • onedeed21 · 7 months ago
    CAUSE AND EFFECT, Who gives a fuck what his rights are. Well I'm not sure who does but i know for damn sure it is not the cops. I live in mississippi and i'm no stranger to dirty cops. Think about how long these jackass go to school, what is it 6 months and then they get to cart around tazers and guns and decide who lives and dies, who's guilty, who's innocent in the world when there is no time for courts and higher minds to debate. It is ridiculous! Maybe if they had not be given tazers in this situation, the cops would have gotten creative and taken a tire of his car so he couldnt have gone anywhere until he let them search the car. Did the cops go overboard.... ABSOLUTELY YES! Is it a tiny bit suspicous that this man let them break his windows in and he just happened to have a camera and film it?.... YES it makes me wonder. I dont wanna say he asked for it, but hott damn GET OUT OF THE CAR!
    TAZERS ARE CRAZY, I think sometime in the near future we will find evidence we cant ignore that tazers are bad for the heart and hopefully they will be retired. There is definitely something off with this guy that he would allow them to
    1 BREAK HIS WINDOWS
    2 TAZER HIM
    I would doing in thing short of sexual favors to avoid tazoring, but that's just me. So, in equation where GET OUT OF CAR= NO TAZER. I would GET OUT OF CAR.
    The other part of my brain is thinking HOTT DAMN I dont have hardly ANY rights at all. When do i get rights? What is too FAR? When the cop is tazing me, forcing himself on me and i make a break for it, then get arrested for resisting arrest. OUCH!
    AND Who the hell does this guy think he IS GOD?.... "Do I have to obey police officers?" Yes you do. They do things and ask questions later. YOU should do what they ask and file a complaint later, but I dunno men are just retarded, the cops, the priest everyone in this equation is WAY WRONG. Some are just wronger, or would this baptist tell you that no sin weighs more than another?
  • Joe · 7 months ago
    Pastor squealed like a little b!tch, next time he should try to remember to let the little things slide. Otherwise a big situation will be made over something that could have been squashed over a polite 5min. conversation.... Just sad..
  • Terrapin Flyer · 7 months ago
    Snackland, since when demanding the rights that are guaranteed to every American citizen by our founding fathers resisting?!?!? They put that unlawful search and seizures in the constituion for a reason...and this is it. "Because we said so" is not a legitimate reason to comply. This is opening the door to unlawful searches and seizures. The catch 22 that the officers have is that if you do not concent to a search then you must be hiding something. That gives unscrupulous officers a loophole to violate your rights. How can you accept that?
  • Scott Williams · 7 months ago
    Good thing that he is a Pastor so he can practice what he preaches:

    Matthew 18:21-22 ESV Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often will my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? As many as seven times?” (22) Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy times seven.
  • randomdude · 7 months ago
    This is fucked up. This is the cops thinking they're some superficial bad ass with tasers who can do whatever they want. This guy did nothing wrong he asked for confirmation he has the right to not let them search his car. They do not have official cause for arresting this guy. They're argument was: were arresting you for using your american rights and then were going to beat the shit out of ya. Ya know it just burns me up seeing idiots as the "protectors" of the people when they do this shit. Ugh fuckin dickheads. They'll get whats theirs though. They'll go to court and realize they screwed themselves
  • david · 7 months ago
    omg, those cops are in so much shit. this guy is really smart not only did he know the laws better then them but he had the sence to get it on tape. look would it be easyer if he just did what they ask. no question, but as he said its his right to not have to without cause.
    so what happened was this the cops thought the guy was hiding something and so they got the dog and said the dog did something even tho it didnt....now if the guy had drugs or something this would be a smart way or breaking the law so they could get him breaking the law. but they fucked up cause he called them out on it on camera then even said hey bring the dog out again and show me what it did but they didnt...and even then you could say they dont have to its the cops word should be good enough. the point they fucked up was when they tased the guy and kick the shit out of him if the just broke his side windows and dragged him out i would give them a pass, but they didnt have to taze him or step on his head they used excevive force and they are all in deep shit!
  • dan · 7 months ago
    just another bunch of assholes that got picked on growing up and now feeling tough with a gun and a badge. Sad thing is that there are truly great officers out there that take pride in their service and than there are douchebags like this.
  • Brandon · 7 months ago
    I'm torn on this one. I think they were probably too hard on him once they decided to take him out of the vehicle. Both windows didn't need smashing, and I seriously doubt that little guy needed a taser more than once.

    HOWEVER. He was told why he was stopped and why they wanted to search his car. He was asked to step out of the vehicle for it to be searched. The police are not required (to my knowledge) to go through a lengthy conversation about the validity of their probable cause other than to state what it is. By this I mean: they don't have to educate this guy on how exactly they interpret the drug dog's actions and then recreate the cause for him. They stated their cause and had right to search the vehicle and he decided he'd rather make things worse.

    So both parties are wrong: the pastor by causing the incident, the cops by taking it too far afterward.
  • onlker · 7 months ago
    wow.......now i don't have to comment on that video....b/c you took the words right out of my mouth...thanks!
  • Neal · 7 months ago
    The passenger side was broken to taze him. The driver side was broken to open the door and remove the tard.
  • Lol · 7 months ago
    You can ask to to be told why you are being searched it's within your rights to do so. So if you do ask they ahve to tell, adn he wasn't resisting an officer becouse he wasn't put under any formal charges before hand :S
  • Kevin · 7 months ago
    ok now hold up. The problem is that the cops DID NOT have probable cause. Just like traffic cops have to show you the radar gun when you get a speeding ticket, police must be able to justify their searches/seizures even though they can't access a judge. Besides, you can hardly defend those guys the way they refused to be in any way logical. Civilian police forces are not supposed to terrorize people into following laws, even WHEN those people are breaking them. This is exactly why we have a bill of rights and the miranda rights and all of those things, and they are being crapped on by officers like these.
  • Al · 7 months ago
    First, the officers had enough probable cause simply by him refusing to answer their questions. Then they had even more probable cause when the dog detected something (assuming they were not lying about that part).

    I'm not sure how many times he was hit with the tazor, but they were justified in using it to get him out of the vehicle. Once he was on the ground, using the tazor would have been excessive. As far as the video's show, the cops did nothing wrong.
  • Bob Saget · 7 months ago
    Cops can't say "our probably cause, or suspicion stems from him refusing to answer our questions"
    They can't use the taser to get him out of the car, he wasn't resisting arrest (he was refusing to co-operate -- they hadn't said your under arrest), he wasn't fighting, he wasn't being threatening or aggressive.
    Those border patrol guys completely over reacted, the violence, the taser, refusing to co-operate with him...
    They were demanding what they had no power to demand
  • Ricky · 7 months ago
    except that not answering questions has nothing to do with probable cause. its our 15th amendment right. you don not have to answer cops when they ask you questions that may or may not result in your arrest.
  • Shaw Davari · 7 months ago
    15th amendment states that no person shall be barred from voting based on race you moron. Cops must obtain a warrant to search your car. Do not allow them to search your shit unless they obtain one. Our 4th amendment rights protect against unreasonable search and seizure, which was CLEARLY the case here. They had no right to search his vehicle. They had no right to detain him. This dude just hit the fucking lottery.
  • Reklaw · 7 months ago
    Exactly and they hardly asked any questions! He just kept yelling get out of the car because a dog that did nothing (who the cops refused to let out) said nothing. Then once he was apprehended on the ground they continued to tase him. That's cruel. So al you think the cops did nothing wrong? If I became a became a cop and gave some stupid excuse for a reason to have you get out of the car and you don't I should tase you 5 times while your having your face smashed into broken glass and asphalt?
  • Dave · 7 months ago
    Do you also agree that bashing him in the head six times with the knight stick while he was flopping around with 50,000 volts running through his whole body was justified as well. I think the cop did that for personal pleasure
  • jen · 7 months ago
    I found out the hard way myself that when a cop says he has probable cause it is irrelevant at the time if this is true or not....you may try and fight it later in court but you will probably lose, even with video because you did not cooperate when told to do so. all it takes for a cop to prove probable cause in court is his word that he "believed" there was a threat ...it sucks but its true...if you resist, you will be arrested.....reality is hard to handle when it hits u with a taser!
  • jc · 7 months ago
    The cops at the border have every right to search your car. I 've had my car searched when coming back from Canada and they didn't even give me a reason. Sometimes the searches are just random. If a cop tells you to get out of the car just get out. They don't do this type of thing just for fun. They know they are on camera. They probaly should not have tazed him but he should have listened
  • jay · 7 months ago
    While I agree they were a bit excessive, the rule about seeing the radar gun is a myth in most jurisdictions they only have to tell you when the gun was last calibrated they do not have to show you the gun. Also the drug dog alerting them is probable cause and at that point they have every right to search your vehicle,
  • R · 7 months ago
    As a private citizen you have the right to privacy and to not be subject to unreasonable search. The cops today do not like it when you demand these rights.

    The pastor shouldn't have resisted. He should have stated clearly on camera that he was not in allowing the search and that his rights are being violated then fought the cops in court.

    The sad thing is that too many people today are all too willing to give up their constitutional rights. The cops should not be allowed to violate those rights and if you allow then to take away your rights then they will expect the next person to do the same.
  • TL · 7 months ago
    You don't have to show a radar gun to anyone. At least not in OKLA.
  • WickedlyWanton · 7 months ago
    Um, cops have to show probable cause to the courts, not to the person they stop. They DO NOT have to show you on the radar how fast you were going, and won't.
  • george · 7 months ago
    hold on....cops are not REQUIRED to show radar guns when issuing tickets. They can just issue the speeding ticket without giving any proof. Hell they can postal mail the ticket to your home without even talking to you.

    However, if you plead NOT GUILTY, then you can demand the cop to show the radar guns/ radar logs. But all that happens in court, not on the street
  • Tim · 7 months ago
    He may have pissed them off but that doesn't give them the right to brutalize somebody. There were 5 of them and he is not exactly a huge guy.

    The question you have to ask yourself is would you feel different about the incident if the police said they suspected him of being a terrorist or if he was of Arabic decent.

    And what are the police on border patrol so afraid of that makes them have that sort of reaction
  • george · 7 months ago
    Dude....they might be afraid of drug mafia....the gun totting gangs. I am sure border police in California does not have a very luxurious life.
  • mgraham404 · 7 months ago
    Exactly. The cops didn't need to go as far as they did, but they didn't really do anything wrong. This guy is an idiot. If they're going to break the windows and pull you out of the car, why are you going to cover your eyes so that glass doesn't get in your eyes instead of unlock the door and step out of the car?
  • scott · 7 months ago
    push his rights to the limit? there isn't a limit. they are "rights". that's why they didn't call it "the bill of optional probabilities if you're lucky...sometimes".
    it's the apathy about these things that is disturbing. I hope the pastor ends up owning the whole border and all those tasers.
  • J.A.M · 7 months ago
    The cops could have brought the drug dog back out but just like in an airport they can search areas when crossing over. He is an idiot for not just showing them what was in his trunk. If he said ok, walked out opened it, they would see the tools, then say ok your free to go, less than 5 min and no force would be used. But he had to be a hard ass trying to push his rights to the limit. If someone did try to bring someone over in the trunk of a car and did what that pastor did should the police just let him go? No you want them to get the guy in the trunk so whenever the police of suspicion like they said they did they CAN search that area.
  • space c · 7 months ago
    sacrificing basic rights to pacify a police man is unacceptable. If what he said was true (and clearly it was because there were no dead bodies or drugs found in his car that the dog wouldve smelled) then it was just a bunch of corrupt cops. no one should have to give up basic rights just because a cop asks you too, especially if it is just to stroke their prides and screw over a civilian who didnt answer their questions.
  • Banaam · 7 months ago
    He wasn't crossing over though. He was Coming from San Diego, CA to Phoenix, AZ, A drive that takes place entirely within the US borders.
  • ric · 7 months ago
    you are just asking for the goverment we are working our way towards. Where are your papers? you nazi puke i hope they just shoot you when (not if) this happens to you.
  • Rufus Nady · 7 months ago
    He deserved what he got. Stupid a hole thought he could go through that he deserved a good beat down just like the one I got before from the cops it didn't make the news because the true Lord (lord of the flies) knew that I deserved it. Jesus Christ.... the bad one
  • Alan · 7 months ago
    The cops have to have a cause to search your car and he has the rights to ask and get proof of evedence to search. With them saying no to showing him evidence like a cop giving you a speeding ticket with no proof that you were even speeding whether or not you were speeding.
  • Marzyman · 7 months ago
    I think the whole thing is bull... Cops are allowed to stop you and ask you questions, but you are not required to answer them or self incriminate yourself under the 4th amendment. Also, officers are not allowed to break into your car without reasonable cause, the dog thing was also made up b/c as he said the dog did not smell anything and he had nothing in the car. They could have told him step out of the car or we have to break in and arrest you, which would have caused him to get out and not get hurt.

    As for previous post by Pizza guy, like I said you can refuse a search on your car, you have a right to not self incriminate yourself and protect your life, your liberty, and your personal belongings. Since they refused to bring the dog back it showed the cops were lying. Tazering a defenseless pastor is just wrong. Since the only reasonable cause was the dog thing, since they refused to bring it out to actually see what the dog did, b/c apparent it just sat there is enough to break into your car is bull.
  • Papasmurf44 · 7 months ago
    i totally agree with brandon. the pastor was too stubborn and the police went WAY too far. the pastor needs to be less stubborn and stuff if he is to be a good man of god O:-)
    the police really need to know when to stop, maybe they were bored or something
  • Joe · 7 months ago
    Yeah I'm a 3 year law enforcement major at a well-known college in florida. Also work part tme as a police officer reserve. I'm going to be un-bias on this issue and here is how I see it.

    Bad decisions were made by the officers, were they excessive? Only those officers know, a video can not tell the emotions and the events that unfolded outside the view of the camera. Both windows needing to be broken? That was a bit too much. However the dog and the non-complience from the pastor was enough cause to make the pastor get out of his car. When he did not get out, what are the officers going to do? Wait for ever until he gets out, his doors were locked, they asked him and asked him to get out. Then, had a lot of respect when the advised him to close his eyes.

    In conclusions this guy acts like and seems like a baby who needs atttention. I have been tasered, there is very little pain, but alot of non-controll. The tazer did its job and no one was seriously hurt. He caused this on himself. If he would have gotten out of the car everything would have been ok. Its easy to judge, but remember these guys deal with and see things everyday that would make you sick, all in an effort to protect you. They do not know what they are up against and for all they knew he had a gun.
  • Brit · 7 months ago
    It doesn't matter how stupid he acted by being mouthy to the cops. That does not give them the right to abuse their power and assault this man in such a way.

    Should he have just opened the trunk? Yes.

    Did he have to? No.

    Did the cops have the right to assault him? Absolutely not!
  • Ricky · 7 months ago
    if he can get footage to show when he was beaten/tased then why wouldnt the police show the first time the drug dog smelled the car? then they could tell him to stfu and stop being a retard
  • Richard Brendl · 7 months ago
    dude... you are an absolute moron...it is non-sentient dickwads like you that allow this kind of shit to happen. Society is in a steady descent toward fascism because people like you willingly accept whatever jack-booted bullirs tell them. Here come the nazis again...thanks to you fuckface.
  • Combo · 7 months ago
    This guy is a D-BAG not the police THE "PASTOR". These police officer are doing their job and this D_BAG decides I am gonna mess with them and cry oh no don't search me. If you don't have drugs or a body GET OUT AND LET THEM SEARCH! WTF this guy should be the d-bag of the YEAR! He asked for this. I mean why is this even news. I mean I could go to a tap-out fight jump in the ring and put it on here and cry that I got my ass kicked is that news? The dogs don't have to DO anything. Him resisting and making a bigger deal out of the situation is what got him tazered and beat down. Step out let them do there jobs and then move on. So if he was in the middle of a baptism and these cops came in and said no I don't believe in baptisism what would he do stop the baptisism? no he would say get out of here. This guy got what he was asking for shut up and quit crying. You are a man of GOD grow up and act like it! You follow GOD they follow the LAW! He should understand that much!
  • Combo · 7 months ago
    spell checked sorry

    This guy is a D-BAG not the police THE “PASTOR”. These police officer are doing their job and this D_BAG decides I am gonna mess with them and cry oh no don’t search me. If you don’t have drugs or a body GET OUT AND LET THEM SEARCH! WTF this guy should be the d-bag of the YEAR! He asked for this. I mean why is this even news. I mean I could go to a tap-out fight jump in the ring and put it on here and cry that I got my ass kicked is that news? The dogs don’t have to DO anything. Him resisting and making a bigger deal out of the situation is what got him tasered and beat down. Step out let them do there jobs and then move on. So if he was in the middle of a baptism and these cops came in and said no I don’t believe in baptism what would he do stop the baptism? no he would say get out of here. This guy got what he was asking for shut up and quit crying. You are a man of GOD grow up and act like it! You follow GOD they follow the LAW! He should understand that much! I say D-Bag that is my opinion!
  • moviejen10 · 7 months ago
    I totally agree with the comment on that there was fault on both parts, if there was nothin he was hiding, y didnt he just let them search the car, but then I agree with his argument with amandment rights, but when it also comes to border control, who do they anwser to, the US constitution, or probible cause(which cops can use at any time)...needless to say, this reminds of me of US greed at its worst...SUE SUE SUE.....this is how i see it, cops on a power trip, and a guy excercising his rights as a US citizin, and taping it(which is a lil wierd, y would he be tapin his trip home to phoenix)...
  • ron · 7 months ago
    Bet you wont mess with them again next time instead of being an idot and giving them a hard time how bout you umm i dunno maybe do what they say. "i dont want them to search my car" well guess what it got searched and so did your face so what did you learn?
  • Anonymous · 7 months ago
    this is nothing more than police brutality. if what the pastor says is true then the officers involved in the incident deserve to be fired. Oh and he was fully within his rights to deny the officers the ability to search his car. the law states that if an officer cannot see something, he needs a warrant to search it. i.e., the trunk of the car.
  • ingozi · 7 months ago
    Honestly, the police dog's reaction to the vehicle, being as it was a border crossing, gave those police officers every right to do what they did, and if he would have done something more threatening, they would have had every right to use maximum force.

    Fair advice to all of you going overseas for your vacations, leave an itinerary with your parents, and tell your embassy that you are in country, and call your family every few days. This is to protect you, your family, and your nation. He was lucky to be caught at the border in his own country.

    On the other side of things, I can hope he'll be going back to doing his job, because I bet he feels like he was handed over to the devil.
  • Josh · 7 months ago
    Exactly. If you just let them check they see some bad stuff. I mean you don;t think terrorists have tried to use the I am a priest to get past border patrol. Look at it like this if this guy had stuff we would be praising the officers for executing a perfect job. They have to be on high alert at all times if they spent an hour with this D-BAG who is to say the next guy who had something didn't sneak across. Don't get me wrong if you want to stop the local police in nowhere, ND go right ahead practice the 4Th away. DON'T TRY IT AT AN AIRPORT OR THE BORDER! Or in another country. I mean be glad you have those rights here. I don't understand all the response that are siding with the D-BAG! don't act like a D-BAG and you won't be treated like a D-BAG. These guys are just trying to keep us "SAFE". If you have nothing let them check it is their JOB! I am totally shocked that he would let them bust the windows HE KNEW IT WAS coming! At that point just give up and let them search if you feel like you were treated unfair take it to the courts! You know the beat down is coming and still don't listen that is YOUR fault! I have no pity for this D-BAG! Who agrees?
  • ed · 7 months ago
    sniffer dog can just sit and look at the car to tell the police officers that there is something there.

    the dog doesnt have to bark
  • Toad · 7 months ago
    If that was true why didn't they let the dogs come back out when the DPS asked them too? It looks as if the stop was random and they were too stubborn to admit they were wrong in the stop.
    This is going to be a civil rights lawsuit, an abuse of authority and use of excessive force. The police should be brought up on Felony assault charges.
  • jessica · 7 months ago
    i completely agree... cops use their power against people in order to feel important. My mother was raped for 9 years by a cop and in the 70s nothing could be done because it is a brotherhood. These cops didn't like this guy and they suspected something that they were clearly wrong about since they found nothing. these cops should not have jobs. they should be put in jail. They should be the ones arrested. This is absolutely ridiculous. To taze him that many times is too much force, to beat him once he got out of the car and to mock him and laugh at him while he is bleeding is not okay. No one should need 11 stitches, no one should have to be hospitalized in order to arrested. And we do not have to follow their orders because they are cops, i think that shows very well what was going on. Your not listening to me so i am arresting you!!! that is crazy!
  • deathblade13 · 7 months ago
    "Why didn't they bring the dog back out?" why should they. They said it gave them probable cause to search the car and he said no so they fallowed to the next course. IE: breaking into the car and forcibly removing him. It’s what their trained to do so why be surprised. The dog isn't there to prove suspicion its there for one quick examination and boom done. He failed. If he has nothing they do a quick search and done. You say no you’re hiding something it seems. Its not random, they dog raised suspicion, and its your freaken car what personal crap do you have in your car worth protecting. All that said. It’s clear these guys grossly mis handled the situation at pretty much every stage of the situation and should be charged with assault.
    I just don’t think he had a right to ask for the dog back again because that’s ridiculous, it’s just an indicator to the handlers not for the one being searched. The search or the refusal to be search gets you arrested. Not the dog barking or not.
    Bad situation that could have been avoided by applying some common sense.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    You're an ass. Police dogs are trained to "speak" when they see something out of the ordinary. They don't just sit there like a normal, untrained dog would. They are a part of the police force just as the officers are. Stop trying to impress people, because you really have no idea what you're talking about.

    Mike Barney
    2nd Lt. NYPD
  • scott · 7 months ago
    yes it seems like the dog was the best trained one in the bunch. they should make the dog the leader. you notice he didn't bite the guy once they got him out. that dog is a model of self control
  • jake · 7 months ago
    you are all full of crap that was a bogus bunch of bull and you all know it
  • Mauro · 7 months ago
    I believe a sniffer dog actually has to do something offer than just sit there and look at a car... because that's just suspicious, that all it has to do is look at your car and their like oh we got him he's got something in the car.
  • earon · 7 months ago
    ed, you're wrong! sniff dogs react frantically to anything they're trained for "ANYTHING suspicious". the dog doesn't have to bark necessarily but body language delivers the message and police officers who rely on sniff dogs knew that. refusal to arrest is not bad granted that you know the extent of your rights according to law--- but refusal (or unclear reasons) to justify arrest from these officers is a big BS!

    police officers have obviously used excessive force (and i call it, ABUSED OF POWER OR THE FUN OF HAVING IT))---and that don't surprise me---A LOT OF THEM NEEDED TO BE TAZED and toss out of the service. promise!!!
  • earon · 7 months ago
    ed, you’re wrong! sniff dogs react FRANTICALLY to anything they’re trained for “ANYTHING suspicious”. yes, the dog doesn’t have to bark necessarily but body language delivers the message and police officers who rely on sniff dogs knew that. refusal to arrest is not bad granted that you know the extent of your rights according to law— but refusal (or unclear reasons) to justify arrest from these officers is a big BS!

    these police officers have obviously used excessive force (and i call it, ABUSED OF POWER OR THE FUN OF HAVING IT))—and that don’t surprise me—A LOT OF THEM NEEDED TO BE TAZED and toss out of the service. promise!!!
  • Sa · 7 months ago
    I am from Germany and i'm a lawyer here. Something like that could have not happened in Germany. According to our law that would be massive police brutality and the DA would rape them in court. It's highly possibly they would even go to jail for several months and never work as police officers or as an other federal employee again. German police officers dont even carry tazers, because we think its inhuman and way more dangerous than maze.
  • James · 7 months ago
    No way, we live in America! we are more free than any other country. . . At least that's what the cops tell us to believe.
  • earon · 7 months ago
    yeah right and some of the infamous polices officers in our beloved america--land of the free---spell freedom as T-A-Z-E-R!!! what a @#&@##$@!
  • mattd · 7 months ago
    I agree with the German lawyer about tazing not being the best option, as it can be quite inhuman, though every once in a while a guy will come around whos doign something so fucked up he should get tazed in the face, numerous times. By so fucked up i mean fucked up enough to be tazed but not fucked up enough to be shot. Anyway, in these circumstances, these cops should be fucked up the ass by the long dick of the law, and then some large black dude in a state pen.
  • Drew · 7 months ago
    HAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAaaa I AGREE!!!
  • The TrueMan½ · 7 months ago
    You are right. Howver, the cops cover for each other, as they have always done, and therefore they will most likely go free.

    Love live democracy!
  • J.A.M · 7 months ago
    To carry tazers the cops get shot with them in training. They know how much it hurts. If we didn't have tazers what the fuck would a cop do if a guy weighing 300 pounds was coming at an officer who is a women and 130 pounds? The guy doesn't have a weapon besides his fists, would you rather her shoot the guy or use the tazer? You want all this freedom but don't realize there are people out there that will kill anyone and cops have to defend you from that. Just because you are not exposed to those people doesn't mean other law abiding citizens aren't.
  • Neuromancer · 7 months ago
    Tasing is BS. A guy in my town was just killed by a taser, because he was high on coke and the taser caused a heart attack. Some ignorant people in town say he was a drugie so he got what he deserved. I totally disagree. If a person is caught with coke in their system, the law says they should be charged and taken to jail. Not summarily executed without a trial.

    As far as this situation goes, come on people. Multiple cops apprehending a single suspect don't need to use a taser. A bunch of guys with nightsticks, mace, and hand-to-hand suppression tactics can't take out a single unarmed holy man? Really?

    As far as the preacher being stubborn, he's allowed. Sorry. There is no law that says being stubborn, lippy, or having a different opinion makes it ok to beat down a suspect.
  • Jerry Hindle · 7 months ago
    I was always taught that no matter what, on the side of the road the cop will always win....right or wrong he will go home and you will go to jail. So here is my observation on this matter.
    1) comply with the request to get out and let them search the vehicle
    2) get the names and badge numbers of every officer involved once the search is over.
    3) go immediatelty to the nearest US ATTORNEY GENERALS office and file a formal complaint against each and every officer involved EVEN IF ALL THEY DID WAS WATCH.
    4) contact a good bulldog lawyer ands file individual suits against each officer personally for violation of your civil rights and against the departments involved for each and every offense involved.
    5) contact the news media and show them the tape. The media coverage alone will put every one of the police involved in a bad light to the public and they don't want that.
    6) make sure that each lawsuit is seperate that way each officer will have to hire a lawyer to represent him/her out of their own pockets and even if they win it still costs them.
    7)make the amounts requested outragiously high so as to attract the attention of the media again


    BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DO YOU ARGUE WITH THE OFFICER ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. HE IS THE LAW AND YOU WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO BEAT HIM IN COURT.
  • tree · 7 months ago
    "BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DO YOU ARGUE WITH THE OFFICER ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. HE IS THE LAW AND YOU WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO BEAT HIM IN COURT."

    uhhhhh, no?
    thats retarted, the cops where wrong as they had NO CAUSE to do this to a person. theyre suppose to protect, not randomly hurt. shame on them.
  • J.A.M · 7 months ago
    The pastor said the dog didn't detect anything....does he train drug sniffing dogs for the police on the side? How does he know the dog didn't pick up something, because in movies the dogs bark? In reality they don't always bark, the can silently tell the handler there is something wrong. The officers were wrong for not bringing the dog back out but why should they? We have to follow the law, to live in this free society we give up some freedom.
  • Puno · 7 months ago
    Pretty sure you mean retarded.

    I love irony, don't you?
  • jay · 7 months ago
    I agree 100%
  • MFL · 7 months ago
    no way. you're basically saying we Americans should be scared of our government.
    since when should THE PEOPLE be afraid to question OUR government?
    i'd be damned if i'll be a government-fearing man before a God-fearing one.
  • bluefootedpig · 7 months ago
    I got afriad of the police when they started packing around guns and i wasn't allowed to pack around a gun.

    Also got even more scared when a cop kills someone and i see them walk but yet i see innocent people on death row.

    That makes me fear the government.
  • Thessik · 7 months ago
    @bluefootedpig: Why exactly are you not allowed to pack a gun? The only reasons that come to mind for that restriction are that you are a minor or a convicted criminal. Either one colors your opinion significantly, and either one means that you have different rights than most citizens.

    A lot of people are distressingly ignorant of what their rights actually are. I suggest reading up on it before making assumptions about what people (including cops) "have" to do.
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    Give me proof of these innocent people on death row.
  • spango · 7 months ago
    not true fuzzy little man bitch, when you take this course of action it ensures your safety. its not being afraid of government its getting back in the traditional American way... sue the fuck out of anyone you don't like.
  • FTP · 7 months ago
    He was not ressiting arrest he was asking them to fuken tell him why thwy want him to get out of the car for there was no reason for them to shater his car window's and then tazer him in my idea cops take advantage of what they are supposed to do thos tazers are for self defense...
  • thenewguy · 7 months ago
    His not getting out of the car was resisting arrest.

    Lets say you're caught drunk driving and you don't think you're drunk. Do the cops care if you believe you're over the legal blood alcohol level? No. It isn't their job to convince you. They told him why they wanted him out of the car. They gave him plenty of chances. He was removed.
  • Neuromancer · 7 months ago
    Police have to match force with force. If the guy had a baseball bat or a knife, that level of force would be justified. The fact that the police beat an unarmed man is not amazing - that is why many of them become cops in the first place. They just screwed up this time because they picked a black man who happend to be a preacher without a criminal record.
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    A black man?
  • Brandon · 7 months ago
    There's lots of good cops. They are the majority. Course when a cop does his job, it's just considered doing his job and doesn't get media attention. But when they're bad, well that's a sensational story to get views!

    Those of you saying the cops lied...STFU. Seriously. Maybe they were. You don't know that. You don't know. None of us do. We don't even know the conversation that took place before the video (which obviously had been going for a little bit). All I'm saying is stop the accusations about stuff you don't know.
  • Brandan "Bizzkit" · 7 months ago
    The truth of the matter here is that even though i do not think it is resisting arrest the court might because they asked him to get out of the car. But the true reality of it is they were falsely accusing him of a crime that was not done but the beating is what really tilts the titter tauter. They pastor was brutally abused for not resisting arrest at all after he was forced out of the car, the tasers and the slamming of the head is what is going to get these pigs years. What really is going to happen is that i think the pastor should do some sort of sue or something. Get money for this because the way this economy is going money is becoming a very valuable asset.
  • thenewguy · 7 months ago
    "But the true reality of it is they were falsely accusing him of a crime"

    How, pray tell, do you know this? Because he said he didn't do anything wrong? The jails are full of innocent people if you ask them.
  • MFL · 7 months ago
    it's funny how you're so quick to assume that the guy was in the wrong.
  • Andreiyfrag · 7 months ago
    I personaly would cut of their balls, for doing the shit they did
  • Ben · 7 months ago
    lol, they sort of deserve it
  • thenewguy · 7 months ago
    You couldn't be more mislead.

    Not answering questions and being extremely subversive. He sat there for more than an hour I believe he said. Shows he has a lot to prove or to work for. These, my friend, are signs of a terrorist. Scoff if you like, but if this guy turned out to be a terrorist you would be hailing these agents and officers as heros. You would be saying "Hell yeah, Tazer the shit out of him."

    These guys reacted as they were trained. They spotted a potential serious threat and responded.
  • yeee · 7 months ago
    ur dumb
  • Tagnizkur · 7 months ago
    He had EVERY right in the world to say no. He had every right in the world to know if they were charging him prior to exiting. He had every right to have proof of why he was being pulled over.

    The border patrol (if it was an hour) should have sought more assistance from local authorities.

    This was a mess, plain and simple. The officers did something they should not have. It was overkill, unjust, and without probable cause.
  • Justin · 7 months ago
    But the point is..... he wasn't a terrorist!

    Yeah, it's ok to take someone out that is a threat, but when you're not doing anything to justify that kind of reaction from the police, then you should get your ass in trouble.

    real simple concept here.

    He has a right to question and face his accuser, that's part of our rights as Americans. If the dog accused him, then he's justified in asking to see what the dog did, his behavior, that indicated he was doing something illegal. Why do you think the DNS asked the border patrol to bring the dog back? Because that's his right.

    And the cops can't arrest him on probable cause. They can detain him, place him in custody, but an arrest is only legal if there is proof and evidence against you. At the time, there was NONE. Only probable cause.

    Police are not infallible. We are not supposed to blindly obey them. Without forward thinking men/women, this would wouldn't be half of what it is today. People are allowed to question the situation, innocent until proven guilty.

    There was no crime, only probable cause. The only witness to this probable cause, was a dog. The dog was no longer around. I don't care how much a dog is trained, sitting down does not fully implicate someone of a crime. Dogs have three natural positions, laying down, standing and SITTING. Is it completely irrational to think, during the dogs shift at border patrol that it won't sit down at some point? So any time, for the rest of that dogs life, if it sits down, that means someone has a body in their possession or drugs on them?

    And lastly, maybe if the border patrol and DNS weren't such dicks when talking to the man, he would have complied. They could have handled it very differently from the beginning. Why not say "Sir if you step out of the vehicle, we will bring the K9 back and show you exactly what he did to give us probable cause. But it's within the law for us to legally remove you from the vehicle and search it whether you cooperate or not. And we will bust out the windows and use a form of non lethal weaponry to secure you in our custody if you do not comply."

    Resisting doesn't have to be a physical fight. It can be verbal as well. Telling an officer no or placing yourself in a position to resist (ex: not removing yourself from the car) IS resisting.

    Bottom line, I would have gotten out. Probable cause, whether you agree with it or not, IS the law. And I would rather them search me and my car, knowing I have nothing to hide, than to not search someone who is. The 10 mins of my time is worth it and I respect those who are trying to protect us.
  • Lestat · 7 months ago
    Granted he did nothing wrong, BUT if he was innocent i don't see why he insisted on staying in the car.. i would've sat there till they threatened to bust up my car then let them find nothing and file a complaint about them lying with the dog alerting them to drugs or a body -.-
  • Germany Guy · 7 months ago
    He stayed in car because it is his f***ing right.
    I would not let anyone search my car if he don't have the right to do so.
  • alice · 7 months ago
    No fucking right to do shit like that to people. Just because someone can question his fucking authoring doesn't mean he has to abuse the people he is supposed to protect, AND his power. The police lose respect from the younger masses with every abuse video and consitutional right violation. Why cant fucking cops understand that even if a person is being a little dick or asking questions they dont like its much better to be a nice fucking person than beat them!!! retards.....
  • alice · 7 months ago
    and for all the people saying he should have gotten out of the car, would you have him BREAK your rights just because a police officer asked you do? If the cops asked you to NOT vote, would you or would you not vote? he had a right to refuse unwarrented searches. he should have been able to just turn around and leave if he wanted to. and refusing isnt a admission of guilt.
  • jerrold · 7 months ago
    People that create there own problems by acting stupid usually get the outcome they want in the end . This case this idiot so called pastor could have said search away i have nothing to hide! But he did not and he got tazed next time he will let them search his body cavity if they so desire. ah ah
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    Vote? thats completely irrelevant voting and getting out your car is unconnected.
  • michelle · 7 months ago
    simply police brutality. it's never stopped. they're just picking a different crowd and using different weapons these days. still incredibly nauseating. torturers who are supposed to guard our communities.
  • paultimate · 7 months ago
    Why is this happening in the United States of America...(even to a white God fearing man)?
    It happens all the time. The true defenders of your rights, the people, are more apathetic and ignorant then ever.
    This discussion spinning into how drug dogs behave, God, etc. what an ADD nation. Rights are something you have even when its 'inconvenient' for the authorities, under arrest 'because I said so' isn't supposed to happen in the USA.
    The nation lost its moral authority years ago, GITMO, fraudulent WMD's, sponsoring torture, invading the wrong country for made up reasons, all supported by a nation made fearful despite its great strength.
    This VID is a sad reflection of the abuse of authority and microcosmic metaphor of US foreign policy.
    Changing leaders is easy, changing a nation won't be.
  • Andy · 7 months ago
    Great comment, but one thing: what's the difference between apathy and ignorance?
  • your friend · 7 months ago
    If this was any other goup doing this, they could be charged with battery, false imprisonment, Intimidation of a witness, Intimidation of a victem all with gang enhancers.
  • your friend · 7 months ago
    Oh and Illeagal search and seizer, Oh fuck it at this point you need to get an attorney and throw the book at these idiots. They think because they put on a uniform they are above the law and reproch. I dont care who the uniform represents they are still a gang.
  • Neal · 7 months ago
    This pastor is an idiot. He is setting a terrible example for his church. He provoked the cops and got just what he deserved: a tazed and beaten ass. Don't be such a prick and you won't get tazed. Cops are dicks, yes, but if you are a dick expect to get your ass spanked.
  • David · 7 months ago
    hm...no evidence, beaten and tazed, keeping bloody face out of view...religeous bias?...god bless this man for what he went through. Makes me sad and angry to watch this. They definately were doing something they shouldnt have done.
  • David · 7 months ago
    o...and wtf!?
    he was just asking wtf he did!
  • Ben · 7 months ago
    american police are idiots, i don't like them, it seems to be worse the further south you go but a lot of them just seem like idiots, the ones up north seem allright but south them seem like idiots,

    here in England you would honestly be owned, the police HQ would be ashamed and they would be fired and probably be put in jail, sorry to any good cops out there just generally they seem like douches
  • Kyle · 7 months ago
    He should have got out of the car, they told him why they wanted to search his vehicle. He could have been on his way in 5 minutes.
    Rodeny King = Excessive Force
    this guy got pulled out of his car, they don't know if he has any weapons so they had to put him down quickly to keep themselves safe.
  • Dale · 7 months ago
    WTF get real look at the facts and think like a normal person.
    1) Him being a pastor has nothing to do with this. How many religous leaders have been caught doing illegal and or immoral activities?
    2)This looks like a permannate federal border patrol check point not something that just appeared out of nowhere. The so called pastor knew what it was and probably drove thru it many times before this happened.
    3)The Officer told this douchbag that a dog alerted to his vehicle plain and simple reason was given for the detainment. They are not required to bring the dog back and search again just cause you do not like the answer.
    4)He was given every chance to comply before any action was taken. He chose the outcome he wanted and he got it. He pre-planned this camera ready and did everything he could to make this happen.

    Now ask yourself what would you do if you were the officers. Would you stand and debate and if so for how long? Or would you just say to him OK you can leave because you are so smart.
  • chicostudent · 7 months ago
    to the people who said cocaine dealers would not know their right, i wish i could live in your ignorant world. the people who really understand our rights and the laws are the people who break them. they are the people that have been to court, have dealt with lawyers who know the law and used it to help them. you do not learn about laws and how they are used correctly from tv or civic classes in school, it is actually dealing with real cases.
  • Evan · 7 months ago
    the pastor here didn't exactly go about this in the best way, he doesn't have the right to demand the dog to come back, he should have been smart about it and got out of the car, especially if he knew he was innocent, it's morons like him that do this (and take videos) just to gain some media coverage. Now, the officers did overreact, however, i'm sure i'd beat him down too if he was acting like such a prick
  • anonymous · 7 months ago
    Cops drunk on authority makes me sick.
  • stayviacomsucks · 7 months ago
    n my oint he didn't do anything wong andwhy did he have to close his eyes for themto do it. they also broke his window or no reason at all. cops need to control them selfs ad go by the law before theylose there job.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    This is crazy.... but i'm sure it's very typical. Law enforcement using the loophole of probable cause to do what they did. I'm glad it was videoed... lets hope there is a law suit brought against them for this....

    Good thing he had video.. I would love to hear what happens with this! Please keep us informed.
  • Gene · 7 months ago
    I think both the baptist AND the cops are douche bags in this case..
  • Jake · 7 months ago
    Maybe you should have talked to Jesus. He would have told you to let them search the car if you didnt have anything in it. It would have saved you that beating. I say you deserved it.
  • thenewguy · 7 months ago
    What he did was illegal ... that's what those who break the law get. Enough said.
  • Bantak · 7 months ago
    Why the hell does it even matter that he's a baptist pastor? That's the question I think is interesting.

    If it was a big truckdriver, would it be less cruel?
  • bart · 7 months ago
    America is a country that glorifies violence, hatred and abuse. What do you think, guys overtrained in violence and violent measures aren't itching to act accordingly?

    Besides, police aren't there to protect and serve the people, they are there to serve and protect the interests of the wealthy. To believe anything else is self deception.

    Cops are pieces of shit who have no productive means of relieving their "Type A" personality disorder.
  • Luke · 7 months ago
    I agree with Jerry, somewhat. Cops were extremely abusive and obviously on an AUTHORITY TRIP. However, in my state and probably all states, we sign over the right for any law enforcement officer to search the vehicle and/or person without a warrent or probable cause when we sign our drivers license. We consent to sobriety tests also. But "sweet" we get to drive, right. I know of very-very few straight up good cops. And they hate the BULLY SCUMBAG COPS as mach as we do. A lawsuit has extremely low chance for success. #1 a cop is held harmless in any actions in pursuit of any probable cause wich includes wether or not he just fuckin" felt like it. #2 courtroom procedures are designed to prevent the admission of any truth should the state seem so fit in thier high and mighty rightous selves. Pastor, for your own good forgive them and pray for them, and let your heart be free from this.
  • Mat · 7 months ago
    Typical fucking PIGS. All they can do is treat the real citizens like shit, because they are too FUCKING scared to deal with real criminals. That is why I HATE PIGS. They are usless and all can suck my dick
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    if you have nothing to hide, whats the point in giving them a hard time? yes youve got rights, but they also have the right to search you under the motor vehicle act.
  • John · 7 months ago
    You deserve to be punished even more! I hope they charge you with something and fine you $$$.

    Idiot...
  • Eric · 7 months ago
    Alright well I e-mailed this to my dad, as I said I would. He is an ex-cop and here are his comments:

    Hey Dad,

    You tell me if you think excessive force was used. This man is a Baptist Pastor, and was badly beaten for nothing by cops.

    YES AND NO.I DIDN'T SEE ANY REASON FOR TAZERS.WERE THEY JUSTIFIED?YES.ONCE THE DOG MADE A HIT ON HIS CAR HE HAD NO RIGHT TO REFUSE A SEARCH.IT'S A ONE SIDED STORY.DID HE DESERVE TO BE TREATED THIS WAY?NO.BUT,HE BROUGHT IT ALL ON HIMSELF BY REFUSING.ONCE THEY HAD PROBABLE CAUSE THEY HAD A JOB TO DO AND HE WOULDN'T COOPERATE.WERE THEY ACTING LIKE JERKS/NO.THEY WERE CALM WITH HIM AND TOLD HIM TO COVER HIS EYES.HIS ACTIONS CREATED REACTIONS WHICH WEREN'T THE BEST RESULTS.BUT THEY HAD TO MAKE A DECISION AND REACT QUICKLY.HAD THEY NOT THAT CHECK POINT WOULD HAVE BEEN HELD UP FOR WHO KNOWS HOW LONG.THEY DIDN'T KNOW IF HE HAD DRUGS,GUNS,ETC..IT'S A SHAME WHAT HAPPENED.BUT IF HE HAD JUST GOTTEN OUT AND DID AS TOLD IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A DIFFERENT ENDING.DRUG DOGS DON'T SIT THERE AND BARK OR POINT.SO HE HAD ZERO CLUE AS TO WHAT THAT DOG FOUND OR HOW IT REACTED TO THE SEARCH.
  • HartOpen · 7 months ago
    I agree with your dad. I've had my car searched before for because I was just sitting on the side of the road. I had nothing to hide anyways so it really didn't matter. It was sort of funny because it made them look stupid.
    I don't understand why the guy, being a priest and all, wasn't more relaxed about the situation. Having your car searched really isn't that bad of a thing and there's really no reason to be all uptight about it. Well, unless you really do have something you're hiding.
  • hustlerpete · 7 months ago
    The pastor was wrong.. when they say they have probable cause, your fucked (whether they actually have it or not.)!! You have no rights and need to do what they say..

    If you have nothing to hide, why couldnt he just show them..
  • Ben · 7 months ago
    There was no need to taze him! No fucking need! All these police officers did is over use there powers. It would have been completely nessersary to force the pastor out of the by man handling, but to taze and beat him just because you have the equipment to do so is just plain wrong. I am American who lives in the UK, it is people like this who give the USA a bad name! Those police officers should be given the full punishment possible to finally say to all of the law enforcement officers in the US that they are not above the law!
  • craig a. · 7 months ago
    guys. he deserved it.
    youtube some more of this "pastor" and see how he acts and the hatred he spews.
    the cops should have put a bullet between his eyes.
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    Yeaaaaa! TASERS 666!!!
  • Tyler · 7 months ago
    will definitely be a good court case. after they told him the dog had alerted to his car, whether he believed them or not, he was required to get out of the car. i don't think they have an obligation to bring the dog back out and show him. but the tazers and the apparent beating(i couldn't make out much from the first vid) were completely unnecessary. lol, do you think he's forgiven them yet?
  • dave · 7 months ago
    us cops just too paranoid about everything?
    HOLY SHYT a squirrel! *bang bang* O_O;;
  • adam mcintosh · 7 months ago
    heres the things about america, sure their cops r ruthless and uncanny, but so r there lawyers. sue these bastards!!!
  • ADez · 7 months ago
    The cops were completely in the right believe it or not. They had suspicion that something was in the car. the pastor refused to leave the car even when asked multiple times in a calm and polite manner. Police protocol had to take place they did not have to ask him to close his eyes when they broke the window and they had to taser him in case he was actually a dangerous felon
  • M.J.A · 7 months ago
    I agree with you... >_>
  • scen · 7 months ago
    How exactly is he a dangerous felon??
  • Unforgiven · 7 months ago
    People always quote the bill of rights from the first sentence only. You have the right to bear arms. So all you Bill Of Rights believers go grab a gun and start walking around town, into a bank, or store. When the cops come and before they turn your lights out for good because you won't put the weapon down. Be sure to yell out that they are violating your civil rights. Dumb Asses.... Bill of Rights are not concrete. You can bear arms, with a license.

    Bottom line do what the police say then sue em later. You can beat the charge, you can't beat the ride. Try that gun thing out and tell me how it works out for ya bleeding heart DB'sOTD!
  • Double Penetration Nation · 7 months ago
    fucking rediculous...i hate the fuckin police...soo pathetic...
  • tom · 7 months ago
    If the cops had reason to search the vehicle then thats final, the guy shouldn't have argued and he wouldn't have been hurt, as for bringing the dogs out again to prove something, that is ridiculous, they are the police officers and shouldn't have to prove something to the person they are arresting, the taser was a step to far though.
  • jay · 7 months ago
    Did they use excessive force to a bit yes. However, a lot of you are wrong about his rights, the 4th amendment that he keeps quoting does protect you from unlawful search and seizure, however when the drug dog alerts them that is probable cause and he must comply with their demands to get out of the car, could the dog be wrong, yes, but this does not give him the right to sit and not comply with their demands to get out of the car and they have every right by law to remove him by force.
  • legice · 7 months ago
    the guyz at the border patrol are just stupid.
    not as in worthless but have huge egos.
    you are not the law.
  • Tony · 7 months ago
    Here's a valid question, why would you refuse to answer their questions? We live in a time where terrorists fly planes into buildings, strap bombs to their chests and kill men, women, & children. Do you not think it is your responsibility as an American to help law enforcement do everything they can to protect us? Have you ever worked with trained police dogs and know how they indicate a vehicle may have drugs or bombs? Most likely not...

    Now with all of that said, I think the border patrol used extremely excessive force and should loose their jobs as there was definately a better way to handle the situation. However, you could have done so also.
  • Pizza Guy · 7 months ago
    The pastor was wrong in the first place because he refused to let the police officers search the car. If ANY police officer has ANY SUSPICION AT ALL that there is something of an illegal nature in a vehicle they can search the vehicle without a search warrant. A vehicle is considered a "dynamic object" and you can easily move the vehicle to dispose of any illegal substances while the police obtain a search warrant. That is why none is needed to search a vehicle. When the pastor refused to let them search his vehicle it was considered obstruction of justice which is an arrestable offense. HOWEVER, the misuse of force on the officer's part was wrong. the officer does have the right to forcibly remove someone from a vehicle and a taser MIGHT have been necessary, but beating the hell out of the pastor probably was not necessary.
  • Joel · 7 months ago
    LMAO. Stupid pigs.

    I hope they get fucking jailed for this shit. The cop called him a terrorist. Give me a break.

    This dude is in the clear, he didn't do one thing wrong. I would never step out of my vehicle for a cop if I haven't done a single thing wrong. Being a pig doesn't mean anything unless the person has done something illegal. If it's a random stop, and my car is locked, you're S.O.L piggy!

    This dude is definately gona get some pretty cash for this. Nice work cops, fucked up yet again. Lol.
  • John · 7 months ago
    He has a constitutional right to bear against illegal searches and seizures. If the border patrol agents were confident in their probable cause, they could easily have gotten a warrant to search the car. I'd like to know what went on in the hour leading up to the breakin.

    Failure to comply with an officer's request is only something you can be arrested for if the request was a lawful one. That's a very iffy situation, as their probable cause seemed to be pretty shaky. They beat the tar out of him, and that was totally unnecessary.

    For all you stooges saying that they needed to taze him just in case he was a dangerous felon, they could say the same thing about anybody walking down the street that looked at them funny. Just because you suspect someone may be a dangerous person, that's not justification to beat/shock the hell out of them. They were just pissed off at his refusal, and took it out on him when they finally got him out.

    And lest anybody think I'm just hating on cops, I'm not. I am currently in the process of becoming one. This was force that went far into the realm of the excessive, far beyond what was justified or necessary.
  • videowatcherfromNEWYORK · 7 months ago
    This IS totally messed up! I MEAN WTF! THIS JUST SHOWS THAT THE POLICE/BORDER PATROL JUST WANTS TO FUCK WITH RANDOM PEOPLE JUST TO SHOW THAT THEY CAN! i mean i feel really bad for this guy! cause he wasnt doing anything wrong! i mean he definatly wasnt resisting arrest either!
  • C'Zar · 7 months ago
    So, I was reading through amendments’ & our rights as citizens. Granted the "Pastor" which i don't know why everybody is labeling this matter with this title, does have rights to ask questions as do the officers have the right to search, but only if they do have probable cause. "The Cops stated that their dogs gave them the right" well i don't believe they always use their dog for the right manners, but none the less that is going to be their argument. This man has the right to an attorney present while this is happening and he does have the right to refuse them to search his car.

    Now the way they acted after they held a lengthy discussion is beyond their means!


    I have posted some information about amendments etc. below and what i gathered from it that the officers have the right to search ones personal property after a witnessed offense of the smallest caliber (misdorneanor) allowed them this right!

    I could go on for days about this, but just hope to shed some light from what i gathered.


    One other thing keep religion out of it, just because he's a pastor gives no one the right to throw the first stone whatever their beliefs are. That is a non-relevant issue from this standpoint (as even he never mentioned that he was a pastor or not in the videos)

    C

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforcement_of...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_t...
  • Germany Guy · 7 months ago
    Tasers are weapons, and the Cops used it against an unarmed Person. Thats the point.
    Ok the guy is a stupid tard and should have known that the cops wouldn't let him go. But he didn't attack the police, so there was no reason for self defesnse.

    And by the way:
    Things like that cause people to think that amerika sucks.
    You guys shoud start to ban hatred and fear out of your emotions.
  • Wtfdizthis? · 7 months ago
    you spelled America wrong
  • Cooper Barkow · 7 months ago
    this is such a fucked up world i mean cumon TASERING A PREIST how fucked up can u get
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    What makes this so different just cos he's a priest?
    Priests aren't always good people.
  • Ken · 7 months ago
    The simple thing to say here is that the pastor could have avoided everything by simply complying with the officers' request. Like an earlier post said, the officers don't have to go into a long discussion with him about why they feel they need to search his car. He was trying to prove a point and trying to show them that he was smarter than they were and he got his ass kicked for his trouble. Good for you, dude. You showed them, didn't you? I'll bet you were rethinking your strategy a bit when you were squeeling like a little girl and peeing all over yourself. If you've got nothing to hide, comply with the officers, let them do their job, and get on down the road to your wife or whatever and prove your smarts in some other way besides trying to show up the police on the side of the road. Man of God or not, you are an IDIOT !! You got what you deserved you little punk !
  • anonymous · 7 months ago
    The police here saw a suspicious man because he was exercising his rights. They obviously fabricated (nothing was found) the probable cause and he called their bullshit, and they beat the shit out of him. All you that say he had it coming are idiots, peace out!
  • its me · 7 months ago
    They were so obviously drunk
  • shadoninja · 7 months ago
    police brutality for sure.
  • thunderfia · 7 months ago
    the police/border patrol was not in the wrong. they stated the reason for there search. if he wanted to bitch about it he could have done it after the search. they have to do searches for a reason and if you refuse then that gives them even more reason the think your hidding something. they did not need to bring the dog in when he asked because it is not the same as a traffic stop. if he would have just gotten out of the car the dog would have come back through and they would have been done with it. if the police/border patrol did do anything wrong it would be that they have to give warning before they tazer you. A group of officers can be used on one individual. it is for the officers safety because you dont know if he is armed. dont blame the officers just because you dont like cops. 99% of them are doing there jobs. its always the 1% that messes it up for the rest. that 1% are the only ones you see on the news or posted on the web. you dont get to see all of the ones that actually do there jobs. so dont be quick to judge. educate youself a little. and this isnt germany so that shit doesnt apply.
  • habibi · 7 months ago
    You have to sue, man !!!!
  • thunderfia · 7 months ago
    and lose
  • JC · 7 months ago
    Just want to add that the cop speaking to him gave him a lawful command to exit the vehicle. The supreme court (look it up people) said that it is a lawful command for police officer safety to have people exit the vehicle.
    He ignored it several times, if he was having a problem with the legality he should get a lawyer and turn up in court. For all the officers knew he was sitting in the car with a weapon hidden in there. You can bitch all you want about police brutality but the more he argued the more it looked like he was hiding something.

    Just a note the dog hitting on something is probable cause to search, reasonable suspiscion does not let a police officer search the car.
  • Deadair · 7 months ago
    The Cops Completely overreacted. One taser is enough to put someone down unless they're huge or something. They didn't need to break both windows either...

    ...However...

    He was told that they suspected drugs or a body in his car, so they had a reason to search the car...

    If I was him, I would've just let them search the car because of these reasons.

    There were no Drugs or Bodies in the car.

    And if they would've made any damages to my car while searching it, as long I let them search it, they'd be required by law to pay for the damages.

    So if he would've done what the police told him to, i don't think this would've happened...
  • thunderfia · 7 months ago
    another thing is if his story was true about have his head put against the car door where the window was, he would have it alot worst. his face doesnt look that bad. but i could tell you he was tazered and taken out of the with the nessesary amount of forces. those officers arent stupid. they know the cameras are there. this guy is just upset because he was humiliated because if he just got out of the car he would have been where he needed to be.
  • Tukdaddy · 7 months ago
    The point is your just wasting time trying to argue with the police. If you really have nothing just let them search real quick and be on your merry way.
  • The Silent Fury · 7 months ago
    This guy needs to SUE THEIR ASSES for undue harrassment, illegal search and seizure and false arrest! SUE THE BASTARDS!!!
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    OMG IF THATS NOT THE FUNNIEST THING IVE SEEN AND HEARD I DONT KNOW WHAT IS. DUDE IF U READ THIS I HOPE U KNOW A GROWN MAN ISNT SUPPOSED TO SCREAM LIKE THAT EVER.

    GREAT VIDEO
  • E Money · 7 months ago
    Thats the new world order....We dont so anything about it either ...If we wake up whos doing anything to stop these bad pigs...
  • bitmap · 7 months ago
    The guy in the car was definatly in the wrong, the guy who tazered him was in the right, however the border patrol agents who BEAT him are in the wrong. Thats what some people dont notice, there was border patrol agents, and 1 cop. the border patrol agents called the police to come and remove this guy from his car.

    I have a sneaking suspicion that the border patrol guys are a bit crooked.
  • tobias · 7 months ago
    So much for the greatest country in the world, huh?
  • Henry · 7 months ago
    why don't you just get the fuck off the car and let them search the car??

    if i were the cops i would do the same thing to you.
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    you need to be in jail with those cops and I have a question for you , what are the three branches of government?
  • Brian Crawmer · 7 months ago
    They definitely used too much force, and the taunting was unneeded.

    But you know what, anyone, especially a Baptist pastor should have humbled himself and cooperated with Law Enforcement.
  • David · 7 months ago
    It's amazing how many people in this thread fail to see that the Constitution protects us from behavior like this from thugs in uniform. And yet Americans appear eager to give up these freedoms.

    No wonder this country is in the state it is in and incidents like these occur.

    Police do not have a right to search your car just because they say so.

    "It is not lawful for police to arrest you simply for refusing to consent to a search."

    http://www.aclu.org/police/gen/14528res20040730...
  • Reverend Maynard · 7 months ago
    Hey Snapperhead, you being a pastor doesn't make you exempt from ANYTHING! Maybe the cops are tired of trying to figure out who the bad guys are, and got no help from you. If you are innocent, next time , listen to them idiot! Maybe churches should pay taxes!!!!!!!!!!!! Douchebag!!!
  • Danny · 7 months ago
    This is why EMS dislike police officers. cuz they have complete disregard of other people in emergency settings. he was obviously bleeding from his head profusely and did nothing to control the bleed. >.> I mean we don't get into fights with police officers but we sure as hell don't like them to much when it comes to patient care.
  • dablah · 7 months ago
    couldn't they have just dragged him out though, I mean, was the tazer really justified? He didn't seem do be doing all that much resisting other than asking a reasonable question
  • Patrick · 7 months ago
    I remember in my Criminal Justice course, K-9 units don't actually respond at all when something is amiss. For instance, if traces of drugs/human flesh/etc are sniffed out, they sit down and happily wag their tail. Barking and such only happens on cop shows. I'm not saying the victim possessed something problematic, but I'm offering that tidbit.
  • Dog gone · 7 months ago
    Police trust their dogs too much. I was stpped one time for a roadside inspection. They were looking for drugs and insurance registration. I have insurance and do not do drugs. Their dog said otherwise and they wanted to inspect my car which I said fine because I had nothing to hide. After removing my suitcase from the trunk and strewing by belongings all over the road the dog said it was in the car. They litarally tore my car apart. Took out the spare tire, the liner, the back seat. the sides. Of course they didn't find anything so they had to call their suppervisor. After a long time of talking to each other and spitting on the ground they said they were letting me go. I had to put everything back together, my belongings into the car, and I was held up in my travels for 2 1/2 hours. I think the dog needs to go back into training.
  • Jessica Black · 7 months ago
    Okay so my friend and i are sitting here watching this video and we both agree that the cops were completely in the wrong. they had no right to search his car for a couple reasons:
    1. They didn't have any probable cause even after the pastor asked him why hes searching his car.

    2. even if there was a reason for the cops to search the car, he has the right to refuse to not let them search it if they dont have a warrent. Just like if he was in his house, they couldn't do anything without having a warrent unless the pastor voluntarily invites them in.

    and even if the pastor did do something he was not proposing a threat to the police therefore he shouldn't have been tazed or had his car windows broken.

    its insane.
  • george · 7 months ago
    1. Cops had right to check his vehicle even though they did not have any warrants. See
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_exce.... Fouth amendment is suspended when it comes to motor vehicles.

    2. He was tasered because he was being uncooperative and he was not following the law as set by constitution (see the point above). The officer clearly asked him to get out of the car and he did not. What was the officer expected to do? Sing him a lullaby?
  • vanessa · 7 months ago
    honestly, i think the man should have just drove away, cops who use there "power" for bullshit like that should be fuckin shot, lets get serious here who the fuck is policing the police
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    You realise if he drives away he will be chased down and then suffer heavy consequences?
    Retard.
  • Ninja_Lohi · 7 months ago
    WTF!!!
  • Tyler · 7 months ago
    wow the cops are fucktards, yes FUCKTARDS! the guy is crying and the fat ass is sitting on his head. they r just lucking he didnt have a gun. idk y cops are such bitches, they think just cuz they're cops they cand do whatever they want to fucking do. retar.... no FUCKTARDS
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    Your a dumb fucking idiot.
  • PhoxiePhox · 7 months ago
    The man was in the wrong in that it is entirely legal for an officer to search a vehicle without a warrent. However, I highly doubt the K9 unit showed any hint that there were drugs or people in the car.

    K9 are trained in specific search patterns, and when they find something, depending on the trainer, they go into a sit-stay or down-stay NEAR the object until called away. It sounds as though the K9 was not even brought into the vicinity of the car for a proper search. When outside the vicinity of a search and the dog "senses" something they will go on alert, meaning there will be a bark, generally deep and short. The man heard nothing, meaning there was no alert.

    Sounds like the BP wanted to search, probably quota, he would not get out, so they made something up. Patrol gets called in, has one side of the story, and for safety they will agree with the BP. Things escalated to the man getting abused and everyone involved looking like asses.

    I bet there will be repremands and if there are any firing it will only be on the BP side of things and not the highway officers involved.
  • Nick · 7 months ago
    Damn...that scream...that just rattled my bones... the sound of sheer pain.... those cops are fucking assholes.....
  • Nunurbiz · 7 months ago
    He sounded like a little girl not getting his way. He's probably been getting his way and if he doesn't ....GOD WILL GET YOU!!

    I'd like to see the WHOLE hour of tape with audio. If he wasted an hour of my time with his whining I'd taser and beat the crap out of him too. GET OUT OF THE FUKIN CAR NEXT TIME !!
  • =] · 7 months ago
    all i have to say is...
  • Peter · 7 months ago
    Some of you people sicken me
  • Classy · 7 months ago
    So he was tasered at the same time by two officers and then 1 - 2 times before or after that tasing.

    It's both the faults of the officers and the pastor for making it into such a situation, but the officers used excessive force in my opinion.
  • Inacio · 7 months ago
    I think they were being pretty patient with you.
    They asked you in a respectfull manner what to do and you refused.
    As a good citizen why didnt you just do what you were asked.
    As a christian you should have geacefully done what you were asked to do you didnt have to prove that you were smatter and knew your rights and argue with them.
    That did not give tem the right to hurt you, that was wrong, very wrong.
    Our law enforcement is under allot of stress, especially the border patrol, with whats going on im mexico and the terrorist they have a huge load on their hand they dont need back talk from a siple request.
  • kyle · 7 months ago
    You should tell that to Jesus!
  • Suzanne · 7 months ago
    I didn't see the guy get beaten. Did you? Sure, he got tased for being stupid and refusing to comply with police instruction, but did you see anyone beat him up?
  • CRAIG · 7 months ago
    Vehicle Searches are not protected under the 4th amendment, as well as numerous others, such as stop and frisk. To be honest, police can be a pain in the ass, but you should always cooperate with them. It will always make the amount of time you must converse with them shorter, and everyone is happier by that. I believe the cops acted in a completely necessary and legal way, you are lucky nothing more happened.
  • ASH · 7 months ago
    On Tuesday, April 21st 2009 the US supreme court issued a ruling that states that vehicles cannot be searched without a warrent unless the person is close enough to the car and believed to be a threat or that the person is placed under arrest and it is believed that evidence to support the arrest could be in the car (ie you are arrested on drug charges and they believe that there are drugs in the car). I'm not saying that the guy shouldn't have complied with the cops, but under this new ruling, I would certainly say he has a lawsuit....easy
  • Sebastian · 7 months ago
    If a K9 detects any form of drug or a dead body, it doesnt bark or move around or anything. They are trained to just sit on the spot telling others they have found something by just siting down.
    And i think you are stupid when you have 4-5 police officers telling you to get out of the car, if they just need to look in the trunk, especially if they have suspiscion, e.g you not answering their questions. If you wanted to go home so bad you wouldve let them do that and then be on your way, but no, you gotta make a fuzz about it. I think this was mostly your own fault. But i agree that this was a brutal act by the police officers and couldve been handled allot more smoothly.
  • Smart One :) · 7 months ago
    Look, a cop can't come to you and search you just because he thinks you have something. The cop has to have either one or more of the five senses:
    1. Sight
    2. Smell
    3. Feel
    4. Hearing
    5. Taste

    Also, dogs are trained to bark at any drugs, dogs do not just stand there and senses if there are drugs, it moves around and barks if they smell anything. I mean put yourself in the dog position, if there is a crime in front of you, what do you do? Stand there and wait until people realize there is a crime, or say something about it?
  • Jack · 7 months ago
    Am I mistaken, or was it mentioned that this was a US border crossing? If so, then this is one of the exceptions to the "search warrant rule" based on supreme court precedent rulings. Law enforcement does not need probably cause to search any incoming person or vehicle/boat/etc. The minister was trying to assert a right that he did not have. When entering at any US border crossing, you are subject to search. Even if it may seem completely random or if you are a US citizen.

    However, I do agree that the deployment of the tazer was dramatic given the number of personnel available at the time. Conversely, the tazer is deemed an "intermediate weapon" and not as lethal force. It can be used (in my state) in cases of active resistance or active aggressive resistance. The minister looked to be a classic "passive resistance". They could have opened the vehicle, again gave him to opportunity to exit and then physically attempt to remove him. If he actively resisted, i.e. physically pushing/pulling away from them, then the tazer would have been appropriate.

    Flame away...
  • monster · 7 months ago
    i hope the sued the shit out of that department
  • Tristan · 7 months ago
    i feel so bad for that poor man. this is the reason i hate cops.
  • SnESxOnE · 7 months ago
    Yeah, this is why I dont respect the police. Stuff life this happens everyday where im from, and a majority of it goes unreported because the police can hide their asses so well. The other day there was a shooting out front of my house, and me and my friend were in my house. And when my friend went to go walk home, the police asked him who had the gun, and he explained that he didnt know, as he was inside with me. The police asked him again, and he said he didnt know, and one of the officers hit him in the eye, and knocked him over, and the officer and another officer kicked him while he was on the ground. Stuff like this pisses me off. But what can you really do? They cover their asses so well. This guy is lucky he has it on tape.
  • Jack · 7 months ago
    UPDATE: My apologies. I hadn't watched the second video. If this was a "check point" on US soil, then he would have the right to refuse a search. However, if the canine hit on his car (erroneously or not, that would be shown in court if it proceeded that far) that is sufficient probable cause to search the car.

    There was a recent case that I believe made it to the US appellate level affirming the use of dogs, but there continues to be further litigation regarding this issue and none has set a precedent of a "yes" or "no" for the use of search dogs as sufficient probably cause.

    Nonetheless, the officer informed him of the dog's hit on the vehicle which is sufficient for a search.

    So, if probably cause was articulated by law enforcement in addition to his demeanor raising their suspicions, his refusal to cooperate constitutes obstruction of the officers completing their duties. The probably cause and accuracy of the canine can be argued later in court.

    The good minister took a situation that could have been litigated as a civil issue and turned it into a criminal law violation.

    Flame on...
  • Dan · 7 months ago
    If you refuse a search you're automatically assumed to be guilty end of story. But there was no need for them to beat the guy up or taze him. The guy sounded guilty anyhow - but who knows?
  • c-rage · 7 months ago
    First off, check the website a guy posted early on in the comments. This guy is ridiculous. It's like he is looking to pick fights with cops, just to get footage of them "abusing their power."

    Second, there was no excessive force used. He was told what he was being taken out of the car for, therefore he was resisting after the fact. He was then immoblized by tazer for fear of being physically confrontational. He was then pulled to the ground, with force, and handcuffed.

    The only thing wrong with it is people saying he was beat up. His face is that way from the force to the ground, which is standard procedure in hostile situations for cops.
  • jesus christ · 7 months ago
    you sound like you are cop. Fuck you.
  • Shortstak6 · 7 months ago
    You're an idiot. First of all, posting as Jesus Christ is offensive to everyone, especially to Mr. Anderson, and me. He sounds like a cop because he's smart like cops. He's nice like most cops (not like the one's Mr. Anderson is talkiing about). Maybe you should think about what you say before you drop the F-Bomb on a priest....moron.
  • kTuck · 7 months ago
    Where in the US are you from where most officers you meet are nice? Just getting a few speeding tickets almost every experience I've had in MA they've been arrogant and demeaning. My first ever ticket I was 17, I was speeding irresponsibly, I'll admit. The officer stated I "took too long to pull over", he was by his lonesome, extricated me from the car, cuffed me, folded me over my hood and tore my car apart searching for whatever it was he didn't find.

    Some of you are right, civil rights are being eaten away, a friend of mine was put on a no fly list after 9/11, seemingly for no reason. It took him two years I think and many many phone calls/meetings to get off it.
  • Pyromaniac21 · 7 months ago
    This is the United States of America. Jesus Christ only did miracles if you're a Christian and, last time I checked, there was a thing called "Freedom of Religion." On top of that, you can't get mad at someone if they insult a religion because maybe they're insulted by YOUR religion. There's also something called "Freedom of Speech" (1st amendment, anyone?) which allows him to say that and you can't tell him otherwise, so why be a douche? Personally, I think that anyone who tries to say that the incident above WASN'T police brutality, obviously either: 1.) doesn't know the REAL rules and the extent of them, so they should do some research, or 2.) is supportive of kicking some poor guys ass for no reason. Take your pick. No unarmed person who is simply trying to figure out what's going on should not be subjected to shit like that. Just because the cops ASSUME (break it down...) that the poor guy knew the rules, doesn't mean he did. Aside from the fact that they broke just about all of the ones surrounding pedestrian rights. Everyone gets an opinion, but you can't tell someone that they can't do something that the have the right to do. So don't be such an ass.
  • civic3dr97 · 7 months ago
    fuck c-rage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and Fuck the police!!!!!!!!
    and my great dane is going to eat ur stupid dogs motherfuckers!!!!!!!!!!!!! our rights are dead................
  • Russee · 7 months ago
    yeh but how many cops does it take to immobilize one person. Even if he was dangerous look how many people were surrounding him. It was more like they were watching him squirm on the floor. That was an abuse of their powere as police officers.
  • Michael · 7 months ago
    I completely agree with you.
  • joe · 7 months ago
    the cops didnt have probable cause. What he should have done is listen to them and then sued them for violating his rights but i guess he wanted to be beaten for emphasis.
  • Daniel · 7 months ago
    Standard procedure to break in his windows, tase him, smash his face in glass, mock him and refuse to show evidence of what he did wrong? Then give the Miranda Rights after all that? It's lovely to see what our law enforcement has to do to get those stubborn old pastors out of their cars. The Cops should be sued and fired.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    C-Rage you are dumb. The cops used excessive force. Multiple cops using tazers is excessive. They had no probable cause. Its police brutality like this is just sad. When people like you can tolerate this it is even more sad.
  • Drew · 7 months ago
    C-rage for the win. this pastah has issues.
  • SEAN · 7 months ago
    I AGREE 100% HE WAS RESISTING AND DESERVED IT.. HAD HE LISTENED IN THE FIRST PLACED HE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ARRESTED... HIS OWN FAULT
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    Yes, and I'm sure if a cop asked you to bend over and pull down your pants, you refused and were tazed you'd be saying the same thing. You don't have to do shit a police officer tells you if it's not the law.
  • deep_throat · 7 months ago
    damn straight c-rage!!!!
  • M · 7 months ago
    Are you fucking retarded?

    He was playing the fourth. Completely within his rights. Resistance was next to none, other than minor verbal defiance. Tazing him THREE times, and 'stepping on his head'. That kind of defiance does NOT require a guy getting 11 stitches.
  • lonixoxo17 · 7 months ago
    C-Rage, that may very well be; however, no matter how much somebody tries to "pick a fight" with cops, they should never be treated like this man was. These police officers definitely abused their power. Even more, they acted like complete douchbags.

    Do you also think that a guy has the right to rape a girl if she flaunts her body in front of him enough? As a woman, I have the right to "test" a guy all I want, but it's up to him to elicit some self-control. The problem here isn't the stubborn dude telling his story, the problem is the police officers and their inability to think as rational adults. This is NOT justice. These cops provide more threat to our public than safety. Personally, I am disgusted by their behavior.

    Oh, and on a completely different note:

    I would suggest you return to your 7th grade English class and relearn basic grammar techniques. Perhaps then you can come back and write an intelligent post that actually makes sense. Have a nice day!
  • Jco · 7 months ago
    I'm sorry to insult your intelligence, but you cannot honestly believe that an officer of any kind should be allowed to falsely make up "clear and present danger" simply because they meet a well minded citizen that knows his rights. Its not necessarily that rights are dead, its just that not enough people in America know their rights like this man (and are proud to verbally fight for them), and there are too many people like you who think a cop should do whatever he pleases in order to fill a quota (completely waste time and get back at a man who is smarter than him). Cops get away with this because people like you think they have the right because they are law enforcers. But the real news is, they have to find someone who is ACTUALLY breaking the law in order to enforce it. Don't worry though cops can be your best friends in times you really need them, but MAKE SURE YOU SPEAK UP AND KNOW YOUR RIGHTS, THEY EXIST AS LONG AS LONG YOU REMEMBER THEM. That is the only reason this man is not in jail now, he knew his rights, spoke up, and did nothing wrong. I praise him for being strong and taking a beating so people can see what atrocities can happen.

    http://www.constitution.org/billofr_.htm
  • Noah Livingston · 7 months ago
    After watching both videos; its obvious that they should have done it differently. The pastor was being completely reasonable and they didn't have enough reason to put him under arrest.

    I'd like to be informed of how this incident continues.
  • You asked for it · 7 months ago
    AGREED! I loved it when I heard your bitch screams, YOU TOTALLY ASKED FOR IT. He gave you so many warning to come out and I hate twats like you who use this type of attitude. You DO go around looking to cause shit, why else were you filming it all, you planned it completely. You showed no respect at all, you knew you weren't going to step foot out that vehicle no matter if the dog came back or not, you just wanted to push and push and thats what you get! Fuck I love it, wish people that cop up this type of attitude got some of this.
  • Coush · 7 months ago
    Alot of people are hating on you. But I think your right. If the guy had nothing to hide he should of answered the questions. The police were right to get suspicious and to act the way they did. But in all fairness they did use excessive force.
    But saying he's a Pastor is highly irrelevant, just to draw more attention.
  • Joseph smith · 7 months ago
    C rage your a fucking idiot.

    i hope you burn in hell
  • ZiggyBoBiggy · 7 months ago
    You forget that the cops when asked why he's being arrested are actually required to tell him, and they never did they just said he was being inspected never said he was actually being arrested either. If they were just going to inspect his car they didn't need to use this much force. Your ignorant and probably a biased human being taking a side.
  • O · 7 months ago
    omfg this is america
  • Bardia · 7 months ago
    That is bullshit. People need to get fired and/or go to jail for this
  • Gorguts · 7 months ago
    Unfortunately the officers are in compliance with the law because the law no longer supports our civil rights (Patriot act). While we were sleeping, for the past fifty years, our rights have been eroded away to nothing. YOU ARE NOTHING. Your a fking worker bee at best. The US gov has been in the terror business since it's conception. Manifest Destiny, Slavery, German funding during WW2, The fed reserve act, 911. There are a million videos on the web showing people getting fucked when trying to stand on the rights they thought they had. Freedom isn't free......it's DEAD!
  • working man · 7 months ago
    I second that.
  • Pyromaniac21 · 7 months ago
    Amen. Our rights are being stripped away, and our own overseers are the culprits. Why should we take their shit? We didn't say it was okay. There are more citizens than government officials/workers, so what's stopping us from taking the power back? Fear. No one wants to do anything because they don't think it will help. The only way anything gets changed is through changing yourself and bucking up to the things you want accomplished. I'm not quite an adult yet (just a few months), but when I am, I'm going to live up to everything my fore-fathers wanted this country to be.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    Couldn't agree more dude. And by the way, great user name \m/
  • Brett · 7 months ago
    "When a country has many laws, the end is near" Madman Nietzche quoting a wise Chineese man.

    Is not the problem that citizens do not know the hierarchy of the law? or the law itself?

    Is there not so many laws that Police have executive privilage to "make it happen," then let the lawyers figure it out as "I have met my quota" ??

    In Cleveland, they recently decided to pick up an old "no spitting" law that was on the books but had not been enforced in years, so they gave out "spitting tickets" on street corners for the end of the month.

    So in conclusion, is this conversation about "what is" or the next step, ethically, "what should be"?
  • KeaR · 7 months ago
    The officers surely overdid it.
    Sure, the man shouldn't refuse to cooperate. If he didn't have anything forbidden in is car, then he had nothing bad to hide.

    But the officers didn't have to tase him and beat him up that bad (if its all true what he said). I don't know what rights the police officers at the borders of the USA have (since I am German), but that is too much.
  • Phuq A. Pigg · 7 months ago
    THIS IS NOT THE BORDER....THEY HAVE THESE STUPID RANDOM STOPS ALLOVER THE FUCKIN PLACE.

    tHE OFFICER DID NOT TELL HIM WHAT HE WAS UNDER ARREST FOR.

    FUCK THE PIGZ AND THE WHITE PRIVILEGE STATUS QUO THEY UPHOLD---TILL THE DAY I D.I.E.

    PEACE & SUCCESS BE UPON ALL THE PEACEMAKERS. TO ALL THE "COPS" WHO ARE UNJUST, THEY WILL RECEIVE THEIR DUE SOON ENOUGH. WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND PIGS.
  • carlo · 7 months ago
    nothing to hide = nothing to worry about?
    when they come to search your house... at will... when you're at work... and not have to notify you after... Console yourself with the fact that's all legal. Patriot Act.
    BTW I think I see some crack cocaine under your mother's bra, that she's wearing... I'd better reach in there and check. If she doesn't have anything to hide why should she care.

    Law enforcement only works by the citizenry's voluntary submission to an agreed upon lawful authority.

    If good people do nothing - evil will rise.
  • fuck them · 7 months ago
    One Dead Cop - Leftover Crack

    Power abuse, authority misuse
    They kill and rape, and it won't be on the news
    But yer the good one
    With a badge and a gun
    Braggin' how you blasted
    Gunshot 41

    (Policia)- Lined up on the wall
    (Policia)- beat it out of em
    (Policia)- Kill and lie some more
    (Policia)- Conspiracy to cage the poor


    One dead cop
    No more donut shops
    More dead cops
    Might make the hurting stop
    Kill cops x7

    (Policia)- Lined up on the wall
    (Policia)- beated animals
    (Policia)- Kill and lie some more
    (Policia)- Conspiracy to cage the poor

    One dead cop
    No more donut shop
    More dead cops
    Might make the hurting stop
    So kill cops x7

    I never took such pleasure in a death
    A hatred born of freedom’s dying breath
    The police kill and then they lie some more
    In a conspiracy to cage the poor
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    I love me some leftover crack.
  • Peter · 7 months ago
    What are you people thinking, the issue here is the complete abuse of power by these cops. They clearly lied about the drug dog signaling a positive. This is everyday behavior with cops, lying in order to violate citizens' Constitutional rights. All for the love of this idiotic drug war that has not stopped one person from getting drugs in this country. Who cares where you stand on drug use, the clear and simple fact is the drug war is an utter failure, we must find another way to get people not to use drugs.

    Moreover, what the hell is the Border Patrol doing stopping and American citizen while he is driving on US soil? The Constitution does not allow the federal government to do these things. It is Unconstitutional. Are you people insane? You think it is acceptable to be randomly stopped and have to answer questions and have drug dogs sniff your car in the United States of America? NO, NO, NO, NO, NO!!!!!

    And where the hell is the media on this one. All day I have been seeing crap about some hardened criminal piece of crap that got kicked in the head by a cop after a police chase, but this makes no news. That's what you get for being white and a pastor in this country when it comes to media coverage.

    Bottom line fact ladies and gentlemen, it is constant behavior like this that makes the majority of Americans fear/hate the police. If they are not beating you up or violating your rights they are working as tax collectors for the government giving you tickets. It's sad that we no longer trust and respect our officers the way we did in the past.
  • hmmm · 7 months ago
    umm, im pretty sure the boarder patrol or anything similar to it is allowed to stop and interrogate anyone coming through the check point- thats their job. American citizen or not, u think that the only people bringing drugs into the US are foreigners? Not that im taking the police's side or anything, just saying...1.he refused to answer questions 2.he obviously knew something like this was going to happen or else he wouldn't have filmed it 3. if he had nothing to hide why not just get out of the vehicle and let it be searched when asked? (yes, i like being the devils advocate)
  • webbes · 7 months ago
    i agree, yes it was a bit excessive on the police behalf. but if the guy didn't have anything to hide then why put up so much of a fuss? just get out of the car and get it over with. second, every one hear are like "FUCK COPS!!!" i do agree that some cops are abusers of there power, but most of them are honest desent people making a living protecting us. so lay off the majority of the police due to you conclusion of a hand full of cops.
  • Pamelad · 7 months ago
    I agree with you. Another point to think about, if they were soooo evil why did they let you keep your video? They could have taken your camera and just erased what they wanted to while you were in custody. This guy is obviously so arrogant that he thinks he is above the law - great way to show the love of Jesus. He should have been respectful of the law and allowing them to search his car. Even if the police went overboard this guy was caused the entire event by not doing what the police asked him to do to start with.
  • pellyrat · 7 months ago
    The biggest point here is we are losing our rights. Now the patriot act allows them to do even more. Since the cops are losing the battle against crime everywhere, they walk around with chips on thier shoulders. The only time we are outraged is when some sweet old lady is hurt. YOUR RIGHTS ARE BEING TAKEN AWAY!!!!!!!!! WAKE UP BEFORE WE ARE LIVING IN NAZI GERMANY.
    If you are young wait tweenty years and see what has changed. Some of you will read this and laugh....that is sad because your children will have fewwer righs than you. How free do you feel?????? Can you go as easily as you could 10 years ago? Good luck.
  • Noahidenanny · 7 months ago
    I hate to be the one to remind you but the Supreme Court ruled that basically a roadblock or bordercheck is a place where probable cause and Bill of Rights means NOTHING. Once the fates give the government some reason to notice you it's BIG trouble. They don't worry about those cameras because they know the truth. They own you,your car, your house, your family. They can do anything they want to you and yours including kill you ;and instead of anger and uprisings, there will be millions of people debating how you deserved it! When will people realize the US is a plutocratic dictatorship wrapped in a media campaign of self-indulgent naivety to fool you into believing that your voice matters,your choice matters and that the government is your friend. Face it, our first hand experience with meetings between the police and citizens is limited to Officer Dare! Those who point out blatent government murders are labled loonytoons. Watch this-RubyRidge- See, hundreds just stopped reading -WACO-there go some more. Anyway, the poor and non-white(I don't believe in calling anyone MINOR anything) they know exactly what's been going on and Whitebread America swallows the lies. When will you people wake up and DO something? Hell,maybe it's too late already.......Pastor just got a little taste of the real America..
  • studente · 7 months ago
    to all of you people who say the dog did not react. we are assuming he was watching the dog at all times it was around his car. if the dog was near the trunk or behind the car, he could not see it. the dogs are not always trained to bark when they detect something. they may instead lay down or maintain a body position. both of those he would not be able to see when the dog was directly behind his car. if the dog started barking or attacking it would be a hazard to the surrounding people.
    also for the cops breaking the window, in the video you can hear the cop and see his mouth moving as he puts the hammer to it. he said, "close your eyes" the guy knew the window was about to be broken. he was being civil disobedient, which many people think they have a right to do. and they do, but most forget this idea is based on the idea of being punished for being disobedient, and you bring attention to the situation when you are punished. This man maintains he did nothing wrong and was not made aware of his crime. they told him he was resisting arrest and was impeding justice. he was constantly talking and would not listen to the answer from the cops.
  • Shawn · 7 months ago
    There are several flaws to your argument. First, the man asks to see the dogs reaction which indicates that the dog has found something. He does not assume that the dog will bark but rather requests to know what the dog's reaction will be in order to observe said action. I find it very unlikely that the dog had any reaction whatsoever due to the complete lack of drugs or human bodies in the car.

    Second, how can the sole reason for a person to be arrested to be "Resisting Arrest"? That would be like putting the cart before the horse.

    Additionally, how can a person who is exercising the constitutionally granted RIGHTS be accused of Impeding Justice? When did the election of one's right become a criminal offense?

    The cops, in this situation, with overblown egos did not like an intelligent person declining to jump through their hoops. While it may have been antagonistic of the guy to refuse cooperation with the border patrol it is also is RIGHTS under the United States Constitution to refuse to be questioned without a lawyer present or to be search with no probable cause. As far as the dog is concerned; that is the most obvious abuse of power in this whole scenario; instead of granting this person his rights as an American, they instead concoct a BS false positive alert from a dog. Every police officer associated with this should be fired, in my opinion.
  • webbes · 7 months ago
    *sigh* its not resisting arrest, it was obstruction of justice. trust me. do your home work.
  • Rob · 7 months ago
    This is why cops are called pigs!
  • Elias · 7 months ago
    I usually laugh at religious people when they get hurt and say:
    "Well, why didn't this god guy protect you?"
    But this... whoa.
    Noone deserves getting beaten up by fat-guys-with-issues-about-their-small-dicks, also known as police officers, in this fashion.

    Anyone who knows the law, or has the least common sense at all, realizes that nor the police or any authority for that matter are allowed to abuse people in this way. Just one offense; illegal restraint, by handcuffing him is enough to put that officer in prison for ten years where I live. This is a scenario where the pastor actully had the right to fend for his life by any means possible, and still he didn't.
    I feel truly sorry for the american people.
    What have they scared you with so terribly that you put up with this shit? Getting your integrity raped is ok i america?

    And to think that some of you don't see anything wrong with what the persons, who are supposed to be rolemodels and uphold the law, do to this pastor?


    With condolences from Scandinavia to "the land of the free"
    Elias
  • Abcd · 7 months ago
    Those officers are fucked up. They should be thrown into jail for the rest of their life. I wanna fucking kill those bastards.
  • Nunurbiz · 7 months ago
    My first thought...The Baptard pastor is Antagonistic. Second thought...prick. No wonder I won't go to any church. When entering a military base last year, they told me to get out, I got out, opened my truck and hood, they searched, they said "Thank you Sir and I went on my way. Why? Because I have respect for officers and the military who protect our lives and freedoms. Why would I object if they request to search my car. Why wouldn't you just get out and show them you had nothing to hide instead of being antagonistic and beligerent. The pastor acted like a spoiled little prick to those in authority. I was brought up to respect authority not some self-serving superstition believing self-rightious a-hole. He got what was deserved and I feel that the officers did what was necessary to protect their environment. It sure seems like he was hiding something with his attitude. And he whines about his rights. People like him need to be tasered. Prick.
  • Resourio · 7 months ago
    It seems that most people are missing the principle of the situation. "He had nothing to hide he should of stopped acting like a spoiled brat." You're missing the point my friend. He had a right not to let them search,yes he had nothing to hide but he has rights, and he chose to exercise them. The cops are completely in the wrong.
  • Brandon St. Germaine · 7 months ago
    Refusing to answer questions and then refusing to leave your vehicle, regardless of their reasoning, means you're about to get subdued. They fucked up with the glass, shouldn't have insulted him, and may have used excessive force, but the initial problem was that this guy thought he was going to be a smartass and argue with a bunch of clearly asshole cops.
  • yo · 7 months ago
    wtf sue the shit out of the cops get them arested shut up u fags who said the cops did nothing wrong they did not need to tazer mabey smash 1 window and drag out mabey but they didnt really have the right. peroid
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    Basically the pastor had nothing to hide so he should of just got out of his car, plus, i also reckon 99% of you would have got out of your car as well. Yes we all agree that the officers used to much force but it could easily have been avoided if the pastor wasn't so stubborn. People saying, 'the police have to much power' well you can shove that up your arse. Crime is getting worse and worse and the police struggle to deal with it because of powers they don't have.

    The pastor should have been smart enough to know that getting out of his car would have been a lot quicker than being forcefully put under arrest. Anyone who doesn't realize this is retarded.
  • fukum · 7 months ago
    fuck u,have u ever been a suspect or stoped buy the police 4 no reason u would know they have way to many fucken rights,we have rights to say NO
  • webbes · 7 months ago
    *hugs*
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    I swear to god 75% of Phil's audience is dumb and 25% are smart. The comments prove this- the logical ones and the completely retarded ones.
  • Mario · 7 months ago
    cops beating up on a white man...BIG STORY
    cops beating up on a black man...no story
  • Confused · 7 months ago
    He had the camera facing the cop who broke the window saying he had his eyes closed and then in the second video he said he had his hands over his face the whole time... Gets a little fishy, not to mention the mutiple tazor shots or the cop "putting his full weight down" because I would assume it would have been worse with a full size male smashing your face into glass rather than a few cuts on your forhead--- overall this guy has flaws in his story, I believe he just want attention and this is it...
  • Fiddle Faddle · 7 months ago
    You can see his reflection after he moves the camera, his hands are covering his face. I would also think that the cuts on his face are more from gravel as they bashed the windows into the car, there would still be glass on the ground but not excessive amounts where his head would be once they detain him. They also seem to either lift him or push him several feet forward on the ground which could be the scrapes as well.

    Also, you think he did it for attention? Are you serious?
  • Jerry · 7 months ago
    Excessive force: probably. they could probably have taken him without the head injuries, but it's tough to tell if he resisted.

    Was force justified: absolutely. when a cop says get out of the car, you get the fuck out. if they have to come in and get you they are probably bringing an ass-kicking with them snf i fon't blame them
  • Jerry · 7 months ago
    Excessive force: probably. they could probably have taken him without the head injuries, but it's tough to tell if he resisted.

    Was force justified: absolutely. when a cop says get out of the car, you get the fuck out. if they have to come in and get you they are probably bringing an ass-kicking with them snf i fon't blame them
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    I know this is completely irrelevant to the topic but look at his videos i'm pretty sure a lot of you just LOVE him now.
  • baseball boy · 7 months ago
    the fact that he was "stubborn" is besides the point. he wasnt stubborn, he was using his RIGHTS guaranteed by the bill of rights. cops cant just make up reasons to stop you and search your car. that would be like if a cop came to your house and searched your house for no reason. i bet a lot of you would be "stubborn" also. all of those cops should be fired for abusing their power.
  • Knux4262 · 7 months ago
    omfg
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
  • kyle · 7 months ago
    The pastor did something that I wish others would do. He exercised his rights as granted to him by the United States of America. Some may say that he was being resistant to the police officers. But was that not the entire point. Those who do not exercise there privileges lose them. The pastor did not scream profanity or say cop jokes; he wanted to exercise his rights. Being a pilot I myself have been searched many times by the TSA for little or no reason. Every time it happens it makes me sad, I have no recourse of action, or my job would be lost. I have lost my rights as an individual because I am nice. My question to you is will you stand quietly while your own rights are being controlled by others. I am sure what the answer would have been for Martin Luther King, or Gandhi. What about you?
  • JFizzell · 7 months ago
    I believe that both were wrong and right. Probable cause is meant for life or death, threats. If all of a sudden a guard dog barks, ur gonna think something could or is going to happen. So it was the cops right to react on probable cause, but for them to break the glass, NOT RIGHT!!! Tazer him with two different guns, but we only saw one, but to break the glass and inflict harm on someone who did not physically resist. He did resist but on counts of getting an answer on the reason y they wanted to search the car. Speaking, where is it in the law where cops CAN SEARCH A CAR, they only can search UR CAR if they SEE WITH THERE OWN EYES!!! Its in the books, education and law books. They can get a warrant for a building or house, or anything in that category, but there is no such warrant for vehicles/cars. I say it was wrong for the cops to overact, but the priest should had stepped out of the car if he was completely innocent. Not the priest fault he knows laws those cops bend to make it seem like they are right.
  • frank2982 · 7 months ago
    First of all, the guy should have gotten out of the car. He doesn't have a right to demand the cops to do what he wants. He has no right to tell them to bring the dog back in. If indeed the dog didn't suspect something, the time to fight it is in court, not at the scene. Then he basically gives himself up, "Oh the reason they said that is because I wouldn't answer their questions." (0:23 of first video)

    Ok if you are innocent then why wouldn't you answer their questions? It's their job to make sure some one doesn't bring in drugs/weapons/people illegally. By refusing to answer the questions you are basically giving them a reason of suspicion. That right there is probable cause for them to search the vehicle.

    Then at 0:28-0:35 he is getting all lippy with the cop.

    "Don't you have to put them under arrest for something specific?"
    "I'm a police officer I am ordering you out of the car."
    "Will you answer my question, police officer?"

    The way he says "police officer" he has a tone in his voice giving the man no respect. It's funny how he doesn't want to answer their questions, but yet he expects them to answer his.

    Then he is like "I have to OBEY you?" Yes you have to obey him. It's his job to investigate this sort of thing. And you are making it difficult.

    As for him being pulled out of the car. He says that one of the officers "steps" on his head. But in the video the only officers around him are all kneeled down on top of him.

    So if there was any pressure to the top of his head as if he was being stepped on like he said, it was probably just them kneeling on him to hold him down.

    As far as posters go:
    Ricky at 9:07 PM you said "except that not answering questions has nothing to do with probable cause. its our 15th amendment right."

    If you are giving an Officer a reason of suspicion that is probable cause. Also the 15th amendment states: "Forbids the federal government and the states from using a citizen's race, color, or previous status as a slave as a qualification for voting."

    I don't know what this has to do with a slave voting?
  • none · 7 months ago
    he does not need to give respect to a badge when the badge is disrepecting him. period. no reson for that kind of use of force (if the cops forget their use of force training then the use of force model is in the back of their notebook). If this person took this to court he would have a good chance of winning a civil case against each of the officers involved, namely the trigger happy fag.


    ps. i have law enforcement background (not that matters).
  • working man · 7 months ago
    exactly.. In order get respect u must give respect. Cops need to learn this b4 they put that little piece of metal on their shirts they call a badge.
  • Jack · 7 months ago
    Everyone who thinks the police officers had probable cause is unbelievably stupid. There was NO probable cause, and the officers also had an option to return the dog and show the pastor that the dog detected something in the vehicle. The officers had no right to horribly abuse this man and should go to jail. For those of you who believe the officers acted correctly, what is the next step in government enforcement? What other rights will the citizens of the United States be surrendering in a few years. Also, those who are torn on the issue must be suffering from a clear "blame the victim" attribution bias (simple psychology). Everyone saw the videos, everyone knows the facts. This man DESERVES retribution.
  • c-rage · 7 months ago
    "Horribly abuse"???

    Show me in the video where this man was abused in any way outside of standard procedure.
  • That was not close to standard · 7 months ago
    11 stitches in his head. Before you are arrested or as they are in the process of arresting you they read you your rights. They had no reason for his arrest other than that he was not obeying them to leave his vehicle which he does not have to. Also look on his 22 min video and you shall see a BP officer clearly stating that he has no clue why he is being detained. Same cop who called him a terrorist. Then they try and switch it around and then start asking for his drivers license. When he does not comply to that you can see some relief come over that cops face as like we really got you now. Those cops are just plain non professional. They also tried to intemidate the man earlier when the cop did the mall cop move where he acted like he was gonna draw his gun on the man. LOL these cops are given guns . Sorry man but how is yanking you out of your vehicle standard procedure when the man has not commited any crime, That senior officer who responded i feel sorry for as he came on the scene late and had some BP officers tell him a lie about the false positive. Also if an officer can not handle a little lip from an individual without holding thier temper they should not carry a gun or tazer. Give them a stick or whislte.
  • Nick · 7 months ago
    Wait, wait... what are these amendments your talking about? Correct me if I'm wrong but the United States abolished our entire constitution!
  • kevin · 7 months ago
    he should sue...
  • george · 7 months ago
    yeah he should sue and then the DPS would end up paying a lot of money but guess what they dont print currency in their backyard. It all comes from taxes of the hard working Americans.
  • Darkknight · 7 months ago
    i think both of them were wrong, the guy for not letting them check in or whatever and the police for taking it too far, it the guy wud have had been not guilty or if there was nothin he had done, he shud have listened to them to further investigate, more specifically he was given chances and he didnt availed them, which turned out be resisting arrest..
  • Death · 7 months ago
    Cheers! to you Jerry 5 Stars!


    Jerry Hindle
    Thursday, 14th May 2009 at 10:51 am
    I was always taught that no matter what, on the side of the road the cop will always win….right or wrong he will go home and you will go to jail. So here is my observation on this matter.
    1) comply with the request to get out and let them search the vehicle
    2) get the names and badge numbers of every officer involved once the search is over.
    3) go immediatelty to the nearest US ATTORNEY GENERALS office and file a formal complaint against each and every officer involved EVEN IF ALL THEY DID WAS WATCH.
    4) contact a good bulldog lawyer ands file individual suits against each officer personally for violation of your civil rights and against the departments involved for each and every offense involved.
    5) contact the news media and show them the tape. The media coverage alone will put every one of the police involved in a bad light to the public and they don’t want that.
    6) make sure that each lawsuit is seperate that way each officer will have to hire a lawyer to represent him/her out of their own pockets and even if they win it still costs them.
    7)make the amounts requested outragiously high so as to attract the attention of the media again

    BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DO YOU ARGUE WITH THE OFFICER ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. HE IS THE LAW AND YOU WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO BEAT HIM IN COURT
  • Death · 7 months ago
    Jerry Hindle
    Thursday, 14th May 2009 at 10:51 am
    I was always taught that no matter what, on the side of the road the cop will always win….right or wrong he will go home and you will go to jail. So here is my observation on this matter.
    1) comply with the request to get out and let them search the vehicle
    2) get the names and badge numbers of every officer involved once the search is over.
    3) go immediatelty to the nearest US ATTORNEY GENERALS office and file a formal complaint against each and every officer involved EVEN IF ALL THEY DID WAS WATCH.
    4) contact a good bulldog lawyer ands file individual suits against each officer personally for violation of your civil rights and against the departments involved for each and every offense involved.
    5) contact the news media and show them the tape. The media coverage alone will put every one of the police involved in a bad light to the public and they don’t want that.
    6) make sure that each lawsuit is seperate that way each officer will have to hire a lawyer to represent him/her out of their own pockets and even if they win it still costs them.
    7)make the amounts requested outragiously high so as to attract the attention of the media again

    BUT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES DO YOU ARGUE WITH THE OFFICER ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD. HE IS THE LAW AND YOU WILL ONLY BE ABLE TO BEAT HIM IN COURT
  • Woody · 7 months ago
    If this is how things are in America, I never want to visit.
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    I am not a lawyer but the man was not in an aggresive state and there was no reason for multiple tazings or the lethal force. They could have broke his neck or blinded him. The man should have complied but it is his right to refuse the search. The police are supposed to protect us and the border agents are supposed to secure our borders and protect us. The abuse was uncalled for and they all should be charged and jailed by the same courts as we are, If the dog did not alert on the car like was said that is dishonest and If they were laughing and mocking the man then officers should be put to death.
  • big Al · 7 months ago
    Tough one, they both incited each other...the pastor was only using his legal citizen rights however police officers are trained to make your rights vanish if they wish it so. I have no trouble believing that they did fake the dog's reaction just to get cause to search that guy's vehicle just because he did not give them permission right away. In the reality of things our legal rights matter little. When the law officers decide they are taking you it is only a matter of time until they do what they want with you. Sad situation since the founding fathers of the constitution had a different view of how things should be.
  • Sam · 7 months ago
    You have to realize that when a sniffer dog detects something (drugs, etc) it is definitely obvious so anyone watching, not just the BIASED dog handler. These dogs are chosen and trained because they have an almost crazy drive to find "their" ball/toy. To train the dog the trainer makes the dogs toy smell the same as the items they are looking for in peoples vehicles. The dog then associates these smells with its ball that it desperately wants to find.
    Sniffer dogs aren't trying to find drugs, they are trying to find their ball which has the same smell!
    The handler can also train the dog to scratch at a car or even the bare ground on command (usually "go on, get it, get it) in order to create reasons for probable cause.
    So basically if they go as far as to get out the dog they are going to get into your vehicle and search it one way or another. Honest or not.
  • george · 7 months ago
    I think this guy is a big turd. He is responsible for wasting cops time and resources which basically means wasting taxpayers money. If he did not have the drugs, then he should have opened his trunk. What else is border police expected to do? Let me tell you something. They are expected to check your vehicles. May be they had a reason to suspect him. May be he was behaving erratically. May be he winked at them. May be he was stuttering while talking to them

    I think that this guy planned everything out. He is probably planning to sue Border Patrol and get huge money out of them (again taxpayers money). That is why he must have behaved erratically and in a strange way when they stopped him. I don't think anybody is stupid enough not to open the car door even when you see 5 cops charging you with hammers and tasers in their hands.

    Also there is a reason why cops are not supposed to show you the proof of cause while doing the check. Hell, they are there for doing the check and maintaining the security. They are not there to get into an argument with every douchebag in order to convince him. Mr. Pastor, the courts and lawyers were made by God for this purpose only.
  • jim · 7 months ago
    Hey, as much crap as what goes on at our boarders, just yes sir no sir do what they want you to do and be on your way. If you are stupid enough to show your balls to the patrol, you deserve a little glass in the face......
  • Anonymous · 7 months ago
    everyone on here whining that he should have just complied with the officers demands to save trouble needs to wake up and realize that some things are more important than mere convenience. if you have a constitutional right to deny search, exercise it!
  • Cypress · 7 months ago
    Honestly the pastor was being a dick. If there's nothing that you're hiding, why not just get out of the fucking car and let them have a look..... what, was he hiding catamites in the backseat?
  • Mr. C.C. · 7 months ago
    Cypress you truly think that Pastor Steven Anderson is at fault? You are a fucking moron. It took eight supposed highly trained cops to take down a non-violent person who wasn't resisting arrest. If it takes eight men (I use the term men loosely) to take down one guy than they are not very good at non-violent conflict resolution. This is just another case of cops using force when using force isn't necessary. The United States is turning into something they have criticised other countries for and that is being a police state. You guys think you are a super power, but you can't even control control your own cops.

    A few of you are saying that based on his politcal and religious views is the reason he got what he deserved. But no, the cop couldn't use his pea brain to think of an intelligent response or any response for that matter as to why they were arresting Pastor Anderson. If I was cop and heard about this, I would be ashamed to wear a badge. I you can throw out the police motto: "To serve and protect." You can change it to: "To hurt, to mame, to beat, to kill." That is what the cops in the United States are doing. They tased a women unconscious than beat her up. You people support police who do that. The women couldn't even defend herself.

    It is so easy to support the police when its someone else getting stopped or beaten, or whathaveyou. When its you, your tune suddenly changes.
  • john · 7 months ago
    Reason for checkpoints is to keep drug and human smuggling from occurring. If you are stopped at a checkpoint and asked a simple question, why not answer. No harm can come of this by answering, this is a matter of security and a way to keep drugs and illegals out of this country. Hes coming from san diego which borders Tijuana Mex. obviously they are gonna ask him why he went there, how long etc. There is no need for him to refuse to answer, all it does is build suspicion. Ok so now he refuses to comply with simple orders like answering a question. Ok fine send him to secondary so the rest of the people behind can pass and they can ask him there. Once in secondary he refuses again, still not complying windows rolled up almost all the way. Does it not look like he is hiding something? Why be so defensive to simple questions. Dog comes over and sniffs car, might of found something, search dogs do not bark growl or do anything when they find something that is to not alert the driver so he or she doesnt take off when they are busted. A dog will scratch at the surface or keep his nose pointed in the direction where it found something. They are trained this way and are not a buzzer thats gonna go off, so obviously he wasnt gonna hear a thing. ok so now he knows dog was near his car, he is told that something may of been found by the dog. At this point they CAN search your vehicle. Probable cause has been established. Why? well dog has found something, what exactly...well only one way to find out..SEARCH!! These dogs are trained to look for dangerous things only a dog wont react to food, snacks etc. It is only after a specific group of things. Ok so lets say no dog was brought over. Fine, he still refused to comply with simple questions. He wouldnt answer anything at all. Why so defensive? No reason to be defensive if you got nothing to hide. I do not condone what the officers did but the pastor is a total TARD. Police have more power then regular civilians, their right and ours are different, for example they can arrest people and detain, civilians can do citizens arrest which is no where near the same. In conclusion the police was right to want to search a man who refuses to answer simple question at a CHECKpoint especially when hes coming from an area where drug and human smuggling is a common occurrence. The pastor is right to question his arrest but wrong to refuse to comply and to "barricade" himself in his car like that. The police did over react but no beaten is clearly shown. The man is tazered and put face down on asphalt, too hard yes, a beating no. looks bad but not as bad as it could of been, just ask rodney king.
  • abe · 7 months ago
    They thought he was a hardcore mexican cartel with swine flu....it is what it is hard knock life
  • Jeff · 7 months ago
    I personally am very grateful that people like this man exist. He seems like a man of principle, not a whiny stubborn prick as other have insinuated. He has become nothing less than a martyr for our rights. While it likely won't change much nationwide, issues like these need to be brought to attention. I hope that I can have the courage to fight for my rights and the rights of all if I am ever in a similar situation, unfortunately I feel like I might take the easy way out.
  • B_machine · 7 months ago
    dude im not trying to say anthing ba about the us but alot of ur cops are abusing there power most ove them join the force sothey have so sort of imunity im am sickended by the fact that this went on for this long an e did nothing i would have done everything in my power i probly would have floored my car just as they were going to smash my windows
  • Nero · 7 months ago
    I think this guy just rubs me the wrong way. But even still, I think he was very much in the wrong. He was pushing buttons he had no reason to push. And until the violence broke out, I don't really see much they did wrong. It's his word against their's as to what their motivations for requesting the search were, and not all reactions are as obvious as a bark from search dogs, I'm sure.
    Once the windows were broken, things changed. He said himself that once the windows were broken he was surprised and completely off-guard. Were the tasers necessary? Definitely not. From there, I couldn't make anything out from the videos and don't really trust his word, but it was out of his hands at that point.
  • Peppino · 7 months ago
    I'm amazed to see how many people are jumping to the defense of the "authorities" on this one. It's probably the clearest case of police brutality and general arrogance I've yet seen.

    The border patrol / DPS lost all credibility when they attacked this guy. Smash out the window, fine. Unlock the door, fine. Pull him out of the car, fine. Place him under arrest (for something other than resisting arrest), fine. But that's not what they did. Had they done this, the lack of explanation might have been overlooked.

    But no, these guys were looking for something to do, and had something to prove.

    They tased him, beat him up, harassed him... why? Because he chose to exercise his rights. Primarily the Right to remain silent and Right to privacy.

    Also, according to him, he didn't cross the border. It was a check point that runs parallel (could be wrong, but that's how I heard it). He was probably just lucky number 11, and got selected for a random search.

    And yes, the dog alerting them was very likely garbage. I've been in the exact same situation and likewise, in mine the K9 walked right past it, they said it alerted them, they searched my car... a car that never at any time had drugs. I was more cooperative, but that's because I lack the spine this guy displayed.

    The "authorities" blew it. Simple as that. This guy politely explained that he shouldn't be bullied into forfeiting his rights. Not something these guys were willing to hear.

    One last thing... The Border Patrol only recently received a huge influx in funding. A lot of these guys were possibly new and inexperienced. No excuse.
  • Nathan · 7 months ago
    Anytime someone says "Wake up America", you automatically know that they are full of shit.

    Yes cops have unchecked power, yes they abuse that power, and yes they will kick your ass if you don't do what they say.

    I hope this guys followers realize how stupid he was for not complying and having this be over with and stop listening to him preach.
  • Scott Morrison · 7 months ago
    Hey folks. I am from Scotland in the UK, and I have to say I was pretty stunned when I watched this video. Now, while I agree that the Pastor really was quite stubborn and could have prevented the whole incident by getting out of the car from the start, there is a principle here, and it's this: If you are going to be arrested for something, you SHOULD be told what you are being arrested for. He wasn't actually resisting arrest because they gave him no reason yet for being arrested. Also, American cops are known world wide for their "forceful nature" and the way they throw people to the ground etc. This video shows a prime example of how the power has went to their heads, and they are abusing that power. Smashing a window to open the door and get him out might have been acceptable, but to then tazer him a few times, and push his head into broken glass where he had to get all that stitches is brutal. They should be ashamed of themselves, and removed from the police force as well as being charged with assault! Also, to be fair, the Pastor should also learn not to be so stubborn, and if he faces similar circumstances again, should just get out of the car, and then make a complaint to the authorities afterwards.
  • Darren · 7 months ago
    true, the pastor could've gotten out of the vehicle but it is his right to refuse the search. it is NOT the right of the cops to beat the shit out of him just because he refused their demands!!!!
  • johny · 7 months ago
    omfg the fkn pricks wtf y would they do that thats y the usa fkn sucks ass well at least the police do
  • fs1 · 7 months ago
    Next time get out of the car. Dog is probable cause. Doesn't matter what you think. Get out of the car. You thought you'd be a smartass and outthink the system. This dude deserved every stitch. There isn't enough time in the day to deal with the whackos who want to be a youtube activist.
  • michael · 7 months ago
    Something you all are forgetting.

    The police didn't find any contraband or illegal substances.

    That dog did not alert.

    The police lied.

    They had no probable cause.

    And the state police that conducted the tasering never whitnessed the dogs actions themselves.

    The 4th amendment protects you from unreasonable search and seizure, that applies to check points as well. The notion that there was a border patrol check point more than 50 miles from the border is ridiculous in itself. This is not natzi germany where the police can stop you without cause and demand your papers.

    The 5th amendment protects you from having to provide basically anything beyond your name to the police.

    The 8th amendment protects you from cruel and unusual punishment. Which this guy clearly experienced.
  • Peppino · 7 months ago
    5 Stars Buddy
  • patrcik · 7 months ago
    Well, wow if this is on the level then the police officers complete lack of judgment in this case is absurd. It would have taken a few minutes to explain to the man why they thought that they had probable cause. They are supposed to be professionals. Not thugs.
  • rawr · 7 months ago
    This is utterly horrifying, how many of you people, replying to this video are RETARDS.

    None of you understand that they obviously were just having some fun, they were out of thier jurisdiction because they didn't allow the man to talk. He was tortured because of stupid fat fuck cops.

    This needs to be taken to the supreme courts, it needs to get out into the media.

    This is not oppinion you retards, it's fact.
    Ask any fucking history/social sciences teacher. Someone who knows about corruption, and isnt too cowardly to speak their mind.

    Most of these comments convince me that the majority of Americans are sad souls. (I'm American, but im not a dumbass.)
  • rawr2 · 7 months ago
    "You’re an ass. Police dogs are trained to “speak” when they see something out of the ordinary. They don’t just sit there like a normal, untrained dog would. They are a part of the police force just as the officers are. Stop trying to impress people, because you really have no idea what you’re talking about.

    Mike Barney
    2nd Lt. NYPD "

    You are such an ignorant fucking example of an American NYPD officer! God help you (If that even exists) (If not just go get smarter, so you wont be proven wrong by someone about 10 years younger than you)

    TL;DR :
    Police dogs react any number of ways to preform different tasks depending on how they were trained (dumbass) that means some dogs will SIT when they detect a substance they have been trained for, OTHERS will BARK, and SOME will point thier noses. IT DEPENDS ON THE DOG YOU SAD EXCUSE FOR A COP.

    I think this man knew that, he asked "what did the dog do to alert you to my car?"
    if they said "He sat like he is trained to do" or "He barked like he is trained to do" or any subtle variation, then he can be seized.

    BUT YOU PEOPLE ARE SO STUPID:
    You think because a man was asking questions about being ARRESTED that he was giving the cops a hard time? Oh poor cops, they dont deserve this kind of struggle.

    NO. FIGHT FOR YOUR FUCKING RIGHTS PEOPLE.

    Argue with the cops all you fucking can, sue their asses for excessive force, then laugh at them while they go to jail. I hate stupid people... I think i'm gonna start my own religion.
  • ErinKay · 7 months ago
    i think that the cops are definately at fault for the most part. they had no right to beat him that severely or tase him or shove his head in broken glass, that's just cruel. however, had i been the pastor, i would have gotten out of the car and opened up my trunk if i had nothing to hide.
  • Lmkt · 7 months ago
    He was a religious piece of shit, who gives a fuck
  • kingofmovies316 · 7 months ago
    this is just standard procedure, doesn't any one watch Cops.

    The police gave him warnings, it wasn't as if it was a random attack.

    In the future the guy should just listen to the cops instead of being a smart ass.
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    OMG white ppl are so cool. He tool that boy to cover his eyes and u new they had something up their sleeve. Look at the guys face just before he tases him.

    He better hope his kids dont see that one day or else they will think, "MAN THIS DUDE IS A PUNK."
    Man if my dad got tased and screamed like I would be so embarassed.

    OMG IF THATS NOT THE FUNNIEST THING IVE SEEN AND HEARD I DONT KNOW WHAT IS. DUDE IF U READ THIS I HOPE U KNOW A GROWN MAN ISNT SUPPOSED TO SCREAM LIKE THAT EVER.

    GREAT VIDEO
  • Steve Fesik · 7 months ago
    Well Micheal, he must not be the toughest, meanest, most hard-ass man alive like you. Let me give you a free piece of advice. Don't mock another mans pain, when you haven't been through it yourself.

    Feel free to go and stick a fork in the wall socket (don't actually do that, Dummy)

    Or better yet, go have a gasoline bath and have a smoke in the tub (don't freaking do that either, Moron)

    If you scream you are not a man. Yeah....it sounds like you know what you are talking about.

    Also, if cops tazed and assaulted your father, and rather than outrage towards their senseless act, you feel embarrassed that your father screamed, you are the punk.

    If you were my child, I would be very disappointed that I had raised someone who thinks this way.
  • white guy · 7 months ago
    Yep, white people are pretty cool.
  • Anon Ymous · 7 months ago
    Lol @ Michael Dayton.

    These videos show disturbing scenes -- you should wait a few years, perhaps until you hit puberty, before you watch them.
  • Howard F · 7 months ago
    Michael D, you should be DBOTD. Try getting tasered and control the way you scream. The lack of any competency in this situation really does not surprise me how those cops did that to the pastor.

    I think it really is a 20/80 blame for both parties. 20 for the pastor because really, in a day and age where people are getting killed for refusing to obey the police, he should've judged the situation more carefully and just let them search his car and if he felt that his rights were violated then, he could've pressed charges. 80 for the cops because that amount of force as described and as seen on the security footage is just ridiculous. Somewhat reminds me of the cop kicking the girl in the face for tossing a shoe at him.

    America, this really sucks that our own people can't feel safe and protected by the people who are employed to do this job. Quite frankly, I think all of the cops involved should be fired. Let someone who is actually concerned about protecting the public and ensuring the safety of people take over. Unemployment is at a high, I'm sure there are people aching to get a job like that and are serious about it.
  • Jake · 7 months ago
    I really want to see you get hit with several tasers and see how you react.
  • Random Guy · 7 months ago
    Well. He got tazed.

    Getting tazed hurts/
  • Elizabeth · 7 months ago
    I live in Yuma and have dealt with DPS a lot. Regardless of who was right in this situation, Arizona looks out for its own.

    I can't tell you how many times we have been pulled over for (Random) car searches and had the inside of our car completely trashed, drinks spilled, and stuff thrown on the floor outside of the vehicle.

    When we asked about our rights regarding unlawful search and seizure, the officer threatened to arrest us for failing to comply with police business. We don't even try to file complaints anymore, we will always be wrong.
  • Peppino · 7 months ago
    Wow. That sucks.

    I haven't had any trouble since I was a teenager, but on multiple occasions I dealt with bored cops looking to harass some kid with no way to fight back.

    This pastor guy speaks coherently to the police, ask reasonable questions, and did nothing to warrant this kind of attack.

    Let's hope it sheds some light on the Yuma DPS records.
  • ihatethemodernestablishment · 7 months ago
    police are fags,
    wtf did they tazer him for?
    that is so excessive force and that guy should sue them

    Peace out, wankers
  • ryan · 7 months ago
    no wonder people hate cops its because of filth like them they will never be known as anything but dirty little pigs
  • Bas - Serial Expat · 7 months ago
    Never going to the US until stuff like this is solved.
  • Mary Kyle · 7 months ago
    This "pastor" is so arrogant. There was no reason for him to be argumentative with the police - he was trying to provoke them. He was acting like "a bad guy"
    Why couldn't he just let them search his car? The bible tells believers to "submit" to authority... I'm bewildered that he went so far with this and is now $cashing$ in on his 15 minutes of fame.... He had the camera on in his car for a reason. Good luck with your reality show "Pastor".
  • BouyertheDestroyer · 7 months ago
    I hope the cops face some kind of punishment. Firing them is the least the BP can do.
  • Reinhard Heydrich · 7 months ago
    This is happening because over the last 8 years of that elite administration that was running the show, boarder safety and the training of boarder guard officials was such an important undertaking. If you don't believe me, look at the wondrous job that the previous Bushinite administration did to our military. After serving for 16 years in it, I could only hope that I would die while deployed so I could avoid having to serve with the bottom of the barrel folks the Bushy folks left us with. You really think the domestic armed forces of this country are gonna be any better? lol. The shame is it actually takes something of this caliber fro people to notice, and it will still not change. It is embarrassing as a citizen of this once great nation to have to see such things, and know that there are traitors her in this country that see nothing wrong with it and in fact help prolong these kind of things. I can only hope it's not to late for this nation to clean up it's international image, but at home, I fear it is.
  • Alex from London · 7 months ago
    Your own fault to be honest.

    You should have just gotten out the car, got it search and you would have been on your way in 20 minutes.

    Instead you decided to be a smartass. Well look what that cost you.

    Next time, just do as the police say will you.
  • Adam Sullivan · 7 months ago
    Nice responds,
    I'm kind of surprised you didn't take the road defending the cops for what they did. I think I would probably scream if I wasn't expecting to be tasered.

    You would think they would have warned him if he didn't comply and get out of the vehicle that they were going to use a taser on him. Where would the fun be in that though. I'm sure those border patrol get pretty bored and agressive seeing as they are all on their high protein diets.

    I think the pastor is pissed because this happened and also I think the cops did use a bit assesive force, I mean look at the guy. He probably weights about 130 at most.

    The guy should have just gotten out of his car; but I would be a bit hesitant too seeing as they didn't give a reason for arresting him other than he was resisting arrest. Jerks
  • shibby · 7 months ago
    This is fuckin crazy, more and more retards are becoming cops. America has to do something about this.... i mean wtf the beat him even after the taser ? ? ? ? and MICHEAL DAYTON i would like to see you get tased by 3 people and getting glass shoved in your face.
  • princess jessica · 7 months ago
    omg that is not right he did nothing wrong for them to do that but he should have opened his door so they didnt have to smash out all his windows
  • jubjub · 7 months ago
    he has his rights tho
  • HaaVoK · 7 months ago
    "OMG IF THATS NOT THE FUNNIEST THING IVE SEEN AND HEARD I DONT KNOW WHAT IS. DUDE IF U READ THIS I HOPE U KNOW A GROWN MAN ISNT SUPPOSED TO SCREAM LIKE THAT EVER."

    OOOOH... big strong man trying to boost his epeen on the interwebz.... If you got tasered, ud be screaming like a cissy, you obviously do not know how a taser effects its target. you are completely paralyzed and lose muscle control.

    DOUCE

    great vid, this kinda stuff unfortunately happens. some people need to pull their heads out their assholes
  • colin · 7 months ago
    Micheal Dayton you're a moron. Infact anyone who thinks the cops were right are morons and I hope they get tazered one day or just die.
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    THIS JUST SO FUNNY THEY SHOULD USE THIS CLIP IF THEY DO ANOTHER SUPER TROOPERS. MAYBE THEY COULD A SPIN OFF. THIS WOULD BE SO FUNNY IF THEY DID. I WOULD BE LAUGHING MY BUT OFF. YOU ARE DEFINATELY THE SOURCE OF LAUGHTER AT MY JOB TODAY. WE WATCHED THE FIRST VIDEO 15 TIMES AND EACH TIME IT WAS FUNNY.


    OMG IF THATS NOT THE FUNNIEST THING IVE SEEN AND HEARD I DONT KNOW WHAT IS. DUDE IF U READ THIS I HOPE U KNOW A GROWN MAN ISNT SUPPOSED TO SCREAM LIKE THAT EVER.

    GREAT VIDEO
  • rollerbabe143 · 7 months ago
    Pastor does not mean GOD. You could have saved your self a lot of trouble and let them see there was nothing in your car. Lets see who got the bad end of the stick OH yeah that would be you.
  • Sebastian · 7 months ago
    wow wtf is up with this shit. the police officers were in the wrong but you know the part where the officer says STEP out of the VEHICLE?? well he should have gotten out.....
  • woody · 7 months ago
    this is the change you all voted for.........enjoy!
  • Meetar · 7 months ago
    Romans 13:1 (NIV)
    1Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.
    ------
    Which comes first? "Rights" as an American citizen, or decorum as an "Ambassador for Christ"? (2 Corinthians 5:20, Ephesians 6:20)

    If his Ministry is more important to him, he should have complied rather than "make a point". He'd also have gotten away without harm.
  • No one special · 7 months ago
    Everyone that is saying "if he didn't have anything illegal then he shouldn't have refused - he had nothing to hide, so he had no reason to not comply" is exactly why cops get away with so many illegal searches today. I've been pulled over and asked to be searched twice. I have never had anything illegal in my vehicle.

    Both times I refused to allow a search. They stated they had probable cause to do so. I insisted on a warrant showing that - because even if they have probable cause they have to get a warrant, unless you are being arrested.

    Funny, when I insist on finding out why I'm being detained and what I'm being arrested for they end up telling me to drive safe and get on my way.

    And @ woody - I didn't vote for this change - this change was put in place by George W. Bush's govt. because of the PATRIOT Acts. Stop blaming everything that happens just because it's after November on Obama. It just makes you look apathetic and re-affirms the fact that you refuse to educate yourself and would rather dwell in your own land of bigotry and ignorance.
  • turdbrain · 7 months ago
    He deserved a beating for being a TWAT!
  • Joshua · 7 months ago
    What a Dumb F*ck. The cops were very nice.. they even were worried about him after he was bing a dick.. he needs to do some jail time.. He was wrong in almost every way.
  • Joey · 7 months ago
    This is awesome to watch. He thinks he is doing right, but it is comedic to watch him act like a total idiot, and get exactly what he deserves.

    I mean come on moron, when the cop holds the baton on your window for 15 seconds?? What did you think he was doing pointing at you?

    This freak wants to draw a crowd and he has done that.

    Jesus said "lift me up and I will draw people to me." Not make a fool out of yourself so people can laugh...

    Hey dude, we ain't laughing with you, we are laughing at you!
  • jay · 7 months ago
    Everyone who is defending this guy really needs to check out his video he is looking for trouble from the police he is an antagonist and just trying to get them to do something wrong. He pushed to long and f***ed up by not obeying the law and got what he deserved. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=queM4c-W048&...
  • That was not close to standard · 7 months ago
    The man was within his rights. As for his church practices that is none of my affair. He can do what he likes that is another of his rights.
    Also i did not like how the female cop tried to open his door. What was that all about. I also was shocked to see automatic rifles in our airports. Those and future terrorist are gonna come here legally and get access to areas with no one the wiser. Not sure why we need automatic rifles at airports.
    Sorry if that man does not preach what you like to hear. It's his right. Most arguements made against this man have been over what he says in his church. Well get over it . That is his right. As for him standing up to cops who just think they are the big bullies on the block and all will obey are the ones who get shot in the line of duty someday. Trust me thier reputation carries and one day a person will do that. Have some respect for your fellow man and give him his American rights.
  • They LET HIM GO ONCE · 7 months ago
    IN THAT VIDEO LINK YOU PROVIDE THEY LET HIM GO AT THE END... HE MUST HAVE BEEN THIER MULTIPLE TIMES... YOU WOULD THINK THEY WOULD KNOW OF HIM AFTER A INSTANCE LIKE THE ONE ABOVE..
  • JB · 7 months ago
    The fact that the windows were broken out was not excessive. The amount of tazers, if what he's saying is correct, is excessive. One tazer shot is all that you need because once the barbs are in, you can continue to shock a person in 5 sexond intervals. The reason for the broken windows was for noncompliance. If someone is noncomplient with an officer, the officer would have suspicious to the reason why the person wont cooperate. Also, a dog typically doesnt make a noise when it alerts to something. Normally the dog has a certain point with their snout or the dog will paw or scratch at an area. IMO, the officers will be taken to civil court and sued and the pastor will probably win, if his story is true, because the indvidual showed no signs of any intent to be physical. They took extreme measures because the pastor envoked his constitutional right.
  • Get out next time · 7 months ago
    get out of the car next time.
  • Matt · 7 months ago
    Moral of the story...got nothing to hide then you have nothing to lose. Stop bein jackasses when they wanna look then show em unless you go crack then run, that way when your beaten it will be worth it.
  • Mik · 7 months ago
    He probably had a little boy in the back
  • nikita · 7 months ago
    u are an ass hole y u got to shit on the pastor? little boy in the back seat? come on he wasn't jewish i don't think....
  • pete · 7 months ago
    it looks to me that the officers overdid it.
    also they had on cause to stop him and look
    in hes car. i live in Canada. but he should get a lawyer and sue the police for everything that he can.

    thank you
  • backinblackbetty · 7 months ago
    the police in england are just as bad! if not worse... its disgusting
  • Deicidal · 7 months ago
    his smart mouth and defiant attitude got him everything he deserved. just because he follows some deities law, that does not mean he is above federal law, if he was more compliant, he would definitely have been sleeping the night at his home, but he chose to put himself into that situation. he is not a victim and he is not "the little guy" he is a prick and he got exactly what he deserved...
  • Deicidal · 7 months ago
    might I also add... what a way to get free national advertising for your church... its bullshit!
  • Roger Arocha · 7 months ago
    Wut the fuck is he being charged with?

    The pastor was resisting arrest and being a smart-ass with thepolice but then the stupid cops went way overboard, smashed in his windows, TAZED the crap out of him, and bloodied his face.

    But what did he do??? Why didn't the cops just tell him what he was being charged with?
  • udumbasses · 7 months ago
    I'm sorry, as bad as these videos seem, if you do a little research on this pastor you find out he is an ultraright wing nut bag. On his YouTube channel he has videos of him blatantly harassing an armed officer at an airport after 911 because he was carrying an assault rifle. He also has a video titled "Judaism is the religion of the antichrist" where he proclaims just that.

    his channel on youtube: sanderson1611
  • Chris · 7 months ago
    We don't know the whole story. What I get from the video is that the pastor could have avoided the whole thing had he just gotten out of his car and instead of sitting there arguing like a spoiled teenager. His screaming, while it may seem violent and scary, is not from being beaten or abused. It's because he's being "tazed." The pastor needs to learn how to communicate and follow orders like an adult. If he is personally trying to stand up for American rights, join the fucking Army.
  • hepotitus · 7 months ago
    all of this was based on the fact that the man didnt notice the dog signaling the authorities. That doesnt mean there wasnt a signal. An audible signal could be a warning to someone actually in a criminal act.
    This could have all been avoided if he had just sat there, answered questions, and let them search. I do not feel bad for this guy
  • Phuq A. Pigg · 7 months ago
    It seemed reasonable to verify that the dog did actually "signal" HIS car IF the pigs were going to claim that they had "reasonable cause". These "cops" LIE ALL THE FUCKIN TIME. I've gone through this stuff so many times. Luckily , i've never been beaten down like so many others, but I'm to the point where I may flip into survival mode when confronted by a Police (Pig) with the knowledge that I may be tasered/beaten to death because I'm a Nigger.

    In your white Privileged view, you may think that the pastor had it coming simply because he stood on Democratic Principles ENSHRINED in the Constitution and didn't kowtow to the Officer's Crass Authority.

    PREPARE FOR THE POLICE STATE. POLICE DON'T WEAR BLUE ANYMORE. THEY WEAR BLACK , CAMOUFLAGED FATIGUES DECKED OUT IN RIOT GEAR AND AS VIOLENT AND DUMB AS EVER.

    NO ACCOUNTABILITY. NO CHECKS. NO BALANCE.

    This is A sign that America as We imagine it "Could be" is doomed.

    THERE IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY IN THIS FACADE OF A DEMOCRACY (Really, A Corporate Sponsored Oligarchy)

    FUCK THE POLICE!
  • They LET HIM GO ONCE · 7 months ago
    I do not think the dog found anything as he had nothing to hide. I am trying to find how many times a dog will give a false positive. I am leaning that they either smell it or do not. I have yet to hear that the dogs think they smell it. I could be horrible wrong but would need an outside source. Any cops willing to chime in would be great.
  • Trev · 7 months ago
    People,

    Fact 1. Police dogs DON'T show the type of reaction to finding drugs, people etc. that a 'suspect' would expect. They have a signal which their handler will understand. That could be as simple as sitting down
    Fact 2. Police dogs do make mistakes. Due to cross contamination false alerts are common.

    Advice: Although you may have done nothing wrong, if you have nothing to hide why not just help the Police and co-operate. They are doing a tough job. If every genuine drug dealer thought they could just refuse to be searched and the Police would let them go on their way then...... well drug dealing would be very easy and we'd all be doing it :-)
  • Mwoundy · 7 months ago
    Wow, everyone who's siding with the cops sound like communists. I bet you guys would want to beat up Christians, but you're too non religiously learned... you Atheists.
  • Whatever · 7 months ago
    Whiney dramaqueen.
  • littletinktink · 7 months ago
    Whiney dramaqueen?? Are You freaking serious??
    I think that you should get tasered and brutaly beaten a couple of times and see how you feel. Lets smash your face into the ground with broken glass. Lets give you 11 stiches on your head you asshole.

    cops need to be put under controll.
  • William · 7 months ago
    Bottom line is if he had cooperated and gotten out of the vehicle none of this would have happened. He could then have them obtain a search warrant. Apparently from the beginning though he was refusing to answer questions which in some jurisdictions can be cause to detain someone. He was being confrontational purposely why else would you refuse to exit the vehicle knowing that your window is going to get broken out and tazed.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    You can never be arrested for refusing to answer questions. 5th amendment. This man broke no law and deserves no punishment. He was simply standing up for himself.
  • Shadow · 7 months ago
    Yea that was abuse of power cause; one he was right he had the forth amendment right, an they atacked him when he had no reason to tas him.
  • reaper · 7 months ago
    We need to control the police. They have too much power. I do not have respect for any police officer I meet for the first time. Respect is something to be earned. Badge or not. They have no respect for us…. Do they? So, why should we just give it to them….huh? When a police officer notices that you are nervous during a traffic stop, or in any other situation which we are forced to converse with them they have the nerve to ask in a judging manor “why ya so nervous?” “You don’t have anything to be nervous about if you haven’t done anything wrong…. Right?” Of course we’re nervous. You so called “peace officers” run around in a squad car armed to the teeth looking for trouble. He who looks for trouble usually finds it. But who pays for it. We do. And for what? So some hypocrite in a uniform can get his adrenaline rush for the day, and bask in his selfish pride. IT NEEDS TO STOP!!! WE NEED TO RISE UP!!! UNITE!!! TAKE THEM DOWN!!! WE DON’T HAVE TO LIVE IN FEAR OF THE ONES WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT US!!! THEY SHOULD FEAR US!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SO, STOP BEING AFRADE!!!!!!! ARM YOURSELF WITH KNOWLEDGE!!! FIX THE BROKEN SYSTEM, THEN USE IT TO FIGHT BACK!!!
  • A guy · 7 months ago
    Wow. Sounds like this guy was just asking for an explaination. All they should have done was tell him what he was asking, as a citizen, and he would have complied. The rest was just overkill. Shit like this makes me scared to go into the US. Fucking American border patrol...
  • Jbm · 7 months ago
    Can i just say A. some cops are d-bags some priests are d-bags. this whole thing looks like a d-bag pissed of other d-bags...GG, oh and post as Jesus Christ doesn't offend every one, cause like most of the smarter people in the world i know there is no god
  • MasterSmiley · 7 months ago
    i think you are half right... i wouldn't say hes a d-bag but i don't understand, even if he feels his 4th amendment rights would be violated to just take the names of the officers involved and report them later, or if he has nothing to hide be like um this is wrong but i have nothing to hide. I also really don't understand the need to use the tazer on someone twice. it is built so that one shot will incapacitate a normal human being not under the influence of any substance as far as i know.
  • MasterSmiley · 7 months ago
    also this is neither the time nor place to discuss the validity if certain deities.
  • Selp · 7 months ago
    Ur just as bad as the people who do believe in god. Just saying ur opinions with no proof. In fact i bet they have more proof he exist than u do saying he doesn't.
  • joe · 7 months ago
    hahah like most of the smarter people eh .. i will beleave u r smart when u explain how he world was created if there was no god cus lets be hoenst if i take a peace of dirt n leave it in my room for millions of years nothing will come from it ,, some thing had to creae this universe
  • Drew · 7 months ago
    He is able to spell properly, at least. Learn some biology, by the way.. a piece of dirt is not what the Earth was, a flaming ball of magma and choas, with lightning storms. And besides, a piece of dirt? It already has plenty of life in it. Learn your biology.
  • Balance · 7 months ago
    The police (that most people hate) told him why he needed to exit the vehicle: their dog indicated probable cause. That's what the judge will see.

    This guy does have a history of provocation against authority, which goes completely against the teachings he claims to promote. He was looking for trouble.

    That said, each officer should be beaten as they so beat, tased as they so tased, and have their rights violated as they have so violated. That is balance. That is the golden rule.

    As well, the "pastor" should be treated by others as he so treated the police. That, too, is balance, etc.

    Cheers.
  • Levydash · 7 months ago
    I don't know you realize this or not but once we accepted Jesus Christ as our lord and savior, we forfeited all of our rights. I believe what happened to this man is a terrible thing, but it's biblical that things like this are going to happen people! When Jesus was crucifred do you think he was trying to use the amendments to talk his way off the cross? Atleast persicution lets this man know he's doing something right! What are you doing with your life?
  • Coldfish · 7 months ago
    What does Jesus Christ have to do with this! You do not lose your rights when you are a christian because of something called "separation of church and state". I do not think Jesus would agree with beating someone like that: he seemed to favor peace. And being beaten like that does not mean you are on the right path... When did God say "Get yourself in a situation where you are senselessly beaten for no reason and I will be happy!
    I hope those officers are held accountable for what happened to this man.
  • Nick · 7 months ago
    I didn't see any excessive force. I saw an extraction with force.

    There seemed to be plenty of warning. I wouldn't think it would be pleasant to get pulled through a broken window and detained by force. so i have little pity.

    The use of tazers has time and time again been ruled well with in the bounds of reasonable force in cases of resistance.

    I've grown sick of this "we live in America" thing. Living in America is not a valid reason to resist an armed authority figure that has been trained and authorized by America to enforce law. You may file a claim after your arrest if you want, but if you resist arrest you are guilty of an actual crime.

    When a cop tells you to do something, do it. He should have allowed them to inspect his vehicle. Instead he wanted to pretend he lives in some mystical wonderland where cops are 9-5 customer service representatives with guns. That some how he could dictate their operating procedures or had a right to a "retest". As a result he was extracted, patched up, and detained. This is a better scenario then stuff i have seen from nations outside of the US.

    So all you excessive force peoples, be thankful you live in America where the cops don't force you to pee into a bottle for their amusement, or just take you straight to jail with your forehead open. Be happy they provide clear and obvious warning before they go breaking windows. Be happy you are allowed to tape the incidents like this and get footage from other cameras. Be happy you can freely post this on the internet and get responses from would be anarchists. Our police do not drink on duty, and typically are not mentally damaged in obvious or dangerous ways. America has an above average expectation of its police force that it meets daily. Every now and then you get a slip up, but this is not one of them.

    Disclaimer: I am not a cop, and I will not be watching this topic so responses to me will go unnoticed.
  • Void · 7 months ago
    1. Beating, tazing, and grinding a guys face into glass is excessive force.

    2. Just because a cop tells you to do it, doesn't mean you have to do it! They're not some big donut Gods in uniforms that you must OBEY OBEY.

    3.They had no reason to search his car. Lets say I'm in a cop and I walk a k-9 by your house, and say, hmm the dog sniffed toward your house. so knock knock, I have a reason to search your house. Right?
  • human · 7 months ago
    I am sorry to hear that anyone would think this was acceptable "extraction/force". The authorities exhibited excessive force. PERIOD!

    If the authorities thought this person was a threat, they could have just detained him within his vehicle, and not physically abuse him.

    I agree that in most cases we should respect the authorities and do what they ask, but at what point do you have to question them and what they are asking...(if he had gotten out of the vehicle, and they asked him to strip in public, would you do it, then they wanted to preform a body search, would you do it...) All knowing you are innocent.

    He did not "cause" the problem, the problem began when the authorities lied.

    I hope I never have to experience anything like this...and I hope you don't either.
  • pissed off · 7 months ago
    wow.... cops fuck you all.... this guy is NOT GUILTY!!!! i am religious, and they did over use there power... they almost MURDERED him!!! so get with the program, and realise he is non guilty!!!! god bless you ....
  • dsfdsf · 7 months ago
    He probably had a good reason why he didn't let them search the car and it was probably because he wanted to go home.
    I know I would when I am driving for hours.
    He was probably filming it because he wanted to show how pointless they were being.
    Cops just love tazers. I'm not sure if people remember the don't taze me bro. Or the kid that was tazed to death etc.
  • Nick · 7 months ago
    btw: i do not hear of any broken bones, large amounts of bruises, permanent injury, internal bleeding, and hes still alive. The only injury he seems to have is from being pulled through a window and onto the immediate ground where glass was.

    That is far from being treated like a physical combatant, where the force would be increased.
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    sure you didnt hear of any broken bones, permenant damage, etc.

    but you did see the gash in his head. you do know that he needed 11 stitches.

    so if i beat someone to the point that they need 11 stiches then its not considered assault/excessive force? only if you hear of the damage listed above?
  • Chris g · 7 months ago
    This is seriously fucked up. The police are fucking ridiculous and all government is getting completely out of control. Anyone who says different is ignorant and doesn't know what they are talking about. Tell me C-rage would you get out of a car with no drugs or guns if a cop demanded you to? Even lying straight to your face? Go fuck yourself...This is just fucked up!
  • geekychick2007 · 7 months ago
    Hmm....well while it does seem that the guy is being a tad belligerent the point of the matter is that at no time did the police inform him of what he did wrong in the first place. Excessive force was used, because at no time was he behaving in a manner that was harmful to himself or others. He was physically harmed for failing to comply to the demands of an officer who never stated what his crime was. I've no interest really, if this guy does this everywhere. Looking at the proof that I have in front of me, the force that the police officer used was unnecessary and merely a form of exerting his authority.
  • Teddy · 7 months ago
    As a student of law (Yes, that's my degree), I have to say this gentleman clearly has a very good case against both the Border Patrol and the Arizona Department of Public Safety.

    One taser is fine if he were resisting once the police forced entry into the car. That can easily be accepted. However, multiple simultaneous tasings surpasses the level of reasonable force. A boot crushing his head into the ground while being tased after being removed from the car, when he was NOT resisting arrest FAR surpasses reasonable force.

    Being heckled after arrest is inappropriate and those Border Patrol agents should be reprimanded, and placed on unpaid leave while they are prosecuted for police brutality.

    If I were admitted to the Arizona Bar, I would have no hesitation in offering my services, pro bono, to this pastor. I may not care for his religious beliefs, but I do care for his civil rights. I do care that police govern themselves by the constitution, in the same manner this man did. It is clear to me that both CBP and DPS should be brought before a court and prosecuted.
  • Jeff · 7 months ago
    Come on down to Oklahoma where the law will royally fuck you as hard and long as they possibly can. You're all wrong. Cops are abuse there power so much its sickening. There isn't a one that doesn't.
  • Chandlermaki · 7 months ago
    It is indeed abuse of power.
    But they didn't do anything they weren't allowed to do.
    If a police officer tells you to step out of yur vehicle, It's much easier to just do it.
  • Chandlermaki · 7 months ago
    Abuse of power? Yes.
    Unnecessary? Yes.
    Un- Provoked? No.

    If a police officer tells you to get out of your vehicle, It's much easier just to do it.
  • jon · 7 months ago
    omg what an moron, he should have stopped trying to be high and mighty on the moral high ground preserving his rights, and just let them search his trunk. i mean if he had done that he could have just saved him self all that trouble.
    dont get me wrong the police did use to much force, but he was resisting arrest and making a show of it like some stupid rich bitch like paris hilton.
  • alex · 7 months ago
    He should not have to feel like he is preserving his rights. Those officers should have respected his rights from the start. The just comply and do what they want crowd on these forums makes me sick. The government should fear the people not the people fear thier government. I am for treating officers and government officials with due respect but they must respect a persons right at all times.They should only use the amount of force only to get the job done.
  • anna · 7 months ago
    im so sorry that happened to you. It was very wrong for the police to do that. They pretty much deserve the title of douchebag
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    THIS GUY DESERVED THIS AND I DONT THINK THEY COULD HAVE PICKED A BETTER GUY. HE IS ONE OF THOSE SUPER RIGHT WING PREACHER GUYS WHO GO AROUND STARTING TROUBLE TO PROVE THE GOVERNMENT IS TAKING OVER. THIS DEFIANTELY BRIGHTEN MY DAY. IT DEFIANTELY BROUGHT LAUGHTER TO MY OFFICE.

    OMG IF THATS NOT THE FUNNIEST THING IVE SEEN AND HEARD I DONT KNOW WHAT IS. DUDE IF U READ THIS I HOPE U KNOW A GROWN MAN ISNT SUPPOSED TO SCREAM LIKE THAT EVER.

    GREAT VIDEO
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    DUDE PAUSE IT AT 1:19 AND LOOK AT THE COPS FACE. HE SHOULD AUDITION FOR THE NEXT INSTALLMENT OF SUPER TROOPERS. INFACT MAYBE ALL THESE COPS SHOULD. THEY COULD DO A SPIN OFF OF SUPER TROOPERS AND MAKE IT ABOUT THE BORDER PATROL.

    OMG IF THATS NOT THE FUNNIEST THING IVE SEEN AND HEARD I DONT KNOW WHAT IS. DUDE IF U READ THIS I HOPE U KNOW A GROWN MAN ISNT SUPPOSED TO SCREAM LIKE THAT EVER.

    GREAT VIDEO
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    DUDE WHEN U HAVE A CRAPPY DAY AND A CRAPPY JOB ITS ALWAYS GOOD TO HAVE SOME GUY COME ALONG AND BRIGHTEN UP YOUR DAY WITH THEIR ACTIONS.

    OMG IF THATS NOT THE FUNNIEST THING IVE SEEN AND HEARD I DONT KNOW WHAT IS. DUDE IF U READ THIS I HOPE U KNOW A GROWN MAN ISNT SUPPOSED TO SCREAM LIKE THAT EVER.

    GREAT VIDEO
  • Josh Morrison · 7 months ago
    Yes, Michael Dayton.....this was just one giant, hilarious video of an American being deprived of his human/constitutional rights. Clearly you haven't the maturity level necessary to grasp the importance of the right to protection against illegal searches and seizures. I hope a similar incident happens to you so you can laugh it up when you tell the story to your buddies.
  • bob marley · 7 months ago
    WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU?
  • BennyP · 7 months ago
    Jackasses like you, who find this funny instead of atrocious, are the reason that stuff like this is allowed to happen. People just shrug it off and allow it to happen... even make fun of it... until it happens to you.
  • myfaceispurple · 7 months ago
    wow man.....I rly rly rly rly rly hope you get tazed by 3 taisers man cuz ur a dick
  • madchyld · 7 months ago
    wow your a pretty big fuckin dick, iv been tazed and trust me, it'll make you fucking scream.
  • Jaffa · 7 months ago
    i have to disagree with you about him being a dick because personally i would have used much much fouler language. its amazing what people thing is ok and/or wrong in the world today, and when the majority of the population are like "MICHEAL DAYTON" i think the world is going to be screwed
  • Tonaho · 7 months ago
    Hey man, at least be decent about it, even if that is your barbaric opinion. When most of us are being tazed and having glass ground into our faces the pain gets a bit much.
  • Bayz · 7 months ago
    MICHAEL DAYTON...have you ever actually been tazed? Not a pleasant experience. Until you have been, shut your damn mouth.
  • Mr smartpants · 7 months ago
    Sadly, some cops are stupid fat and frustrated. Hope they are not all like this.
  • JP · 7 months ago
    You're a Pastor.. you supposedly have nothing to hide.. instead of getting so high and mighty about your rights blah blah blah.. get your dumbass out of the car and let them search it.. then your stupid ass wont get tazed next time. SIMPLE.
  • Clayton · 7 months ago
    Probable cause is all the police need to search a vehicle. A warrant is only required for search of a home. The pastor was required by law to allow a search of the vehicle and instead ran his mouth. Police get annoyed and frustrated just like anyone, and that is why this played out the way it did. This only shows that the police are doing their job to ensure safety for everyone involved.
  • Zachery Brinker · 7 months ago
    Hey dude thats seriously some bullshit! I have had the same thing done to me except without the tazers and broken windows. Oh uh our dog hit on your car and this that and the other. Take me out slam me on the hood on my way to work at 4 am. in houston
  • Alex C. · 7 months ago
    i hope you know, smart ass, that you cant control your nerves, nor body functions when you have that much electricity running through your body, im sure you would sound like a hiyena compared to that guy. Aka GROW UP
  • None · 7 months ago
    Dayton your moron, when you're tazered you can barely control what you do or how you sound. And he can sound like that if wants too, this is America, and in America you have rights, he had the right to know what he was being charged for. Grow a heart.
  • michael jacobs · 7 months ago
    damn thats not cool for them to do that to do that to the guy for no reason
  • Stupi american · 7 months ago
    Stupid motherfucker should be teased 10 times and put on a jail.
  • K. Hughes · 7 months ago
    Here's a thought. Just let them search your car in the first place. If you have nothing to hide, then what difference does it make?
  • redbadger · 7 months ago
    Welcome to the Police State...
    Krushaev...said" they would take our Country without firing a shot!"
  • redbadger · 7 months ago
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbRr4smVxP0
    ...seem like it is happening more and more...welcome to the New Amerika
  • alex · 7 months ago
    I remember watching videos of USSR and Europe where citizens had to show passports or ID / permission slip to travel from one area to another. Guess we have it in America now to. That pastor should have told them to go screw themselves and since when do i need my car inspected in America to travel around. If that crap was going on in my state I would definately be all over the local and state government to end it.
  • Ace · 7 months ago
    Absolutely disgusting. These stories/videos make my blood boil. Cops are supposed to protect us; what the hell is wrong with these people? Why do these things continue to happen to innocent people? Why aren't we trying to prevent these horrific things from happening?
  • thinkanti · 7 months ago
    The thing with situations like this is it is never a good idea to argue with the cops. The smartest thing to do is to comply and then after, make a case against them if you believe they mistreated you or didn't follow procedure (like not informing you what you're being arrested for). If something like this ever happens to me I'm sure as hell going to get out of the car before they break the window and taze me. :/
  • Jim · 7 months ago
    To the ones that think the cops we're wrong you're a bunch of idiot's if he really thought he's right's were being violated then file a complaint but you know what it would not have gone anywhere because they were not wrong!!! The one guy is correct, it's a check-point, they don't know him from a good guy to a rapist or terrorist, if he whent through but had a dead budy in the back then you would be complaining that they did't do their job!!
  • tkidwelll · 7 months ago
    i see both sides. if you have done nothing wrong it does make you mad to have to answer to the police,on the other hand when you are a cop and someone starts acting like an ass you think he is hiding something . if the police just let everyone go that said im innocent . america would be worst off than it is .. but again i can see both sides of this
  • Zachery Brinker · 7 months ago
    Oh, and by the way I forgot... If you have ever been tazed it is totally okay to scream however you must. I was tazed while drunk with some friends and we were tazing each other throughout the day and I got hit and it fuckin hurts dude... SO yeah fuckin scream if you don't piss yourself
  • Brittany · 7 months ago
    This is horrible. Police are definitely out of control. The guy was clearly not resisting once he had been removed from the car so there was no need to taser him a second or third time as they did. I have no clue why the police thought they needed to use excessive force to get this man out of the car. Our country is going to shambles...absolutely horrible!!!!!

    So sorry for your pain
  • John Doe · 7 months ago
    This happens all the time in the US. We let it happen because we don't want to hamper the policeman's job. We let them have a ton of power. It is a shame. Until everything they do is accounted for they will abuse there power. One solution is that they are force to wear a camera and microphone so that if there character is called into question we will know the truth right away. Public servants should surrender there privacy while working for the community. It is a sad day because we have forgotten that the US was made for fairness and when a government is not fair to the people it is there duty to fight it. We lost the will to fight :(
  • drewdles · 7 months ago
    This is why people don't trust the police anymore. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Just be glad they have tasers now, the used to just use there gun.
  • steven · 7 months ago
    good job michael now lets see u go thier and try to scream to make up for another mans actions of screamign and make him feel better!
  • steven · 7 months ago
    ps...its also a question.
  • Rain · 7 months ago
    wtf those cops were so retarded. "I'm a police officer, you have to obey me." What kind of reason is that? They DEFINITELY used excessive force.
  • Brindley · 7 months ago
    Dude, I hope you take everyone of these assholes into court and get them all removed from duty or suspended.

    Good luck.

    Brindley,
    Japan
  • Tanner · 7 months ago
    Dude i dont care if your a fuckig paster that is so fucked up on so many levels i would not rest until every one of them had the boot of our judicial system up their asses. that is fucked up please post another video leting everyone know what happened whether they found you guilty or not.
  • yoyo · 7 months ago
    Dude, you fucked up. Once the police tell you your under arrest you have to comply. Whether they're right or wrong in what they suspect you of doesn't matter. But please, go waste your money & sue, you'll get laughed out of court.
  • andria · 7 months ago
    just so all of you people know i have made that wire for those taser guns. that gun shoots out 50,000 volts! that much would make anybody sound like that. The adverage wall socket at home is 120 volts. and anybody knows that would F$%k somebody up. so all those so called macho men, can act tough but they know they would be screaming like that to.
  • Kristy · 7 months ago
    I don't know how you can laugh at a grown man being tortured by others. It is unfortunate things like this happen all the time. Remember Rodney King? It's called cops abusing their power. Unfortunately, I've been victimized in a similar way. I am sorry for the pastor and glad he was able to video his experience.
  • James · 7 months ago
    This scares me also disgusts me.

    It just makes me wonder, if they did this to a Christian Pastor, what did the authorities do to the Muslim "terrorists" they had in captivity for years?
  • fsds · 7 months ago
    I would personally go to every single one of those cops house and fuck them up so bad they shit blood.
  • Dan · 7 months ago
    I hope this gets media coverage, border control are too busy harassing innocents while their resources could be better used elsewhere. But with their attitudes, I hope they don't stay in their current jobs for too much longer,
  • Tabitha · 7 months ago
    This is beyond belief! Cops take the power of the badge to sick limits.
  • Johnny · 7 months ago
    This type of shit makes me want to lead a revolution against all police/troopers/sheriffs.

    They can all eat a dick and die!
  • helloxmenwelcome2die · 7 months ago
    ahh good 'ol testosterone junkies... haha cops are horrible
  • helloxmenwelcome2die · 7 months ago
    btw 4th amendment rights are non-existant after patriot act hence probable cause..
  • Gabe · 7 months ago
    Police > You.
  • jedidiah · 7 months ago
    The White Rodney King.
  • Jose · 7 months ago
    These people with freaggin power, they think they can just do w.e. they want to other people.. u cant imagine how ashamed i am to hear their last names.
    Are you gonna show them the vid in court?
    and.. i hope u didnt drop the soap in jail dude :p
  • MATTHEW · 7 months ago
    FUCK HIM, HE NEEDED TO GET HIS ASS KICKED FOR BEING DISRESPECTFUL, YOU DONT TALK TO PPL LIKE THAT ESPECIALY NOT TO A PIG...WHAT A DUMBASS..... IDK I JUST THINK ITS FUNNY
  • fsum242 · 7 months ago
    Michele - i mean Michael - you're a pussy and I'd love to taze you b/c obv. a loser like you has never been man enough to get in a serious fight or get in trouble enough to get tazed (or unlucky like this gentleman)

    Godspeed and flush your ass down a toilet!

    :)
  • Suprise! · 7 months ago
    Dude stfu
    you seriously haven't thought about how he was wrongfully accused and then got into some police brutality.
    I really think you just hate him cause he's a pastor, and that's why you are a douche :D
  • Cory G · 7 months ago
    should have just done what they wanted in the first place,, shouldnt have been such a smart ass idiot i would have beaten him too.. they shouldnt have done all the but that would have annoyed me enough to beat him and just cooperate! fucking IDiot
  • DAVID · 7 months ago
    DUH
  • Odin · 7 months ago
    Let’s face it ever since the Patriots Fools Act has passes congress (where most of our representatives did not even read it) and ever since the country is always on heighten alert most of our basic rights have been taken away and law enforcement assumes that if you don’t comply with their logic you have something to hide. Instead of presuming innocent they always presume guilty.

    Now I am not saying that this gentleman was doing the right thing, he clearly is in the business of stirring up trouble where he can but so were the border patrol agents and the DPS officers.

    In today’s mentality we accept searches (be it on the airport, miles away from the border on roads) without any problem because it’s a fact of daily life and for the common good, but that does not make the search legal or even justifies that search. We just accept it as a way a life.

    Every so often someone does not accept this and asks questions and instead of backing down when he see that the law enforcement is not behaving as they should they continue escalating the situation.

    He should have gotten out of the car, taken names and badge numbers of the officers involved and then after the search driven to the US Attorney’s office to complain.

    He clearly did understand that if he does not back down that this would escalate to a point where it would become so unstable that all involved would regret this for long period to come.

    Clearly I’m blaming both sides here for what happened.
  • Malorise · 7 months ago
    I enjoy SXE phil's show usually. When I saw this one about the pastor I was like wtf. I thought the guy got shafted and the po po did a number on him. But that isn't the whole story. Go look at the pastors other videos. The dude was PURPOSELY going around and getting in several confrontations with police officers. He has like 3-4 videos(maybe more I got sick of looking) of blah blah the police state in america, big brother is watching you etc etc. The guy was waiting and hoping for something like this to happen and if you go around disrespecting officers long enough this is bound to happen.

    Seriously go look at his vidos he planned this to happen and instigated it for who knows what reason. Probably publicity.

    The fact that he is a supposed religious leader makes it all the more sad.

    I hope Phil reads these and see's this pastor for what he really is.
  • Steven · 7 months ago
    I thought this was really distressing actually, the police are essentially torturing him for fun. They should be charged, but of course it won't happen.
  • M. Paskulov · 7 months ago
    That's what you get for standing up for your rights! Because that's just fancy talk for 'not doing what you're ordered by some half-wit pussies with insecurities about their dick sizes who wanted nothing more than to take the piss on you and jerk themselves off at how tough they think they are'.

    "Rights are not rights if someone can take them away just like that. Temporary privileges is all they are folks" -George Carlin
  • philip kay · 7 months ago
    are you people serious! this guy was wrongfully beat... how can you say that he is a pussy or an idiot?

    he is complaining a little to much but it's undrestandable. they kicked the shit out of him for absoulutely no reason!
  • Amanda · 7 months ago
    Philip, the only person so far that has said anything negative towards the pastor was the first guy that made a comment (Micheal Dayton). The rest of the comments are in response to his childish post.
  • Hellz Fury · 7 months ago
    Philip Kay: i think you're misunderstanding who those comments were for. I'm sure they meant those comments for Michael Dayton, who by the way is a P*SSY. The Pastor got tazed by 3 or more tazers and he says he aint suppose to scream..lol.. lets see Micheal get tazed by a few see how much of a man he is. It's people like Micheal who inside are such p*ssies that they have to put on a man front just to feel like a man. Either way, sorry for what happened nd i hope things work out in the end.
  • khamitic goddess · 7 months ago
    um Phil, they were referring to the guy who made the first comment about the pastor...they say his name..michael....i would say that we are all on the same page, but i would like to add this is what black men across america experience on a daily basis...having a gun and a badge does not make you a god nor does it give u the right to harass and attack civilians. the pastor is lucky he aint dead...
  • Cavan M · 7 months ago
    Phillip they were commenting on Michael's post at the top not the actual video read his post at the top and you may agree with them
  • SMRDcompany · 7 months ago
    Well, the police were wrong for tazing him that much, but it's basically this guy's fault. If there's nothing else in the trunk but tools, why didn't he open it? I know he doesn't have to, but he was too much a dick and you know how police oficers are...
  • redbadger · 7 months ago
    yeah Micheal Bolton, oops Dalton
    I agree with ofther post from Steve , myfaceispurple and fsum 242, hope you get tases...sound like your a punk...you probably beat woman and are a meth head...since your thinking is like a silly little child...another words, your response is lame and your thinking is retarded...but if your retarded...I won't blame you , but if you are not, then your just really stupid...Clearly your seeking attention...are you getting it? Now go away and play your video games or with yourself
  • redbadger · 7 months ago
    philip kay...It is Micheal ,,,who is saying that,,,read again ...Bump...everyone else knows this is serious but for silly little Micheal... we all are agreeing and we are responding to Micheal's child like behavior about this very serious incident
  • Person · 7 months ago
    Wrongfully beaten. Force was needed, but once they got you out they shouldn't have beat the living shit out of you.
  • charles · 7 months ago
    what the f did you expect??? you were going through a " CHECKPOINT " what an idiot !!!!! try pulling that same stupid stunt the next time you go through an airport. JUST chill a little. dumbass
  • Owen · 7 months ago
    This is the problem when you let americans do anything involving weapons and security eventually someone innocent gets injured.
    Im only baiting you dont worry.

    It reminds me of the "old west" attitude to law
    Officer "these are the vageries of the law, I am the law. Do as i tell you"
    Accused "well I know the law and you are out of your depth"
    Officer "Shut up or i'll beat your face in"

    I've read about many a story like this. We should always be reviewing our police force in the west in order that we may be found blameless (or near so) when we turn up somewhere else (e.g. china demonstrations) and tell them what to do.
  • Jeremy · 7 months ago
    I can see both sides of the story. I know you have the right to refuse for them to search your car, however you had nothing to hide and if you had of just let them search the car you would have been on your way in less than 30 min probally!

    And you did not get far by trying to prove your point that you have rights. Sometimes you just have to deal with shit you don't want to, but do it and get on with your life.

    I am not excusing them for what they did to you, but by refusing you created suspicion like you had something to hide and their job is to protect.
  • Tommie lenning · 7 months ago
    Wow if those people are not all put in jail and severely punished, then i am moving to canada
  • Bruno · 7 months ago
    Why IS this happening in US of America??????
  • ch1nawhyte · 7 months ago
    "he is complaining a little to much but it’s undrestandable."

    yeah, because white folks in this country aren't used to being treated like that !
  • Aaron · 7 months ago
    The BP agents in this case (and in most cases similar) are wrong. They can't simply destroy property and assault an individual on suspicion. He asked legitimate questions which they refused to answer.

    When people allow that sort of thing to occur, it's a matter of time before the state gets confident that it can continue the abuses of power that are so prevalent today.

    Laches (look it up) is close to incurring on abuses of power like this.
  • R. B. · 7 months ago
    What they did was legal, as far as asking to search your car. Because it was a border situation, no warrant is required for a search. When the dog hit on your car, it did give them probable cause to search the car, which they didn't even need because of the above reason. So all in all, even though they were being dicks about explaining it to you, they were justified in their requests, which you blatantly disregarded.

    As far as the cops were concerned, you were being uncooperative. This does not, however, justify them beating you once you were tased, since you were pretty much unable to do anything at that point.

    In my opinion, you're both in the wrong.
  • alex · 7 months ago
    Not a border situation. Was not on the US, Mexico border.
  • warren · 7 months ago
    You people are completely ridiculous...

    fuck the guy...

    look at the action that was committed...it's disgusting.
  • eternity23 · 7 months ago
    i like how anymore a man puts on a hideous blue uniform and all of a sudden he's God and we must bow down to everything he says even if for no reason.

    i don't even think i can remember a day when it was OK to approach an officer with conversation or for help without it turning around on you and getting arrested.
  • Chad · 7 months ago
    Well i do agree that, the police where out of line with what they did, i also know the best thing to do in term of them is, just do what they say and get it sorted out when your not in a high risk situation. though im sure the guy had no idea that it was a high risk situation. As for the taser comment, being tasered hurts i dont care how tough you think you are, and before you judge i will say ive been hit with a standard police taser, ( nephew is a cop) they hurt a lot i couldn't imagine getting hit with 2 or more at a time.
  • us-ass · 7 months ago
    Dude, if you had simply complied, then all this shit that happened, would not have happened. Dont you realise that these guys on borders are under attack from people who want to kill americans????, get a life, maybe next time you will be sensible. Although I agree the force was unacceptable!
  • alex · 7 months ago
    Not on the border line of US, Mexico. I have yet to hear of cops being constantly shot from extridaiting people back to Mexico. From what i have gathered this happened well withing the US where BP somehow can stop traffic and search people. Sounds like that state needs to look into that. Seems wrong that BP can even be operating well within the US.
  • alex · 7 months ago
    The BP has this 100 mile zone from the border. He was traveling from San Diego to Phoenix, AZ . Guess his hiway passed in that zone. Gonna go and look up how many terrorist have crossed the US Mexican border and attacked us in the last 35 years as well. I bet the number will be 0.
  • Sergio · 7 months ago
    This man is the garbage of the earth, he got his wish granted and i love how he screams like a little pig when he realized this is way more than he can handle.

    He deserves this completely even if the cops are pigs.

    This is like watching a pig kicking another pigs ass. They deserve each other, they should destroy each other.

    The religion of pig cops against the Religion that makes this stupid person a Pastor.

    Any bets?
  • Malorise · 7 months ago
    Seriously... most of you people are idiots, just flat out dumb. I can't stress it enough so I'll type in caps.


    GO LOOK AT THE PASTORS OTHER VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE!!!!!!!!!

    For christs sake do some research. The guy has 0 credibility. In the last couple of months this pastor has gotten into several confrontations with police officers. Not only that but they ARE ON TAPE. This means unless the guy rolls with a cam 24/7 he was planning it.

    The guy probably has gotten into more confrontations with po po they just weren't caught on tape or controversial enough.

    I mean if you go and LOOK AT JUST ONE VIDEO look at the one where he is harrasing the cop at the airport with the big gun. Watch that video, its very short and shows you EXACTLY WHY THIS DOUCHEBAG HAD THIS COMING HIS WAY. If you are patient enough you could watch his many other ones that are much longer where he just verbaly abuses cops.


    I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT RETARDS PEOPLE ARE FOR SAYING ZOMG THAT POOR POOR MAN.

    HE GOT A BEAT DOWN HE DESERVED!!! THE PASTOR WAS JUST PLAIN ASKING FOR IT!!!!


    GO LOOK AT HIS VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE THEY ARE THERE FOR EVERYONE TO SEE. IF YOU DON'T AND CONTINUE TO BACK HIM UP YOU ARE A COMPLETE FUCKING MORON.
  • MasterSmiley · 7 months ago
    yeah at first (w/o looking at his videos) i was on his side but now, looking at how much he baits officers this guy is a tool. it is true how ever that 2 tazers were excessive and he is well within his rights, but that is an extreme case of what happens when you bait officers. They are human and get annoyed like the rest of us. If you are nice and respectful when one pulls you over you wont get crap, whereas (wrong punctuation?) if you are blasting "Fuck The Police" by NWA, they will have a short temper.
  • Joe C · 7 months ago
    Thank god theres another smart person on PhillyD.tv. You said exactly what i was thinking.
  • Blue · 7 months ago
    You know what, you're completely right. I was on this guy's side COMPLETELY, before looking at his channel. This video is very much out of context.

    It's still true he had every right to do what he did, but he doesn't seem to have any excuse for just being an asshole every time he meets a police officer. Nobody's going to want to calmly reason with an angry idiot.

    Maybe it's just because I'm not religious, but I always thought that a man of god (anyone associating themselves with a religion to that extent) would be a little more... what, jolly? Pleasant? Polite? He's really using the whole 'Pastor' title more as a security blanket.

    People are people, I guess.
  • Jake · 7 months ago
    Why did they have to taze him and drag him through the car window? Why not just break the window, open the door and pull him out?
  • ed · 7 months ago
    Border agents working checkpoints have more power than most officers and naturally should have more. The man was wrong for not getting out at the checkpoint. He should be fined heavily.
  • kno · 7 months ago
    I don't know if you're aware Nick and those thinking like Nick, but just because you resist arrest does not give the right for a cop to shoot someone with a taser. That is a method only to be used when the cop is in danger as well as the possibility of the suspect putting themselves in intentional danger. That and an officer may use one when the suspect is not apprehendable.

    This man, was not being unreasonable by any means nor threatening to the police officer and co-operated when they told him to put his hands over his face. At this point in time, not only is he obeying and passive but he is also defenseless! On top of all this there is not just one police officer, there are many. Under these circumstances the way this man was treated is pretty much a crime. To say that this was not excessive force would simply be ignorance. Even if he was resisting under circumstances where he was going beyond his rights, these men could have easily handled him without hurting him.

    These men deserve to have their badges revoked and banned from law enforcement.
    One mistake is too many for someone with higher power.
  • alex · 7 months ago
    I agree with you 100%. Men who are given guns and the right to use force if needed need to be better trained to see when an indivudual is still complying even tho he is not. He covered his face with both hands, which clearly shows he has no weapons. The police man could have reached in and unlocked the door then pulled him out. Those police officers should be given whistles for at least 5 years if they are ever alowed to go back on duty. As they can not determine how to use thier force.
  • Jack · 7 months ago
    If you would have just let him search your car at the beginning he would have stuck his head in realized you had nothing to hide and you would have been on your way. Dumb ass.
  • Gumballtiger · 7 months ago
    Okay, I am not saying that what the police did was morally right or correct, but they have rules and regulations that they have to follow for their own safety and the safety of others. That is why they are police, to protect and serve. They are looking for illegal activity, you act suspicious, guess what? They are going to do what they have to do to make sure you are not a threat. I am so tired of people calling everything police brutality. What should they have done; let him go without searching him? And then when some dead kid stuffed full of drugs was found in his trunk, what then?

    He was the one causing the problem. Just because he is a pastor he gets a free pass on acting like a jerk and not having to follow the same rules as everyone else? I don't think so. I'm all for the constitution and our rights, but there are stupid people who think that just because you have the right to do something, doesn't mean you should in that situation. And let's face it, when you make that choice, you are then responsible for the consequences. The KKK has the right to say whatever they want(I am not endorsing the KKK, it is just an example) But does that mean that they should? *sarcasm* "Yes, it is a fantastic idea to go to a place full of people we hate and who hate us, and start talking smack about them. That will not be a problem at all." */sarcasm* He could have made the opposite choice, and instead of being an indignant self-righteous a-hole, he could have answered their questions and he most likely would have been sent on his way. He had multiple opportunities to be cooperative with the police: answer their questions, let them search his car, let them search him, follow their directions when they told him something... If he wasn't doing anything illegal the worst thing that would have happen would have been some wasted time.

    I realize that there are bad cops, just like there are bad people in every job(such as say, pastors?), but for the most part, if you do what they tell you to do, you won't get the crap kicked out of you. I've had encounters with law-enforcement and the military, and if you aren't intentionally doing anything wrong(such as wandering past a restricted zone on a military base or stopping to ask police for directions), they will firmly but nicely correct or help you correct the problem. When a person refuses to answer simple questions(like he apparently did when they first stopped him) it become suspicious behavior. Then when you refuse to let them do their job(search your car, search you, run your license, all that jazz) you are reinforcing their beliefs that you have something to hide or are participating in criminal activity. Then when behavior becomes a possible threat to them or the civilians around them, they need to act. That guy refused to get out of the car. They removed him from the car after giving him enough time to voluntarily remove himself. *sarcasm* "They should have let this guy go, or let him sit in his car all night until he chose to come out."*/sarcasm*

    If he hadn't been a pastor would we really be discussing this? He didn't follow directions, he refused to cooperate, and when they tried to arrest him he began resisting arrest, and the police did what they had to do to return to a safe and secure environment for themselves and the other people. Sounds like a normal day on the show 'Cops.'
  • William · 7 months ago
    this is just fucking messed up cops dont got the right for shit the prob just was looking in there for something to eat cuz these cops were bums..im hating right now but for the right reasons
  • MilkyBones · 7 months ago
    It was wrong for the cops to use so much force but wouldn't it be a lot easier if the guy just let them search his car? I know it has to be annoying but just let them do their job. Although it would be nice if the cops just said "We want to search your car to make sure you don't have anything on you," or something to that effect. I think both sides were wrong, but I favor the man because the cops definitely didn't have to go that far. At least give him a FAIR warning and tell him if he doesn't allow you to search you'll have to use force. Why do people have to be so stubborn sometimes? Not complying and not directly answering questions.
  • anonymous · 7 months ago
    why is everyone so bias. this video clearly says that cops is abusin power for no reason. no need to praise the cop just to sound cool.
  • girl · 7 months ago
    4th amendment rights dont count when you are not in the country yet. they have the right to random searches. it keeps our country safe. what did he have to hide?
  • Owen · 7 months ago
    Actually he was in your country, he clearly states it is an INTERNAL check a few miles from the border, a 2nd line if you will except that many of your countries 2nd lines are not even on routes going away from borders and are infact running parallel
  • Sergio · 7 months ago
    Where was your GOD when you were squeaking like a pig Pastor?

    Probably looking at your future You tube video and laughing his ass off.
  • hope · 7 months ago
    wow i feel so sorry for you. i hope that you sue them, (if you can)
  • Dan · 7 months ago
    WTF this guys an idiot!! How did they know there wasn't drugs or a dead guy in the car, doesn't him refusing to answer make him suspicious!!!

    If they had let him go and there were drugs in his car the video would just read "dumb ass cops let drug smuggler go" be glad your cops are doing something!!

    A cop is an authority figure and he deserves to be answered so YOU can be safe. So if a guy defies them their not just going let him go, cause that would make them fuck ups and easy to walk over bitches.

    The beat down was going too far but if this dumbass just said sure I’m innocent so search me it wouldn't have happened. Instead he says no! So that means you think he should be released?? NO!! If a random douche says there’s nothing in my car but you can’t search it that make him a threat.

    Lastly if a guy is so god damn suspicious that he wont get out his car you think they just going to ask him to proceed to the trailer, no cause he wouldn't even get out the car. This guy could have been a serial killing bastard that was going to try shoot them, some people are fucked up like that!! Why should they have to take a life threatening risk and give him a chance to even reach for his pocket, when he could pull out a gun or some shit!! How would they know he's innocent? Their job is to be suspicious of you so that when drug smugglers do come they catch them and don't get stabbed!

    How can I not cast a blanket over all Americans and not say their dumb when half these comments say, the resistant potential drug smuggler as seen by anyone in that situation, is right. Shut up and be thankful for your security and though cops defending you!
  • alex · 7 months ago
    Drugs are in America. Been in America. Will always be in America. Drugs go through that station probably in the tons per day as well as illegal imigrants. Cop should just do his job. They beat the man up cause they had a bone to grind with him. Unprofessional . Unethical. Dangerous to the Americans who go through there everyday. That senior officer and all who was there need a serious investigation with suspension / termination.
  • Guigsy · 7 months ago
    Sue these guys, You are completely entitled to do that and it looks like they don't have a leg to stand on. On the flip side, if you had nothing to hide why did you not let them search it? I think your mouth is your enemy pal. If you would have only complied with the search then you would be in a much better position than you are now. America has been at war for some time now and inland security is ruthless. We have the east to blame for that. Somehow I think stuff like this happens to you a lot!
  • Blue · 7 months ago
    This has absolutely NOTHING to do with religion. This is absurd, that police have the gall to do this. He had the right to do everything that he did, according to the 4th amendment.

    It doesn't matter if he has something to hide or not, every citizen has the right to decline a search without a warrant.

    If we ignore this right and comply with everything the police tell us to do, where does it end?

    Keep in mind, police officers are human beings too, not some higher power that knows what's best for us. All humans have the ability to be corrupted, which means that not every law officer has your best interest in mind. Many do, and I appreciate those who do, but my town-- Pelham, Massachusetts had a police chief by the name of Officer Flurry. He was incompetent and irresponsible-- first shooting off a pistol during a gun safety lesson in a 1st grade classroom. Recently it got to the point where he hosted a firearm fair. A child was given an uzi to try out by his parents. The recoil shot the uzi back and the child killed himself. Flurry is refusing to comment on the subject. Clearly there was not nearly enough attention paid to the fact that a bullet can kill you.

    There is nothing wrong with having faith in people with law authority, but keep in mind: not all law officers are responsible.
  • berserkerich · 7 months ago
    Ther videos are just showcasing giant douche vs. giant douches. At security checkpoints or during a traffic stop DO NOT give a police officer reasonable suspicion or probable cause. Unless you want to get tazed. Cooperate and move about your business and file a complaint. With this guy filming the whole thing it just seemed like he was asking for it, but excessive force was definitely used. Assholes all around.
  • Anonymous · 7 months ago
    you my friend are a fool. just because you said no to an officer doesnt mean its probable cause. you are what is reallying giving our government too much power it is our right to say no. once you have given them that right then you might as well be a slave. for anyone who thinks he had the intentions of all this is also a fool. you can not predict an out come of anything. he thought that one of the officers would understand him and get a warrant because that is what they are suppose to do. if he didnt record any of this would anyone really believe this? of course not because its unbelievable with out proof it never happened.
    of course its easier if he just pop open the trunk to show them he has nothing. its also easier to just bend over and take it up the ass.
    they should be put in jail or at least fired for doing this because when its your turn to be tazared you would be thinking the same.
  • doesnt matter · 7 months ago
    alright ur just fucking stupid...yea its a shame, police officers abuse there power blah blah blah. Its america...people do shit...bitches get fucked...but this guy asked for it. Alright im not saying he deserved to get all that shit but come on if you tried to go through border control from afghanistan to iran without cooperating your be shot so stop...u clearly know nothing...ur one of those people that tries to put fault on the government for everything...and its annoying stop bitching
  • TodoInTX · 7 months ago
    Maybe so, but this is not Afghanistan and we are not in a war-zone. The gentleman knew his rights, asked for confirmation of those rights, asked for the dogs to be used to confirm probable cause. He was not rude nor abusive. He simply did not bow to abuses of power. As anyone ought to do, because it's the right thing to do. There are consequences for doing the right thing especially when it's against someone who believes they can wield un-lawful authority with impunity. I likely would have done the very same thing, and I would have been tazed, I don't like it, but it is the right thing to do.
  • rwlangg · 7 months ago
    Amendment 4: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
    According to this right in the constitution, he had the right of not having his car searched. They hid any evidence of the dog that was brought out and NOTHING WAS FOUND in the vehicle. OMGs the police were wrong once again. They're not being safe, they're being paranoid.
  • anonononon · 7 months ago
    obviously you're fucking retarded
  • matthew · 7 months ago
    Stop polluting the internet with your ill informed rantings. You don't know what your talking about so please stop embarrasing yourself.
  • yes your stupid · 7 months ago
    @Matthew - Oh that's neat you can type without a point.

    The Afghanistan analogy was spot on. Bottom line your rights as an American does not mean you can be an ass and its ok. If you act like a slut im going to treat you like one. Act like a drug runner who is smarter than everyone else and your going to get tazed. He is lucky stitches is all he got IMO.

    So lets change this up. Personally I think that pastor looks like a pedo. So lets say he has a little girl kidnapped in his trunk. He has knocked her out and he is on his way to kill and bury her. Cop knows something is up and asks some questions and he starts to act like that jack ass. Cops is having none of it stops the car and saves the girl.

    Are you really saying you would rather see the girl killed because he runs he mouth? Worth pointing out at no point was his rights violated. I cant speak on the cops breaking the rules but I don't care after listing to him ramble.

    Personally I would rather get out of the car and let them do there job then act like an ass. But then again I have a set of balls. From the screaming in that video I think that dude has nothing more than a set of tits...

    His whoa me video after sure did not help any...
  • Karma · 7 months ago
    No, dude. You're taking this out of context. If you're driving through a border patrol from Iraq to Afghanistan, that is COMPLETELY different from driving to Phoenix from San Diego..
    ONE thing that the pastor could do, just to be cooperative with the officer, would have been to answer their questions. That's IT.
    He is NOT to be searched without probable cause and he SHOULD be given reason or evidence of probable cause.
    The officers in this video were plainly abusing their powers and in my opinion, they were committing Attempted Murder with a deadly weapon. They are police officers, and yet imagine what would have happened if they had performed those acts out of uniform. They would be facing those charges... It's disgusting to see that and I'm sure that they will even have been allowed to continue working without any consequence.
  • Karma · 7 months ago
    @Yes your stupid - Oh that's neat, you can make a completely nullified point based on information that was NOT at ALL involved in THIS FUCKING SITUATION!

    Are you that slow minded that you can't register the fact that people are responding to this based on the information given and not because YOUR moronic ass thinks he looks like a pedophile. You are obviously the kind of person that would have participated in or allowed the tazing and beating of this man. You should consider that the police FOUND NOTHING. Not that "what if they found a little girl in the trunk" you shit wad. They never brought the dogs out and NO ONE'S CAR looks like it MIGHT have a little girl in the trunk. And so, again, your thoughts on "well the cop knew something was up so he started asking questions" is completely and totally off center and a worthless point to make. So for instance, let me put this into perspective. You seem like a complete and utter shit head so when you drive up to the border patrol, the cop would obviously know your a shit head and start asking questions. You, being the shit head you are, would say "yes i'm a shit head i'll answer your questions willingly" and so the cop tells you to get out of the car, where he then beats the fuck out of you and tasers you three or four times on the grounds that you are a shit head, EVEN THOUGH YOU COMPLIED. Hope you enjoyed that. As sxephil would say.. BITCH YOU STUPID.
  • jabob · 7 months ago
    amen! people need to realize that the preservation of our rights is vital. we have already given the government too much power, and look at what its done to our country! those police officers used excessive force for sure. i do wonder why the good pastor had the video camera handy though.
  • TodoInTX · 7 months ago
    Why do you own a digital camera or have a camer on your cell-phone? Same reason, just nice to have and damned convenient. It just became essential in this case to backup his side of the story.
  • Billy · 7 months ago
    This guy has numerous videos where he goes from checkpoint to checkpoint and tries to engage in 'pissing contests' with law enforecement... he deserves a few more 'rides' on the 'lightning'...
  • GOD · 7 months ago
    well his camera only started after he asked him to get out of the car and the security camera only after he was dragged out, i mean come on it sounds fishy he would show the very start of it, and he was a suspected to be carring illigal substance which gives the police the right to check his car, he could be smuggling things over the border, all u anti police guys are just as bad as commi's
  • TheGirl · 7 months ago
    You're fucking retarded. If they REALLY had probable cause to search his car they wouldn't have resisted bringing the dogs back out. They had NO reason to think there was anything illegal in his car.
  • armorlt · 7 months ago
    You don’t need P.C to ask someone to search the vehicle, you only need reasonable suspicion, if they said a dog hit on his car then that was the P.C they needed (if it was true or not). America needs to wake up? Give me a break, most Americans are screaming to secure our borders from illegal’s and when the Border Patrol tries to step it up, you have ass holes like this guy just making waves for the hell of it. If you know that there was something done wrong, then do what they say and when nothing is found file a complaint. What the hell did he prove by staying in the car?
  • Whoever · 7 months ago
    The dog gave them probable cause - they don't have to explain to people how the dog is trained to react to detecting something, whether they made it up or not.

    Having a hostile, non-cooperative person sitting in the drivers seat, with the keys, with probable cause to search the vehicle while you wait for a warrant, which you don't need at that point, doesn't make any sense.

    The law is on the cops side and he's clearly lying about the extent of his "beatings".
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    Using that logic police could search anything for any reason and just say, "The dog said so." This man was not hostile, he was just standing up for himself and didn't break a single law. The police didn't like that they were being told what was the law and beat him up to show him who's boss. It's sickening. And I'd love to see how you can lie about an event while the camera's are rolling taping every second of it.
  • John Webster · 7 months ago
    I hope this guy sues, and the officers involved go to jail!!! This is rediculous!! What an obvious violation of this man's rights and freedoms. Things like this happen way too often to people who are afraid to speek out. You should never feel like you're a prisoner in your own country.
  • Travis Young · 7 months ago
    Those cops should be fired!! Blatant abuse of power. I hate cops like that! They are not above us at all! Their job is to keep peace... not create violence! They are assholes who don't deserve the badge, much less any respect. They are pieces of shit.
  • Just Some Guy · 7 months ago
    As a law enforcement officer, I can tell you this. If I ask a person to step out of their vehicle, I need a reason. If they refuse, guess what, it is not resisting arrest. The driver in no way had any legal reason to step out of his vehicle. In fact, an exterior serach by a K-9 is not legally sufficient to place a person under arrest (as the police officer said he was doing). Anotherlittle tid-bit of information, the reason a walk-by of a closed vehicle is not sufficient is becuase the owner of the vehicle must be present and agree to the search. The fourth amendment is the fourth amendments. Does not matter if a person or a K-9 is doing the search. Don't like the law, change it. Until then, when I am asked to step out of my vehicle, it is a polite NO. If I am told I am under arrest for no apparent reason, not a problem; I will be released within the hour and you will lose your job when I am done with your CO.
  • alex · 7 months ago
    The police could have gotten a warrant to go into his vehicle if he was truly sitting out there for hours.. they used the dog alert just to bypass the mans rights. Then tazing the man is just pain rediculous.
    Cops being paid to do this in our country is a huge waste of money. I still see migrant workers in our fields and processing plants every year. I can also get any drug at any hour of the day or night within twenty minutes of any city. Guess we need a job for retards who want to act tough.
  • Mark Pouliot · 7 months ago
    I agree with the general consensus. This guy was trying to make a problem worse. He was challenging authorities who are put in place to execute security responsibilities. He is wrong in every aspect of how he conducted himself and deserved the excessive force which I dont consider excessive under the circumstances.
    Its simple people, when an officer of the law is instructing you to get out of your vehicle, you listen and complain later if there is a problem.
  • BrandonG · 7 months ago
    First of all, the guy had every right to question authority. That's the problem with "citizens" today; everyone just stands by and lets the "authorities" do as they please. What's the point of being an American if we can't stand up for ourselves. In my opinion, our country is in its current state because there are WAY too few that stand up for themselves. Stop being a pussy and be a damn American and maybe we can accomplish something!
  • DrStoooopid · 7 months ago
    You'll also want to inform them that you're complying under protest and duress, and that you will file a complaint.
  • GregHouse · 7 months ago
    im familiar with thedogs that law enforcement uses. you know what they do when they detect something? they sit untill their handler pats them which can be under a second.

    Mr. Pastor dude shouldve just let them search his car and he would've been gone in an hour.

    he did have the right to say no and the cops shouldve brought the dog out again to prove it but the pastor delt with overbearing cops in an extremely stupid way
  • Russ · 7 months ago
    Well the police had to search the vehicle after he gave them probable cause. They tried to use the dog just to fill in the legal bureaucracy b.s and then went about there business.
    Everything was fine up until one key moment, and this is very key:
    They committed police brutality. This is common beyond belief. I have suffered from it myself. Someone phoned in a lie about me to the police which they had to take seriously and they broke into my house under the assumption I was armed and dangerous (not true) and proceeded to beat me.
    When police officers let the adrenaline of the situation make them lose control and turn into vicious monsters we are all possible victims. I didn't do anything in my situation to warrent what happened to me, and this preacher pretty much just put the system to the test to see how it works out. He did nothing to pose a violent threat visibly so why was he tased? Why didn't someone have the common sense to realize there was broken glass there and they would need to proceed extra careful with the arrest?
    Why?
    Because they don't care. They enjoyed torturing him. Trust me, I know. They live in a life where every day they spend the entire day with the scum of our society and so once in a while they cross paths with a regular joe and mistake us for scum. But at the root of it all this is how they treat people!
    I'm a white guy, I look pretty much the same as the preacher. I have no criminal record, hell I used to work in childcare and when I was younger security. I was always on the right side of the law.
    So if I can get tortured because someone who hated me went to a public phone and made a bunch of false claims about me then it can happen to any of you as well.
    I think this video is important because it totally shows the truth. It's like treating people in this way is standard procedure now in North America.
    Ask yourself if that's fare to those falsely arrested who haven't had a chance to be proven innocent.
    And just so you know, no charges were laid against me. The police swept the whole thing under the rug as an invisible mistake.
    I bet they try the same thing with the pastor.
    I hope he doesn't allow it. If I had my incident on film I promise you those officers would have lost their jobs and been charged.
    I will never forget their names...
  • Russ · 7 months ago
    sorry this reply is in the wrong spot, I reposted it below..
  • blamethe east · 7 months ago
    Yes , blame the east and maybe the Mexicans to, why not Canadians, all of them are the reasons we (Team USA) are a bunch of idiots.

    Lets sue them fuckers, Why not finishing fucking the economy once and for all.

    VENDETTA!!!
  • erdokets · 7 months ago
    are you retarded? did your parents drop you on your head when you were a child? that is the dumbest thing i have ever heard in my entire life.
  • bb · 7 months ago
    honestly, if i had to guess, Id almost say he planned this from the beginning. He has a camera, he knew about the border patrol. All he had to do was open his trunk, and show them the tools and move on. Instead he sits there for an hour and wont get out. Of course they are going to suspect him at that point, and of course they are going to pull him out of the car. I doubt very much the border patrol would be very useful if you could just say, oh... I dont want to be searched today, thanks... I think he knew this would happen, and planned on it happening for some publicity, and a lawsuit
  • James · 7 months ago
    I liked your comment although I think you crossed the line when you said:

    "of course they are going to pull him out of the car." ... it's part of their job to respect the rights of citizens.

    They might have to be efficient to do their job, but they need to have something RIGHT, like a faster warranting system on the boarder... not a free pass to violate rights.
  • TheGirl · 7 months ago
    Oh, yeah. He "must" have planned it. You're logic is retarded. If you really believe that then half the the major Youtubers must have planned the explosion in Canada last summer... seeing as how they all had their cameras.

    You're a serious douche.
  • ilikepie · 7 months ago
    Poor communication and co-operation on both sides
  • Jon F · 7 months ago
    Bunch of ass holes simple as
  • Sara · 7 months ago
    why didnt he just answer the flipping questions? why was he being so defensive? its BORDER PATROL they are doing their job, did he think he could just drive on through border patrol?? he should have cooperated. I've been through border patrol from mexico/texas many times and all they do is ask a few simple questions, ask to see your license, ask whose in the car and THATS IT.

    im not saying he deserved any of this but he shouldve just freaking cooperated.
  • David · 7 months ago
    thats true Sarah but he and the right not too get out of the car with out cause which they couldn't duplicate. he could win millions in court if he sues the state... its all on tape and now all over the internet
  • doesnt matter · 7 months ago
    no he doesnt have the right to just not answer questions. what kind of dumb ass statement is that. ITS BORDER CONTROL you answer fucking questions but i guess u want them to just let who ever wants to come into our fukcing country to come in. r u retarded
  • Dudewtf · 7 months ago
    He does indeed have the right to not answer their questions. They (the officers) said that themselves in the trailer.
    "You have the right to remain silent."
    I think you're the retarded one, sorry.
  • IdleRevolutionary · 7 months ago
    First, it should be mentioned that it *wasn't* a border crossing. It was an interior border checkpoint 50 miles from the border crossing. This has nothing to do with securing the border.

    You show your obvious lack of knowledge regarding the United States constitution here as well. The Fourth Amendment of the United States constitution bars the executive authorities from searching your personal property without proper cause displayed by a judge-issued warrant. The Fifth -- The right to not self-incriminate, commonly referred to as the right to remain silent.

    So let's review:

    1) Not a border crossing; nothing to do with securing the US border.
    2) Fifth Amendment says he doesn't have to answer to ANYONE before seeing a judge-issued warrant.
    3) Fourth Amendment says they had no right to search his private property without probable cause. Because *nothing* was found in the man's car, I think we can be pretty certain that any probable cause they tried to come up with is bunk.

    Your entire argument crumbles. But you're a good American citizen, sir -- obedient and stupid.
  • v8harry · 7 months ago
    I bet you'd have received Your tazering about half way through your second paragraph if you'd said that to the officers too.
  • Travis · 7 months ago
    That's fine.. I would be the one who gets the last laugh, and would be smiling all the way to the bank.

    Police officers have WAY too much power granted to them, and some, like these douche bags, abuse that power at will. We have specific rights in place, to protect us from these types of attrocities.

    Pull that type of shit down here in the south, and those cops would end up in a swamp, tied to a stump, one by one. Eye for an eye..
  • Till · 7 months ago
    Wow that's complete bullshit notice how the names of the officer's are mexican. They want their revenge ver not getting free geen cards.
  • Tim G. · 7 months ago
    Don't be an idiot, that's not even close to the point nor does it make any sense. Why would they need a green card if they're already police officers?
  • Brian · 7 months ago
    arguably it would have been easier for him to complie and let the cops search his trunk. it also would have been just as easy for the cops to complie and bring the dog back.

    It's obvious the cops were just lieing so they could flex their "authoritative muscle"
  • Corey · 7 months ago
    Umm well i see what your saying that " he shoudl ve freaking cooperated" but at the same time this pastor is one of the few people in the US who are not afraid to demand their rights. Unlike many citizens who simply "obey" anything an officer says he demanded a warrant for his car to be searched. But I believe that legally an officer does not need a warrant to search a car because it is a movable crime scene. He simply needs reasonable suspicion and good faith, meaning he believes a crime is being committed. But these officers did not need to use this much force, granted he seemed very annoying at the time, but you do not become a peace officer in order to have people obey you, you become one in order to help protect peoples rights and stop crimes and enforce laws, o and crimes WHEN THEY ARE ACTUALLY HAPPENING. I can guarantee you that if those officers did not have a taser we would have one less pastor today. The Land of the Free? not necessarily.
  • d-mikey · 7 months ago
    being movable doesn't matter. your home can be searched on similar reasonable suspicion. This is just an 'authority' that the law enforcement branch has given its self.
  • esther · 7 months ago
    omg. creepy music!!! when it shows the border patrol surveillance footage
  • Kate · 7 months ago
    Wow those cops r doshes that poor man :,(
  • EQ · 7 months ago
    Sara needs to watch the videos with her eyes open this time. Then go read the Bill of Rights. This guy got a BIG TIME BAD RAP by officers who are supposed to protect us. They need to be handed the pink slip, and brought up on charges.
  • YooJay · 7 months ago
    They were doing there job. They try to limit illegal immigrants from coming into this country. All he had to do is say go ahead. What did he have to hide? It would have only taken 5 mins to search the car. He is just one of those stupid people who always question authority.
  • Civil Libertarian · 7 months ago
    And you're one of those idiots that always obeys authority. Your logic is on the same level as "Well if youre not a criminal, you have nothing to hide. here, let me TRAMPLE ALL OVER YOUR RIGHTS ANYWAY".

    Maybe you should read the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Habeas Corpus, Posse Comitatus, and the Magna Carta before spewing stupid totalitarian dogma.
  • smart liberal · 7 months ago
    i completely agree. and being a 'stupid person who questions authority' is actually, sadly, something that just goes along with how law enforcement works. you can never trust anyone nowadays, including the authorities. the DPS, "im ordering you out of the car....obey me" is just another way to say "YOU ARE WORTH NOTHING AND I RULE YOU". its like saying he cant be himself, he has to be a dummy for the cops.

    law enforcement has become sooo egotistical its ridiculous. it really dissapoints me to see stuff like this happening...to anyone....
  • Bobbo · 7 months ago
    Yeah, have you noticed that everyone is afraid of these so-called "protectors" of ours? It's just plain crap. Why is it they abuse their power? They were bullied in school, and now they take it out on everyone else.
  • Rachel · 7 months ago
    Listen Pastor Dumbass, seriously? I have been through border patrols on both mexico to cali and new york to canada. They ask questions, its their job. Sometimes they are a dicks, but duh! He is an idiot, its his own fault Obviously they got a little trigger happy. This is happening because of all these drugs that are coming up from Mexico. Stupid Baptists, acting like idiots and then blaming others for the poor result.
  • Jim · 7 months ago
    I've been thru the border more times than can I count and one thing that always rings true is the petty pisspot attitudes of the BP officers.

    It's as if they hate their job and then take their frustration out on whomever gets under their hide. From the initial video the Pastor is just the ticket for a large can of Whupass to be opened. IMHO Smartass versus Smartass.

    A comedian once said "They were rough guys and I didn't know how many it was gonna take to kick my ass but I knew how many they sent"

    Let us all pray for the Pastor to get a clue real soon. And may the officers lose the desire to tenderize some ones head as a solution to stupidity.

    In San Jose, CA where I live there are many people being hit with resisting arrest and hindering an officer in the line of duty etc, The gotchas on one of the cases: the defendants were charged yet the Cops didn't identify themselves and 2d they were at the wrong address. The raid took place at 1am, And in addition, guns were drawn on children and an elderly grandmother. Oops
  • youbugginxd · 7 months ago
    wow u so stupid this happened more than 100miles away from the border of mexico and blaming the mexican is the worst u can say even thought drugs arent the only place the come from they are made here by ur own pplz dumbass plus he has the right not to answer any question and did u c the vidoe where they call him a terrorist!. and laugh at him when saying that he already went through a check point...
    ps he will be more of a partiot for defending the constituion then someone who is taking away his rights. and ur also being a racist agianst pastors.
  • TheGirl · 7 months ago
    Rachel, I'm getting the idea that you're not a terribly bright indevidual. So let me spell this out for you... IT WASN'T ON THE BORDER, IT WAS WITHIN THE COUNTRY AT A CHECKPOINT. Get it through your head, sweety, not a drug thing.
  • jdaemon · 7 months ago
    The pastor antagonised the border officers on multiple occasions. It then became a matter for the police whom he then proceeded to antagonise.

    These check points are obviously in place to protect the public and integrity of the border.

    Not a smart guy...
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    The patriot act, and warrentless wire taps are also there to "protect us", that doesn't make them right. Not to mention checkpoints well inside of nation borders are unconstitutional as hell.
  • mathew · 7 months ago
    he showed signs that he might hurt any one so no force should have been shown and he was cooperating to the extant that he believed was lawful becuz he was still there and talking to them so they had no reason to think he was going to run it was the police officers job to show reason and if the dog was such evidence it should have been produced i have see all to many dirty cops to be on there side for this one tho there are good ones out there protect and serve in the pursuit of safety freedom should never be lost or the we have tyranny
  • EvilBanana · 7 months ago
    OMG! what an idiot !!!
    if you got nothing to hid , just let them search !

    But no he will sit in his car for 1 hour and piss everyone and then get tased - what was he thinking will happen !!

    And plus in boarder you have to let them to search your car , and he said he was un-
    suspiciously , dude you refused to search your car - hows that not suspiciously ??

    They just did there job, and you was a dickhead!

    Damn.. this guys is a moron!
  • Dudewtf · 7 months ago
    You litterely make me sad.
    If I was a cop and told you to bend over if you didn't have drugs on you, would you?
  • Dan R · 7 months ago
    Yes.

    The ass is obstinate, the man is obedient.
  • Fletch · 7 months ago
    I submit another vote for the "Assholes all around" award. The border patrol cops need a course in conflict management, and a testosterone inhibitor. The asshole pastor needs to remember that these guys are charged with protecting US citizens from shit coming across the border. Did this guy have drugs in his trunk? a dead body? Plutonium? How the hell are they supposed to know unless they search? And the pastor is just another asshole American who thinks that he has infinite "rights" and NO responsibilities. This sort of thing could NEVER happen in Canada.... unless of course the guy came at them with a stapler... ...
  • IdleRevolutionary · 7 months ago
    Your mistake here is that he wasn't crossing the border. The "internal border checkpoint" that he crossed through was well over 50 miles from the border crossing. These checkpoints are commonly known to be for spreading executive power further than necessary, and spreading executive power for its own sake. I'm sure you don't want this country to become a Soviet-like police state any more than I do, so next time do your homework before commenting publicly.
  • youbugginxd · 7 months ago
    Wow is wrong with u guys they beat him up for no reason even thought he al;ready went through the first check point and he is tired and wants to go home cuase he just came from a job. plus they had no right to search his car. even though they said they did he did ask them to bring the dog around and check agian..... OH Yea well some of maybe right that he just should of gotten out of the car and let them search his car. But still he did have a right to use his 4rth amendment
    which stated that u have the right to refuse a search of private property with out a search warnent.



    oh yea also he had the camera with him becuase he travels alot and always carries a camera plus this wasnt the first time they tried to do this to him.
    note. there are more vids about this they also called him a terrorist for using his rights
    also note that he didnt resist and they mocked him right after he was hurt.



    yea i noe u are all like wow wast of time why didn't he just get out of his car and let them check and they were just doing there "job"

    they blamed and acuse wiith out reason the other dhs officer also asked them to bring the dog out to check agian cuase they said the dog warned them theat he had contraband and or human being in his car


    ps after they brutally beat him up guess what they didnt find anything. and throught out the whole thing he did not say he was a pastor.


    its a did he or did he not do the right thing question well i think both but u should all note he was more right then the border patrol
    anyways hes gunna win the case no matter what no matter what u all think
  • Owen · 7 months ago
    Refusal to answer questions is not illegal in america or in england, refusal to be searched also isnt illegal in america or england.
    If an officer wishes to "force" you do be searched or enter questioning he must arrest you and/or gain a search warrent.
    If he is to arrest you he must be able to prove in a court of law that he had reasons that if found not adequate the case will be thrown out regardless of what was found during the search as the search is declared illegal.
    Warrents can be issued for random stop searches but these officers superiors would have to be able to produce such a warrent if the officers were challenged.

    This guy acts stubborn but if you see your rights slowly drifting into horse poo then you have to start taking a stand somewhere, I'd say an internal check is a good place to start.

    Since 9/11 we have seen in england and america laws passed that undermine our fundamental laws (american constitution and british common law) and police taking action that seems "necessary" for a while but under scrutiny is flawed and illegal.

    At some point we all have to draw the line but there are ways and hows that are less likely to see your ass smacked by a policeman.
  • aimee · 7 months ago
    im not a fan of christianity or anything to do with god i actualy dispise it but wat has happend hear is so fucked up its just out of controll... u are a very lucky man to have goten this on vid.. u may be a pastor but bye no means did u deserve that torture. im sorry if im guna get on some bad peoples sides wen i say this but im glad i dont live in america with crook cops and all thie violence u guys get proud to b an auzzy... gd luck with ur court case on friday sir... goodluck
  • Rafael · 7 months ago
    Buhhaaaaaaaaaaaaa I got tazored.
  • wesley · 7 months ago
    the cops were wrong in some areas like beating him when he was motionless but this guy could have easily opened his door stepped out and opened his trunk and said "look its tools" but a even better idea was to answer the first set of questions... just because your a pastor it doesn't put you above the law. so there was some mistakes on both sides but i believe the pastor was in the wrong for not cooperating
    then the police were in the wrong for beating him repeatedly
  • Leigh Ross · 7 months ago
    Yeah he should have co operated with the police and just done what they told him.. Just like in Russia. Oh wait this was in America.
    Go read the Contitution and Bill of Rights and figure out which one of your liberties you dont mind giving up.
  • bs · 7 months ago
    dude that shit you should sue them
  • antieverything · 7 months ago
    I think every man of the cloth should be beaten like this.
  • Return · 7 months ago
    The 4th amendment rights are necessary for the resisting of police corruption. the Pastor's situation is a great example of the dichotomy of "what is best" and "what is fair."

    In the officers' line of work, it is necessary to hire forceful individuals with a bit of a**hole in them. The aggressive initial questioning is important to catch the 2 out of 1000 people who are truly dangerous that cross borders. It is best that we have suspicious and aggressively interrogative officers.

    As citizens of the U.S. it is important for us to understand that we are an integral part to lend a helping hand in aiding officials above and beyond legal obligations to weed out the truly dangerous and corrupt.

    The pastor exercised his rights correctly in legal boundaries, but for all of the wrong reasons.

    This police brutality looks like it came from a batch of terribly trained and mentally complexed individuals. What started as suspicion wrongfully became a bloody statement of power by a**holes. All in all, it shows a need for improvement in government hiring / training and in OUR own personal responsibility (legal or not) of aiding in national safety.
  • kendon81 · 7 months ago
    you got tasered because you were been a smart ass and pissing off the cops, if you had nothing to hid you should have gotten out and co-operated with them (you have to remember cops are like a 3 year old and will throw a tantrum and kick your ass when they dont get their way and like a 3 year old you cant hit them or tell them to shut the fuck and piss thats life deal with it), it would have taken just a few moments and you wouldn't have ended up looking like a douche, they did use excessive force but then again you were acting like a douche
  • TheGirl · 7 months ago
    That's great logic... if you're in RUSSIA.
  • jay · 7 months ago
    You have no rights at a border station so all of you all saying he was exercising his rights are wrong, the supreme court of the US said that border stations are constitutional free zones meaning they can search your car with or without cause.
  • Kinkade · 7 months ago
    This is the same man, I believe, who was beaten and tazed at another checkpoint just a few months ago.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFS7oZtE8Ks
  • brandikinz · 7 months ago
    I think you're correct o.o;;; The pitch, tones and inflections sound identical. It seems as though this man just went around setting up these situations. Granted, it is within his rights to not let them search his vehicle with no warrent n' such, it still seems like he's just provoking people to get a rise. I wonder if he's doing it for money. With the video from April he's likely to get some sort of monetary settlement :( The whole situation is rather messed up.
  • Raptureman07 · 7 months ago
    It's gods will!!
  • Butch2112 · 7 months ago
    OK so your a tool, Not a problem but you ran into bigger tools. Just because your a minister you don't deserve any special attention or consideration. Just like a cop thinks they are owed something because they are cops. Bottom line do as they say and file a complaint later. Don't mess with them on there turf or you will lose period! But thank you for showing us as a minister that you feel you are above the law. Now go and cry to the media and get your 15 min of fame when if you had given them 2 min answered the questions got out of the car done as you were told and been on your way. But then nobody's paying attention to you that way are they.
  • EndlessSporadic · 7 months ago
    I love how all the police officers are fat.

    According to law, police officers have to provide a reason why you are being under arrest according to the fifth amendment (?) of due process. Police officers are not allowed to arrest someone because a police officer was not being listened to. If you are stopped and are told you are under arrest and they will not provide a reason, it is 100% legal to drive away. You do not have to talk to a police officer if there is no reason for them being there.

    Not only did those police officers use excessive force, they violated the 5th amendment of the U.S. constitution. In my opinion, all of them should be fired, fined, and sent to jail for a few weeks.
  • Adam Boyle · 7 months ago
    It doesn't matter whether it was morally right or not, the laws are the laws and until they're changed the police broke them and should be sued, no opinion necessary, just solid fact.
  • LO73K1 · 7 months ago
    What law did the police break? For a vehicle you don’t need a warrant. When you defy police at a border checkpoint by locking yourself in your car and mouth off for an hour, you have created probable cause and a heightened alert for officer safety. Everyone and their grandma knows when approaching border checkpoints that you are subject to a vehicle search, so the pastors actions are instantly considered out of the ordinary.
  • Jailhouse attorney · 7 months ago
    Here is what the 4th amendment says:

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    The pastor has a right to refuse based on what is written above. Now lets take a look at case law.

    April 21, 2009 - The Supreme Court ruled that police couldn't search the car of a person arrested unless the officer's safety was threatened or there was reason to think the car contained evidence of a crime, reviving a constitutional protection against unreasonable searches.

    As far as the citizen is concerned, that level was never reached. Arizona DPS will be sued and they will lose.
  • min54teresa · 7 months ago
    I appreciate your input.

    However in this day and age, I will go out of my way to cooperate with those hired to protect all the citizens in these United States of America and not worry about my rights.

    Also, I'd probably shoot first and ask questions later ,.... but I seen one too many programs on TV about ministers who murder, torture, rape..... The average Joe blow ending up being the one who blew a cork and used an assault rifle .... handymen in state parks kidnapping, rapping, beheading ....and people foqcing with the system based on their 'rights'.

    What happened to keeping one's nose clean? Ah, guess I'm just an old hippy turned Republican.

    Peace, love, & no more tax increases. :)
  • LO73K1 · 7 months ago
    For a vehicle you don't need a warrant. When you defy police at a border checkpoint by locking yourself in your car and mouth off for an hour, you have created probable cause and a heightened alert for officer safety. Everyone and their grandma knows when approaching border checkpoints that you are subject to a vehicle search, so the pastors actions are instantly considered out of the ordinary.
  • stuff · 7 months ago
    remind anyone else of harold and kumar go to white castle?
  • mick · 7 months ago
    wow, those cops are fucking fucked up. fuck that shit the cops had no reason to do that. the pastor is in the right here, he had have every right to do what he did. andf the police had no right whatsoever to do whAT they did to this man. THE POLICE ARNT SHIT BUT A BUNCH OF PAHETIC FAT LOSERS THAT THINK THEY HAVE POWER. FUCK THE POLICE!!!!!!! THEY DESERVE TO GET TAZED AND BEAT ASWELLL
  • Ali · 7 months ago
    I'm sorry, but I don't feel sorry for this guy. I know the 4th amendment exists for a reason but come on. Wouldn't it have been a hell of a lot easier for him to just answer their damn questions and be on his way? You'd think with 5 kids (yes 5, I looked him up) he'd learn to pick his battles. If he would have just answered the questions in the first place, his face wouldn't be mangled and he wouldn't be in this mess he's in. Now if he'd answered the questions and THEN they got rough with him, that'd be a different story.
  • Ali · 7 months ago
    and let me clarify in that I do think the DPS and other officers got too rough. But at the same time, he was kind of asking for some small hassle from them. Not necessarily to be tazed and beaten, but something was bound to happen there. It shouldn't have happened like THAT, but I don't feel sorry for him. *shrug*
  • Anonymous · 7 months ago
    if a police officer can beat you like that, shouldnt you have a right to self-defense?
  • alex · 7 months ago
    If he did anything else he probably would have been shot. I mean come on he had no weapon on him and they tased him multiple times. They could not just break the window and open the door. They had to break multiple windows then tazer him. Drag his face over every piece of glass then taz some more and grind his face in the pavement. To a non violent pastor who is exercising his rights. Real men out there on the boader patrol. Real brave men.
  • tommy · 7 months ago
    wow your stupid why wouldnt you listen to them they wernt gonna let you go and you knew it so just let them search it lololol
  • jabob · 7 months ago
    even if he did set it up, it was a gross mishandling of our rights as american citizens. am i to understand there were no drugs or bodies hidden in his car? if this is so then there was no crime and he had the right not to submit until they had a warrant showing probable cause.
  • LO73K1 · 7 months ago
    For vehicles, you don't need a warrant to search, you just need probable cause. When you tell an officer you won't step out of your car, you are creating reasonable suspicion. When a police dog alerts, you now have probable cause. Even without the dog, police have the right, with reasonable suspicion, to search driver wingspan of interior of vehicle. By locking youself in car and defying police, they have reason to believe you are dangerous and may have weapon in car, and will take every step to ensure their safety, such as tazing you while breaching car to make sure you don't grap a gun while you are trying to be detained.
  • Sean · 7 months ago
    He was being a pain in the ass....should of co-operated...but the punishment does NOT fit the crime here AT ALL!
  • Eunhae · 7 months ago
    So much for protect and serve....
  • Kevin · 7 months ago
    Everyone keeps referencing our rights as citizens. Read Miranda v. Arizona. Thats where the Miranda Rights come from. There is a difference between complying with the requests of an officer of the law who is executing his civic duty and rolling over and letting the government control you.

    We have several rights, named withing the Bill of Rights and implied through various supreme court decisions. On the same page, our continued existence is an implied consent to abide by the laws of the nation, state, and civil region in which we live. We are always free to leave or to attempt to change the system through the legal channels.

    An act of rebellion, in any form, will often stray outside what is legal. (Notice I didnt say "right") As such, you are still subject to the laws which you are rebelling against.

    In the above situation, which is made interesting because the video begins while the pastor is being adressed by a senior officer (count the stripes on his sleeve) meaning he had already exchanged words with other officers. We cannot even begin to hazard an educated assertion that the force used was unnecessary without understanding what transpired before-hand.

    Do I believe this will end the debate? No. People, in general, do not apply logic to such arguments. Therefore this is not an intellectual debate, but instead a shouting match. With that I offer the following opinion.

    Should anyone be bloodied in the process of what amounts to a traffic stop? No.

    Are the police given free reign to abuse and assault whomever they see fit? No.

    Should we, as citizens, comply with the reasonable requests made of us by officers of the law? Yes. The law itself will bear out our alleged guilt or innocence.

    Now, back to your pissing match.
  • q-volez · 7 months ago
    ha its all big bull shit lets start by this retard sorry to the mentally challenged people but this lame east guy you are a serious pendejo dont ask why you was shit that way may b the doc drop yo ass for being so ugly n the inside fuck he knew your ass as soon as yo mama shittet u out no 1 has the right to beat you up he did what was right but some law enforcemet assholes get their pantties in a buch cus you play your cards right poor poor way of doing their job we pay for and for the welfare of blamthe the east too this are the people who shoul lose their jobs instead of other persons may b thats why terrorist do their shit on america or (team usa) because the pendejos go and look and act tough on poor people like this and laugh and say i think you is a terrorist with a smile while our trade cernter gets hit cuz fucking team usa has not capture the bitch who plotted the shit yet team usalooks some where else cuz may b team usa was one of the terrorist team america hides and throws curve balls as long as they dont get cought open you eyes people we had some shit to do with it buy we i mean team usa and lame ass east too i salute u with my middle finger its always easy 2 blame some 1 else just like its dps foult pendejos you made the stop take care of it so if you see a person with a bomb well i told the dps stupid do your job and do it right if not get the fk out and let some other person who knows better now your stupid ass i hope gettin fired and go to jail if not i would like for you to invite me to your house ill buy dinner and invite blamthe the east i hate people lke u the usa is made of different races the real 1s are the indians all others are like you wanna bss now ass for mexicans read history it belong 2 mexico canadians can walk over 2 not ride in boats and bull shit my way over this lands plz get some edgeumacation estupid poor excuse of american i am sorry for the rest who arent like this piece of cacaaaa. as 4 the pastor turn you cheek and pray 4 this people to loose their job and get feed to real terrorist see if they smile the same way hope team usa put better players out there to do the job right now if a pastor get beat up like that imagine what they do to regular joe's or jose's GOD REALLY BLESS TEAM USA THEY NEED IT & THE LAME EAST RETARD. god loves every one no matter how much you belive in him or not its his mission to help you under stand not to be evil like me i still need help but others more the team usa is catching up 2 me see i put others in front of me2 iam just bull shiting but on a real not FUCK YOU EAST FROM A MXCAN&MY CANADIANFRIEND. peace biatchhh
  • kittymom62 · 7 months ago
    Where in the fuck did you get your education or should I say "lack of education"??? Your response was atrocious. Didn't make a lick of sense. I suggest you go back to school and learn how to spell and use proper grammar. People like you is what is wrong with this country....lack of education and no common sense.
  • LO73K1 · 7 months ago
    What the hell are you talking about? SPEAK ENGLISH MUTHA FUCKA!!!
  • hellspring · 7 months ago
    cops are people who break laws in uniform and have no one to challenge their authority
  • P.O.I.N.T.Y · 7 months ago
    Yah, i just think all Americans are dumb.
  • Swift · 7 months ago
    You do realize that he was travelling in the US and never crossed the border. These are border patrol areas miles into the US. I can understand this at the border but not when we travel from state to state.
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    Okay first of all Im not black but I grew up in a black neighborhood. Ive seen so many police officers harrass and abuse my family, friends, neighbors, and even me. I can tell u this Im a freakin expert when it comes to abuse and this was not it. This guy goes around harassing people of law as if they arent human and dont have feeling or bad days. He totally desevered this. I showed this to some of my co workers and they thought this was so funny like me.

    Holy crap he got hit by 3 tasers. Thats a lie most people, especially his size, couldnt handle that and would black out and/or die. Also cops wouldnt use that much force on one suspect

    I USE TO WORK IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TRUST ME HAD THIS HAD HAPPEN TO PEOPLE THE PEOPLE IN MY DISTRICT. WE WOULD HAVE BITCH SLAPPED HIM AROUND AFTER WE TASED HIM.
  • MICHEAL DAYTON · 7 months ago
    I was on the Police force for 4yrs in the Army and I was on the regular Police force for 6.5yrs. Ive been tased and maced several times. I didnt cry at all. I dont consider myself to be a tuff guy but I do realise how hard it is to be cop while some guy is trying to give u a hard time at the end of your shift. That is a tuff job being and cop and for someone to jerk u around like that it really wears down on u.

    I hope they slapped him around for a little bit.
  • alex · 7 months ago
    What was so hard about that stop. They found nothing on him. The K9 unit lied just to get around his rights cause at that point they was going to get in that car just to prove to him they can. Whats so hard about doing the walk with the dog then sending him on his way. I mean come on those cops keep drugs out of my city and all migrant workers out of the US right.
    You can tell all that about how they treated the man after entering his vehicle. If anything I would classifiy them as terrorist. They are trying to ingrain fear into that man to comply in the future or this will happen.
    Stand up for your rights. Many good men and woman have died so we do not have to take this in our own county.
  • Trevor · 7 months ago
    This could have all been avoided had he not been an asshole and just let the Border Patrol search the car. You can cry Amendment 4 all you want, but if they have probable cause, the Patriot Act takes over.

    Basically: If you want to be a smart aleck, at least have a good understanding of the law.
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    The Patriot Act is the most unconstitutional piece of legislation to have ever been passed. Did you know, according to it, your house can be searched without a warrant, while you aren't home? Besides the Constitution is THE supreme law of the land. NOTHING can overrule it in a court of law, NOTHING.
  • JIMMY · 7 months ago
    these people are assholes
    the guys is dumb for not getting out of his car but they really beat the shit out of him.
  • roflcopter · 7 months ago
    hey, now I admit it would have been easier if he just got out of the car, but also, he shouldnt let them push him around. Also, I havent read through all the comments so im sorry if I'm repeating someone elses comment when I say, if they are willing to break his window and tase the poor man, why didnt they break open his trunk and check, I mean jeez they did it anyway....AFTER THE BRUTALY HURT HIM. no such force was needed. this is just my opinion, sorry if you dont agree
  • Scott · 7 months ago
    OMG, here we go with all the "defy authority idiots". He was at a border checkpoint. The K-9 alerted, which gives the officers the right to search. Had the pastor complied...he would've been out of there in 15 minutes (provided he wasn't transporting drugs). Oh, and if you don't think people of the cloth can be criminals too, go talk to the kiddie touching Catholic Priests and all their victims. Criminals have more fucking rights than the cops these days and it's nice when people fail to cooperate and get educated. Sure there are officers out there who abuse their power, and there are ways to deal with them. The pastor was given plenty of opportunity to comply, he failed to follow verbal direction, therefore he was arrested. Take your medicine and quit whining.
  • min54teresa · 7 months ago
    Amen & pass the chardonnay son!
  • alex · 7 months ago
    Cops had nothing on him and the man was using his rights responsibly. Police should have let him go on his way, but they lied and abused thier power to beat a man. Those police men should be fired and sued. Nothing in that video was police doing thier job period.
  • min54teresa · 7 months ago
    Alex, did you get a little gold star for every chore you did right even if it wasn't done correctly?

    Did you get a trophy for being a goalie in soccer even if you let the loosing ball roll between your legs?

    Alex, life aint fair little guy & it will serve you well to take responsibility ,...repeat ....to take responsibility for how you get into situations good or bad, and don't blame others if you get the same treatment as criminals if you refuse to cooperate with the law.

    OK, big guy....time for you to log off and get a good night's rest. The tooth fairy will be in to tuck you in later.

    And just as general advice sweetie, when you see a pile of dog shit, don't step in it. Hope you're feeling better soon.

    May the Lord be with your stupid ass.
  • alex · 7 months ago
    Wish i was a kid again. Not sure how to read your post. I am ex military and served my country as well as 90% of my family has. My dad was ex military and police officer. Those police men where very unprofessional. The K-9 unit that had the false positive ya a lie so they can go around the mans rights and then beat him because they are having to deal with an american who is exercising his rights. One right that some in my family has gone to war and fought so we could not be terrorized in our own country.
  • James · 7 months ago
    Why didn't he just let them search the car? This guy was begging for media attention. Why would he jump to the cameras and start fucking with the cops if there was nothing wrong? I don't buy it. He got what he deserved, I think it should end here.
  • Potion · 7 months ago
    Well said Scott
  • bob · 7 months ago
    This guy is a retard, but he did have the right to not allow them to search his car. So in the end all people involved = the douche bag of the year
  • Manny · 7 months ago
    :: yawn :: douche had it coming.
  • huwgo · 7 months ago
    i live in australia so we sdont have fucked up police like in your country so i just found this hilarious. No offense but for pure gratuatous entertainment this vid is the bomb. I loved it most when he scremed like a little bitch. I was tasered during a brawl and its not fun but damn he had time to prepare and he still went down like a whiny bitch. Grow some balls...sing a hymn or something
  • name · 7 months ago
    This is realy quite bad. I dont understand why the dps did this. Im from the uk but still if this happened over here it would have been the police being locked up. This is Terrible these people should be punished.
  • Tim Ellison · 7 months ago
    This pastor is a punk. All he had to do was answer the simple question and he would have been on his way like all the other people that went through that check point.
  • Dan R · 7 months ago
    UK =/= US

    We proved that when we beat your ass 200 years ago.
  • name · 7 months ago
    Not this guy is a fool he shouldnt have resisted.
  • Caity · 7 months ago
    berserkerich: "Ther videos are just showcasing giant douche vs. giant douches"

    I agree! Fighting the cops just for the sake of fighting the cops is retarded and leads to you getting tazed. Do I think that excessive force was used? I guess... but do I have sympathy for the guy? Not at all. If the cops say that the dogs picked up on his vehicle and ask him to step out, then just get out of the damn car, if you don't have shit on you they'll look at your crap search your stuff and leave you the hell alone.

    I've been stopped for less shit than that at border control. It's not worth being a self-righteous douche over.

    Douches vs. Douches indeed.
  • Dolton Jones · 7 months ago
    I would have tased that guy, arrested him, booked him, take him to the doctor to have him cleaned up, and then taken him to the interrogation room where I proceed to tase him, water board him, and bitch slap his sorry ass around the room.

    Afterwards I would have had him up on charges of resisting arrest, falling to obey a police officer, and slowing up traffic.

    POLICE OFFICERS 1 RIGHT WING EVANGLECIAL BIBLE THUMPERS 0.

    I NEEDED THAT LAUGH GREAT VIDEO.
  • Dolton Jones · 7 months ago
    I would have tased that guy, arrested him, booked him, take him to the doctor to have him cleaned up, and then taken him to the interrogation room where I proceed to tase him, water board him, and bitch slap his sorry ass around the room.

    This guy screamed like a litte bitch.
    Afterwards I would have had him up on charges of resisting arrest, falling to obey a police officer, and slowing up traffic.

    POLICE OFFICERS 1 RIGHT WING EVANGLECIAL BIBLE THUMPERS 0.

    I NEEDED THAT LAUGH GREAT VIDEO.

    VA:F [1.3.1_645]
  • Dolton Jones · 7 months ago
    This guy screamed like a little bitch. Ive been tased and maced before and Ive seen women get tased by 2 tasers and they didnt scream like bitch.

    I would have tased that guy, arrested him, booked him, take him to the doctor to have him cleaned up, and then taken him to the interrogation room where I proceed to tase him, water board him, and bitch slap his sorry ass around the room.

    Afterwards I would have had him up on charges of resisting arrest, falling to obey a police officer, and slowing up traffic.

    POLICE OFFICERS 1 RIGHT WING EVANGLECIAL BIBLE THUMPERS 0.

    I NEEDED THAT LAUGH GREAT VIDEO.

    VA:F [1.3.1_645]
  • Dolton Jones · 7 months ago
    I would have tased that guy, arrested him, booked him, take him to the doctor to have him cleaned up, and then taken him to the interrogation room where I proceed to tase him, water board him, and bitch slap his sorry ass around the room.

    Afterwards I would have had him up on charges of resisting arrest, falling to obey a police officer, and slowing up traffic.

    POLICE OFFICERS 1 RIGHT WING EVANGLECIAL BIBLE THUMPERS 0.

    This guy screamed like a little BITCH!

    I NEEDED THAT LAUGH GREAT VIDEO.
  • Ethan · 7 months ago
    and while yur at it why not give our government the right to track us at all times ehh name?
    no this was a terrible thing to do and they had no reason to do it. all you people saying that these officers were rightous in the arrest are full of bullshit. its not like the are guarding a border into the us or anything. it was just a state border, he came from SAn Diego, California and was heading into arrizona. I might have believed this was ok if it was even near the border but it wasnt! this was just a blatent misuse of power. Im with this guy for keeping his rights and not helping turn our democracy into a totalitarian state
  • alex · 7 months ago
    They have tried to bring a tracking device out on the market. Was brought out as a way to track your kids incase of kidnapping. They also was trying to link bank account info, medical info so forth on that chip. Might be able to see some of the propaganda that was spewed out on youtube.com on how great this idea was. I think a few took the chip as all good sheep should.
  • ken · 7 months ago
    The Cops had no right to act the way they did. THE ONLY reason they stopped him is because he fits the profile ( male 25-38 of age ) Many dont know this but if you are a male 25- 38 years old you will have more problems going accrossed boarders. Why you might ask because you fit the profile. THATS THE ONLY REASON. I have been stopped many times and forced to let them search my car, when i have asked why they have replied " because you fit the profile". What they did here was wrong and it will continue. Its the sad trueth. As long as there are drugs and terrorist in the USA this type of thing will happen. Its a sad fact.
  • seriously?? · 7 months ago
    i hope everyone of these cops go to jail i think the old roman law should apply to this. "An eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth" those cops should repent. and have what they did to this poor man unto them. they deserve it. and we all know there going straight to hell for this. no human being should go there this for nothing. its absolutly absurd to damage his car taze him 3 times then beat hi. for no reason. and of course they found nothing. just proves the police force is full of ignorant,self conscience, pieces of shit. to be honest i hate the police force. thier stupid. but thats my opionion.
  • matt · 7 months ago
    that was the most ridiculas thing i have ever seen, those police officers abused their powers, he should have never been tasered, the fact that his face was stepped on and that he was mocked should have those fucking cops fired and locked up. anyone who doesnt agree with that is either a huge asshole OR your just plain stupid, the cops were looking to pick on someone and used "probable cause" to do so. i hope that the footage is reviewed and those bastards are fired !
  • min54teresa · 7 months ago
    Hello .... Why don't you just make these guy's day easier and let them do their job? At what point does your common sense kick in and realize that SURPRISE .... they're doing what they are paid to do?

    Dumb FOQQ. Guys who look as average as you, have kidnapped people and then in an attempt to flee, end up at an unexpected check stop.

    You stupid ASS!!!! Cooperation is what these officers asked of you from the get-foqcing-go!

    Yep, blood happens when you get smacked about the face and head .... Cure: Cooperate!

    You're an idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Here are my ideas about personal rights:

    1. Cooperate
    2. Don't make these guys jobs harder than they need to be.
    3. Respect the people who have jobs where their lives are at risk everyday trying to protect everyone.... it aint all about you dumbfoqc!
    4. Grow the foqc up & accept responsibility for how you got yourself in the position you were in.

    I'm a girl and have had 15 stitches in my head and face after getting bucked off a horse. Know how I got them... I stuck a young horse with spurs who didn't like it. I was no victim. I created the situation and you created your situation.

    And do you think that labeling yourself a "minister" makes you any different? An intelligent minister would have cooperated. A guy with too much testosterone wouldn't back down for fear of having his rights violated. Learn anything stupid?
  • alex · 7 months ago
    Those police men are unprofessional and need more training after a lengthy suspension / possible termination for what happened. I also think they should be sued by the state or by the pastor.You may ask why do I say they are unprofessional. They let thier emotions get the better of them. They went overboard and abused the man. Even if the man had a kid or two hundred pounds of cocaine in the trunk they still handled that incident wrong. The man had no weapon, vehicle was turned off. No officer was in any way threatened with bodily injury or in danger. Yet they tazed a non violent man then ground his face in the pavement. Sorry but just because a person does not want to comply with a police officer whether he is right or wrong and the police officer is in no danger then tazing is out of line. You can not taz people just because they do not say how high when you order them to jump.
  • LO73K1 · 7 months ago
    When you stay locked in your car, police have probable cause to believe you are hiding something because this is not normal behavior. They took necessary actions to ensure the safety of their own life. What if you were the policeman and a an idiot was telling you to f off at the border? To ensure the safety of our country we need to search every vehicle coming in for drugs and weapons.
  • Barbara · 7 months ago
    Ok that is bull shit, u have an attitude but by no means can they lay a finger on u i hate cops, they always say you no,'well we are just doing our job' well it is not their job to taze you!
  • batz · 7 months ago
    He was exercising his RIGHTS instead of being a sheep doing what he was told for no good reason.
    From what I've seen he didn't deserve any of it. He could have cooperated but he was completely in his right to say no.
    Police officers are not the Be All and Say all .. they haves rules and regulations that they must abide by .... it is the LAW. They of all people should know this and not abuse their power. end of story.
  • Tim Ellison · 7 months ago
    Next time - answer the nice officer's questions!
  • v8harry · 7 months ago
    if I spoke like that to ANYONE, not just the police, but anyone, I'd expect 11 stitches later as well.

    You just can't go around being a jack-ass.

    Surely the dude knew they were the Police, and therefore had skills and weapons greater than his, plus the law on their side, so practicing some caution may have have been a wiser stance.

    Probably thought his god would protect him so he'd be free to antagonise them as he pleased... (they really think that you know)

    H.
  • Jared · 7 months ago
    He excercised his fourth ammendment right to have his ass kicked. If you've got nothing to hide open your trunk douchebag.
  • name · 7 months ago
    Drug-sniffing dogs aren't trained to bark. They usually just sit down when they find something. . .or when they get tired of standing.
  • No Terrorist is Gonna SNEAK IN · 7 months ago
    Why would a terrorist sneak in when all they have to do is apply for a VISA. These terrorist plan thier attacks over a period of 5. 10, 15 years. No need for them to ever sneak a person in. Can not believe America is so brain washed with this sneaking in of people that we now gave almost every right we have up. I expect it may give some people the sense of security to see more police out and some with automatic rifles at airports. I tell you what America , no one is gonna sneak in when they can just come on over legally.
  • GO_DPS · 7 months ago
    WOW DID THOSE BOYS EVER DO A GOOD JOB! Serves that asshole right for thinking he has rights and freedoms! Fourth amendment my ass, these are OFFICERS OF THE LAW!! Learn to obey like a good american, and DONT QUESTION ANYTHING!!!!!
  • RoflReplier · 7 months ago
    It was a bit excessive, but he wouldn't get out of the car. If he had nothing to hide, show them, he was an idiot, he got more than he deserved, but, you know, one idiot pisses of a group of angry people...
  • Kristina · 7 months ago
    I feel sorry you don't have enough respect for our law enforcement. These are men and women that deal with criminals, drug lords, and individuals that want to kill/ hurt them and their family everyday. Why was it so diffcult for you to just let them look at your car and let them search? You took up their time and man power, to be on a power trip. If you really didn’t have anything to hide, which I believe you most likely didn’t. I believe you were being difficult. I think you got everything you asked for, even if it was not verbal. WOW, what a paster you are. You clearly have never had to deal with people that hate you and what to kill you everyday. GOD BE WITH THOSE MEN AND WOMEN WHO PROTECT OUR BORADER. There are people who believe in what you are doing, THANK YOU!
  • Whoever · 7 months ago
    He gave them every reason to think he would be non-cooperative when they breached the vehicle, imho the tazer was justified.

    I'm not saying that standing up to abuses of power is a bad thing, but there's a fine line between exercising your rights and putting law-enforcement people in that situation.

    By refusing to leave the vehicle, after being told he's being arrested, he basically forced their hand. Not only that, he is clearly exaggerating the extent of the "beatings" - if he'd been repeatedly struck, I'm sure he'd have at least some bruising.

    It looks like he got tazed, thrown to the ground, and handcuffed - the cuts are not long, like he was being dragged around on the ground - just impact from being tossed out of the car and held down while cuffing.

    Bottom line, it's not his job to determine if the dog detected anything or not - when he was told he was under arrest, he started resisting arrest by failing to cooperate and forced the cops into the situation.
  • Anon. · 7 months ago
    If he didnt have anything in his car, why wouldnt he let them search? I know some people r gonna say "but we cant give up our rights!!!!" but cmon, the Mexican drug cartel is destroying the country and stricter policies are clearly needed for the border. If this guy had been cooperative and just answered the questions in the first place, they probably wouldn't have even wanted to search his car. That being said, the officers obviously abused the guy and i think they should be punished.
  • Riki · 7 months ago
    This is absolutely ridiculous. Both American and European law states that they must inform you what you are being arrested for, then arrest you and then read you your rights unless under situations which are dangerous to either yourself as a police officer or others. The guy was not threatening the policeman with violence and regardless of if you think he was being pointlessly stubborn, your LAW states that he is welcome to what he was asking for and the attack is in no way warranted. The most disgusting thing is that if he had not recorded it, the police would have attempted to twist the situation.
  • Karl · 7 months ago
    Nope, this goofs vehicle was alerted on by a trained k-9 and the handler, that is probable cause! What is the supposed victims background....hum
  • kris · 7 months ago
    now my moms a retired cop. i called her, talked to her about it, and even she said it was wrong on the lowest level, not to mention illegal! i know this may make a lot of you guys laugh and make fun of me, but this sounds a lot like satin to me. i mean, think about. a guy get humiliated, assaulted, and beaten half to death, and this guy just happens to be a pastor. buddy, got one piece of advice on what to do next for ya: SUE THEIR LOUSY BUTTS FOR EVERYTHING THEY'RE WORTH!!!!!
  • Drivethrujedi · 7 months ago
    Damn, thats fucked up. They had no right to do that to him no matter who he was. The use of excessive force happens on a daily basis and it's happened to me many times. I believe we should pick up on things and start going against authority in a non-anarchial way or just do it in a more common sensicle way.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    Know your rights. If you are to ask that we, as citizens, respect individuals who are in place to protect us, and most importantly, PROTECT OUR RIGHTS TO LIVE PEACEFULLY, then these officers who protect and stand for the law must also obey the laws in place for them.

    Why oh why is their a point to police protection of citizens if the laws clearly stated in numerous places do not apply to these men?

    Was he unnecessarily stubborn? Yes. But as a citizen it is your RIGHT to know under what grounds you're being arrested. It is YOUR right to refuse search without proper consent, reasoning, or warrant. If you would like to ignore these rights, then I'd like to ignore the police and military in place who DEFEND (supposedly) these rights.

    If you're going to defend these sorts of actions under the claim that these men are actively protecting you, you might as well understand this. The laws that protect you apply to everyone. You cannot pick and choose when use of ones rights are appropriate, they apply to all citizens no matter what. If you're going to claim that officers have jobs designed to protect us, then you must also concede that the laws they, the officers, MUST (always) abide by are in place to protect us.

    Furthermore, several statements made defending the police come with mindful contradiction. This man wasted their "man power" and "time" about as much as the police did his and their own. There are other videos which clearly show the officers are laughing, in fact, calling him a "terrorist" and laughing that they were going to break down his windows because he invoked his 4th amendment right. They wasted their own manpower and their own time, and they wasted your hard earned tax dollars doing it.

    That's right, you're paying out the ass so that these men and women can exercise protocol in situations that do not require excess force. This is a great example of government workers and officials wasting money for unnecessary reasons. These men did not have a hand that was forced. These men did not have to spend excess time harassing and beating this man.

    It's sad to see citizens who don't know their rights, it's even sadder to see citizens who consider exercising those incredibly important rights correctly when they feel personally violated. You make me ashamed of my country. I feel burdened to be an American because these men in the video and you people posting defending brute force when it's clearly not necessary have given me a bad name.
  • anyone · 7 months ago
    You can't pick and choose when to obey the common law - everything leading up to him being told he's under arrest is irrelevant.

    I'm all for the 4th amendment, but when you're arrested, the argument is for your lawyer to handle. You can't resist arrest just because you disagree.

    I'm sure the officers will be punished, and I'm sure he'll have any charges dropped, but there is a line he crossed - being arrested. After that, he, as a member of a society, has the civic obligation to consent to the laws regarding arrest, and he continued to resist.
  • Riki · 7 months ago
    i'm incredibly thankful that there are atleast some rational thinkers amongst society.

    I would add some of value to what you said, but it would be in vain as you seem to have covered everything.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    Actually, it's against the law for any officer to deny you the right to know what you're being charged with. This man was never told what he was being arrested for despite repeatedly asking.

    I think that's besides the point. The force was completely unnecessary.
  • Billy · 7 months ago
    Actually, the Arizona DPS officer told him, "These guys told me that a canine alerted to the presence of..." and was interrupted by the antagonist before he could finish explaining why he was going to be arrested. If a canine alerts to your car it's game over, a search of your vehicle is now authorized. For failure to obey lawful commands at that point this man should have been arrested or forced to comply. If it turns out that one of the good pastor's friends or relatives borrowed his car and smoked pot in it or that his vehicle had some otherwise trace amount of narcotic in or on it then he still must cooperate with the search once the canine has alerted to aleveate suspicion. You don't get to tell a cop or a judge or a lawyer how to do their job. Do patrons of Burger King walk in back and tell the folks working how to cook? Why does this person's camera give him the right to act like a beligerent fool? Why would you intentionally engage in NUMEROUS, 'pissing contests' with federal and state law enforcement officers? If he has a problem with the laws he should be talking to his representatives not arguing with the folks hired to enforce the laws.
  • Mike · 7 months ago
    I'd like to note that I agree with you to a certain extent. I think he did cross a line. But the violence here is very real. This was ludicrous. My post was regarding people who were stating his use and claim to his rights as being "stupid" and "dumb".
  • Gabby · 7 months ago
    What I do not understand is why he didn't just let them look in his trunk.
    I mean its obvious the police are in the wrong here but if he did nothing wrong why would he let them look?
  • S1apSh0es · 7 months ago
    Because he has a right to refuse a search. Sure it'd just be easier to let the police search every inch of my house for an alleged pipe bomb or something, but they can't do shit if they don't have a warrant because I have that right.
  • Billy · 7 months ago
    Once the canine alerted on his car it was as good as having a warrant and the 'good pastor' no longer had a right to interfere with a search of the vehicle...
  • BiGeMs! · 7 months ago
    he's a pastor, he probably had a lil boy tied up in the trunk.
  • ben · 7 months ago
    Those jerks will be buying a new church!
  • Billy · 7 months ago
    This guy is an idiot. He has numerous videos where he goes from checkpoint to checkpoint trying to provoke a confrontation with Border Patrol Agents (BPA). In one video he sits an a checkpoint in NM and refuses to cooperate for about 30 minutes. In the process he is wasting tax-payer dollars and the time of the agents. Most people just state their citizenship and are sent on their way when they come to a checkpoint but, not this guy... It is the job of a BPA at a checkpoint to try and ensure that unauthorized people and things (aliens, drugs, weapons, etc..) are not smuggled further into the country. If you don't want them doing this job then tell your congressman, but don't try and provoke confrontation with guys while they're working... especially if they have guns and tasers and can kick your ass... and stuff.
  • Billy · 7 months ago
    Oh yeah, and if he wins the lawsuit it's our tax dollars that he'll be spending... something tells me he won't donate it all to the "Stop checkpoints fund"
  • BiGeMs! · 7 months ago
    Yo the cops were assholes, they always are! That being said, the pastor is an idiot too, its because he's white he did some dumb shit like that. As a black man, I just politely acquiesce an officers request(or demand) because in the end, whether they are wrong or right, they can kick your ass up and down the street and there's only a slim chance they will actually be punished for it!
  • Graeme · 7 months ago
    thats flippin ridiculous
  • LO73K1 · 7 months ago
    If you do not listen to police, they now have probable cause to do what they feel is necessary to deal with you. The second you defy police, you become a safety hazard to the officers in their eyes and they will take every step to ensure you are not hiding a weapon and have the opportunity to endanger their life. It's their life or yours and they definitely choose their life first.
  • Supasteve · 7 months ago
    Abuse of power or not. When a police officer tells you that you're under arrest you cooperate! Just like the police officer who posted here earlier said: You get released in an hour and they're fired after you complain to their CO.
  • Dan R · 7 months ago
    The officers have an obligation to their fellows and their families to neutralize any security threat to their persons. If the man is holding a camera, who knows what other items he may have. For the sake of the families of the police officers, their lives are not worth losing to a non-compliant asshat. The tasers were used to weaken and stun him, so he wouldn't pull out a weapon or violently resist arrest while being extracted from his vehicle. There is a reason why only a 6"x6" portion of his window was broken out.

    Civil rights are not the same as their right to life. Every day they are faced with hazardous, life-threatening situations, where they must make the difficult decision of how to apply force. Be glad we're in America, otherwise he would have been SHOT and KILLED, not just scraped up. By claiming this is police brutality disservices and makes a mockery out of the individuals who are actually victims of excessive force.

    A Taser is painful as fuck, but a Bullet ends your life. Be glad you were just tased.

    P.S. I managed to YouTube some of this douchebag's other videos, and the guy is a complete dumbshit, especially regarding issues of faith. This guy is no more a pastor than Ronald McDonald is a cook.
  • Leola · 7 months ago
    Hmmm. See, I don't know. In general, I am not a fan of the machismo and feeling of all-powerful-ness that appears to come to many people when they become police officers. These men and women are very brave, etc., but not every person who is accused of committing a crime is a horrible person or a terrorist or what have you. A police officer's job is to protect. It is not to beat the crap out of some guy. I can understand how such action would have seemed reasonable if the man had a weapon or was a seriously dangerous individual, but the thing is, he wasn't. True, the pastor should have answered the questions at the border checkpoint. I have traveled myself and heard the questions, and they are not particularly invasive. The only reason that someone would have a problem with answering them would be if they were in a bad mood or hiding something. He was at fault, but the fact is, the officers should not have beaten him up just because they were pissed off at his attitude. The drug dog should have been taken out to prove whether or not there was something in his car.
  • Grace · 7 months ago
    This is sick and discusting. I hope those men know they have no right to be free or even alive right now.

    What type of monsters would do such a thing then laugh about?! This is so twisted I'm not even sure what to say beyond that.

    I truly hope charges were pressed againist them and they were found guilty. At the very least I hope they lose their jobs. I may sound harsh, but if I were to pass boarder patrol, I wouldn't want those crule men stopping me.

    I also hope they see what horrid people they are. They had no right to do anything! But in their empty, worthless lives they felt the need to attack someone so they could feel better.
    Really, I would expect so from young children, but from grown men? This shows signs of a pyscological disorder. Such signs as seen in murders, rapists, and kiddnapers.

    In the end, I suppose they know what we think of them. They are ugly monsters wearing human skin. I hope they know that.
  • pAUL · 7 months ago
    wow all the people who commented on this are FUCKING DOUCHE BAGS

    this guy DIDNT DESERVE THAT AT ALL

    this man's 4th amendment was not taking into account.they abused their power just because they are boarder patrol..HES NOT Mexican..and hes NOT a terrorist..so FUCK OFF.

    MAN I HATE THE FUCKIN POLICE
  • ScottyP · 6 months ago
    I agree with Honest about everything..if there was nothing to hide why didnt he just open the trunk and be on his way?!?! if a cop tells you to do something you dont agree with just do it and go after them legally..this "pastor" is supposed to be a model citzen but yet when a police officer asks him to something he gets nothing but shit. I have a bunch of friends that are cops and it is a regualar accurance for a person like this thinking just because he has rights that he can be an asshole..if it were you and the "pastor" was at ur check point and was giving you shit wouldnt you think he was hiding something..those border patrol officers are there to keep us safe from any harm..you say "hes not a terrorist and he's white" ?? what kind of racist shit is that anyhow? if he poses a threat in anyway he should be stopped..look at september 11 those guys had nothing to hide either but look what happened..i believe people are entitled to your opinion and i could see why you hate cops because one does one stupid thing and they are associated with everyone..not all cops are asshole but in this case i believe the pastor was wrong and should have just done what he was asked.. if he had done that and felt his ammendments were violated in anyway he should go through the right channels and stop acting like a little kid mad at his parents!
  • Johnnie · 6 months ago
    The cops had "Probable Cause" to search the car when the dog alerted. They did, however, use excessive force. This is abuse of power and they should be punished. The Pastor should sue and teach these cops and all other abusive cops a lesson. Forcibly removing him from the car may have been necessary but the use of the tazer, forcing his head into broken glass and stomping his head into the ground went way too far. Unfortunately too many cops are on power trips and need to not only forfeit their hard-earned money but spend time in jail for such flagrant abuse of power!
  • birthday girl · 6 months ago
    so u think that him just saying no please dont search my car . deserves 11 stitches being tazered lied to about the dog. beaten. and harassed put in jail. hmm ya know i dunno i think u have something. nawt.
    actually i think u deserve 11 stitches being tazered lied to . beaten. and harassed put in jail. oh and top of that u cant pee the whole time ur their.wtf. is wrong with u !
  • Blueboy · 6 months ago
    You're a bit looney..
  • jake · 6 months ago
    really scotty9 your kidding right: I mean you are very ignorant; first off the terrorists behind 9/11 had box cutters, a serious security breach which by the way they hid or else they wouldn’t of been allowed on the plains, second off the border patrol should be on the f***in border. I do have to agree with you that not all cops are asses like those ones, and that the pastor should have just complied with their demands, but those "cops" were definitely in the wrong and should be at least suspended from active duty for a long time.
  • jonb2k8 · 6 months ago
    Dude OMG!! you are a F#$%ng Dousche if you think this Pastor or BFF of GOD deserved this. Yeah he should have just got out the car and opened the trunk, but the cops should have brought the dog back out again upon request check your amendments asshat it is in there under 4th or 5th, i cant remember i believe the it is the 5th! Basically he is a soldier for the American people and should be elected Pres. !
  • Trevor poling · 6 months ago
    Being honest isnt required when an officer refuses a legal request. At that point you have to be aware of your own safety and request another officer come by...one who wasnt present. The police were showing suspicious actions by refusing to bring the dog over again.....he needs to sue them and make sure those on duty are fired or at the least suspended.
  • zack · 5 months ago
    Okay, so I guess it was right for the cops to abuse him after he was tased. (Which paralizes you) I think he has every right to sue!
  • Anus · 6 months ago
    He's a religious fanatic, and he deserves to be beaten.
  • Johnnie · 6 months ago
    You truly are an anus aren't you? I admittedly didn't watch all the video but what I saw had no reference to religion. I heard no justification of his actions using religion. You are just anti-religion so decided that since he happens to be a pastor you could capitalize on the subject. Well, as I said, you are an anus! Too stupid to use your head so you use your ass. It shows!
  • Eric · 6 months ago
    Not one time did he mention God, Jesus, or the Bible. It's probably because your an atheist and you enjoy it when a man of the cloth gets hit or beaten. /spit
  • Madeleine · 6 months ago
    Saying that "because he's an atheist" is just as bad as saying that the pastor deserves to be beaten because he's a religious fanatic.

    This is disgusting. Our country is falling apart. What can we do to fight this destruction of our world and people? Is there any hope for us at all? We are turning into disgusting monsters, thriving on the pain of others and grasping at any glimmer of power we can. Our world is turning into a disgusting place and the only way to get out of this is to focus on the community that we might be able to restore. Blind hatred is what is fueling this. People are not drones to blindly follow the government, and yet the federal government thinks we are. We need to learn to not hate, not strive for power in petty and destructive manners, and most of all do not trust the government, which should be here to protect us (which is what they are claiming to do by "fighting terrorists" and starting wars) but then treat us like trash at the drop of a hat. We need to start a revolution against this fascist oppression that is slowly but surely oozing it's way into this country and the minds of the people who live here. We are not safe in our own homes when the government does not trust it's own citizens. So, in the words of N.W.A., fuck tha police.
  • jake · 6 months ago
    you know that wasn’t quite as bad as saying the pastor was a religious fantastic face it really there are three groups of people, 1 those who believe in religion, 2 those that are tolerant or have no preference, 3 those that hate or dislike religious people with his referring to the man as a "religious fanatic" means he is not tolerant, nor does he believe in a religion thus he is a person who hates religious people, and the main group of people in that group are, you guessed it right atheists.
  • duwanee · 6 months ago
    OMG.......I am so sorry this happened......but, it happens all the time.......and brother you can say "Wake up America", but we are all woke up and can't do a damn thing about it.
    I hate to tell you, but sh** is happening that isn't supposed to be happening everywhere and not just to you............this is evidently the first time you have experienced something like this.......THOSE TASERS SHOULD BE OUTLAWED...........Cops are people.....there are good cops and bad cops (Drew Peterson).......the problem is when a bunch of bad cops form their own little group.......
    With all this police brutality, what are our congressmen and women doing to stop this? They see it on t.v...........they have computers.........
    no one needs to tell them it is happening.......
    You're just lucky your not black and didn't have something that they could misconstrue as a gun..........
  • blueboy · 6 months ago
    Listen up a$$holes. When you are dealing with people like that it is a very dangerous situation. Why is he putting up such a fight if has nothing to hide or done nothing wrong ? There is no way anybody can look at a person and tell what their intentions are. How do you know he wasn't transporting a bomb or something of that nature. So all u people are sitting there claiming police brutallity. Well all you people can kiss my ass. You have some random guy locked himself in his car and won't get out when he's told to. How do you know that you are not dealing with a deranged individual who is loaded down with guns and shoots all those officers. What then ? And by the way. Police dogs sit or scratch when they alert on a vehicle. They dont bark. If the dog alerted on the trunk, then of course his dumb ass didn't see because he was still sitting in the damn car.
  • Eric · 6 months ago
    No, it is not dangerous. If the dog didn't make a sound, than they DON'T have probable cause. They just haven't struck an innocent civilian in a while, so they made up a lame excuse. All of them deserve punishment to the extreme.
  • jonb2k8 · 6 months ago
    BLUEBOY is right! the police dog sits or scratches at the car or suspicious bomb or drugs or body....the main fact is that they were supposed to bring the dog back upon request it is apart of the rights you have the right to face your accuser....even if it means more than once. also you need a warrant to search and seize anything....plus why are they 50 miles from the actual border WTF! he is still in America, 50 miles in America. same thing happened to me driving through Texas except it was about 12 at night and i had a rednose vicious pitbull in the car with me:) thats just how i roll... but i thought to myself WTF i am still in America why am i being interigated and flashlights shined in my F#$#ng face....maybe thats what the pastor needs next time a (pitbull) instead of doctoring a police brutality... why did he have a video camera and not a photo camera he was out on business i thought. He knew he was going to get his as beat thats why...This is a very controversial case and a lot of things were violated ...
  • Uranium - 235 · 5 months ago
    You realize cops are allowed to put a bullet in your dog if they even suspect it's a threat to them, right? They could shoot your dumb ugly dog as it was still in the car with you before they drag you out if they really wanted to. Dogs don't exactly have any rights.
  • weekendwarrior · 6 months ago
    you
  • Madeleine · 6 months ago
    He has the right not not be subjected as a criminal simply because the officers are having a slow night! He has rights and those rights include being innocent until proven guilty. No where in the law does it say that everyone is a terrorist and should be treated as such.
  • Jacob · 6 months ago
    But that's why we have the bullshit that is the Patriot Act...
  • Madeleine · 6 months ago
    Oh, and since when to people have to do everything the government tells them to do? Personally, I'm not one to follow blindly. Not doing something when being told to do it is irrelevant. It's like saying the government is the mommy and we are the children who don't know anything about life or the world and we have to do everything Mommy tells us. That is NOT right. We can not and should not live like that.
  • Matt32 · 6 months ago
    ok, first of all, they did not have probable cause when he first said, "i would like to be on my way you don't have a right to search the car" The 4th Amendment clearly states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Now the police did not have probable cause....then to make him wait an hour and bring a dog....and say he said you have drugs in the car...is crap...The reason he probably didn't want his car searched is because they would have done the same thing to his car, as they did to his face!!! I would not let them search my vehicle either....whether I had something to hide or not...simply because I have the right given to me by the 4th Amendment, that says they have to get a warrant first before they can search it...
  • David · 6 months ago
    Let me explain several things. First off, assuming that the dog did actually hit (and it is very subtle, its not a bark or an obvious thing at all) they had probable cause to search his vehicle.

    Second, refusing any lawful, reasonable order of a police officer is a crime. He can't tell you to bark like a dog or cluck like a chicken, but if he tells you to get out of the car and you dont, he will remove you. He was already under arrest for refusing to go to the secondary area.

    Third, the reason they broke both of his windows. They broke the passengers side window out so the other officer could taze him safely and effectively. It is a lot easier for an officer to taze someone from a distance than to do it from the drivers side. Not to mention it would be hard to hit anything other than the face. They then broke out the drivers side so they could remove him from the car.

    From what we can tell from the video, there is no excessive force involved.
  • David · 6 months ago
    I wanted to add a bit to my last post, I feel that whatever parole or community service this guy gets (and he will) will not be enough. If he had nothing to hide, allow them to search. It would have taken them 10 minutes to search his trunk, rather than the 2 hours of Border Patrol time he wasted. My question is, why did he not let them search?
  • Eric · 6 months ago
    Are you kidding me? He did nothing wrong. They invaded his privacy, beat him, and mocked him. All those policeman deserve to be fired, and given community service. I don't know how you can think that he deserved anything like that. Stupid police, abusing their powers, of course.
  • jake · 6 months ago
    this is true plus the make of the tazer works so that it has to be from far away since it comes out with a lethal flow of electricity that when it hit would only decrease due to the timing to put him in cardiac arrest, but it is excessive force to taze him once he’s on the ground under the cops control and they used excessive force getting him out of the vehicle as he was subdued they should have just opened the door
  • Someone · 6 months ago
    I agree. Fuckon asshole, rot in hell. Just because you have a badge doesn't mean that you have ultimate power. The guy didn't want his car searched, who the fuck cares, they had no reason to fuckon beat him to a pulp. Fuck the police. Almost every cop that I've seen or met is a dick. Fuck'em all.
  • kevin · 6 months ago
    ok so yes this guy got tasered, and yes i felt sry for the guy. but this guy is insane..and the definition for insanity is trying the same thing and expected different results. he asked and asked for a reason why he was being arrested and it got him no where, yet he persisted, which is insane. and i think thats what the cops thought as well. lets think what might have happened if they didnt tasser him..he could have shot or stabbed a policeman trying to get him out, who has a family he provides for..and just to put this out there. i would have just got out the fucking car, i mean really..your on vacation, lets not get tassered.
  • Joey · 6 months ago
    It's not "insane" to try and protect your personal property. especially in this socialist police state we're living in. God Bless America and fuck the police.
  • Jonathan · 6 months ago
    You ain't lyin. Those dirty spics were on some power trip, don't know why they suck at their job!! I hope that precher sues the hell out of those taco eatin pricks
  • xdamy63x · 6 months ago
    woah, woah, WOAH! There is absolutely NO need for using racial slurs against ANYONE. Grow up and learn to respect people!!

    The man was wrong by resisting to answer the simple questions and not getting out of the car, AND the cops were wrong for using wayyyy too much excessive force. Both parties were out of line in this case and both should be punished.

    And btw, there are checkpoints like this (miles away from the border) because there is a great deal of drugs and human trafficking going on in our great U.S. of A. I live 15 minutes away from the US/Mexico border and when I am traveling due north, I do pass one of these checkpoints. They are usually quick and smooth as long as you don't act like an asshole or the dogs detect something (of course)... so for this guy to have been stopped in the first place, he must have been acting like an ass. He even had a camera rolling!!! For all we know he acted that way on purpose just to get some attention// possibly get money from suing them!

    This guy is dumb but the cops definitely crossed the line....
  • jimmy · 6 months ago
    He wasnt a threat, force is used to remove a threat, and for nothing else, not just because you're feeling lazy and force is convenient.
  • andrew · 6 months ago
    that was his fault for not answering the questions dipshit. obviously if hes not going to answer simple questions then somethings going to be up. because his skin is lighter then mexicans that doesnt mean that hes not from there even though its rare. and yeah, hate the polce, the poeple that have a living to protect you, even if there are some corrupt like these ones clearly were, that doesnt mean all of them are. for example, some white people are gay, not all of them are, some black people are racist, not all are, some women are bitches not all are (for the most part) so on so forth.
  • RancherMomma · 6 months ago
    Ok there is a really easy solution to this problem...

    Answer the questions asked of you and try not to make trouble just because you "rights" said you could!!!
    granted I think the police were excessive with their actions...
    However... pretty simple don't act like you have something to hide at a border crossing or check point.
    If you hadn't already been hit in the head I would swear that you had prior to the incident.
  • Rhiannon · 6 months ago
    I am SO sick of individuals failing to exert their rights as American citizens because they "don't want to cause trouble," or because they "don't want to start an incident." God damn it, if starting an incident is what it takes to be given your rights, then do it!
    This man was clearly and completely within his rights under the 4th Amendment, and should have been clearly told what his crime resulting in arrest was (which, by the way, makes no sense whatsoever, in the context that arrest occurs under probable cause, which brings us back to the dog) and shown that the dog had displayed some form of warning that there were illegal paraphernalia or bodies stowed in his trunk.
    And another issue not discussed: this dog? Yeah, it's a DOG. Not exactly what we'd call a flawless drug-busting machine. Yeah, the dog's been trained, and you can say what you will about the aspects and scrupulousness of government canine training, but my dog won't even sit on command. How are we to know that this dog didn't make a mistake, as any creature can; and he obviously did, as there was nothing in this man's car in the first place.
    Now don't get me wrong; I'm not some "soldier of God" or "God's BFF", or some "anarchist freedom-fighter fighting the conspiracy, man." I'm simply a liberal, Agnostic-Atheist, and say what you will. But this man said NOTHING about God. He did not bring his religious beliefs into the situation at any time. His profession and beliefs do not and did not interfere with this situation, and I deeply respect and admire him for what he has done. A man is not an "asshole" for exerting his rights in a civil manner, and if someone is an "asshole" for doing so, then I guess I'm one hell of an asshole.
    We all know that if this man had just gotten out of the car, opened his trunk, displayed his lack of illegal paraphernalia,and complied with the border control, he would have been on his way in fifteen minutes; but this would have just been another simple display of the government being, as previously stated, the "Mommy", and the U.S. citizens being the "children", to be told what is right and what is acceptable. Agreed, we must follow the law when it is just, as a law is meant to be, but as the American people have rights, they have the right to exert them when a law, or supposed "law-abiding and enforcing" citizen is not just. And if this means getting beaten and bruised and laughed at and even arrested, and it can be one more step towards the freedom we truly deserve, then I say: Do what it takes.
  • daddy danny · 6 months ago
    so if he wAs mexican it would have been ok? and im sorry but what do terrorist look like?
  • Darrell · 6 months ago
    wow. he should def get a lawyer. I'd get my local senator involved. I'd also get the papers involved. I'd email both videos to every news station in the country. heck id even send it to the pres and demand that some"change" take place.

    Normally I tend to side with law enforcement, however this was excessive.

    for what its worth, thats my two cents
  • PoIsoN · 6 months ago
    So if a Police *Officer tells some one to suck their dick, they should do it? A law enforcement officer MUST tell them the reason for what they are doing. MUST MUST MUST. They MUST tell them why they are under arrest and the MUST read them their Meranda Rights..
  • Rhiannon · 6 months ago
    Not exactly, PoIsoN. An officer must be giving a reasonable and lawful command. Therefore, sucking someone's dick would likely not be situationally reasonable. This officer was giving a generally reasonable command, but the man was clearly within his rights to demand a reason for arrest and display of the dog's supposed alert, as the officers had no warrant for search, and without the dog's displayed alert had no probable cause either. I see where you're coming from, PoIsoN, and I agree that the cops became unreasonably violent and forceful. I would like to see these men have their badges revoked and be put under arrest themselves.
  • HarloweBABY · 6 months ago
    what cop says you do, just go for them afterwords, like said below. He should have listened to the police, especially if he had nothing to hide (like said already). The dog sits when it smells drugs or paraphenalia (SP?)in the car it does not bark or make noise. It is sad that this happened, but you should have done what you were told... fuck even 2 year olds know that one. The cops did use excessive force they did not need to taser him. And they could have said, get out of the car or we are going to taser your ass and the pastor probably would have gotten out.
  • man of new zealand · 6 months ago
    i agree with paul....the FUCKING police are assholes and the guy has every right to ask what he's being charged for, every fucking officer involved should be sacked and charged to pay compensation to the victim!
  • Honest Citizen · 7 months ago
    Law enforcers have a tough job on a good day. They put their life on the line every time they pull someone over. What is wrong with rolling down your window and answering some questions? They say the dog hits on your trunk......open the trunk if you've got nothing to hide. Why make their job more difficult. Next thing you know you are headed down the road 15-20 minutes later.

    These officers do not have the luxury of assuming anyone they come in contact with is an honest citizen because their lives are at risk. That being said..... I think the BP and DPS over did it. The guy would have got out of the car eventually on his own. He was going to have to take a leak or get a drink of water sometime. The pastor was correct about unlawful search & seizure.....it is our 4th ammendment right.....
  • justin Ruzicka · 7 months ago
    From An HONEST CITIZEN, that cares about the CONSTITUTION our FORE FATHERS DEVELOPED after the persecution they received for years under the pressures of Great Britain.

    If you are so ignorant as to agree to answer questions of an overpowered, boarder patrol person, who then feels your rights are not valuable, shame on you to call yourself an AMERICAN!

    The constitution was written to PROTECT YOU FROM GOVERNMENT, that includes Boarder Patrol, and Police OFFICERS, and Even our great PRESIDENT, we as the "small and weak" are protected but if we as the "small and weak" don't stand together and call our government to uphold the LAW, and CONSTITUTION, which is the HIGHEST LAW, then we might as well move to China or India, where people are killed for something as simple as what this pastor did, what would have happened if this pastor was killed, then would you think differently that these police officers face in their job?

    What if this was your son, who was abused? What if this allows your local police officers to enter your house at 2am just because they have "probable cause," and in their actions are found to be wrong and actually find that police officers break the law? What if the police begin to KILL on site because of "probable cause," and human error?

    I pray, that we as the "small and weak" will begin to defend our rights as humans and furthermore rights as AMERICAN "honest" Citizens!

    And of course this pastor was found NOT GUILTY of having Drugs or a dead person in his car, so NOW WHAT??? The police where wrong, but still this guy got tazed!
  • Kelly · 6 months ago
    I dont think anyone on this page has said it better, kuddos my friend :)
  • Kyle · 6 months ago
    Too many "what if's." In real life a bunch of possibilities isn't the answer it's the outcome. In all respect those border cops should be held accountable for their actions though. I don't like getting all religious and shit but this isn't the way God wouldn't like brothers and sisters to treat one and other.
  • Eric · 6 months ago
    He still makes many valid, and very probable points. It's all happened in the past.
  • selena · 6 months ago
    yes but then you get so use to doing this and who knows what it can turn into one day. just like all their illegal wire taps. if you don't think people can abuse power then you're not being truthful to yourself. and beside no matter what this pastor did, he did not deserve that and the police had no right what so ever to treat anyone like that. and most of all it is our right to be considered innocent until proven guilty, and i don't believe you should be beating an innocent man like they did. (also if the police were being honest they would have the dog come back and show the man how he reacted. it's not that hard to do)
  • Not Buying It · 6 months ago
    "Law enforcers have a tough job on a good day. They put their life on the line every time they pull someone over."

    What a bunch of police brutality apologist BS.

    If they don't like the job and can't do it right then they should quit like the losers they are.

    They give a bad name and are a disgrace to all of the officers out there who perform their jobs admirably.
  • JL · 6 months ago
    You're a retard justin ruzicka.
    The constitution was there to limit the powers of the government over the state.
    You fail at US history. Go re-take it and try not to fall asleep. Then you may post, you retard.
  • djjones23 · 6 months ago
    the constitution was set up due to the weaknesses of the articles of confederation. they were specifically designed to dominate over the states...not protect their rights. an example of this is the supremacy clause which specifically states (among other things) that in the event of a conflict between federal law and state law...that federal law is always supreme. the constitution was so not intended to support state's rights, that a large number of delegates at the convention would not vote for it. they felt is was giving too much power to the federal gov't and not to the states or citizens. one of the biggest leaders of this group was thomas jefferson...who went on to become the leader of the anti-federalist party (later known as jeffersonian republicans and/or democratic republicans) jefferson and the other anit-federalists refused to ratify the constitution unless a bill of rights was added to protect the power of the citizens and the states. jefferson knew that "a government big enough to take care of all your needs is also powerful enough to take from you all that you have." (quote is paraphrased, but the essence is there) this power struggle problem is an age old one. it was with mankind long before america came along. jl...you might want to check your own sources...because you are dead wrong in your assertion that the constitution was set up to protect states rights. it took intelligent, foward-thinking leaders to add our bill of rights after the constitution was ratified to protect our rights. basically this is an argument of big government vs. little government...individual rights vs. the right of government to exercise power to protect its citizens. also it is that same bill of rights that lets us have this free expression of opinion. don't forget that. "the only thing we seem to learn from history is that we don't learn from history" a. huxley (again...slightly paraphrased...but you are welcome to check it out)...and to whoever does read this post...thanks for your time.
  • J · 6 months ago
    I understand where your comming from, because i've had many encounters with the law, and i've noticed, the more just do what ever the hell they want and not give them any shit, the faster the process moves. as soon as anyone starts talking about rights and all that is the moment its a whole different ball game. i've delt with police for a long time.. at least 8 years and i've just about approached them with ever kinda attitude you can have and sometimes it really dont matter who you are or how you approach them. I've also noticed majority of times they violate our rights ive just learned its easier not to say anything because i dont want my life taken away by an appointed douche with a badge. i just hope one day there is actual change, not a black guy in the white house to simulate change. i just hope change actually comes. BTW this has been happening for years to us black and minority lower and middle class citizens..only when it reaches upper class america is it this important.
  • Got Brain? · 6 months ago
    Just go along even if they violate your rights. It fastens the process. What an American patriot.
  • xdamy63x · 6 months ago
    I COMPLETELY agree with you. Well said!!! :]
  • xdamy63x · 6 months ago
    I COMPLETELY agree with you, Honest Citizen! Well said!! :]
  • Russ · 7 months ago
    Well the police had to search the vehicle after he gave them probable cause. They tried to use the dog just to fill in the legal bureaucracy b.s and then went about there business.
    Everything was fine up until one key moment, and this is very key:
    They committed police brutality. This is common beyond belief. I have suffered from it myself. Someone phoned in a lie about me to the police which they had to take seriously and they broke into my house under the assumption I was armed and dangerous (not true) and proceeded to beat me.
    When police officers let the adrenaline of the situation make them lose control and turn into vicious monsters we are all possible victims. I didn’t do anything in my situation to warrent what happened to me, and this preacher pretty much just put the system to the test to see how it works out. He did nothing to pose a violent threat visibly so why was he tased? Why didn’t someone have the common sense to realize there was broken glass there and they would need to proceed extra careful with the arrest?
    Why?
    Because they don’t care. They enjoyed torturing him. Trust me, I know. They live in a life where every day they spend the entire day with the scum of our society and so once in a while they cross paths with a regular joe and mistake us for scum. But at the root of it all this is how they treat people!
    I’m a white guy, I look pretty much the same as the preacher. I have no criminal record, hell I used to work in childcare and when I was younger security. I was always on the right side of the law.
    So if I can get tortured because someone who hated me went to a public phone and made a bunch of false claims about me then it can happen to any of you as well.
    I think this video is important because it totally shows the truth. It’s like treating people in this way is standard procedure now in North America.
    Ask yourself if that’s fare to those falsely arrested who haven’t had a chance to be proven innocent.
    And just so you know, no charges were laid against me. The police swept the whole thing under the rug as an invisible mistake.
    I bet they try the same thing with the pastor.
    I hope he doesn’t allow it. If I had my incident on film I promise you those officers would have lost their jobs and been charged.
    I will never forget their names…
  • Greg · 7 months ago
    i hate seeing this stuff. i've seen a man get beat to where he had a broken noise because he was resisting the officer when in fact he was trying to sign to the officer that he was deaf.
  • AlliBeth · 7 months ago
    If he gave them probable cause, then I think they have a right to search his car. I think. I could be wrong. But they're very wrong for not answering his genuine questions. He wasn't trying to resist arrest, he was trying to figure out why they thought he had something illicit in his possession. I, personally, am not a fan of cops. In my city, cops contribute almost nothing to upholding safety in the streets of Baltimore. Cops think that just because they have a badge and the uniform, they can do whatever they want. Blacks especially seem to be targeted by police in my city, there's a lot of racial profiling, and it's wrong. Now I'm not saying all police are belligerent, arrogant, cocky bastards, but a lot of them are. We need more genuine cops, and less assholes. Seriously.
  • Ásgeir · 7 months ago
    How difficult would it have been for them to bring back the dog, and clear up this without escalating it to this ridiculous action of breaking the guy's window and actually TAZERING him?!?!

    Had my brother (a cop) watch it and he simply said that it was one of the times a cop with a cocky attitude and a feeling of empowerment gets into a spot they can't back out of without feeling their authority lessened.
    That is, that was a either burned out or a simply bad cop.
  • supermigue009 · 7 months ago
    THE PASTOR LOOKS LIKE ROB DYRDEK
  • Joel · 7 months ago
    You forfeit your fourth amendment rights when you travel through a border. The dog does not have to show YOU its signal of a possible drug hit. You must conform with instructions from an officer when asked to vacate your vehicle.

    Learn your laws before you act like an idiot next time. Had you just exited your vehicle you would had avoided all of your troubles.
  • Teh Jeff · 6 months ago
    Even if that's true, it still would not justify the force used by the police. They could have easily removed the man from the car without breaking a window and tazing him that many times.

    While yes he should have just let them search his car, it was still an abuse of power by the police.
  • Got Brain? · 6 months ago
    Oh Joel. What you said was very true. Except one thing............ He was not going through international border. This is internal suspicionless immigration checkpoint. It is far inside of the U.S. and has nothing to do with the border or traffic from the border. Your probably asking why are then border patrol agents conducting checkpoints inside the U.S. and not the border. I'll leave that to find out for you.
  • michael bradshaw · 6 months ago
    you think black men been making this up. unnecessary brutality by law enforcement is real and you have no defense. 1
  • alex · 6 months ago
    what the hell our government is going to hell have anyone hered the song land of confusion by disturbed this is what they are talking about the governemt is taking our rights and money controls anything the police have no right to yous excevive force he did nothing wrong what was he going to go on a killing spree whith a rench and screwdriver serriously
  • jesse · 6 months ago
    FUCK THE POLICE Im down to riot whenever yalls are
  • David · 6 months ago
    i hope you could fuckin their asses! What they did was totally unfair. The fact that they wouldn't bring the dog back out means that were bullshitting you about it detecting drugs or a body. They had no reason to not bring it back out, other than they didn't feel like it. And they don't have the luxury to tell you that! On top of that, they beat your ass, and then they made fun of you for it. I swear to God, if it were me, at least two of those ass holes would be either dead or breathing through a fuckin' straw. This is why people hate the fuckin' cops!

    But dude, you should really see if you could sue them for that. They deserve to lose everything they have for what they did to you.
  • Moroko · 6 months ago
    Alright, Well i have seen what people have to say on both sides and my comment is simply the most honest one from a Canadians point of view.

    4th ammandment or not if your going threw a boarder patrol point and the officers tells you to exit your vehicle or ask you questions then you listen and obay.

    If your driving from the US to Canada (or Canada to the US) Boarder Patrolers are responsible to inspect ANY and all suspicies vehicle. The only reason people are making a big fuss is cause this guy was a pastor.

    He even admits RIGHT AT THE START of his own video that he REFUSED to give out ANY information.

    Now if i was a cop, and a vehicle who was going threw my controle point looked suspicious and the guy driving it (REGARDLESS THE FACT HE IS A PASTOR OR NOT) does not want to answer any of my questions then id certainly be suspicious.

    And to be honest they worned the guy several times to exit his vehicle and cooperate.

    Also his injurys are REALY not that bad. They seam more like the results of having your face pressed againts the asfult. The officers forcefully removing the guy from his vehicle and he probably struggled a bit too. The officers did NOT kcik the guy down or hit him sencessly or anything. This is a textbook way of dealing with the situation.

    My final comments is this.
    1) Congrats to the fine officers in this video who delt with the situation in the best way possible. I would had done the same thing too if i had a suspicious vehicle at my controle point for more then an hour.

    and 2) If your a Pastor and your legit why the hell would you NOT simply open the trunk and follow the instructions. That would had taken you oh about 5 min. IF YOU HAD NOTHING TO HIDE! The police officers are there for YOUR protection and to get the drugs off the streets.

    Posting this video is a foolish thing to do in my book.
  • Got Brain? · 6 months ago
    Moroco, Moroco, Moroco. This guy didn't cross any borders. He was not crossing any international border. He came up to a internal suspicionless immigration checkpoint. It was inside of the U.S. far away from border.
  • jake · 6 months ago
    Thank you!!! Any one who comments on this should remember he didn’t cross an international border it is true what he said though about international borders because it is two countries and if they don’t agree on a law it is irrelevant but this was not the case
  • dave · 6 months ago
    No one is saying this...but I believe it to be true. The pastor didnt cooperate because something in his spirit told him these men were liars, they were evil, and harmful. The Pastor challenged these men be